help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0526
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/12/4529    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 12 4529-4535
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society


REVIEW

REVIEW: The Somatomedin Hypothesis 2007: 50 Years Later

Solomon A. Kaplan and Pinchas Cohen

David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Solomon A. Kaplan, M.D., Professor Emeritus, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095-1752. E-mail: skaplan{at}mednet.ucla.edu.

Context: The somatomedin/IGF hypothesis was based on the observation that GH was inactive when added to an in vitro incubation system but required a GH-dependent substance in the circulation to mediate its activity. Newer experimental evidence has led to several modifications of the hypothesis, but none of the proposed modifications accounts for all of the integrated actions of GH and IGF-I. In this paper, we propose an augmentative/counteractive modification of the existing hypothesis that takes into account all the actions of the GH-IGF system.

Evidence Acquisition: The modification is based on experimental evidence published since the hypothesis was originally developed.

Evidence Synthesis: The modification is based on an integration of the results of published experimental evidence regarding the actions of GH and the IGF complex.

Conclusion: We propose a new augmentative/counteractive modification of the hypothesis that the actions of the GH-IGF system provide a distinct evolutionary advantage to the organism by augmenting the anabolic actions of GH while countering its potentially deleterious effects of hyperglycemia and depletion of lipid stores.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. C.-M. Chang, J. Hook, F. A. Lemckert, M. M. McDonald, M.-A. T. Nguyen, E. C. Hardeman, D. G. Little, P. W. Gunning, and R. R. Reddel
The Murine Stanniocalcin 2 Gene Is a Negative Regulator of Postnatal Growth
Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2403 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society