help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on February 26, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0019
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/5/1860    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Debono, M.
Right arrow Articles by Price, J. N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Debono, M.
Right arrow Articles by Price, J. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology

Submitted on January 4, 2008
Accepted on February 15, 2008

Gluteal nodules in patients with metastatic mid-gut carcinoid disease treated with depot somatostatin analogs

Miguel Debono, Lye-Quen Hon, Nigel Bax, Anthony Blakeborough, and John Newell Price*

Unit of Endocrinology and Reproduction & Department of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2JF

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.newellprice{at}sheffield.ac.uk.

Context and objectives: We were referred a patient with metastatic well differentiated endocrine tumor of the small intestine (mid-gut carcinoid) in whom asymptomatic subcutaneous gluteal nodules had been identified on routine abdominal CT, and labeled as metastases. This prompted us to assess the prevalence and cause of these nodules.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional.

Setting: University Teaching Hospital.

Methods: Routine abdominal CT scans of 56 patients with metastatic mid-gut carcinoid were analyzed by two independent radiologists, blinded to treatment status (depot somatostatin analogs).

Main Outcome Measures: Number of patients with nodules; number of injections, duration and total cumulative dose per patient.

Results: No nodules were detected in 13 patients not on depot somatostatin therapy. Nodules were found in 29/43(67%) patients on somatostatin analog therapy: 16/22 patients on Lanreotide Autogel; 5/12 patients on Somatostatin LAR only; and 8/9 patients who had been treated with both somatostatin analogs. There was no difference in the clinical state of those with or without nodules. Per patient the average number was 7, and average size 1 cm. Presence of nodules was significantly associated with total number of injections (P = 0.024), duration on treatment (P = 0.022) and cumulative dose of Lanreotide Autogel (P < 0.001). Nodules underwent involution on follow-up imaging.

Conclusion: Patients with metastatic mid-gut carcinoid tumors have large numbers of asymptomatic subcutaneous nodules in the gluteal area when on either depot somatostatin analog, but these resolve over time. This clear observation gives reassurance to patients and those managing them that such nodules are unlikely to represent metastases.


Key words: somatostatin analog • mid-gut carcinoid • subcutaneous nodules • Lanreotide Autogel • Somatostatin LAR







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society