help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0578
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Asa, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Asa, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 93, No. 9 3610-3617
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society

Deoxyribonucleic Acid Methyltransferase 3B Promotes Epigenetic Silencing through Histone 3 Chromatin Modifications in Pituitary Cells

Xuegong Zhu, Xinliang Mao, Rose Hurren, Aaron D. Schimmer, Shereen Ezzat and Sylvia L. Asa

Departments of Medicine (X.Z., X.M., R.H., A.D.S., S.E.) and Pathology (S.L.A.), University Health Network, The Ontario Cancer Institute (X.Z., X.M., R.H., A.D.S., S.E., S.L.A.) Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G-2M9

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Sylvia L. Asa, Ontario Cancer Institute, 610 University Avenue 8-327, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9. E-mail: sylvia.asa{at}uhn.on.ca.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context and Objective: Epigenetic dysregulation is implicated in pituitary neoplasia as the cause of silencing of several tumor suppressor genes. However, the upstream mediators of such events remain unknown.

Design: We examined the three members of the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) enzyme family in normal and neoplastic human and mouse pituitary cells.

Setting: This study was performed at a university-affiliated cancer research institute.

Main Outcome Measures: Gene expression, promoter DNA methylation, histone modifications, and cell proliferation were determined.

Results: In contrast to DNMT1 and DNMT3a, DNMT3b was expressed at relatively higher levels in neoplastic pituitary cells. However, examination of the human DNMT3b 5' region showed uniformly low DNA methylation levels with little difference between normal and tumor samples. Through pharmacological methylation inhibition or histone deacetylation inhibition, we identified that DNMT3b gene expression is subject to histone modifications. Down-regulation of DNMT3b resulted in induction of retinoblastoma, p21, and p27, and reduction in cell proliferation. These targeted effects were associated with enhanced histone 3 acetylation and diminished histone methylation.

Conclusion: Our findings identify DNMT3b as a putative mediator of epigenetic control through histone modifications of gene expression in pituitary cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pituitary tumors represent 10% of all surgically removed intracranial neoplasms. They interrupt normal hormonal homeostasis, and large tumors cause morbidity by invasive growth into surrounding brain and erosion through bony structures. Pituitary tumorigenesis rarely involves intragenic mutations of classical oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) (1, 2). Genetic ablation of several cell cycle control elements in mouse models has resulted in pituitary tumor development (3). Examination of these factors in human samples has identified significant protein down-regulation in tumor cells associated with 5' promoter methylation (3, 4). These findings are consistent with epigenetic dysregulation rather than intragenic mutations, loss-of-heterozygosity, or gene rearrangements in pituitary neoplasia (5). Such epigenetically targeted genes include among others retinoblastoma (Rb) (6, 7, 8), p27 (9), p21 (10), and p16 (11). However, little is known about the factors potentially mediating the epigenetic silencing of TSGs found in pituitary tumors.

In this study we examined the expression and function of members of the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) family of enzymes in normal and neoplastic pituitary cells. We focused on cell cycle control elements including Rb and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) p21 and p27 as examples of epigenetically silenced signals in pituitary cells. The data point to the importance of DNMT3b in targeting several TSGs.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture conditions and primary pituitary specimens

Mouse pituitary corticotroph AtT20 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and grown in Ham F-10 medium supplemented with 15% horse serum and 2.5% fetal calf serum (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) with 2 mM glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (37 C, 95% humidity, 5% CO2 atmosphere incubation). Normal mouse pituitaries were obtained from 6-wk-old male animals with Institutional Protocol Approval.

Normal human pituitary specimens with no morphological abnormalities were obtained from autopsies performed within 12 h of death and with no evidence of endocrine abnormality. Primary human pituitary adenomas were obtained at surgery after informed consent. The use of all human tissue was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Health Network. The pathology of pituitary adenomas was examined using immunohistochemistry for all cases, and tumors were classified histologically according to currently accepted Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and World Health Organization criteria (12, 13). The adenoma samples examined included six somatotroph adenomas, four lactotroph adenomas, four oncocytic null cell adenomas, three gonadotroph adenomas, two corticotroph adenomas, one mixed lactotroph-somatotroph adenoma, and one silent subtype 3 adenoma.

5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) and trichostatin-A (TSA) treatments

AtT20 cells were plated at 1 x 106 cells per 10-cm dish and allowed to attach for 24 h. For assessment of the impact of DNA methylation, cells were treated with the DNMT inhibitor 5-Aza-dC (Sigma-Aldrich) at concentrations of 5 or 10 µM for 5 d. At 24-h intervals, new medium containing freshly prepared drug was added. For assessment of chromatin histone acetylation, cells were treated with 0.3 and 0.6 µM of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, TSA (Sigma-Aldrich), for 24 h. Each experiment was independently performed with three separate dishes in at least three independent experiments.

Western blotting

Cells were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, aprotinin, and sodium orthovanadate in PBS). Total cell lysate protein was quantified using the Bio-Rad method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Fifty micrograms of whole lysates were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate denaturing polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto a nylon membrane (Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) at 100 V for 1.5 h at room temperature. Blots were incubated with antibodies against DNMT3B (Imgenex Corp., San Diego, CA), Rb (4H1 Mouse Monoclonal Antibody; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA), pRb (phospho-Rb Ser780, polyclonal 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology), the CDKIs p21 (polyclonal 1:500; BD Biosciences, Mississauga, Ontario), and p27 (monoclonal 1:1000; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), and actin (monoclonal 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich) as a loading control. Antibodies were diluted in PBS-5% nonfat milk with 0.1% Tween 20 at 4 C overnight, followed by washing with PBS-Tween 20 four times for 10 min each at room temperature, then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (1:2000) for 1 h at room temperature with agitation. Protein bands were visualized using chemiluminescence (Amersham, Ontario, Canada). Experiments were performed on three independent occasions.

Immunocytochemistry

DNMT3b expression by AtT20 pituitary cells was examined by immunocytochemistry on 4-µm sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell pellets. Briefly, sections were treated with 2% hydrogen peroxide to quench endogenous peroxide for 30 min and exposed to 5 µg/ml proteinase K for 15 min at room temperature. The sections were washed extensively and exposed to equilibration buffer for 10 min. Each slide was then incubated with anti-DNMT3B antibody (IMG-184A; Imgenex) at 4 C overnight. The reaction was visualized with the avidin-biotin method and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine.

RNA extraction, semiquantitative, and quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from human pituitary tissue using TRIZOL reagents (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA). RNA from AtT20 cells was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD), combined with optional on-column DNase digestion by RNase-Free DNase Set (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions to diminish genomic DNA contamination. Approximately 1.0 µg total RNA from each sample was used to conduct RT in a 20-µl volume using TaqMan RT reagents kit (Applied Biosystems, Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Branchburg, NJ). The synthesized cDNA was used for PCR amplification or stored at –20 C for further analysis. RT-PCR primers were designed to span exons to avoid genomic DNA contamination. The primer sequences and PCR conditions are shown in Table 1Go. PCR reactions were performed for 10 min at 95 C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 sec at 95 C, 30 sec at annealing temperatures, and 30 sec at 72 C, followed by a 10-min extension at 72 C. RT-PCR examinations were performed on at least three independent occasions. For quantitative assessment the cDNAs encoding DNMT3b and 18 S were amplified using the primers shown in Table 1Go. Equal amounts of cDNA for each sample were added to a SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR reactions were performed on an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The relative abundance of a transcript was represented by the threshold cycle of amplification (CT), which is inversely correlated to the amount of target RNA/first-strand cDNA being amplified.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Primer list and PCR conditions

 
Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-down-regulation of DNMT3B

Oligonucleotides complementary to a region of the mouse DNMT3b were synthesized by Ambion, Inc. (Austin, TX). The forward strand 5'-GGAUGCUAUUGUGAAUGUGtt-3' and reverse strand 5'-CACAUUCACAAUAGCAUCCtc-3' were transfected using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) at different concentrations as indicated.

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate, and labeled with MTT (Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide; Sigma-Aldrich) as a measure of cell proliferation. Absorbance was measured with an OPTI max microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at 570 nm and reference wavelength of 650 nm.

Bisulfite sequencing (BS) and quantification of DNA methylation

One microgram of genomic DNA was bisulfite modified according to the manufacturer’s protocol (CHEMICON International, Inc., Temecula, CA) diluted in 25 µl volume. One microliter of modified DNA was used for BS. Primer location, sequence, and PCR conditions are indicated in Figs. 1Go and 2Go and in Table 1Go. Final PCR products were cut from 1.5% agarose gels, extracted, and cloned into the TA cloning system (Invitrogen) for automated sequencing. At least 10 positive clones from each sample were sequenced.


Figure 1
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. DNMT3b is up-regulated in human pituitary tumors. A, RT-PCR amplification of DNMT1, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, p21, and Rb mRNA was performed on primary human pituitary samples, including six normal pituitary specimens (N) and 21 pituitary tumors (T). B, Displayed graphically are the means of densitometric products ± SE for each DNMT relative to phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) housekeeping gene expression. The asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference with P < 0.001 vs. normal samples (N). C, The human DNMT3b 5' region from –600 to +315 encompassing the 5' untranslated region and exon 1 contains a large CpG island. Aberrant CG sites are denoted by vertical bars below the graph. BS and COBRA examination covered the –93 to +189 region. Sequence numbering follows GenBank accession no. NC: _000020). D, BS was performed from –93 to +189, which includes 37 CpG dinucleotide sites. Results from BS in a representative normal and tumor sample are shown in a string-on-a-bead pattern. Individual unmethylated CpG sites are indicated by open circles, whereas methylated sites are shown by closed circles. Each row represents an individual clone. Note infrequent DNA methylation in normal and neoplastic samples. E, MSP analysis using methylated specific (M) and unmethylated-specific (U) primers reveals lack of methylation of the DNMT3b promoter in two representative normal and two tumor samples. First two lanes marked by (–) and (M) denote universal unmethylated and methylated positive controls, respectively. F, DNMT3b DNA methylation levels in human normal (n = 6) and tumorous (n = 21) samples by COBRA analysis. Values represent the mean + SE and show no significant differences between the two groups.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. DNMT3b expression analysis in AtT20 cells after 5'-Aza-dC and TSA treatment. Primary mouse normal pituitary cells and clonal AtT20 cells were examined by RT-PCR and Western blotting (A) and by immunocytochemistry (B) for detection of DNMT3b expression. Treatment with the methylation inhibitor AZC or the histone deacetylation inhibitor TSA results in enhanced DNMT3b expression. C, ChIP analysis covering the region associated with the DNMT3b promoter was performed using diMeH3–K9 or AcH3 antibodies without and after treatment with AZC or TSA as indicated. Nonspecific antibody (IgG) was used as a negative (–) control. Input lanes reflect PCR reaction products without prior immunoprecipitation. D, BS and combined BS and restriction analysis (COBRA) were performed covering the mouse –194 to +334 DNMT3b regions as shown. Aberrant CG sites are denoted by vertical bars. E, Methylation-specific PCR analysis using methylated specific (M) and unmethylated-specific (U) primers also reveals minimal DNA methylation of DNMT3b promoter in normal mouse pituitary cells, or in untreated or AZC-treated AtT20 cells. First lane marked by (–) denotes universal mouse unmethylated positive control. F, A string-on-a-bead representation showing normal mouse pituitary and AtT20 cells without and after AZC treatment. Each row represents an individual clone. Note infrequent DNA methylation in normal and AtT20 cells. GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

 
DNA methylation level was measured by combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA). Briefly, bisulfite-treated DNA was PCR amplified to cover the CpG sites where alternative methylation would be expected to generate multiple Taq1 products. Ten micrograms of purified bisulfite PCR products were incubated in a 15-µl volume reaction with 5 U Taq1 (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) overnight at 65 C. Restriction digestion products were separated on 2.0% agarose gels, followed by UV exposure. Experiments were performed on three independent occasions. The digested band (methylated) intensity divided by all products (methylated plus unmethylated) yielded the methylation level (percent ratio).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays

The ChIP assay was performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations (United Biotechnologies, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) and as previously described (14). Briefly, histone was cross-linked to DNA by the direct addition of 37% formaldehyde, and cells were washed with cold PBS containing protease inhibitors before lysis. The lysates were sonicated to shear DNA lengths between 200 and 1000 bp. After centrifugation, cell suspensions were further diluted, and 20 µl lysate from each sample was used to monitor the amount of DNA present (input DNA) for PCR detection. The rest of the lysate was cleared with salmon sperm DNA/protein G-agarose beads. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-dimethyl-histone 3 (Lys9), and anti-acetyl-Histone H3 (AcH3) antibody (all from United Biotechnologies) overnight at 4 C with agitation. Negative controls were performed with omission of antibody. For PCR analysis, the histone-DNA cross-links of eluates were reversed at 65 C, and the immunocomplexes were digested with proteinase-K for 1 h at 50 C, and DNA was finally purified by phenol extraction and used for PCR amplification. PCR primers and conditions are shown in Table 1Go. PCR reactions were performed in a volume of 15 µl containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 0.2 mM each primer, and 0.375 U AmpliTaq Gold polymerase (Applied Biosystems). Experiments were performed on three independent occasions.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DNMT3b is up-regulated in human pituitary tumors

We used RT-PCR amplification to examine the expression of the three principal members of the DNMT family, DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b, in primary human pituitary samples that consisted of six normal pituitaries and 21 pituitary tumors (Fig. 1AGo). Figure 1BGo displays graphically the mean relative levels of DNMT mRNA in normal compared with neoplastic pituitary samples. DNMT1 and DNMT3a were expressed at readily detectable levels with no appreciable differences in the two tissue types. In contrast, DNMT3b was expressed at significantly (P < 0.001) higher levels in neoplastic than in normal tissue. The DNMT3b overexpression in pituitary tumors was further confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 1BGo).

To explore the mechanism underlying this altered expression, we examined the human DNMT3b 5' region extending from –600 to +315, which encompasses the 5' untranslated region and exon 1 (Fig. 1CGo). This region contains a large CpG island with multiple CG sites. COBRA covering the –93 to +189 region revealed little evidence for DNA methylation in normal or tumor samples (Fig. 1DGo). Similarly, bisulfite DNA sequencing (BS) (Fig. 1EGo) failed to identify DNA methylation in normal pituitary samples (n = 6) or in pituitary tumor samples (n = 21). Indeed, DNA methylation of the DNMT3b 5'region was uniformly low (2.1 and 1.9%, respectively) in both sample types (Fig. 1FGo).

DNMT3b expression is positively regulated by 5'-Aza-dC and TSA treatment

To explore mechanisms other than DNA methylation that may be responsible for DNMT3b regulation in pituitary cells, we used primary mouse pituitaries and clonal mouse AtT20 cells. Figure 2AGo demonstrates significantly lower levels of mRNA and protein levels of DNMT3b in normal mouse pituitary compared with neoplastic AtT20 cells. To determine whether these differences are related to epigenetic silencing of DNMT3b, we examined the impact of the methylation inhibitor 5'azacytidine (AZC) and the histone deacetylation inhibitor TSA on AtT20 cells. Both compounds proved effective in enhancing DNMT3b mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2Go, A and B). To determine if chromatin modifications can be implicated in this alteration, we used a ChIP assay (Fig. 2Go, C and D). Using anti-methyl-histone H3-Lys9 (diMeH3-K9) and AcH3 antibodies, we identified the ability of AZC and TSA to enhance H3 acetylation and diminish methylation of this histone mark. To determine the extent of involvement of DNA methylation in mediating the action of AZC on DNMT3b regulation, we performed COBRA and BS (Fig. 2DGo). Both techniques revealed a modest degree of DNA methylation in normal pituitary cells, with little if any in AtT20 cells (Fig. 2Go, E and F). These studies show that, as in the human pituitary, DNA methylation contributes little toward DNMT3b regulation. Moreover, in mouse AtT20 pituitary cells, histone modifications appear more relevant in modulating DNMT3b expression.

DNMT3b down-regulation recapitulates the effect of AZC methylation inhibition on Rb, p21, and p27

We next examined the ability of DNMT3b to modulate key targets that are known to be epigenetically silenced in pituitary tumors. First, we ensured that our selected targets, which included Rb and the CDKIs, p21, and p27, were under readily measurable control in our experimental system. Specifically, we demonstrate that AZC or TSA treatment can also effectively enhance levels of these targets (Fig. 3AGo). To determine whether DNMT3b is a mediator of epigenetic silencing of these targets, we used an siRNA approach targeting this enzyme. Figure 3BGo shows the confirmation of effective down-regulation of DNMT3b protein levels. This DNMT3b down-regulation was associated with increased protein levels of Rb, p21, and p27 with dephosphorylation of Rb. Corresponding RT-PCR examination revealed similar increases in Rb, p21, and p27 mRNA levels (Fig. 3CGo). Thus, although AZC or TSA treatment and DNMT3b siRNA can reproduce similar actions on cell cycle control elements, the fact that DNMT3a and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 mRNA levels were not altered by DNMT3b siRNA suggests that the targets of DNMT3b action are relatively more gene specific.


