| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
Submitted on March 11, 2005
Accepted on July 19, 2005
stergård Kristensen,
rskov
Medical Department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes), Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus (J.O.L.J, J.F, J.-W.J, H.
.), and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, (U. F.-R.), and Herlev Sygehus, Copenhagen, (L.
.K.), and Odense University Hospital, Odense, (C. H.), Denmark
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jolj{at}dadlnet.dk.
Context: Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist, which blocks the peripheral actions of GH in acromegaly. Pegvisomant, in contrast to somatostatin analogs (SMS), does not suppress the activity of the GH producing adenoma.
Objective: We assessed the effects of cotreatment with pegvisomant and SMS in acromegaly on GH secretion, IGF-I levels and glucose tolerance.
Design, patients, and interventions: 11 patients with persistent disease despite previous therapy underwent the following fixed treatment algorithm: 1) on SMS therapy, 2) off therapy for 2 months, 3) 6 weeks treatment with 10 mg pegvisomant/d, 4) six weeks treatment with 15 mg pegvisomant/d, 5) 3 months treatment with 15 mg pegvisomant plus SMS. Blood was sampled in the fasting state and during an OGTT.
Results: Total serum IGF-I levels (µg/l) decreased following pegvisomant, but the lowest levels were obtained with cotreatment [458 ± 67 (SMS), 562 ± 78 (active), 376 ± 51 (10 mg), 269 (15 mg), 195 ± 24 (combined) (P < 0.0001)]. Free and bioactive IGF-I changed in a similar pattern. Steady-state pegvisomant levels (µg/l) were obtained, but SMS cotreatment increased pegvisomant levels by 20% (P = 0.02) [2631 ± 616 (10 mg), 6536 ± 1413 (15 mg), 8030 ± 1914 (combined)]. Pegvisomant increased endogenous GH levels (µg/l), which was countered by SMS cotreatment [5.1 ± 1.3 (SMS), 8.9 ± 2.9 (active), 14.6 ± 4.9 (10 mg), 19.7 ± 6.5 (15 mg), 11.8 ± 2.8 (combined) (P < 0.01)]. Plasma glucose levels (mmol/l) were highest during SMS and lowest during pegvisomant 15 mg [2-h OGTT: 10.3 ± 0.7 (SMS), 8.9 ± 0.7 (active), 7.2 ± 0.7 (10 mg), 6.5 ± 0.5 (15 mg), 8.0 ± 0.8 (combined) (P = 0.02)].
Conclusions: dual blockade of the GH axis with pegvisomant and a somatostatin analog is feasible in acromegaly.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Nielsen, L. C. Gormsen, N. Jessen, S. B. Pedersen, N. Moller, S. Lund, and J. O. L. Jorgensen Growth Hormone Signaling in Vivo in Human Muscle and Adipose Tissue: Impact of Insulin, Substrate Background, and Growth Hormone Receptor Blockade J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2842 - 2850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P Matta, E. Couture, L. Cazals, D. Vezzosi, A. Bennet, and P. Caron Impaired quality of life of patients with acromegaly: control of GH/IGF-I excess improves psychological subscale appearance Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lindberg-Larsen, N. Moller, O. Schmitz, S. Nielsen, M. Andersen, H. Orskov, and J. O. L. Jorgensen The Impact of Pegvisomant Treatment on Substrate Metabolism and Insulin Sensitivity in Patients with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1724 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Melmed Acromegaly N. Engl. J. Med., December 14, 2006; 355(24): 2558 - 2573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O. Akintoye, M. H. Kelly, B. Brillante, N. Cherman, S. Turner, J. A. Butman, P. G. Robey, and M. T. Collins Pegvisomant for the Treatment of gsp-Mediated Growth Hormone Excess in Patients with McCune-Albright Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 2960 - 2966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, R. Pivonello, R. S Auriemma, M. C. De Martino, M. Bidlingmaier, F. Briganti, F. Tortora, P. Burman, I. A Kourides, C. J Strasburger, et al. Efficacy of 12-month treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term, high-dose somatostatin analog treatment: effect on IGF-I levels, tumor mass, hypertension and glucose tolerance. Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 467 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |