help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on April 8, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2454
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/7/2539    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brugts, M. P
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, J. A M J L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brugts, M. P
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, J. A M J L
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Metabolism

Submitted on November 5, 2007
Accepted on April 2, 2008

Normal Values of Circulating IGF-I Bioactivity in the Healthy Population: Comparison with five widely used IGF-I immunoassays

Michael P Brugts*, Michael B Ranke, Leo J Hofland, Katy van der Wansem, Karin Weber, Jan Frystyk, Steven W J Lamberts, and Joseph A M J L Janssen

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Pediatric Endocrinology Section, University Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany; Medical Research Laboratories, Clinical Institite and Medical Department M, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.brugts{at}erasmusmc.nl.

Background: IGF-I immunoassays are primarily used to estimate IGF-I bioactivity. Recently, an IGF-I specific Kinase Receptor Activation Assay (KIRA) has been developed as an alternative method. However, no normative values have been established for the IGF-I KIRA.

Objective: To establish normative values for the IGF-I KIRA in healthy adults.

Design: Cross-sectional study in healthy non-fasting blood donors.

Study participants: 426 healthy individuals (310 M, 116 F; age range: 18 – 79 yrs)

Main outcome Measures: IGF-I bioactivity determined by the KIRA. Results were compared with total IGF-I, measured by five different IGF-I immunoassays.

Results: Mean (± SD) IGF-I bioactivity was 423 (± 131) pmol/L and decreased with age ({beta} = -3.4 pmol/L/yr, p < 0.001). In subjects younger than 55 yrs mean IGF-I bioactivity was significantly higher in women than in men. Above this age this relationship was inverse, suggesting a drop in IGF-I bioactivity after menopause. This drop was not reflected in total IGF-I levels. IGF-I bioactivity was significantly related to total IGF-I (rs varied between 0.46 – 0.52; P-values < 0.001).

Conclusions: We established age-specific normative values for the IGF-I KIRA. We observed a significant drop in IGF-I bioactivity in women between 50 and 60 years, which was not perceived by IGF-I immunoassays. The IGF-I KIRA, when compared to IGF-I immunoassays, theoretically has the advantage that it measures net effects of IGF-binding proteins on IGF-I receptor activation. However, it has to be proven whether information obtained by the IGF-I KIRA is clinically more relevant than measurements obtained by IGF-I immunoassays.


Key words: IGF-I bioactivity • total IGF-I • normal values • IGF-I KIRA • IGF-I immunoassay • healthy population







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society