help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on April 24, 2006
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0136
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/7/2555    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kontulainen, S. A
Right arrow Articles by McKay, H. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kontulainen, S. A
Right arrow Articles by McKay, H. A

Submitted on January 23, 2006
Accepted on April 13, 2006

Change in cortical bone density and its distribution differ between boys and girls during puberty

Saija A Kontulainen*, Heather M Macdonald, and Heather A McKay

Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: saija{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

Context: Postmenarcheal girls and premenopausal women have 3-4% higher cortical bone density (CoD, mg/cm3) compared to boys and men, respectively. Females’ denser cortical bone is thought to serve as a calcium reservoir for reproductive needs. However, prospective data are lacking that describe CoD development and bone mineral density distribution during puberty in both sexes.

Objective: To assess maturity- and sex-differences in 20-month change of CoD and radial distribution of bone mineral density (RDBMD, mg/cm3) in early-, peri- and postpubertal girls and boys.

Design: Observational study with longitudinal and cross-sectional components

Subjects: 127 healthy children, categorised as pre-, early or postpubertal according to 20-month change in menarcheal status (girls N = 68) or Tanner Stage (boys N = 59).

Main Outcome: Measures Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to measure CoD and RDBMD at the tibial mid-diaphysis.

Results: The increase in average CoD was 1.9% (22.8 mg/cm3; 95% CI, 10 to 36), 2.8% (33.8 mg/cm3; 95% CI, 21 to 47) and 1.5% (55.0 mg/cm3; 95% CI, 17 to 93) greater in early, peri- and postpubertal girls compared with boys, respectively. Analysis of RDBMD revealed that all girls showed an increase in the high density mid-cortical region whereas only peripubertal girls showed an increase in the lower density subcortical region. A sex-difference in RDBMD change was noted within early- and peripubertal groups.

Conclusion: Our findings of sexual dimorphism in cortical bone density development give support to the hypothesis that female bone deposits calcium for reproductive needs by consolidation of cortical bone during puberty.


Key words: Cortical bone density • growth • sex-difference • puberty • pQCT • radial distribution of bone mineral density




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D M L Cooper, Y Ahamed, H M Macdonald, and H A McKay
Characterising cortical density in the mid-tibia: intra-individual variation in adolescent girls and boys
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 42(8): 690 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society