help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on March 1, 2005
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-2229
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/6/3287    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FINEBERG, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by KRASNER, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FINEBERG, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by KRASNER, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
*Diabetes Type 1

Submitted on November 15, 2004
Accepted on February 22, 2005

Antibody Response to Inhaled Insulin in Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes

S. EDWIN FINEBERG*, TOM KAWABATA, DEBORAH FINCO-KENT, CAMERON LIU, and ALAN KRASNER

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, CT, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: efineber{at}iupui.edu.

Objective

To compare antibody responses to inhaled human insulin vs. sc human insulin and to determine if insulin antibody binding is associated with adverse clinical consequences.

Research Design andMethods

Insulin antibody data from initial phase II/III trials were analyzed comparing the efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin with various agents, including sc insulin. Additionally, data from a 24-month extension of the phase III studies were examined. Data were pooled into the following three groups based on insulin treatment status at baseline: patients with type 1 diabetes, patients with type 2 diabetes insulin-using and non-insulin-using at baseline. Immunoglobulin class analysis was also performed on randomly selected sera from type 1 patients at the end of the initial trials.

Results

In the initial trials, greater insulin antibody binding was observed in patients receiving inhaled insulin vs. sc insulin. The greatest antibody responses to inhaled insulin were observed in patients with type 1 diabetes (non-parametric comparison of medians at end of study 22.0% binding [unadjusted 95% CI 19.5, 24.5]) and the lowest responses were observed in non-insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes in which there was no difference in medians values at end of study. There were no correlations between antibody binding and glycemic control (measured using HbA1c), insulin dose requirements, hypoglycemic events, or pulmonary function (measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide [DLco]). Antibody responses were IgG in type. Differences in antibody levels observed in patients with type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes were maintained over the 24-month extension trials. Peak antibody levels across all groups were generally observed after 6-12 months of insulin therapy. Inhaled insulin therapy was not associated with a greater incidence of allergy or other hypersensitivity reactions.

Conclusion

Inhaled insulin was observed to produce a larger antibody response than sc insulin. Insulin antibody binding has not been associated with adverse clinical consequences in trials to date.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. Rosenstock, W. T. Cefalu, P. A. Hollander, A. Belanger, F. G. Eliaschewitz, J. L. Gross, S. S. Klioze, L. B. St. Aubin, H. Foyt, M. Ogawa, et al.
Two-Year Pulmonary Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exubera) in Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, September 1, 2008; 31(9): 1723 - 1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. E. Fineberg, T. T. Kawabata, D. Finco-Kent, R. J. Fountaine, G. L. Finch, and A. S. Krasner
Immunological Responses to Exogenous Insulin
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 625 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
D. Q. Pham, H. Cohen, and V. Chu
Inhaled Human [rDNA Origin] Insulin, a Novel Formulation for Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2007; 47(7): 890 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. S. Skyler, L. Jovanovic, S. Klioze, J. Reis, W. Duggan, and for the Inhaled Human Insulin Type 1 Diabetes Stud
Two-Year Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exubera) in Adult Patients With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 579 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
S. Ghosh and A. Collier
Inhaled insulins
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2007; 83(977): 178 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. T. McMahon and R. A. Arky
Inhaled Insulin for Diabetes Mellitus
N. Engl. J. Med., February 1, 2007; 356(5): 497 - 502.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Med.Home page
Y. C Kudva and A. Basu
Adjunctive inhaled insulin before meals improved glycaemic control more than adjunctive metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Evid. Based Med., December 1, 2006; 11(6): 176 - 176.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. H. Barnett, M. Dreyer, P. Lange, M. Serdarevic-Pehar, and on behalf of the Exubera Phase III Study Group
An Open, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Profile of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exubera) With Glibenclamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on Metformin
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1818 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. H. Barnett, M. Dreyer, P. Lange, M. Serdarevic-Pehar, and on behalf of the Exubera Phase III Study Group
An Open, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety Profile of Inhaled Human Insulin (Exubera) With Metformin as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled on a Sulfonylurea.
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1282 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. G. Teeter and R. J. Riese
Dissociation of Lung Function Changes with Humoral Immunity during Inhaled Human Insulin Therapy
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2006; 173(11): 1194 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. Morton-Eggleston and E. J Barrett
Inhaled insulin.
BMJ, May 6, 2006; 332(7549): 1043 - 1044.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
S. Bellary and A. H Barnett
Review: Inhaled insulin: overcoming barriers to insulin therapy?
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, May 1, 2006; 6(3): 103 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. Rosenstock, B. Zinman, L. J. Murphy, S. C. Clement, P. Moore, C. K. Bowering, R. Hendler, S.-P. Lan, and W. T. Cefalu
Inhaled Insulin Improves Glycemic Control When Substituted for or Added to Oral Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med, October 18, 2005; 143(8): 549 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society