This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 92/3/865    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Redman, L. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Redman, L. M. Related Collections Metabolism Obesity

Effect of Calorie Restriction with or without Exercise on Body Composition and Fat Distribution

Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Eric Ravussin, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808. E-mail: ravusse{at}pbrc.edu.

Context: There is debate over the independent and combined effects of dieting and increased physical activity on improving metabolic risk factors (body composition and fat distribution).

Objective: The objective of the study was to conduct a randomized, controlled trial (CALERIE) to test the effect of a 25% energy deficit by diet alone or diet plus exercise for 6 months on body composition and fat distribution.

Design: This was a randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: The study was conducted at an institutional research center.

Participants: Thirty-five of 36 overweight but otherwise healthy participants (16 males, 19 females) completed the study.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to either control (healthy weight maintenance diet, n = 11), caloric restriction (CR; 25% reduction in energy intake, n = 12), or caloric restriction plus exercise (CR+EX; 12.5% reduction in energy intake + 12.5% increase in exercise energy expenditure, n = 12) for 6 months.

Main Outcome Measures: Changes in body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and changes in abdominal fat distribution by multislice computed tomography were measured.

Results: The calculated energy deficit across the intervention was not different between CR and CR+EX. Participants lost approximately 10% of body weight (CR: – 8.3 ± 0.8, CR+EX: – 8.1 ± 0.8 kg, P = 1.00), approximately 24% of fat mass (CR: – 5.8 ± 0.6, CR+EX: – 6.4 ± 0.6 kg, P = 0.99), and 27% of abdominal visceral fat (CR: 0.9 ± 0.2, CR+EX: 0.8 ± 0.2 kg, P = 1.00). Both whole-body and abdominal fat distribution were not altered by the intervention.

Conclusion: Exercise plays an equivalent role to CR in terms of energy balance; however, it can also improve aerobic fitness, which has other important cardiovascular and metabolic implications.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Redman, J. Rood, S. D. Anton, C. Champagne, S. R. Smith, E. Ravussin, and for the Pennington Comprehensive Assessment of Lon Calorie Restriction and Bone Health in Young, Overweight Individuals Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2008; 168(17): 1859 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Janiszewski, T. J. Saunders, and R. Ross Themed Review: Lifestyle Treatment of the Metabolic Syndrome American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, April 1, 2008; 2(2): 99 - 108. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Ungvari, C. Parrado-Fernandez, A. Csiszar, and R. de Cabo Mechanisms Underlying Caloric Restriction and Lifespan Regulation: Implications for Vascular Aging Circ. Res., March 14, 2008; 102(5): 519 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]