help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on January 31, 2006
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-1500
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/5/1862    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badaru, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk Neely, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badaru, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk Neely, E.

Submitted on July 7, 2005
Accepted on January 19, 2006

Sequential Comparisons of 1-Month and 3-Month Depot Leuprolide Regimens in Central Precocious Puberty

Angela Badaru MD, Darrell M. Wilson MD, Laura K. Bachrach MD, Patricia Fechner MD, Laura M. Gandrud MD, Eileen Durham RN, Kupper Wintergerst MD, Carolyn Chi MD, Karen O. Klein MD, and E. Kirk Neely MD*

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: neely{at}stanford.edu.

Background: Dosing of monthly depot leuprolide (DL) in central precocious puberty (CPP) varies considerably. U.S. practitioners use 7.5-15 mg, in contrast with the international standard of 3.75 mg. Pubertal suppression using the newer 3-month DL also has been reported from Europe. To date there have been no direct comparisons of these different DL doses.

Objectives: In an open 12 month protocol we tested the efficacy of three DL doses (7.5 mg- and 3.75 mg-1 month and 11.25 mg-3 month) given sequentially to subjects treated for CPP. Primary outcome measures were stimulated gonadotropin (Gn) levels at 12 week intervals. The null hypothesis was no difference among doses.

Methods: Both existing and new patients with CPP received our standard therapy (DL 7.5 mg every 4 weeks) for a minimum of 24 weeks. In subjects with DL-stimulated LH (LH) ≤ 2 IU/L, the dose was changed to 3.75 mg every 4 weeks and evaluated 12 weeks later. Subjects who met LH criteria (< 4.5 IU/L) on 3.75 mg then received a single dose of 11.25 mg-3 month and were reevaluated 12 weeks later. Serum LH/follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and sex steroids were obtained 40 min after DL injection.

Results: 30 subjects were enrolled (20 naive; 24/6 female/male), and 21 were evaluated on all three DL doses. DL-stimulated LH levels (mean ± SD) were 1.30 ± 0.74, 1.73 ± 0.99 and 2.13 ± 1.41 on 7.5 mg, 3.75 mg and 11.25 mg-3 month, respectively (7.5 mg vs. 3.75 mg, P = 0.019; 7.5 mg vs. 11.25 mg-3 month, P = 0.004, Wilcoxon ranked sign test). Mean FSH levels were 2.86 ± 1.91, 3.91 ± 1.98 and 3.96 ± 1.34 respectively (7.5 mg vs. 3.75 mg, P = 0.017; 7.5 mg vs. 11.25 mg-3 month, P = 0.020). No differences were detected in mean sex steroid levels.

Conclusions: Stimulated LH and FSH levels were significantly higher during therapy with both the 3.75 mg and 11.25 mg-3 month depot leuprolide doses compared with 7.5 mg, contradicting the null hypothesis of no difference. These data suggest that low dose 1-month and 3-month DL preparations are associated with persistently greater gonadal stimulation in most CPP patients, but the LH/FSH results were not corroborated by differences in sex steroid levels. Whether various DL doses lead to long-term therapeutic differences remains to be determined.


Key words: precocious puberty • depot leuprolide • gonadotropins




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. N. Brito, A. C. Latronico, P. Cukier, M. G. Teles, L. F. G. Silveira, I. J. P. Arnhold, and B. B. Mendonca
Factors Determining Normal Adult Height in Girls with Gonadotropin-Dependent Precocious Puberty Treated with Depot Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2662 - 2669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. A. Eugster, W. Clarke, G. B. Kletter, P. A. Lee, E. K. Neely, E. O. Reiter, P. Saenger, D. Shulman, L. Silverman, L. Flood, et al.
Efficacy and Safety of Histrelin Subdermal Implant in Children with Central Precocious Puberty: A Multicenter Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1697 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society