This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 90/3/1407    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, S. Articles by Santen, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, S. Articles by Santen, R. J. Related Collections Female Endocrinology

Recombinant Cell Ultrasensitive Bioassay for Measurement of Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women

Department of Internal Medicine (S.W., R.X.-D.S., R.J.S.), University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; Service de Pediatric, Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve (F.P., C.S.S.), 34295 Montpellier, France; Department of Pathology and Medicine (L.M.D.), Penn State University, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033; and Taylor Technology, Inc. (B.S., J.S., S.O.), Princeton, New Jersey 08540

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Richard J. Santen, M.D., Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 801416, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: rjs5y{at}virginia.edu.

A recent analysis of data from nine studies provided convincing evidence that plasma estradiol measurements predict the risk of breast cancer in normal postmenopausal women. However, the median values detected by the various assays used in this study varied by 5-fold. These and other published data in normal postmenopausal women suggest that assays measuring low plasma estradiol concentrations suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, and precision. Availability of a practical, low-cost, specific, precise, and ultrasensitive estrogen assay might allow enhanced prediction of the risk of breast cancer and provide an objective means of selecting postmenopausal women for breast cancer prevention. A recombinant cell ultrasensitive bioassay (RCUB) for estrogen was recently validated for use in prepubertal children. We postulated that the RCUB might also prove useful for measurement of postmenopausal levels and designed the present study to examine this possibility.

Thirty normal postmenopausal volunteers provided blood samples for measurement of estrogen by RCUB and, for comparison, by RIA. The estrogenic activity measured by RCUB [mean ± SD, 11.9 ± 10.9 pmol/liter (SI units, 3.23 ± 2.96 pg/ml] was significantly lower than estradiol levels measured by RIA [43.7 ± 44.0 pmol/liter (11.9 ± 12.0 pg/ml)] in our volunteer subjects (P < 0.00001). Nonetheless, plasma estradiol levels measured by bioassay were significantly correlated with the estrogenic activity measured by RIA (r = 0.84) and by gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (r = 0.85). To obtain biological evidence of the validity of the RCUB, we related plasma estrogen levels to body weight and body mass index and found highly significant correlations (r = 0.54 and r = 0.53, respectively). Surprisingly, 28 of 30 postmenopausal women were found to have estrogen levels in the prepubertal range with the RCUB. The levels detected by RCUB were similar to those previously reported using an ultrasensitive but less practical yeast bioassay. These results provide validation for the RCUB in postmenopausal women and suggest that it might prove useful for selection of women for drug therapy to prevent breast cancer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Ankarberg-Lindgren and E. Norjavaara A purification step prior to commercial sensitive immunoassay is necessary to achieve clinical usefulness when quantifying serum 17 -estradiol in prepubertal children Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 158(1): 117 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Z. Stanczyk, J. S. Lee, and R. J. Santen Standardization of Steroid Hormone Assays: Why, How, and When? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1713 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Park, S. E. Aiyar, P. Fan, J. Wang, W. Yue, T. Okouneva, C. Cox, M. A. Jordan, L. Demers, H. Cho, et al. Effects of Tetramethoxystilbene on Hormone-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells: Biological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Action Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5717 - 5726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J Santen, N. F Boyd, R. T Chlebowski, S. Cummings, J. Cuzick, M. Dowsett, D. Easton, J. F Forbes, T. Key, S. E Hankinson, et al. Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 169 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Lee, B. Ettinger, F. Z. Stanczyk, E. Vittinghoff, V. Hanes, J. A. Cauley, W. Chandler, J. Settlage, M. S. Beattie, E. Folkerd, et al. Comparison of Methods to Measure Low Serum Estradiol Levels in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3791 - 3797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Aksglaede, A. Juul, H. Leffers, N. E. Skakkebaek, and A.-M. Andersson The sensitivity of the child to sex steroids: possible impact of exogenous estrogens Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 341 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Stanway, A. Purohit, L.W. L. Woo, S. Sufi, D. Vigushin, R. Ward, R. H. Wilson, F. Z. Stanczyk, N. Dobbs, E. Kulinskaya, et al. Phase I Study of STX 64 (667 Coumate) in Breast Cancer Patients: The First Study of a Steroid Sulfatase Inhibitor Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1585 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]