help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on September 13, 2005
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0734
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/12/6380    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watterberg, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Backstrom, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watterberg, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Backstrom, C.

Submitted on April 6, 2005
Accepted on September 6, 2005

Effect of dose on response to ACTH in extremely low birth weight infants

Kristi L. Watterberg MD*, Michele L. Shaffer PhD, Jeffery S. Garland MD, SM, Elizabeth H. Thilo MD, Mark C. Mammel MD, Robert J. Couser MD, Susan W. Aucott MD, Corinne L. Leach MD, PhD, Cynthia H. Cole MD, MPH, Jeffrey S. Gerdes MD, Henry J. Rozycki MD, and Conra Backstrom RN

Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM. Assistant Professor of Health Evaluation Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA. St. Joseph Regional Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI. Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Director, Newborn Research, Children's Hospital of St. Paul, Professor of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, St. Paul, MN. Director of Clinical Research, Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital and Clinics of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Associate Professor of Pediatrics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Chief, Pennsylvania Hospital Newborn Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. Nurse Manager, General Clinical Research Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kwatterberg{at}salud.unm.edu.

Context: Various cosyntropin doses are used to test adrenal function in premature infants, without consensus on appropriate dose or adequate response.

Objective: To test the cortisol response of extremely low birth weight infants to different cosyntropin doses and evaluate whether these doses differentiate between groups of infants with clinical conditions previously associated with differential response to cosyntropin.

Design: Prospective, nested study within a randomized clinical trial of low-dose hydrocortisone, 11/1/2001 - 4/30/2003.

Setting: Nine Newborn Intensive Care Units.

Patients: Infants 500 - 999 g birth weight.

Intervention: Cosyntropin, 1.0 µg/kg or 0.1 µg/kg, given between 18 - 28 days of life.

Main outcome measure: Cortisol response to cosyntropin.

Results: 276 infants were tested. Previous hydrocortisone treatment did not suppress basal or stimulated cortisol values. Cosyntropin 1.0 µg/kg, vs. 0.1 µg/kg, yielded higher cortisol values (P < 0.001) and fewer negative responses (2% vs. 21%). The higher dose, but not the lower dose, showed different responses for girls vs. boys (P = 0.02), infants receiving enteral nutrition vs. not (P < 0.001), infants exposed to chorioamnionitis vs. not (P = 0.04), and those receiving mechanical ventilation vs. not (P = 0.02), as well as a positive correlation with fetal growth (P = 0.03). A response curve for the 1.0 µg/kg dose for infants receiving enteral nutrition (proxy for clinically well infants) showed a 10th percentile of 16.96 µg/dl. Infants with responses <10th percentile had more bronchopulmonary dysplasia and longer length of stay.

Conclusions: A cosyntropin dose of 0.1 µg/kg did not differentiate between groups of infants with clinical conditions that affect response. We recommend 1.0 µg/kg cosyntropin to test adrenal function in these infants.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society