| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 2, 2007
Accepted on February 14, 2008
Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology Service (J.L.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Department of Pathology (N.R.), Children's Hospital Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.D.), University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1K 2R1; Clinical Affairs (M.M.), Watson Laboratories, Inc., Morristown, NJ 07960; Department of Biostatistics (G.D.), Boston University School of Public Health and Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition (N.A.M.), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nmazer{at}bu.edu.
Objective: To compare the effects of oral vs. transdermal estrogen therapy on C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, E- and P-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, Serum Amyloid A (SAA), Transferrin, Prealbumin, IGF-1, SHBG, TBG and CBG in naturally menopausal women.
Design: Randomized, open-label crossover clinical trial. A 6-week withdrawal from prior hormone therapy (baseline) was followed in randomized order by 12 weeks of oral conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) (0.625 mg/day) and 12 weeks of transdermal estradiol (E2) (0.05 mg/day), with oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/day) given continuously during both regimens.
Results: 27 women enrolled and 25 completed both treatment periods. Nine parameters changed significantly during oral CEE (median percentage change from baseline; P-value): CRP (192%; P<0.001), E-selectin (-16.3%; P=0.003), P-selectin (-15.3%; P=0.012), ICAM-1 (-5%; P=0.015), transferrin (5.3%; 0.024), IGF-1 (-30.5%; P<0.001), SHBG (113%; P<0.001), TBG (38%; P<0.001) and CBG (20%; P<0.001). With transdermal E2, only three parameters changed significantly and to a lesser degree: ICAM-1 (-2.1%; P=0.04), IGF-1 (-12.5%; P<0.001) and SHBG (2.6%; P=0.042). During oral CEE the intra-subject changes in CRP correlated strongly with the changes in SAA (r=0.805; P<0.001) and were only weakly associated with the changes in SHBG (r=0.248; NS), TBG (0.430; P=0.031) and CBG (r=0.072; NS). The log-log relationship between CRP and IL-6 observed at baseline showed a parallel shift during oral CEE, suggesting an amplified hepatic response or a greater sensitivity to IL-6 stimulation.
Conclusions: Compared to oral CEE, transdermal E2 exerts minimal effects on CRP and the other inflammation and hepatic parameters.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |