help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on April 15, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0135
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/7/2546    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Losa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortini, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Losa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mortini, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology

Submitted on January 18, 2008
Accepted on April 9, 2008

THE ROLE OF STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH GROWTH HORMONE-SECRETING PITUITARY ADENOMA

Marco Losa*, Lorenzo Gioia, Piero Picozzi, Alberto Franzin, Micol Valle, Massimo Giovanelli, and Pietro Mortini

From the Pituitary Unit of the Department of Neurosurgery (M.L., L.G., P.P., A.F., M.V., M.G., P.M.), Istituto Scientifico San Raffaele, Università Vita-Salute, Milano, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: losa.marco{at}hsr.it.

Context: Single-session stereotactic radiotherapy (SR) may be a potential adjuvant treatment in acromegaly.

Objective: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of SR in patients who had previously received maximal surgical debulking at our centre.

Design: Retrospective analysis of hormonal, radiological, and ophthalmologic data collected in a predefined protocol from 1994 through 2006.

Setting: The study was performed at a university hospital.

Patients: Eighty-three acromegalic patients, 52 women and 31 men, with a mean age of 42.6 ± 1.2 yr. The median follow-up was 69 months (IQR, 44 to 107 months).

Intervention: The patients were treated with SR for residual or recurrent GH-secreting adenoma.

Main Outcome measure: Normalization of age- and sex-adjusted IGF-I levels together with a basal GH level below 2.5 µg/liter without concomitant GH-suppressive drugs.

Results: Fifty patients (60.2%) reached the main outcome of the study. The rate of remission was 52.6% at 5 yr (95% C.I., 40.6 - 64.6%). Other 13 patients (15.7%), who were resistant to somatostatin analogs, were in remission after SR. Multivariate analysis showed that low basal GH and IGF-I levels were associated with a favorable outcome. No serious side effects occurred after SR. The 5-yr cumulative risk of new onset hypogonadism, hypothyroidism, or hypoadrenalism was 3.6% (95% C.I., 0 - 8.6%), 3.3% (95% C.I., 0 - 7.7%), and 4.9% (95% C.I., 0 - 10.4%), respectively.

Conclusion: In a highly selected group of acromegalic patients, SR treatment had good efficacy and safety. This may lead to reconsider the role of SR in the therapeutic algorithm of acromegaly.


Key words: Radiotherapy • Radiosurgery • Pituitary neoplasm • Pituitary surgery • Hypopituitarism • Acromegaly • Somatostatin analogs







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society