| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on January 28, 2005
Accepted on June 20, 2005
MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cc{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk.
Background: During pregnancy, mineralization of the fetal skeleton and obligate urinary losses require adaptation of maternal calcium homeostasis, such as increased intestinal calcium absorption and bone resorption. However, the environmental determinants of maternal bone resorption during pregnancy in healthy adult mothers have not been previously described.
Subjects and methods: We conducted a population-based longitudinal study of 307 term pregnancies using a cohort of 307 pregnant women living in Southampton, UK. During early and late pregnancy, skeletal status was measured at the left calcaneus using quantitative ultrasound (QUS).
Results: There was a significant (P < 0.001) decline in both speed of sound and bone ultrasound attenuation during pregnancy. Those women who were pregnant for the first time (P = 0.001), had low milk intake pre-pregnancy (P = 0.01), and reduced measures of fat mass (P = 0.01), showed the greatest decline in calcaneal bone measurements. Furthermore, those women who were pregnant over winter months had greater losses in calcaneal QUS (P = 0.02).
Conclusion: Maternal lifestyle, fat stores and seasonality of early pregnancy influence maternal calcaneal QUS loss during pregnancy; the findings support a role for vitamin D supplementation of women pregnant during winter, especially those with low calcium intakes who are pregnant for the first time.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Olausson, M A. Laskey, G. R Goldberg, and A. Prentice Changes in bone mineral status and bone size during pregnancy and the influences of body weight and calcium intake Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1032 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. C. Harvey, M. K. Javaid, J. R. Poole, P. Taylor, S. M. Robinson, H. M. Inskip, K. M. Godfrey, C. Cooper, E. M. Dennison, and Southampton Women's Survey Study Group Paternal Skeletal Size Predicts Intrauterine Bone Mineral Accrual J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1676 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M Inskip, K. M Godfrey, S. M Robinson, C. M Law, D. J. Barker, C. Cooper, and and the SWS Study Group Cohort profile: The Southampton Women's Survey Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2006; 35(1): 42 - 48. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Cunningham and L. G. Raisz Screening for osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med., November 3, 2005; 353(18): 1975 - 1975. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |