| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on August 9, 2007
Accepted on December 14, 2007
Hospital for Children and Adolescents (K.W., T.L.), Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Finnish Genome Center (E.W., A.P.), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Clinical Chemistry (A.P.), The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatrics (L.D.), Kuopio University Hospital and University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: karoliina.wehkalampi{at}hus.fi.
Context and objective: Constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP), more commonly observed in boys than in girls, often has a familial background. We characterized the occurrence of CDGP in relatives of CDGP patients to elucidate the mechanisms influencing timing of puberty.
Participants and design: We identified 492 subjects with CDGP from hospital records of two pediatric clinics in Finland; 95 male and 29 female subjects and their first-degree relatives participated. In family-members, CDGP was defined by use of growth charts (growth spurt taking place 2 SDs beyond the mean). One-third of the families was expanded to include also second-degree relatives with an interview-based assessment of pubertal timing.
Results: Of male, 80%, and of female probands, 75%, had first-degree relatives with CDGP. Of all probands, 45% had one (unilineal families) and 32%, two parents affected. In 2% of the families only siblings were affected. The prevalence of CDGP in male first-degree relatives was only slightly higher than in female relatives: 79 of 148 (53%) vs. 64 of 164 (39%) (P = 0.01); male-to-female-ratio 1.2:1. In 74% (17 of 23) of extended unilineal pedigrees, the inheritance pattern of CDGP was consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance.
Conclusions: CDGP clusters in families. Although its inheritance likely is complex, some predisposing genetic factors may have a dominant effect. CDGP was almost as common in male and female relatives of the CDGP subjects seen at specialist care, challenging the view of a marked overall male preponderance of CDGP.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |