help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on October 26, 2004
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1043
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/44    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chevalley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bonjour, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chevalley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bonjour, J.-P.

Submitted on June 2, 2004
Accepted on October 14, 2004

Interaction between calcium intake and menarcheal age on bone mass gain: an 8-year follow-up study from pre-puberty to post-menarche

Thierry Chevalley*, René Rizzoli, Didier Hans, Serge Ferrari, and Jean-Philippe Bonjour

Service of Bone Diseases [WHO Collaborating Centre for Osteoporosis Prevention], Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Service of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Background: Both late menarcheal age and low calcium intake (Ca intake) during growth are risk factors for osteoporosis, probably by impairing peak bone mass. We investigated whether lasting gain in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in response to increased Ca intake varies according to menarcheal age and, conversely, whether Ca intake could influence menarcheal age.

Methods: In an initial study, 144 prepubertal girls were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive either a Ca supplement (Ca-suppl.) of 850 mg/day or Placebo from age 7.9 to 8.9 yr. Mean aBMD gain determined by DXA at 6 sites (radius metaphysis, radius diaphysis, femoral neck, trochanter, femoral diaphysis, L2-L4) was significantly (P = 0.004)greater in the Ca-suppl. than in the Placebo group (27 vs. 21 mg/cm2). In 122 girls followed up, menarcheal age was recorded and aBMD determined when aged 16.4 yr.

Findings: Menarcheal age was lower in the Ca-suppl than in the Placebo group (P = 0.048). Menarcheal age and Ca intake were negatively correlated (R0.35, P < 0.001), as were aBMD gains from age 7.9 to 16.4 yr and menarcheal age at all skeletal sites (R range: from -0.41 to -0.22, P < 0.001 to P = 0.016). The positive effect of Ca-suppl. on mean aBMD gain from baseline remained significantly greater in girls below but not in those above the median of menarcheal age (13.0 yr). Early menarcheal age (12.1 ± 0.5): Placebo: 286 ± 36 mg/cm2; Ca-suppl.: 317 ± 46, P = 0.009; Late menarcheal age (13.9 ± 0.5): Placebo: 284 ± 58, Ca-suppl.: 276 ± 50, P > 0.05.

Interpretation: The level of Ca intake during pre-puberty may influence the timing of menarche which, in turn, could influence long-term bone mass gain in response to Ca supplementation. Thus, both determinants of early menarcheal age and high Ca intake may positively interact on bone mineral mass accrual.


Key words: bone growth • calcium-enriched foods • calcium intake • menarcheal age • bone mass gain




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Chevalley, J.-P. Bonjour, S. Ferrari, and R. Rizzoli
Influence of Age at Menarche on Forearm Bone Microstructure in Healthy Young Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2594 - 2601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. A. Atkinson, G. P. McCabe, C. M. Weaver, S. A. Abrams, and K. O. O'Brien
Are Current Calcium Recommendations for Adolescents Higher than Needed to Achieve Optimal Peak Bone Mass? The Controversy
J. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 138(6): 1182 - 1186.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
M K. Javaid and R. I. Holt
Understanding osteoporosis
J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2008; 22(2_suppl): 38 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. L Lambert, R. Eastell, K. Karnik, J. M Russell, and M. E Barker
Calcium supplementation and bone mineral accretion in adolescent girls: an 18-mo randomized controlled trial with 2-y follow-up
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2008; 87(2): 455 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. Vatanparast, D. A. Bailey, A. D. G. Baxter-Jones, and S. J. Whiting
The Effects of Dietary Protein on Bone Mineral Mass in Young Adults May Be Modulated by Adolescent Calcium Intake
J. Nutr., December 1, 2007; 137(12): 2674 - 2679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
S. A. Abrams and G. J. Strewler
Adolescence: How Do We Increase Intestinal Calcium Absorption to Allow for Bone Mineral Mass Accumulation?
IBMS BoneKEy, May 1, 2007; 4(5): 147 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. I. Gafni and J. Baron
Childhood Bone Mass Acquisition and Peak Bone Mass May Not Be Important Determinants of Bone Mass in Late Adulthood
Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(Supplement_2): S131 - S136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
J.-P. Bonjour and T. Chevalley
Pubertal Timing, Peak Bone Mass and Fragility Fracture Risk
IBMS BoneKEy, February 1, 2007; 4(2): 30 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. Zhu, Q. Zhang, L. H. Foo, A. Trube, G. Ma, X. Hu, X. Du, C. T Cowell, D. R Fraser, and H. Greenfield
Growth, bone mass, and vitamin D status of Chinese adolescent girls 3 y after withdrawal of milk supplementation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 714 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.-Y. Ku, J. W. Kang, H. Kim, Y. D. Kim, B. C. Jee, C. S. Suh, Y. M. Choi, J. G. Kim, S. Y. Moon, and S. H. Kim
Age at menarche and its influencing factors in North Korean female refugees
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 833 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Cheng, A. Lyytikainen, H. Kroger, C. Lamberg-Allardt, M. Alen, A. Koistinen, Q. J. Wang, M. Suuriniemi, H. Suominen, A. Mahonen, et al.
Effects of calcium, dairy product, and vitamin D supplementation on bone mass accrual and body composition in 10-12-y-old girls: a 2-y randomized trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2005; 82(5): 1115 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. C Elwood
Time to value milk
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1160 - 1162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. A. Abrams, I. J. Griffin, K. M. Hawthorne, and L. Liang
Height and Height Z-Score Are Related to Calcium Absorption in Five- to Fifteen-Year-Old Girls
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5077 - 5081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Chevalley, J.-P. Bonjour, S. Ferrari, D. Hans, and R. Rizzoli
Skeletal Site Selectivity in the Effects of Calcium Supplementation on Areal Bone Mineral Density Gain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Prepubertal Boys
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3342 - 3349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
L. K. Bachrach
Calcium and Peak Bone Mass: How Much Is Needed and When?
IBMS BoneKEy, April 1, 2005; 2(4): 11 - 14.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
J.-P. Bonjour
Is Peripuberty the Most Opportune Time to Increase Calcium Intake in Healthy Girls?
IBMS BoneKEy, March 1, 2005; 2(3): 6 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
E. Seeman and G. J. Strewler
Clinical and Basic Research Papers - January 2005 Selections
IBMS BoneKEy, February 1, 2005; 2(2): 1 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society