| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 14, 2005
Accepted on May 23, 2006
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO; Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: wendy.kohrt{at}uchsc.edu.
Context Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate (DHEAS) decrease with aging and are important androgen and estrogen precursors in older adults. Declines in DHEAS with aging may contribute to physiological changes that are sex hormone-dependent.
Objective The aim was to determine whether DHEA replacement increases bone mineral density (BMD) and fat-free mass.
Design, Setting, Participants A randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial was conducted at an academic research institution. Participants were 70 women and 70 men, aged 60-88 yr, with low serum DHEAS levels.
Intervention The intervention was oral DHEA 50 mg/d or placebo for 12 months.
Measurements BMD, fat mass, and fat-free mass were measured before and after intervention.
Results Intent-to-treat analyses revealed trends for DHEA to increase BMD more than placebo at the total hip (1.0%, P = 0.05), trochanter (1.2%, P = 0.06), and shaft (1.2%, P = 0.05). In women only, DHEA increased lumbar spine BMD (2.2%, P = 0.04; sex-by-treatment interaction, P = 0.05). In secondary compliance analyses, BMD increases in hip regions were significant (1.2-1.6%; all P < 0.02) in the DHEA group. There were no significant effects of DHEA on fat or fat-free mass in intent-to-treat or compliance analyses.
Conclusions DHEA replacement therapy for 1 yr improved hip BMD in older adults and spine BMD in older women. Because there have been few randomized controlled trials of the effects of DHEA therapy, these findings support the need for further investigations of the benefits and risks of DHEA replacement and the mechanisms for its actions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Maggio, G. P. Ceda, S. Basaria, G. Valenti, and L. Ferrucci Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Has Not Been Substantiated as an Anabolic Hormone--Reply Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2008; 168(13): 1470 - 1470. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Stewart Aging and Fountain-of-Youth Hormones N. Engl. J. Med., October 19, 2006; 355(16): 1724 - 1726. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |