| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on July 19, 2005
Accepted on October 13, 2005
Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Anatomy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland Pharmatest Services Ltd, Turku, Finland Finnish Red Cross, Blood Service, Helsinki, Finland Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cheng{at}sport.jyu.fi.
Context: The role of sex steroids in bone growth in pubertal girls is not yet clear. Bone biomarkers are indicators of bone metabolic activity, but their value in predicting bone quality has not been studied in growing girls.
Objective: To examine the association of sex hormones and bone markers with bone geometry and density in pubertal girls. Design: 2-year longitudinal study in pubertal girls. Measurements were performed at baseline, 1- and 2-year follow-up.
Setting: University laboratory.
Participants: 258 10-13 yr-old healthy girls at the baseline.
Methods: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to scan the left tibial shaft. Serum 17
-estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), their binding globulin (SHBG), osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRACP 5b) were assessed. Data were analyzed using hierarchical linear models with random effect.
Results: E2 was a positive predictor for total bone mineral density (BMD), cortical thickness, and a negative predictor for endocortical circumference (EC), but had no predictive value for total bone cross-sectional area (CSA) or pericortical circumference (PC). T was a positive predictor for total CSA and PC as well as EC, and a negative predictor for total BMD. OC was negatively correlated with cortical BMD (R2 = 0.325, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: In pubertal girls, E2 and T have different influences on bone properties at the long bone shaft. The results suggest that at the endocortical surface, E2 inhibits bone resorption during rapid growth and later, after menarche, acts at higher concentrations to promote bone formation. At the periosteal surface, T promotes bone formation, while E2 does not affect it. In addition, OC might be used as a predictor of cortical BMD.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Z. Budek, C. Hoppe, K. F. Michaelsen, S. Bugel, and C. Molgaard Associations of Total, Dairy, and Meat Protein with Markers for Bone Turnover in Healthy, Prepubertal Boys J. Nutr., April 1, 2007; 137(4): 930 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Tobias, C. D. Steer, C. Vilarino-Guell, and M. A. Brown Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Regulates Area-Adjusted Bone Mineral Content in Late Pubertal Girls J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 641 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Leger, D. Marinovic, C. Alberti, S. Dorgeret, D. Chevenne, C. L. Marchal, N. Tubiana-Rufi, G. Sebag, and P. Czernichow Lower Bone Mineral Content in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Is Linked to Female Sex, Low Insulin-Like Growth Factor Type I Levels, and High Insulin Requirement J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3947 - 3953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |