| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on October 5, 2005
Accepted on May 18, 2006
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología/Fundación Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia, South America, Joint Baylor College of Medicine/The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Training Program in Endocrinology, Houston, TX 77030; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030; Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3101; Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rgagel{at}mdanderson.org.
Context: The recent identification of germline mutations of the mitochondrial complex II genes in variants of paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma syndrome has enlarged the number of known causative genes for hereditary pheochromocytoma. A question confronting clinicians is whether they should screen patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas for unsuspected germline mutations of some or all of the 7 genes known to cause hereditary paraganglioma or pheochromocytoma (NF1, VHL, RET, MEN1, SDHD, SDHC, and SDHB). A positive answer was suggested by a report, which placed the estimate of hereditary disease in apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma as high as 24%.
Evidence Acquisition: We applied clinically useful criteria to a review of the literature, defining cases of apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma as those without a suspicious personal or family history, with a focal, unilateral pheochromocytoma, and presenting at age < 50 yr.
Evidence Synthesis: We reduced the overall estimate of unsuspected hereditary pheochromocytoma patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma to approximately 17%. Mutations in only three genes (VHL, SDHB, SDHD) accounted for almost this entire minority, and unsuspected RET mutation was rare. Costs, coverage by insurance, the potential effect on insurability, and deficient information for populations outside of referral centers should be considered before recommending genetic testing in patients with apparently sporadic presentations of pheochromocytomas.
Conclusion: We recommend genetic testing for patients with an "apparently sporadic" pheochromocytoma under the age of 20 yr, with family history or features suggestive of hereditary pheochromocytoma, or for patients with sympathetic paragangliomas. For individuals who do not meet these criteria, genetic testing is optional.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. L. M. Timmers, A. Kozupa, G. Eisenhofer, M. Raygada, K. T. Adams, D. Solis, J. W. M. Lenders, and K. Pacak Clinical Presentations, Biochemical Phenotypes, and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Patients with Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit B-Associated Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 779 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |