| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on February 24, 2006
Accepted on May 26, 2006
Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (JGE, SGT); Graduate Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Health, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (SGT); Freeman Centre for Endocrine Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada (LK, SE); Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (SE)
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sezzat{at}mtsinai.on.ca.
Context: Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) and skinfold anthropometry (SKF) have been used to monitor body composition among patients with HIV-wasting, however, validation of these techniques during recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment has not been performed.
Objective: To evaluate the degree of agreement between criterion measurements of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and those of BIS and SKF in patients with HIV- wasting treated with rhGH.
Design and Setting: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover trial conducted at the University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Canada).
Patients: Referred sample of 27 community-dwelling men with HIV-associated weight loss (
10% over preceding 12 months) despite optimal antiretroviral therapy.
Intervention: One daily injection of rhGH (6 mg) or placebo self-administered for 3 months in a cross-over fashion with a 3-month washout.
Main Outcome Measures: Fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) were measured by BIS, SKF, and DXA before and after rhGH and placebo treatment.
Results: FFMBIS was not significantly different than FFMDXA after rhGH treatment (P = 0.10). Mean differences (bias±SD) according to Bland-Altman analysis were smaller for SKF than for BIS (P < 0.05) at all time points yet treatment-induced change in FM was better detected with BIS than with SKF. BIS estimates of FFM and FM showed better agreement with those of DXA following rhGH treatment (1.6 ± 4.6 kg and -2.1 ± 3.9 kg) compared with baseline (3.8 ± 3.5 kg and -4.1 ± 3.6 kg) and placebo (2.7 ± 4.4 kg and -3.1 ± 4.6) (P < 0.05). BIS overestimated, and SKF underestimated, the treatment-induced changes in FFM and FM.
Conclusions: SKF is more accurate than BIS when measuring body composition in patients with HIV-wasting before and after rhGH treatment, nonetheless, the accuracy of BIS increases following treatment. Change in FM due to treatment is not accurately assessed with SKF.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |