help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on February 5, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2490
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/4/1217    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Booth, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson-Hughes, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Booth, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dawson-Hughes, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium and Bone Metabolism

Submitted on November 8, 2007
Accepted on January 25, 2008

Effect of Vitamin K Supplementation on Bone Loss in Elderly Men and Women

Sarah L. Booth*, Gerard Dallal, M. Kyla Shea, Caren Gundberg, James W. Peterson, and Bess Dawson-Hughes

USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University; Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sarah.booth{at}tufts.edu.

Context: Vitamin K has been implicated in bone health, primarily in observational studies. However, little is known about the role of phylloquinone supplementation on prevention of bone loss in men and women.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of three-year phylloquinone supplementation on change in bone mineral density of the femoral neck bone in older men and women who were calcium and vitamin D-replete.

Design, Participants and Intervention: In this three year, double-blind, controlled trial, 452 men and women (60–80 y) were randomized equally to receive a multivitamin that contained either 500 µg/d or no phylloquinone, plus a daily calcium (600 mg elemental calcium) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplement.

Main Outcome Measures: Measurements of the femoral neck, spine (L2-L4), and total body bone mineral density, bone turnover and vitamins K and D status were measured every six to twelve months. Intent-to-treat analysis was used to compare change in measures in 401 participants who completed the trial.

Results: There were no differences in changes in bone mineral density measurements at any of the anatomical sites measured between the two groups. The group that received the phylloquinone supplement had significantly higher phylloquinone and significantly lower % undercarboxylated osteocalcin concentrations compared to the group that did not receive phylloquinone. No other biochemical measures differed between the two groups.

Conclusions: Phylloquinone supplementation in a dose attainable in the diet does not confer any additional benefit for bone health at the spine or hip when taken with recommended amounts of calcium and vitamin D.


Key words: Vitamin K • clinical trial • BMD • elderly • dietary supplements







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society