help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on March 21, 2006
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-2548
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/6/2017    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zacharin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zacharin, M.

Submitted on November 23, 2005
Accepted on March 14, 2006

MATERNAL AND INFANT OUTCOME FOLLOWING PAMIDRONATE TREATMENT OF POLYOSTOTIC FIBROUS DYSPLASIA AND OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA BEFORE CONCEPTION: A REPORT OF FOUR CASES

Brendan Chan MBBS and Margaret Zacharin MBBS, FRACP*

Dept of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Childrens Hospital, Parkville 3052 Victoria Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: margaret.zacharin{at}rch.org.au.

Background : Pamidronate is used extensively for treatment of osteoporotic and high bone turnover conditions. As it has a long retention time in the human skeleton, concerns have been raised as to safety profile in women of child bearing age.

Methods: Four infant outcomes of pregnancies of three women, two with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia and one with osteogenesis imperfecta, all of whom were treated with intravenous pamidronate before conception, are reported, with biochemical, radiological and bone density data.

Results: Each pregnancy was uncomplicated and the four offspring are healthy with no evidence of biochemical or skeletal abnormality.

Conclusions: We found no evidence for adverse effects of pre-pregnancy pamidronate on maternal or fetal health. Until the results of systematic studies are available, caution is recommended regarding pamidronate use in women of child-bearing years.


Key words: maternal • infant • outcome • pamidronate • polyostotic fibrous dysplasia • osteogenesis imperfecta







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society