Figure 3
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. DNMT3b down-regulation recapitulates the effect of AZC or TSA treatment on Rb, p21, and p27. A, AtT20 pituitary cells were treated with AZC or TSA as detailed under Materials and Methods and examined by RT-PCR. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a housekeeping loading control. Note effective induction of mRNA levels for Rb, p21, and p27 with either AZC or TSA treatment. AtT20 cells were down-regulated for DNMT3b by siRNA and examined by Western blotting (B) and RT-PCR (C). Note the positive impact of DNMT3b down-regulation on Rb with diminished Rb phosphorylation (pRb), p21, and p27 levels mimicking the action of AZC or TSA.

 
To determine if the effects of DNMT3b down-regulation on Rb, p21, and p27 were mediated at the transcriptional level, we examined the impact of DNMT3b down-regulation on DNA and histone modifications associated with their respective promoters (Fig. 4AGo). Figure 4BGo shows a modest degree of DNA methylation of the Rb promoter as detected by COBRA and BS, as has been described previously (15). Down-regulation of DNMT3b resulted in near complete elimination of Rb DNA methylation (Fig. 4BGo, upper panels). No detectable DNA methylation changes were noted for p21 or p27 by either technique (Fig. 4BGo). In contrast to the DNA findings, ChIP analysis revealed increased histone 3 acetylation for all three promoters with corresponding reduction in histone (Lys 9) methylation in response to DNMT3b down-regulation (Fig. 4CGo). Finally, using an MTT assay, we show that cells down-regulated for DNMT3b display reduced proliferation (Fig 4DGo).


Figure 4
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. The effect of DNMT3b on Rb, p21, and p27 is mediated through histone modification, not DNA methylation. A, Schematic representation of the mouse promoter regions encompassing the 5' untranslated region and exon 1 are shown for Rb, p21, and p27. All three genes reveal multiple potential aberrant CG sites that are denoted by vertical bars. Regions examined by ChIP, BS, and COBRA are shown. Sequence numbering follows GenBank accession no. NC: _000080 (Rb), NC_000083 (p21), and NC_000072 (p27). B, Effect of DNMT3b down-regulation on Rb, p21, and p27 DNA methylation. Each panel depicts the corresponding string-on-a-bead representation of BS (left). Each row represents an independent sequencing reaction. Closed circles represent individual methylated sites numbered as in panel A. Scrambled controls are represented by S and siRNA denotes siRNA-mediated down-regulation of DNMT3b. The right panels display MSP analyses using methylated specific (M) and unmethylated-specific (U) primers. The Rb gene shows a modest degree of DNA methylation in scrambled (S) control cells by both techniques. Down-regulation of DNMT3b results in reversal of methylation. First lane marked by (–) denotes universal mouse unmethylated positive control. No detectable DNA methylation was noted for p21 or p27 by either BS or methylation-specific PCR. C, Effect of DNMT3b down-regulation on Rb, p21, and p27 histone modifications. ChIP analysis covering the region associated with the 5' regions as depicted in panel A was performed using diMeH3–K9 or AcH3 antibodies. AtT20 cells transfected with scrambled control (S) or after two different doses of DNMT3b siRNA are shown. Omission of antibody was used as in the negative (–) control lane. Input lanes reflect PCR reaction products before immunoprecipitation. D, DNMT3b down-regulation reduces cell proliferation as determined by MTT assay.

 
DNMT3b down-regulation impedes the effect of methylation inhibition on itself

Given that DNMT3b was effective at targeting several histone methylation-sensitive genes, we next asked whether it can also target its own promoter. To this end, we ensured that our DNMT3b siRNA targets the most 3' coding exon (Fig. 5AGo). This allowed us to examine DNMT3b mRNA expression at an upstream region. Figure 5AGo confirms that our DNMT3b target did not directly interfere with the stability of the mRNA upstream. Figure 5BGo demonstrates again the sensitivity of DNMT3b mRNA to induction by AZC or TSA treatment. That DNMT3b itself was at least partially responsible for mediating the action of these compounds is demonstrated in Fig. 5BGo. Down-regulation of DNMT3b abrogated the effect of AZC and of TSA on DNMT3b mRNA levels. These data support the notion that DNMT3b exhibits broad epigenetic control of pituitary gene expression.


Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. DNMT3b down-regulation impedes the effect of methylation inhibition on itself. A, AtT20 pituitary cells expressing DNMT3b siRNA at different doses or scrambled sequence (S) as controls were examined for DNMT3B mRNA expression. The DNMT3b siRNA was designed to target the most 3' coding exon (large arrow), whereas primers for mRNA analysis were designed to identify the 5' coding region (small arrows). DNMT3b siRNA did not directly interfere with the stability of the upstream mRNA upstream. B, AtT20 pituitary cells expressing DNMT3b siRNA or scrambled sequence as controls were treated with AZC or TSA, as detailed under Materials and Methods, and examined by RT-PCR. DNMT3b mRNA responds to induction by AZC or TSA treatment, and DNMT3b siRNA abrogates the effect of AZC or TSA on DNMT3b mRNA levels. GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

 
Having demonstrated a relationship between DNMT3b and the mRNA expression of cell cycle control elements, we reassessed these in primary human pituitary tumor samples. Indeed, the increased DNMT3b noted in the human adenomas examined was accompanied by a tendency of diminished Rb and a statistically significant reduction in p21 mRNA expression (Fig. 1BGo, lower panels).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Covalent DNA methylation of cytosines represents a form of epigenetic modification with clear biological functions through association with stable transcriptional silencing (16, 17). Such silencing is critical for embryonic development, genomic stability, X-chromosome inactivation, and genomic imprinting. However, aberrant DNA methylation underlies many neoplastic conditions, including pituitary tumors (18). We have explored the role of DNMTs based on their recognized ability to catalyze the transfer of a methyl group from a donor molecule to a cytosine ring within a symmetrical CpG dinucleotide (19). Three main mammalian distinctly active DNMTs encoded by the DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b genes have been identified (20). These proteins show a high similarity to each other and have several domains in common, including a highly conserved C-terminal domain containing catalytic DNMT motifs (21). DNMT3a and DNMT3b are considered de novo DNMTs because they are responsible for initiating DNA methylation and show a preference for unmethylated DNA in vitro (22). They are expressed during germ cell development and early embryogenesis consistent with the temporal phase of active methylation reprogramming. Isoforms are generated through alternative promoter utilization in the case of DNMT3a and alternative splicing for DNMT3b. The isoforms and their expression patterns are conserved from mice to humans, indicating that they likely perform specific biological functions. Together, these enzymes can generate new DNA methylation patterns and maintain them through cellular divisions, forming the basis of a stable epigenetic transcriptional memory.

We identify here DNMT3b’s relatively unique variable expression in human pituitary tissues and tumors compared with a more constitutive expression pattern of DNMT1. These data are similar to recent findings in the breast, in which DNMT3b was overexpressed in nearly 80% of sporadic carcinomas (23). We also found that siRNA down-regulation of DNMT3b recapitulates the effect of pharmacological DNA methylation inhibition or histone deacetylation inhibition in up-regulating several candidate pituitary target genes. These included cell cycle control elements known to be of importance in pituitary tumorigenesis, Rb, p21, and p27. Using methylation-specific PCR, BS, and COBRA, we found no difference between DNMT3b methylation in normal and neoplastic human pituitary tissues. Similar findings were also obtained in mouse pituitary cells. Instead, using pharmacological and ChIP approaches, we identified evidence of histone modifications, including acetylation and demethylation, in the control of DNMT3b expression. In particular, we identified histone 3 lysine 9 (K9) methylation as a target of DNMT3b action, consistent with the recognized early critical role of this modification in silencing TSGs (24).

An emerging theme from studies of human pituitary tumorigenesis has been the evolving significance of epigenetic control rather than intragenic mutations, loss-of-heterozygosity, or gene rearrangements (5). For example, despite its well-recognized impact in genetically deficient mice (25), the Rb TSG was not mutated in primary human tumors (26). Instead, the gene has been suggested to be down-regulated through methylation at a CpG island in these tumors (6, 7, 8). Moreover, no inactivating mutations have been identified within the Rb1 promoter region in pituitary tumors that fail to express the protein (27). It should be noted that Rb1 DNA promoter methylation alone, as shown in this report, is not sufficient to explain inactivation of this gene in human pituitary tumors.

Epigenetic silencing has also been shown in other tumor suppressors that are considered to be important in pituitary. Mice lacking p27kip1 have an increased propensity to develop multiorgan neoplasia, including pituitary tumors (28). Protein levels of this CDKI are reduced in human pituitary adenomas, a feature that correlates with recurrence (29, 30), however, the p27kip1 gene is not mutated; instead, protein levels are diminished through other mechanisms. Here, we show that DNMT3b can also target p27 in pituitary cells. More significantly, the magnitude of induction of p27, p21, and Rb through DNMT3b down-regulation was sufficient to diminish pituitary cell proliferation.

It has been estimated that approximately 80% of all CpG dinucleotides in the mammalian genome are subject to methylation changes (19). The remaining unmethylated CpG residues are mostly located in the promoter regions of constitutively active genes and are referred to as CpG islands. DNA methylation has long been shown to have a transcriptional silencing function with an important role in several tumorigenic states. This is mediated by recruitment of HDACs through the methyl-DNA binding motifs of components of several HDAC-containing complexes (31). More recently, direct functional links between DNA methylation and histone methylation have been uncovered. Indeed, genetic evidence indicates that histone methylation may be a prerequisite for DNA methylation (32, 33). Our findings on the effect of AZC, classically considered as a DNA-demethylating agent, on histone demethylation of DNMT3b support this model. Furthermore, our findings are in partial agreement with other recent reports supporting the view that DNA and histone methylation may have reinforcing functions (34, 35). Moreover, the effect that we observed with TSA treatment on endogenous gene expression and histone methylation further emphasizes the role of histone modifications in the control of genes responsible for this action.

In summary, we have shown that DNMT3b is relatively unique among members of the DNMT family. Expression is higher in neoplastic pituitary cells where gene expression appears to be predominantly regulated through a histone-modifying network. Given the ability of DNMT3b to regulate multiple cell cycle control elements, including Rb, p27, and p21, our findings highlight this DNMT as a potential therapeutic target. Thus, our data support the rationale exploring the role of HDAC inhibitors in the medical treatment of pituitary tumors.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Kelvin So for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant MOP-79340) and by the Toronto Medical Laboratories.

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to declare.

First Published Online June 10, 2008

Abbreviations: AcH3, Anti-acetyl-Histone H3; AZC, 5'azacytidine; 5-Aza-dC, 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine; BS, bisulfite sequencing; CDKI, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; COBRA, combined bisulfite restriction analysis; diMeH3-K9, dimethyl-histone 3; DNMT, DNA methyltransferase; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor; HDAC, histone deacetylase; Lys9, anti-dimethyl-histone 3; Rb, retinoblastoma; siRNA, small interfering RNA; TSA, trichostatin-A; TSG, tumor suppressor gene.

Received March 12, 2008.

