| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Endocrinology, Hypertension and Diabetes Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gordon H. Williams, M.D., Endocrinology, Hypertension and Diabetes Division, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail: gwilliams{at}partners.org.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| The early years |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By 1948, Deane et al. (4), through anatomical and histological examination, determined that electrocortin was secreted from the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex under provocation from a low sodium diet or potassium loading, providing early evidence of regulation. However, it wasnt until 1953, when Simpson and Tait developed a landmark bioassay with high sensitivity for mineralocorticoid activity, that crystallization of 21 mg electrocortin from 500 kg beef adrenal glands was announced (5). Within months, groups in America and Basel confirmed these findings, and by 1954 the structure of aldosterone was reported (6). Highly specific and sensitive bioassays, such as the double isotope derivative assay by Kliman and Peterson (7), introduced a flood of investigations into the regulation and mechanisms of action of aldosterone in subsequent years. It was only 2 yr later that Conn (8) described hyperaldosteronism arising from an adrenal tumor, leading to the identification of the syndrome of hypertension and hypokalemia that bears his name. In 1956, Giroud et al. (9) reported production of aldosterone by the zona glomerulosa. Ganong and Mulrow established the limited role ACTH played in aldosterone regulation in 1962 with experiments in hypophysectomized higher animals, determining that although ACTH contributed to aldosterone secretion it was not a major stimulus in humans (10, 11).
Deane and Mason (12) in 1951 shed light on a major stimulus for electrocortin secretion when they hypothesized that the renin-angiotensin system directly stimulated aldosterone secretion and that this effect could be augmented with dietary sodium restriction. Paige and Helmer (13) a dozen years earlier had isolated a pressor agent, which they initially called angiotonin, also known as hypertenisin, and eventually angiotensin. Skeggs et al. (14) identified two forms of angiotensin: a decapeptide called angiotensin I and an octapeptide, angiotensin II. In 1958, Gross (15) suggested that the kidney secreted an aldosterone-stimulating factor largely responsible for aldosterone secretion. Three years later, Mulrow and Ganong (16) documented that angiotensin II stimulates aldosterone secretion. The other major stimulus for aldosterone secretion, potassium, was described by Giroud and colleagues (Refs. 17 and 18 ; Fig. 2
). Sodium, calcium, magnesium, and hydrogen along with ACTH were found to play secondary roles in regulating aldosterone secretion.
|
By the late 1960s, the biosynthetic pathway from cholesterol to pregnenolone to progesterone to 11-deoxycorticosterone to corticosterone and finally 18-hydroxycorticosterone to aldosterone had been established with little controversy. Although all zones of the adrenal cortex contained most of these enzymes, in humans only the zona glomerulosa was found to demonstrate 18-hydroxycorticosterone activity, thus establishing a pivotal regulatory role for the last step in aldosterone synthesis.
Aldosterone antagonists.
Amphenone represents the first agent demonstrated to blunt mineralocorticoid action by inhibiting aldosterone biosynthesis (20). The ability of amphenone to alter urinary sodium excretion enabled study of secondary hyperaldosteronism in congestive heart failure and cirrhosis. Later, 17-spirolactone steroids or spirolactones were developed to antagonize aldosterone and the activity of other sodium-retaining hormones at the renal distal tubule. In the late 1950s, this lead to the development of spironolactone as a potassium-sparing diuretic in the treatment of volume overloaded states and primary hyperaldosteronism.
Genomic mechanisms of aldosterone activity.
Classic agonist/antagonist experiments in the toad bladder model in the 1960s revealed that a significant lag (3090 min) existed between the time of aldosterone administration and alterations in Na/K flux (19, 22). Around this time, endocrinology entered the field of molecular biology, revealing the genomic actions of glucocorticoid-mediated, and eventually aldosterone-mediated, induction of RNA with subsequent protein synthesis (23). The delayed response in activity represented binding to cytosolic steroid receptors, translocation to the nucleus, interaction with DNA, and finally genomic transcription and translation of effector proteins.
Clinical significance of aldosteronism.
Since its structural identification in 1954, a great deal of information has accumulated about the contribution of aldosterone to several medically important diseases. In 1937, Steigler and Reichstein (24) synthesized desoxycorticosterone acetate, intending it to possess potent glucocorticoid activity. However, it was found to have only very weak glucocorticoid activity but surprisingly caused a syndrome of hypokalemia and hypertension. In 1955, Conn (8) described a clinical syndrome of hypertension with hypokalemia resulting from an autonomous aldosterone-secreting tumor of the adrenal cortex. These pathophysiological observations helped clarify the renin-aldosterone interaction. Two categories of hyperaldosteronism emerged: 1) primary hyperaldosteronism, conditions with suppressed plasma renin activity (PRA), and 2) secondary hyperaldosteronism, those diseases with elevated PRA (25). Therefore, increased aldosterone secretion was determined to contribute to some forms of arterial hypertension, disorders of sodium retention and edema, and syndromes of potassium wasting.
The contribution of aldosterone to hypertension, aside from overt primary hyperaldosteronism, remained obscure during this period although several groups, including Conns (25), felt that aldosterone activity/sensitivity either directly or indirectly contributed to a substantial portion of essential hypertension. In the late 1950s, increased aldosterone in edematous states was described (26). Rather than a primary event, the hyperaldosteronism was assumed to be secondary. The hyperaldosteronism was postulated to contribute to the sodium avid state of these edematous disorders (e.g. congestive heart failure). At the time, investigators assumed that the maladaptive response of aldosterone in these volume-overloaded states was secondary to the need to maintain intravascular volume. Curiously, edema was not a feature of primary hyperaldosteronism in which patients seem to "escape" the salt-retaining effects of aldosterone. Although several hypotheses have been proposed for the mechanism of escape, it still remains elusive (27) and it is likely that several mechanisms are involved.
Extrarenal effects of aldosterone: early description of cardiovascular remodeling.
In 1946, Selye (28) reported on "a state of chronic stress" that developed in rats fed deoxycorticosterone acetate, an intermediate in the biosynthetic pathway of aldosterone with mineralocorticoid activity. This state resulted in an "adaptation syndrome," leading to formation of perivascular granulomas visible in the coronary, renal, and systemic vasculature. A pathological consequence was the development of high blood pressure (28) and histological evidence of myocardial necrosis and fibrosis (29). Other investigators confirmed that administration of glucocorticoids reduced granuloma formation whereas mineralocorticoids induced inflammation and fibrosis in animal models in a yin/yang relationship (30, 31). Unfortunately, these observations remained essentially forgotten for 40 yr but clearly represent the groundwork on which future investigation of nonepithelial effects of aldosterone were formed.
| The middle years: 19701990 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The announcements of a sensitive RIA for plasma aldosterone (32) and a preparation of dispersed zona glomerulosa cells (33) were published in 1970. These two events marked a turning point in aldosterone physiological research, providing the necessary tools to perform detailed investigations of aldosterone biosynthesis and regulation. In the 1960s, theories of aldosterone formation divided biosynthesis into an "early pathway" preceding the production of pregnenolone and a "late pathway" in which corticosterone is converted to aldosterone (34). In the 1970s and 1980s, several inhibitors and stimulants of early-phase products were described, reinforcing the multifactorial complexity of aldosterone regulation; however, no substance had been reported to directly modify the late pathway enzyme, aldosterone synthase. Identified inhibitors of aldosterone biosynthesis included atrial natriuretic peptides, adrenal medullary inhibitor, somatostatin, dopamine, ouabain, androgens, glucocorticoids, and select prostaglandins. Direct simulators included angiotensin II and III, ACTH,
-MSH, prolactin, vasopressin, potassium, hydrogen, ammonium, serotonin, histamine, and select prostaglandins.
Perhaps one of the most intriguing aspects of the regulation of aldosterone biosynthesis are the roles of dietary sodium and, to a lesser extent, dietary potassium. In the early 1970s there was an extensive debate on whether sodium intake had an effect independent of its modulation of angiotensin II levels (30, 35, 36, 37). Several investigators as early as 1956 reported that angiotensin II-induced aldosterone secretion was modified by the level of sodium intake (38). A high salt diet blunted the aldosterone response to low-dose angiotensin II infusion as compared with low sodium diet in humans, but not in all experimental animal models. Alterations in aldosterone synthesis and secretion in response to dietary sodium maneuvers were considered to represent a tight link between aldosterone and the renin-angiotensin system activity. Additionally, short- and long-term effects of sodium depletion on aldosterone sensitivity could be replicated by exogenous administration of renin or angiotensin II, whereas in a bilaterally nephrectomized model aldosterone increase was not present. Finally, blockade of renin-angiotensin system activity abolished the aldosterone stimulatory effect of a low sodium diet (39, 40). However, the studies by Tait and Tait and their colleagues (33) and Williams et al. (41) clearly documented an independent role for sodium intake both in experimental animals and humans. Their results documented that sodium restriction and potassium loading enhanced the activity of the late pathway (aldosterone synthase) of aldosterone biosynthesis with consequent changes in the structure of the glomerulosa zone of the adrenal cortex and the acute response of aldosterone to angiotensin II and potassium administration. Hollenberg and Williams also documented that sodium intake had a reciprocal effect on the vascular (particularly renal vascular) response to angiotensin II but not to other pressors (31, 42). They proposed that effect of sodium intake on these two systems was designed to fine tune the organisms response to sodium challenges to more precisely regulate sodium/volume homeostasis. Before these studies, it was generally assumed that the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was primarily involved in blood pressure regulation. With this new evidence, it was likely that its primary role was volume regulation. These findings in normal subjects provided the critical underpinnings for subsequent theories in human hypertension.
The discovery of secondary messenger systems removed the former "black box" of signal transduction at the adrenal cortex, thereby expanding the capabilities of cellular biology. The first step in the angiotensin II effect on aldosterone secretion is binding to the type I receptor (AT1). This is a G protein-coupled receptor that activates protein kinase C generating inositol triphosphate and 1,2 diacylglycerol. These then lead to an increase in calcium release, stimulating aldosterone synthesis (43). In contrast, ACTH activates adenylate cyclase, leading to production of cAMP (44), which in turn, as a secondary messenger, activates intracellular protein kinases (45), thereby leading to a cascade of calcium influx, further modulation of protein kinase activity, and subsequently aldosterone production. An elevation in extracellular potassium opens potential-dependent calcium channels. This increases intracellular calcium concentration and activates cAMP and protein kinases, leading to increased aldosterone synthesis (46, 47). Over the next 15 yr, these studies lead to an extensive evaluation of the interaction of several proteins, ions, and enzymes in the regulation of aldosterone secretion.
Aldosterone in essential hypertension.
In the 1960s, several groups maintained that aldosterone played an important role in human hypertension. In the early 1970s, a progressive hypothesis that altered target tissue sensitivity to angiotensin II, aldosterone, renin, and sodium intake together could contribute to the development of human hypertension. Efforts were made to categorize large heterogeneous populations of essential hypertension into homogeneous subsets by comparing hormonal responses to biological stimuli to facilitate investigation of pathophysiological candidates including aldosterone. One of the first substantial subsets identified was low renin hypertension. In this form of hypertension, patients display low PRA despite sodium restriction (48, 49). However, these subjects do not display unusually high aldosterone levels or hypokalemia and suppress aldosterone on high salt diet and are, therefore, distinct from primary hyperaldosteronism. An extensive search for other mineralocorticoids over the next decade identified many potential candidates, but in only a few low renin patients were any of them pathophysiologically involved (50).
Based on their earlier work in normal subjects, a second large subset of hypertension was described by Williams and Hollenberg and colleagues (51, 52) in the mid 1980s in which parallel alterations in both adrenal (aldosterone) and renal (renal blood flow) activity in response to angiotensin II and dietary sodium manipulation were described in 25% of the essential hypertensive population. In these normal/high renin individuals, changes in sodium intake failed to produce the reciprocal changes in adrenal and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II infusion; thus, was born the term "non-modulators." Over the ensuing 15 yr, it has been determined that these individuals have salt-sensitive hypertension (like low renin subjects), are insulin resistant (even if lean), and have a heritable form of hypertension that is associated with polymorphisms in the genes of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Most intriguingly, their pathophysiological defects are corrected by converting enzyme inhibitors (53, 54, 55, 56, 57). Thus, between the low renin and non-modulating hypertensive populations, nearly all of the salt-sensitive subgroups have been identified.
The mineralocorticoid receptor.
Historically, adrenal steroids had been classified according to their relative potency as a mineralocorticoid or a glucocorticoid. Similarly, receptors were categorized according to relative affinity. Mineralocorticoid (type I) receptors possessed high affinity for mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoid (type II) receptors possessed high affinity for glucocorticoids. Therefore, early studies using [3H]-labeled steroid-binding assays demonstrated high affinity for aldosterone and deoxycorticosterone but low affinity for dexamethasone and corticosterone for the mineralocorticoid receptor (58). However, contradictory models developed when attempts were made to explain aldosterone activity at the distal renal tubule in which varying concentrations of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors were located and, at times, counterintuitive concentrations of aldosterone or cortisol (59). Clarifying this paradox were experiments performed in 1987 in which adrenalectomized rats were found to have equivalent renal cytosolic in vitro binding affinity for aldosterone and corticosterone. However, when these steroids were then injected into the animal in vivo significantly higher binding affinity for aldosterone was found in the kidney, parotid, and intestine but not in other tissues (60). The presence of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD) in these tissues conferred high aldosterone selectivity. Enzymatic conversion of cortisol to cortisone by this enzyme disabled the cortisol effect on the type I receptor. This observation explained the phenomenon of apparent mineralocorticosteroid excess in which deficiency of 11ß-HSD lead to a syndrome of cortisol-dependent type I receptor activation with ensuing hypertension and hypokalemia (61). This also explained licorice toxicity resulting in a similar syndrome in which glycyrrhizic acid was a potent inhibitor of 11ß-HSD production (62).
Cloning and sequencing techniques introduced in the mid 1980s greatly enhanced efforts to define physiology. The advances clarified how steroid hormones control gene function. By 1987 the mineralocorticoid receptor had been cloned (63) enabling detailed study of regulatory DNA sequences, hormone response elements, and the ability to influence transcription/translation of inducible protein elements. These studies also clarified the molecular mechanisms underlying the earlier in vitro studies. Corticosterone and aldosterone bind equally well to the type I glucocorticoid (i.e. mineralocorticoid receptor). Thus, the selectivity of the type I receptor for mineralocorticoids does not occur at the receptor level but at the level of 11ß-HSD type II"the guardian of the gate" (64). In those tissues possessing this enzyme in close proximity to the receptor (e.g. epithelial cells in kidney, bladder, gastrointestinal tract, sweat and saliva glands, smooth muscle, and vascular endothelium), only mineralocorticoids can activate the receptor. In other tissues (e.g. brain and myocytes) that do not possess 11ß-HSD type II, glucocorticoids, because of their higher concentration, likely are the principle activators of the mineralocorticoid receptor.
| The later years: 19902000 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By 1990, substantial research reinforced aldosterone as the primary hormone of Na+ and K+ homeostasis, extracellular fluid volume, and blood pressure, yet still unidentified were the aldosterone-induced proteins that bridged aldosterone action at the nucleus and increased sodium transport. In the mid 1990s aldosterone was shown to exert its effect through the epithelial Na channel (ENaC) via latent transcriptional and translational regulation, leading to de novo synthesis of ENaC with selective insertion in the apical epithelial membrane effecting enhanced sodium transport (65, 66). Recently, the serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase, a serine/threonine kinase, was identified as an aldosterone-induced protein that produced upregulation of EnaC (67), thereby completing a link between aldosterone introduction at the cell nucleus to the outcome of Na+ flux through the ENaC. Traditionally, it has been assumed that the reabsorption of sodium through ENaC modifies the electrochemical gradient for potassium producing an influx into the urine. However, whether this is the only mechanism responsible for potassium excretion is uncertain.
Nonepithelial effects of aldosterone.
For most of the past 50 yr the focus of aldosterone action resided in the classical target organ, the kidney. However, as noted previously, Selye and others in the 1950s realized that aldosterone exerted nonepithelial activity particularly relating to induction of inflammatory processes, collagen formation, fibrosis, and necrosis. In addition, steroid hormone biosynthesis had been described in several extra-adrenal tissues including brain, cardiac tissue (68), and blood vessels (69) in which paracrine and autocrine properties are assumed to exist. Studies have revealed the presence of mRNA for aldosterone synthase and aldosterone along with local tissue effects in these tissue beds. In the heart, this local production of aldosterone can be induced by angiotensin II or dietary sodium/potassium manipulations (70). By the early 1990s, interest in this aspect of aldosterone action resurfaced and reports of perivascular fibrosis and cardiac damage appeared in the literature again under various experimental models (71, 72). These nonclassical descriptions of aldosterone activity in nonepithelial target tissues have now been associated with various models of pathology in animals and in humans. Perhaps one of the most intriguing examples of a successful translational research endeavor involved the studies of Weber and Pitt. In the early 1990s, Weber and colleagues (73) studied the effects of aldosterone in cardiac remodeling documenting that chronic aldosterone excess in the presence of salt loading caused cardiac fibrosis in experimental animals. Additional animal studies demonstrated that uninephrectomized rats fed a high salt diet and aldosterone were protected from development of cardiac fibrosis with the administration of spironolactone (an aldosterone receptor antagonist), thus implicating the mineralocorticoid receptor in cardiac fibrosis. Similar studies in stroke-prone hypertensive rat support the notion that mineralocorticoid blockade reduces vascular injury (74). It should be pointed out that injury was not seen on low salt diet. Further clinical evidence that implicate the likely pathological influence of aldosterone in cardiac disease came from studies of patients with primary hyperaldosteronism. A study comparing severity of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), an independent risk factor of increased cardiovascular risk, in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism vs. those with essential hypertension found that primary hyperaldosteronism possessed a significantly higher severity of LVH despite controlling for age, duration of hypertension, gender, and severity of hypertension. Napoli et al. (75) demonstrated that patients with primary hyperaldosteronism had significantly more impairment in myocardial perfusion as measured by single photon emission computed tomography scan after exercise as compared with matched subjects with essential hypertension. These findings, along with the well documented observation of chronic renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation in congestive heart failure, and the finding that blockade of angiotensin was beneficial in this condition led Pitt and colleagues to devise the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES). This multicentered international clinical trial comparing standard therapy in moderate to severe heart failure vs. standard therapy plus low-dose spironolactone was terminated early when a 30% reduction in rate of death in the active drug arm was realized (Fig. 3
; Ref. 76). Further supporting the role that both cardiac fibrosis and aldosterone effect had in this population was evidence from a substudy of RALES in which markers of collagen synthesis, associated with development of cardiac fibrosis, correlated with disease severity and increased cardiac risk. In the spironolactone-treated subjects, survival benefit correlated with reduced collagen synthesis markers at 6 months (77).
|
|
Earlier studies demonstrated a lag between times of administration of aldosterone to increased cellular activity (
3090 min). Subsequent research focused on revealing the cytosolic steroid receptors to which aldosterone binds. These receptors translocate to the nucleus and function as transcription factors through interaction with DNA regulatory elements (81, 82). As mentioned earlier, two distinct nuclear receptors were characterized: the mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors. The ENaC, K+ channels and Na+/K+-ATPase are the final effector elements of this genomic interaction. In general, this is described as classical genomic effect of aldosterone. However, research over the last 10 yr has led to the discovery of rapid, nongenomic or nonclassical effects of aldosterone. This has led to investigation of aldosterone action in tissues other than the kidney. In 1992, Wehling et al. (83) identified rapid (nongenomic) effects of aldosterone action in smooth muscle (83). Reports of rapid nongenomic effects of aldosterone have been described in skeletal muscle (84), colonic epithelial cells (85), and myocardial cells (86). These nongenomic effects have been linked to development of increased systemic vascular resistance (87) and might, therefore, participate in human hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, it is uncertain whether these effects are secondary to activation of the classical mineralocorticoid receptor or not.
| The 21st century |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 19, 2003.
Accepted April 2, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Shafiq and A. B. Miller Blocking aldosterone in heart failure Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2009; 3(5): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Sowers, A. Whaley-Connell, and M. Epstein Narrative Review: The Emerging Clinical Implications of the Role of Aldosterone in the Metabolic Syndrome and Resistant Hypertension Ann Intern Med, June 2, 2009; 150(11): 776 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Gomez, A. Rueda, Y. Sainte-Marie, L. Pereira, S. Zissimopoulos, X. Zhu, R. Schaub, E. Perrier, R. Perrier, C. Latouche, et al. Mineralocorticoid Modulation of Cardiac Ryanodine Receptor Activity Is Associated With Downregulation of FK506-Binding Proteins Circulation, April 28, 2009; 119(16): 2179 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Minnaard-Huiban, J. M. A. Emmen, L. Roumen, I. P. E. Beugels, G. M. S. Cohuet, H. van Essen, E. Ruijters, K. Pieterse, P. A. J. Hilbers, H. C. J. Ottenheijm, et al. Fadrozole Reverses Cardiac Fibrosis in Spontaneously Hypertensive Heart Failure Rats: Discordant Enantioselectivity Versus Reduction of Plasma Aldosterone Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 28 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Blanner, R. A. Barve, and C. W. Bolten Mineralocorticoid Receptors and Vascular Inflammation: New Answers, New Questions Endocrinology, April 1, 2007; 148(4): 1498 - 1501. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Hanke, B. B. Holmes, Y. Xu, K. Nithipatikom, and W. B. Campbell Endothelium-Derived Steroidogenic Factor Enhances Angiotensin II-Stimulated Aldosterone Release by Bovine Zona Glomerulosa Cells Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 317 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Hanke and A. C. Bauer-Dantoin Teaching aldosterone regulation and basic scientific principles using a classic paper by Dr. James O. Davis and colleagues Advan Physiol Educ, December 1, 2006; 30(4): 141 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Cascella, S. Palomba, L. Tauchmanova, F. Manguso, S. Di Biase, D. Labella, F. Giallauria, C. Vigorito, A. Colao, G. Lombardi, et al. Serum Aldosterone Concentration and Cardiovascular Risk in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4395 - 4400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Epstein, G. H. Williams, M. Weinberger, A. Lewin, S. Krause, R. Mukherjee, R. Patni, and B. Beckerman Selective Aldosterone Blockade with Eplerenone Reduces Albuminuria in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2006; 1(5): 940 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Perrier, S. Richard, Y. Sainte-Marie, B. C. Rossier, F. Jaisser, E. Hummler, and J.-P. Benitah A direct relationship between plasma aldosterone and cardiac L-type Ca2+ current in mice J. Physiol., November 15, 2005; 569(1): 153 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Williams Cardiovascular Benefits of Aldosterone Receptor Antagonists: What About Potassium? Hypertension, August 1, 2005; 46(2): 265 - 266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Freel and J. M.C. Connell Mechanisms of Hypertension: The Expanding Role of Aldosterone J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1993 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Dluhy and G. H. Williams Aldosterone -- Villain or Bystander? N. Engl. J. Med., July 1, 2004; 351(1): 8 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Duprez Is the Female Heart More Sensitive to Aldosterone for Early Remodeling? Hypertension, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 936 - 937. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tsybouleva, L. Zhang, S. Chen, R. Patel, S. Lutucuta, S. Nemoto, G. DeFreitas, M. Entman, B. A. Carabello, R. Roberts, et al. Aldosterone, Through Novel Signaling Proteins, Is a Fundamental Molecular Bridge Between the Genetic Defect and the Cardiac Phenotype of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1284 - 1291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. K Shieh, E. Kotlyar, and F. Sam Aldosterone and cardiovascular remodelling: focus on myocardial failure Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2004; 5(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Baker Evolution of Glucocorticoid and Mineralocorticoid Responses: Go Fish Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4223 - 4225. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Funder Aldosterone Resurgens--Letter from EPHESUS J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2373 - 2375. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |