help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on October 9, 2007
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1660
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/12/4522    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolland, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolland, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, I. R.

Submitted on July 25, 2007
Accepted on September 28, 2007

Low body weight mediates the relationship between HIV infection and low bone mineral density: a meta-analysis

Mark J. Bolland MBChB*, Andrew B. Grey MD, Greg D. Gamble MSc, and Ian R. Reid MD

Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.bolland{at}auckland.ac.nz.

Context: HIV infection has been associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) in many cross-sectional studies, although longitudinal studies have not demonstrated accelerated bone loss. The cross-sectional studies may have been confounded by the failure to control for low body weight in HIV-infected patients.

Objective: To determine whether low body weight might explain the association of HIV infection with low BMD.

Data Sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for English language studies published from 1966 to March 2007, and conference abstracts prior to 2007 were hand-searched.

Study Selection: All studies reporting BMD and weight or body mass index in adult patients with HIV and a healthy age- and sex-comparable control group were included. Nine of 40 identified studies and one of 68 identified abstracts were eligible.

Data Synthesis: We adjusted for the between-groups weight differences using regression coefficients from published cohorts of healthy men and women. On average, HIV-infected patients were 5.1 kg (95% CI -6.8,-3.4; P < 0.001) lighter than controls. At all skeletal sites, unadjusted BMD was lower, by 4.4–7.0%, in the HIV-infected groups than the controls (P < 0.01). After adjustment for body weight, residual between-groups differences in BMD were small (2.2–4.7%) [lumbar spine: -0.02 (95% CI -0.05,0.01) g/cm2, P = 0.12; total hip: -0.02 (-0.04,0.00) g/cm2, P = 0.031; femoral neck: -0.04 (-0.07,-0.01) g/cm2, P = 0.013; total body: -0.03 (-0.07,0.01) g/cm2, P = 0.11).

Conclusion: HIV-infected patients are lighter than controls and low body weight may largely account for the high prevalence of low BMD reported in HIV-infected patients. However, in the setting of current treatment practice, HIV infection per se is not a risk factor for low BMD.


Key words: HIV • Body Weight • Osteoporosis • Bone density • Meta-analysis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society