Accepted June 2, 2008.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Asa SL, Ezzat S 1998 The cytogenesis and pathogenesis of pituitary adenomas. Endocr Rev 19:798–827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Asa SL, Ezzat S 2002 The pathogenesis of pituitary tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2:836–849[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Alexander JM 2001 Tumor suppressor loss in pituitary tumors. Brain Pathol 11:342–355[Medline]
  4. Zhao J, Dahle D, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Klibanski A 2005 Hypermethylation of the promoter region is associated with the loss of MEG3 gene expression in human pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2179–2186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ezzat S, Asa SL 2006 Mechanisms of disease: the pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2:220–230[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Woloschak M, Yu A, Xiao J, Post KD 1996 Abundance and state of phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product in human pituitary tumors. Int J Cancer 67:16–19[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Pei L, Melmed S, Scheithauer B, Kovacs K, Benedict WF, Prager D 1995 Frequent loss of heterozygosity at the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB) locus in aggressive pituitary tumors: evidence for a chromosome 13 tumor suppressor gene other than RB. Cancer Res 55:1613–1616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Simpson DJ, Hibberts NA, McNicol AM, Clayton RN, Farrell WE 2000 Loss of pRb expression in pituitary adenomas is associated with methylation of the RB1 CpG island. Cancer Res 60:1211–1216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Qian X, Jin L, Kulig E, Lloyd RV 1998 DNA methylation regulates p27kip1 expression in rodent pituitary cell lines. Am J Pathol 153:1475–1482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yoshino A, Katayama Y, Ogino A, Watanabe T, Yachi K, Ohta T, Komine C, Yokoyama T, Fukushima T 2007 Promoter hypermethylation profile of cell cycle regulator genes in pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol 83:153–162[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Ogino A, Yoshino A, Katayama Y, Watanabe T, Ota T, Komine C, Yokoyama T, Fukushima T 2005 The p15(INK4b)/p16(INK4a)/RB1 pathway is frequently deregulated in human pituitary adenomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 64:398–403[Medline]
  12. Asa SL 1998 Tumors of the pituitary gland. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
  13. DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C 2004 Pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer
  14. Ezzat S, Yu S, Asa SL 2003 Ikaros isoforms in human pituitary tumors: distinct localization, histone acetylation, and activation of the 5' fibroblast growth factor receptor-4 promoter. Am J Pathol 163:1177–1184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Frost SJ, Simpson DJ, Clayton RN, Farrell WE 1999 Transfection of an inducible p16/CDKN2A construct mediates reversible growth inhibition and G1 arrest in the AtT20 pituitary tumor cell line. Mol Endocrinol 13:1801–1810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lande-Diner L, Zhang J, Ben Porath I, Amariglio N, Keshet I, Hecht M, Azuara V, Fisher AG, Rechavi G, Cedar H 2007 Role of DNA methylation in stable gene repression. J Biol Chem 282:12194–12200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kareta MS, Botello ZM, Ennis JJ, Chou C, Chedin F 2006 Reconstitution and mechanism of the stimulation of de novo methylation by human DNMT3L. J Biol Chem 281:25893–25902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ezzat S, Asa SL 2005 FGF receptor signaling at the crossroads of endocrine homeostasis and tumorigenesis. Horm Metab Res 37:355–360[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Li E 2002 Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 3:662–673[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Okano M, Xie S, Li E 1998 Cloning and characterization of a family of novel mammalian DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. Nat Genet 19:219–220[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Posfai J, Bhagwat AS, Posfai G, Roberts RJ 1989 Predictive motifs derived from cytosine methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res 17:2421–2435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Yokochi T, Robertson KD 2002 Preferential methylation of unmethylated DNA by Mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a. J Biol Chem 277:11735–11745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Butcher DT, Rodenhiser DI 2007 Epigenetic inactivation of BRCA1 is associated with aberrant expression of CTCF and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT3B) in some sporadic breast tumours. Eur J Cancer 43:210–219[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Bachman KE, Park BH, Rhee I, Rajagopalan H, Herman JG, Baylin SB, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B 2003 Histone modifications and silencing prior to DNA methylation of a tumor suppressor gene. Cancer Cell 3:89–95[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Jacks T, Fazeli A, Schmitt EM, Bronson RT, Goodell MA, Weinberg RA 1992 Effects of an Rb mutation in the mouse. Nature 359:295–300[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Cryns VL, Alexander JM, Klibanski A, Arnold A 1993 The retinoblastoma gene in human pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:644–646[Abstract]
  27. Bates AS, Farrell WE, Bicknell EJ, McNicol AM, Talbot AJ, Broome JC, Perrett CW, Thakker RV, Clayton RN 1997 Allelic deletion in pituitary adenomas reflects aggressive biological activity and has potential value as a prognostic marker. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:818–824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nakayama K, Ishida N, Shirane M, Inomata A, Inoue T, Shisido N, Horii I, Loh DY 1996 Mice lacking p27Kip1 display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors. Cell 85:707–720[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Bamberger CM, Fehn M, Bamberger AM, Ludecke DK, Beil FU, Saeger W, Schulte HM 1999 Reduced expression levels of the cell-cycle inhibitor p27Kip1 in human pituitary adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol 140:250–255[Abstract]
  30. Lidhar K, Korbonits M, Jordan S, Khalimova Z, Kaltsas G, Lu X, Clayton RN, Jenkins PJ, Monson JP, Besser GM, Lowe DG, Grossman AB 1999 Low expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p27Kip1 in normal corticotroph cells, corticotroph tumors, and malignant pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3823–3830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Nan X, Ng HH, Johnson CA, Laherty CD, Turner BM, Eisenman RN, Bird A 1998 Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature 393:386–389[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jacobsen SE 2002 Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature 416:556–560[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Johnston MC, Bronsky PT 1991 Embryonic craniofacial development. Prog Clin Biol Res 373:99–115[Medline]
  34. Snowden AW, Gregory PD, Case CC, Pabo CO 2002 Gene-specific targeting of H3K9 methylation is sufficient for initiating repression in vivo. Curr Biol 12:2159–2166[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. McGarvey KM, Fahrner JA, Greene E, Martens J, Jenuwein T, Baylin SB 2006 Silenced tumor suppressor genes reactivated by DNA demethylation do not return to a fully euchromatic chromatin state. Cancer Res 66:3541–3549[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
K J Dudley, K Revill, R N Clayton, and W E Farrell
Pituitary tumours: all silent on the epigenetics front
J. Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2009; 42(6): 461 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
V. Quereda and M. Malumbres
Cell cycle control of pituitary development and disease
J. Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 42(2): 75 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Asa, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Asa, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals