help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0269
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blesa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chaves, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blesa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chaves, F. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
*Genetics Home Reference
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid
Right arrow Metabolism
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 93, No. 9 3577-3583
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society

A New PCSK9 Gene Promoter Variant Affects Gene Expression and Causes Autosomal Dominant Hypercholesterolemia

Sebastian Blesa, Santiago Vernia, Ana-Barbara Garcia-Garcia, Sergio Martinez-Hervas, Carmen Ivorra, Veronica Gonzalez-Albert, Juan Francisco Ascaso, Juan Carlos Martín-Escudero, Jose Tomas Real, Rafael Carmena, Marta Casado and Felipe Javier Chaves

Laboratorio de Estudios Genéticos (S.B., A.-B.G.-G., S.M.-H., C.I., V.G.-A., F.J.C.), Fundación Investigación Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, and Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia (S.V., M.C.), E-46010 Valencia, Spain; Servicio de Endocrinología (S.M.-H., J.F.A., J.T.R., R.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Universidad de Valencia, E-46022 Valencia, Spain; Servicio de Medicina Interna (J.C.M.-E.), Hospital Rio Hortega, E-47005 Valladolid, Spain; and CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (S.B., A.-B.G.-G., S.M.-H., V.G.-A., J.F.A., J.T.R., R.C., F.J.C.)

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: F. Javier Chaves, Fundación de Investigación Hospital Clínico, Universitario de Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibáñez 17, E-46010 Valencia, Spain. E-mail: felipe.chaves{at}uv.es.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH) is a genetic disorder characterized by increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels, leading to high risk of premature cardiovascular disease. More than 900 mutations in LDL receptor, six in APOB and 10 in PCSK9 have been identified as a cause of the disease in different populations. All known mutations in PCSK9 causing hypercholesterolemia produce an increase in the enzymatic activity of this protease. Up to now, there are data about the implication of PCSK9 in ADH in a low number of populations, not including a Spanish population.

Objective: The objective of the study was to study the prevalence of PCSK9 mutations in ADH Spanish population.

Participants: We screened PCSK9 gene in 42 independent ADH patients in whom mutations in LDL receptor and APOB genes had been excluded.

Results: None of the known mutations causing ADH was detected in our sample, but we found two variations in the promoter region that could cause ADH, c.-288G>A and c.-332C>A (each in one proband). The analysis of the effect of these two variations on the transcription activity of the PCSK9 promoter showed that c.-288G>A did not modify the transcription, whereas c.-332C>A variant caused a 2.5-fold increase when compared with the wild-type sequence, either with or without lovastatin.

Conclusions: PCSK9 is a rare cause of ADH in Spanish population and, up to what we know, none of the previously described mutations has been detected. We have identified a new mutation that could cause ADH by increasing the transcription of PCSK9.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH) (OMIM 143890) is a frequent genetic disorder being present in about one in 500 people in open Caucasian populations. It is characterized by increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in plasma, which can produce skin and tendon xanthomas and, overall, premature cardiovascular disease. Up to now, ADH is known to result from mutations at three main loci, although other loci could also be involved. Two loci are well characterized: LDLR (encoding the low density lipoprotein receptor) and APOB (encoding apolipoprotein B100); mutations in these genes cause familial hypercholesterolemia (OMIM 143890) and familial defective apolipoprotein B (FDB) (OMIM 144010), respectively. More than 900 mutations in LDLR gene have been described, whereas only six in APOB gene causing FDB have been identified (1, 2, 3, 4). Other mutations in the ApoB gene can cause hypobetalipoproteinemia (OMIM 107730). Recently it has been demonstrated that specific mutations increasing activity in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 precursor (PCSK9; OMIM 607786) are responsible for ADH, whereas those reducing PCSK9 activity are associated with lower LDL-C levels (5, 6, 7).

Human PCSK9 gene is approximately 22 kb long, comprising the promoter region and 12 exons, and it is located on chromosome 1p32. The gene produces an mRNA of 3636 bp encoding a 692-amino acid protein. This protein, also called neural apoptosis regulated convertase, is a serine protease belonging to the protease K subfamily of subtilases. It is a subfamily of proteases largely involved in the processing of inactive precursor proteins to the active product and seems to be involved in the inactivation and degradation of LDLR (8, 9, 10). Several studies have found that mutations increasing the activity of PCSK9 result in an increase of LDL-C levels whereas those reducing PCSK9 activity decrease LDL-C levels (5, 7, 11, 12, 13). The regulation of LDL-C levels has been related to LDLR-dependent and -independent pathways (14, 15, 16, 17, 18).

Several studies have aimed to identify mutations in PCSK9 causing ADH in a limited number of populations, but no data are available on the prevalence of these mutations in Spanish population (11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22). Previous reports by our group have described mutations in LDLR and APOB genes causing ADH in our population (23, 24, 25, 26). Thus, the aim of this study was to establish the importance of PCSK9 as a cause of ADH in Spanish population and to characterize the mutations responsible for it.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and controls

The study was conducted in 42 ADH probands attending our Lipid Clinic at the Hospital Clínico Universitario (Valencia, Spain) in whom mutations in LDLR or APOB genes had been previously excluded. The initial group was composed by approximately 150 ADH patients. ADH was diagnosed following the Med Ped criteria, summarized as plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C higher than the 95th percentile corrected for both age and sex, together with presence of tendon xanthomas, coronary artery disease in the proband or in a first degree relative, and bimodal distribution of TC and LDL-C plasma levels in the family (autosomal dominant pattern of lipid IIa phenotype). Participants were not under cholesterol-lowering therapy at the time of sample extraction. All subjects were Caucasian and lived in the Valencian community (Spain).

A control group of 450 normocholesterolemic subjects with LDL-C and TC levels lower than percentile 70 and without treatments capable of influencing cholesterol levels was also studied. Individuals with glucose alterations were excluded. Patients and controls were not matched.

The protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee and all subjects gave their written consent.

Genetic analysis

DNA was extracted as described or using Chemagic system (Chemagen, Baesweiler, Germany) from whole blood (23). RNA was extracted from lymphocytes after separation with Ficoll-Hypaque.

In all patients the presence of mutations in LDLR or APOB genes was excluded by previous analysis of these genes as previously described (25). In brief, LDLR promoter region and exons (including intronic junctions) were sequenced to detect small mutations and analyzed by Southern blot and semiquantitative procedure to detect large rearrangement (23, 27). Regions of exons 26 and 29 of APOB gene, in which all mutations causing FDB have been found, were sequenced (3).

For PCSK9 analysis, we sequenced the promoter region (–1000 bp upstream from ATG), all exons and intronic boundaries (a minimum of 50 bp in each intron sequence was analyzed). Primers were designed by Primer3 software and synthesized by Sigma (St. Louis, MO) (28).

Database for LDLR mutations is accessible at http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) databases can be consulted (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?locusId=255738&chooseRs=all).

Genetic sequences used as reference for PCSK9 are the following: for mRNA, accession no. NM_174936.2; for genomic sequence, accession no. NC_000001.1.

pGL3-PCSK9 promoter-reporter gene constructs

A fragment of the human PCSK9 promoter from nucleotides –1028 to –1 relative to the translation initiation site was amplified with the following primers: 5-CATCTGCAAGGGAGGATCATAAATTC-3 (forward) and 5-GGAGCTGACGGTGCCCATGGGGGCCAGGGGAGA GG-3 (reverse) from heterozygote DNA samples for mutations c.-332C>A and c.-288G>A. PCR products (wild type and variants) were cloned into pGEMTEasy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and then subcloned into SacI/NcoI sites of pGL3basic vector (Promega). The sequence and integrity of each construct were verified by sequencing in both directions.

Cell culture and luciferase assay

For promoter assays, NIH3T3 or HepG2 cells were grown in DMEM containing 25 mM glucose, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Plasmid transfections were performed on attached cells at 70% confluence. Cells were transfected by Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 750 ng of pGL3-PCSK9 reporter constructs (wild type or mutated) and 40 ng of a promotorless Renilla luciferase construct (pRL-0). When indicated, 10 µM lovastatin (Merck Sharp & Dohme, Madrid, Spain) was included. Transactivation activities were measured 24 h after transfection in a Wallac 1420 VICTOR luminometer using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative light units were determined by quantification of the signal from the Firefly luciferase, normalized with cotransfected Renilla luciferase activity in the same sample. Finally, these relative values were normalized against mock transfection. Each expression construct was transfected in triplicate wells. The experiments were repeated three times.

PCSK9 expression and plasma measurement

To measure the expression of PCSK9 in plasma from patients carrying c.-332C>A mutation, RNA was extracted from lymphocytes and cDNA was obtained using TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Real-time PCR was performed using SYBGreen (Applied Biosystems) and primers amplifying exons 3–4 of the gene. A fragment of the major histocompatibility complex, class I, G (b2 microglobulin) gene (HLA-G) was used as housekeeping. Amplification plots and dissociation curves were obtained. Ratio [PCSK9 threshold cycle (Ct)/HLA-G Ct] was calculated for each sample.

To quantitate PCSK9 from plasma, ProteoPrep Blue albumin and IgG depletion kit (Sigma; PROTBA) was used to remove albumin and IgG from eight samples of human plasma. HepG2 extract (40 µg) was the positive control. Twenty-five microliters of human depleted plasma were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels. Proteins were separated and transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membrane (Roche, Stockholm, Sweden). For immunoblotting the primary goat anti-PCSK9 (ab28770; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), used at 1:250, was incubated overnight at 4 C. Membrane was next incubated with peroxidase-labeled rabbit antigoat IgG (Pierce, Rockford, IL) at 1:5000 for 60 min at room temperature. Proteins were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence and exposure to x-ray film.

Statistical analysis

Values are given as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was used to analyze differences between groups. P <0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Clinical data

Clinical characteristics of 42 ADH subjects without LDLR and APOB gene mutations and controls are shown in Table 1Go. As expected, their LDL-C and TC levels are higher in patients than in controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Clinical data from patients and controls

 
Genetic variations in PCSK9 gene

We sequenced promoter, exons, and its corresponding intron-exon boundaries and found several known polymorphisms, one not previously described intronic polymorphism and two new variations (c.-332C>A and c.-288G>A) in the promoter region (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. PCSK9 gene variations detected

 
Variations c.-332C>A and c.-288G>A are located close to a sterol regulatory element (SRE) in the promoter region of PCSK9 (Fig. 1Go), overall variation c.-332C>A. When annealing PCSK9 promoter sequences from human, Canis familiaris, Mus musculus, Bos taurus, Macaca mulatta, and Pan troglodytes, these positions are conserved between human and Pan troglodytes, the closest species studied (both of them are the only Hominidae), supporting the possibility of a functional effect. In addition, there has recently been suggested a specificity protein-1 transcription factor (SP1) site in human PCSK9 promoter involving position c.-332 (29).


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of human PCSK9 promoter. A, The Mat Inspector 7.4 software was used to detect consensus motifs. Position –1 was fixed to the nucleotide preceding the initial ATG codon. The position of studied genetic variations and nuclear transcription factor Y (NF-Y) and SP1 binding sites are indicated. B, Nucleotide sequences corresponding to the wild-type (WT) (c.-332C) and mutated (c.-332A) probes used in the EMSA. The core SREBP binding site sequences and c.-332C>A variation are indicated with opened boxes. Putative Sp1 site suggested by Jeong et al. (29 ) is indicated.

 
Two ADH patients, whose TC and LDL-C levels can be seen in Table 3Go, were found to carry one of those variations. In 450 controls, mutation c.-332C>A was absent, whereas c.-288G>A was identified in three subjects (with TC levels 200, 142, and 154 mg/dl and LDL-C levels 115, 58.4, and 72 mg/dl). None of the mutations described so far as causing either hyper- or hypocholesterolemia was detected in our sample.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Clinical data from patients carrying c.-288G>A or c.-332C>A PCSK9 mutations

 
We analyzed the segregation of mutation c.-288G>A in the proband’s family and did not find cosegregation of mutation and disease (data not shown). In the case of the proband carrying mutation c.-332C>A, there was only one relative available, and he presented the same mutation.

Mutation effect

Analysis using MatInspector software and previous publications (29, 30) suggest that putative binding sites for sterol regulatory binding proteins (SREBP), SP1 and nuclear transcription factor Y might regulate the activity of PCSK9 human promoter (Fig. 1Go). The regulation of PCSK9 expression by depletion of sterol levels and statins has been previously reported, which indicates that SREBP transcription factors could be responsible for this regulation (30).

Both variants are located close to the core SRE in PCSK9 promoter. Furthermore, c.-332C>A is located inside a Sp1 site recently described (29). Therefore, we analyzed their ability to modify its promoter transcription activity.

Luciferase reporter analysis indicated that c.-288G>A variant had no significant effect, whereas c.-332C>A variant caused a 2.5-fold increase in PCSK9 promoter activity relative to wild-type construction activity when transfected in HepG2 cells (Fig. 2Go). Similar results were obtained in 3T3 cells (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Transcription activity analysis of the –1028/–1 region of PCSK9 human promoter. NIH3T3 and HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with 750 ng of PCSK9 luciferase reporter constructs plus 40 ng of promotorless-renilla plasmid. Luciferase activities were normalized against the internal control Renilla values. The data represent mean ± SEM (n = 3) and are expressed as fold induction respect empty vector (pGL3basic). *, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.05.

 
Treatment of cells with statins (lovastatin) increased the promoter activity in the wild-type or c.-288G>A constructions and caused an even stronger activation in c.-332C>A mutant, maintaining the 2.5-fold of overexpression in relation to the normal sequence (Fig. 2Go).

Mutant PCSK9 expression and plasma measurements

Once the effect of c.-332C>A mutations in vitro was shown, the question whether this mutation was able to modify PCSK9 gene expression and protein levels in carrying patients arose. Although it has been shown that lymphocytes do not express PCSK9, we decided to try to quantify lymphocytes expression to check this possibility. RNA was extracted from lymphocytes from the mutant PCSK9 proband and her relative: two familial hypercholesterolemia probands with mutations in LDLR gene (p.C660X and p.V408M) and two controls without any mutation in LDLR nor PCSK9 genes. The mutant PCSK9 proband’s relative was taking plant stanol esters with a lipid-lowering diet at the moment of the extraction (Benecol; Kaiku Corporation Alimentaira, Urnieta, Spain). Therefore, controls used in the experiment took the same supplement for 3 wk, and samples before and after this treatment were collected.

Real-time PCR was performed as explained in Patients and Methods. PCSK9 expression was very low in all the individuals and almost undetectable in controls and patients with LDLR gene mutations (in the level of 0–1 copy). However, PCSK9 expression in both patients with c.-332C>A was detectable in a range from 1 to 10 copies. PCSK9 expression was calculated as the ratio of PCSK9 to HLA-G Cts. Results obtained were the following: 1.958 ± 0.223 for controls (with and without Benecol supplementation), 1.650 ± 0.014 for c.-332C>A patients and 1.153 + 0.081 for LDLR gene mutation carriers. Patients with LDLR or PCSK9 mutations are under the same condition of hypercholesterolemia and when comparing their PCSK9 expression differences are significant (P ≤ 0.05), whereas no differences were found between controls and PCSK9 gene mutants. However, due to the low PCSK9 expression in lymphocytes, real-time PCR measurements are very close to the detection limits, and these results have to be interpreted with caution. Figure 3Go shows the amplification plot from patients with LDLR or c.-332C>A PCSK9 mutation.


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Amplification plot of PCSK9 expression in lymphocytes. PCSK9 from lymphocytes extracted from both c.-332C>A carriers and ADH patients with mutations in LDLR gene (p.C660X and p.V408M) was measured by real-time PCR. LDLR mutation carriers present a lower PCSK9 expression than c.-332C>A PCSK9 mutants, and this lower expression is maintained when correcting with the housekeeping gene. The figure also shows the low expression levels in lymphocytes.

 
Similar results were obtained when trying to measure plasma PCSK9 levels by Western blot (data not shown). Cells used as positive control gave a weak signal, whereas no detectable signal was obtained from patients and controls. PCSK9 levels in plasma are very low (31, 32) and due to detection limits they were undetectable. Therefore, we could not obtain any conclusion from this experiment.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In our previous work, we were able to identify a mutation in LDLR or ApoB genes in about 75% of the probands diagnosed as ADHs (24, 25, 26). We identified a group of 42 ADH patients in whom mutations in LDLR or APOB genes were not found, using the procedures for mutation detection described by our group (24, 26, 27).

In this group of ADH subjects, we found polymorphisms previously described by other groups or by public SNP databases (see Patients and Methods) and only one new polymorphism with low frequency downstream exon 6 (c.996 + 44G>A) (5, 6, 12). Although some of these polymorphisms have been identified as modifying LDL-C and TC in population studies, they have not been identified as causing ADH (6, 7). In addition, we have found two novel variations located in the promoter region, c.-332C>A and c.-288G>A, close to an SRE site. Variation –332C>A was inside the SP1 site described recently (29) in the promoter area and could be thought as causing ADH.

We tested the presence of these two new variations in a control population with normal LDL-C and TC levels. Mutation c.-288G>A was present in the control population but at a very low frequency (three of 450 controls). In addition, we failed to find a cosegregation of mutation and disease in the proband’s family. Unfortunately, we could not test the c.-332C>A segregation with the disease because the proband’s family was unavailable and only one relative, a cousin, could be studied. His TC and LDL-C were close to dyslipidemic levels (TC and LDL-C, 257 and 190 mg/dl, respectively), but he was taking a lipid-lowering diet and supplements. He also carried mutation c.-332C>A. The proband with c.-332C>A was a woman and had TC 292 and LDL-C 208 mg/dl at baseline. She had neither xanthomas nor xanthelasmas, and the same was found in her relative. Her family history showed several relatives were dyslipidemic and mortality history from cardiovascular disease: her father and her two paternal uncles died from myocardial infarction at 57, 48, and 66 yr, respectively. On the other hand, she was unresponsive to statin treatment (Table 3Go). Differences in lipid levels between proband and relative could be due to the proband’s unresponsiveness to statin treatment and an slight cholesterol-lowering effect of control diet and supplement (Benecol) (33).

Up to now, only mutations increasing PCSK9 protein activity have been identified as causing hypercholesterolemia, and no one has been found in the promoter region of this gene (5, 11, 12, 13, 19, 21). To confirm the possible implication of these two new mutations in the development of ADH, we tested their ability to modify the PCSK9 promoter activity. Our results indicated that mutation c.-288G>A does not modify the promoter activity, whereas mutation c.-332C>A causes a 2.5-fold increase in the transcriptional activity of this promoter, compared with the wild-type sequence. Recently a paper regarding regulation of PCSK9 expression by SREBP2 has been published (29). The authors suggested a new Sp1 site in PCSK9 promoter, which involves position c.-332. Furthermore, specific mutation of this Sp1 site increases promoter transcription and maintains regulation by sterols. Our results agree with those from this work about the implication of this position in promoter regulation, supporting the fact that c.-332C>A mutation affects PCSK9 expression and can be responsible for ADH.

The statin used in our experiments increases the activity of PCSK9 promoter in all sequences tested, as has been previously described (30). Our results show that wild-type sequence and c.-288G>A mutation have similar promoter activity, whereas c.-332C>A produces an increase in promoter activity, maintaining the 2.5 times of overexpression, compared with wild sequence.

Activation of PCSK9 expression by statins has been suggested as one of the mechanisms involved in loss of statins treatment efficiency. It is known that inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activates SREBPs, which in turn increases LDLR levels but also PCSK9 and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase levels. Genetic polymorphisms affecting PCSK9 expression or activity could therefore contribute to interindividual differences in response to pharmacological treatment with statins. Preservation of the increased activity of c.-332C>A mutation, compared with the wild-type sequence, was demonstrated in transfected cells with and without addition of statins (Fig. 2Go). This result could explain the poor response of this patient to statins, shown in Table 3Go. The proband’s clinical history confirms a poor response to statins, with plasma lipid levels kept elevated along the years despite different statin treatments. The increased PCSK9 expression found in cells treated with statins supports the clinical findings.

We have also tried to demonstrate an effect of this c.-332C>A PCSK9 mutation on PCSK9 gene expression and plasma protein levels. PCSK9 is a protein made by the liver, which exerts its function mainly in this organ. Only RNA extracted from lymphocytes was available to quantification. We watched that both patients with c.-332C>A mutation have a slightly higher expression when compared with samples with similar plasma LDL-C levels but not with samples from normocholesterolemic individuals. However, expression is very low, close to detection limits, and data could be considered not conclusive. RNA from other tissues could confirm these results. Analysis in a sample with more patients would be necessary to confirm these results. The same problem was found when measuring PCSK9 protein levels on plasma, as other authors have also seen. Serum PCSK9 levels have been measured by immunoprecipitation and a newly developed ELISA method (31, 32), showing a wide range of values. Our difficulty in detecting PCSK9 protein levels can be due to the method used. On the other hand, a correlation between serum PCSK9 and LDL-C levels has been described in men but not women (32). PCSK9 mutation carriers are a woman (proband) and a man (his cousin); therefore, the quantification of PCSK9 in plasma will not be conclusive.

Unfortunately, the size of the family carrying this new PCSK9 mutation and the available samples do not allow demonstrating the effect of the alteration in blood but previous data (29), the absence of this mutation in control population and our in vitro studies argues in favor to the effect of this mutation in PCSK9 gene overexpression and involvement in hypercholesterolemia.

In conclusion, we have screened the complete PCSK9 gene and found only two mutations, c.-332C>A and c.-288G>A, which can be related to hypercholesterolemia. Our data indicate that mutation c.-322C>A increases the transcription of PCSK9 and can cause hypercholesterolemia, whereas c.-288G>A does not. We have identified only one patient with a mutation in PCSK9 of 42 ADH subjects without mutations in APOB or LDLR genes. This seems to indicate that in our population ADH caused by PCSK9 is uncommon, as has also been reported in other populations (11, 12, 19, 20, 22).

Thus, we have identified and characterized a new point mutation, c.-332C>A, in the promoter sequence of PCSK9 capable of causing hypercholesterolemia, which reduces statin treatment efficiency. Its frequency in our ADH population seems to be low, in accordance with previous reports from other European populations.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Health, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Madrid) (to F.J.C., S.M.-H., and C.I.) in the programs for incorporating researcher to the National Health Service (Reference FIS01/3047) and postspecialized formation (CM06/0060), respectively; "Juan de la Cierva" Program (Spanish Ministry of Science and Education, starting in 2004) (to A.-B.G.-G.); Red de Hiperlipemias Primarias (C03/181 and PI05/0174); Spanish Ministry of Science and Education Grants SAF05/02883 and SAF2006-06760; Generalidad Valenciana Grants CTIDIA 2002/65, ACOMP2007--075, and GV04/255; and Spanish Ministry of Industry, Bargain, and Transportation Grants FIT-010000--2007--69. CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM) is an Instituto de Salud Carlos III initiative.

Disclosure Summary: S.B., S.V., A.-B.G.-G., S.M.-H., C.I., V.G.-A., J.F.A., J.C.M.-E., J.T.R., M.C., and F.J.C. have nothing to declare. R.C. consults for Pfizer and Merck Sharp & Dohme and received lecture fees from Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Astra Zeneca.

First Published Online June 17, 2008

Abbreviations: ADH, Autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia; APOB, ApoB, apolipoprotein B100; Ct, threshold cycle; FDB, familial defective apolipoprotein B; HLA-G, histocompatibility complex, class I, G gene; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLR, LDL receptor; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 precursor; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SP1, specificity protein-1; SRE, sterol regulatory element; SREBP, sterol regulatory binding protein; TC, total cholesterol.

Received February 5, 2008.

Accepted June 10, 2008.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Heath KE, Gahan M, Whittall RA, Humphries SE 2001 Low-density lipoprotein receptor gene (LDLR) world-wide website in familial hypercholesterolaemia: update, new features and mutation analysis. Atherosclerosis 154:243–246[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Villeger L, Abifadel M, Allard D, Rabes JP, Thiart R, Kotze MJ, Beroud C, Junien C, Boileau C, Varret M 2002 The UMD-LDLR database: additions to the software and 490 new entries to the database. Hum Mutat 20:81–87[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Fouchier SW, Kastelein JJ, Defesche JC 2005 Update of the molecular basis of familial hypercholesterolemia in The Netherlands. Hum Mutat 26:550–556[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Vega GL and Grundy SM 1986 In vivo evidence for reduced binding of low density lipoproteins to receptors as a cause of primary moderate hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Invest 78:1410–1414[Medline]
  5. Abifadel M, Varret M, Rabes JP, Allard D, Ouguerram K, Devillers M, Cruaud C, Benjannet S, Wickham L, Erlich D, Derre A, Villeger L, Farnier M, Beucler I, Bruckert E, Chambaz J, Chanu B, Lecerf JM, Luc G, Moulin P, Weissenbach J, Prat A, Krempf M, Junien C, Seidah NG, Boileau C 2003 Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nat Genet 34:154–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Shioji K, Mannami T, Kokubo Y, Inamoto N, Takagi S, Goto Y, Nonogi H, Iwai N 2004 Genetic variants in PCSK9 affect the cholesterol level in Japanese. J Hum Genet 49:109–114[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Cohen JC, Boerwinkle E, Mosley Jr TH, Hobbs HH 2006 Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 354:1264–1272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Zhou A, Webb G, Zhu X, Steiner DF 1999 Proteolytic processing in the secretory pathway. J Biol Chem 274:20745–20748[Free Full Text]
  9. Maxwell KN, Fisher EA, Breslow JL 2005 Overexpression of PCSK9 accelerates the degradation of the LDLR in a post-endoplasmic reticulum compartment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2069–2074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Poirier S, Mayer G, Benjannet S, Bergeron E, Marcinkiewicz J, Nassoury N, Mayer H, Nimpf J, Prat A, Seidah NG 2008 The proprotein convertase PCSK9 induces the degradation of LDLR and its closest family members VLDLR and APOER2. J Biol Chem 283:2363–2372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Allard D, Amsellem S, Abifadel M, Trillard M, Devillers M, Luc G, Krempf M, Reznik Y, Girardet JP, Fredenrich A, Junien C, Varret M, Boileau C, Benlian P, Rabes JP 2005 Novel mutations of the PCSK9 gene cause variable phenotype of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat 26:497
  12. Leren TP 2004 Mutations in the PCSK9 gene in Norwegian subjects with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Clin Genet 65:419–422[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Timms KM, Wagner S, Samuels ME, Forbey K, Goldfine H, Jammulapati S, Skolnick MH, Hopkins PN, Hunt SC, Shattuck DM 2004 A mutation in PCSK9 causing autosomal-dominant hypercholesterolemia in a Utah pedigree. Hum Genet 114:349–353[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Benjannet S, Rhainds D, Essalmani R, Mayne J, Wickham L, Jin W, Asselin MC, Hamelin J, Varret M, Allard D, Trillard M, Abifadel M, Tebon A, Attie AD, Rader DJ, Boileau C, Brissette L, Chretien M, Prat A, Seidah NG 2004 NARC-1/PCSK9 and its natural mutants: zymogen cleavage and effects on the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and LDL cholesterol. J Biol Chem 279:48865–48875[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ouguerram K, Chetiveaux M, Zair Y, Costet P, Abifadel M, Varret M, Boileau C, Magot T, Krempf M 2004 Apolipoprotein B100 metabolism in autosomal-dominant hypercholesterolemia related to mutations in PCSK9. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:1448–1453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Park SW, Moon YA, Horton JD 2004 Post-transcriptional regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor protein by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9a in mouse liver. J Biol Chem 279:50630–50638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Sun XM, Eden ER, Tosi I, Neuwirth CK, Wile D, Naoumova RP, Soutar AK 2005 Evidence for effect of mutant PCSK9 on apolipoprotein B secretion as the cause of unusually severe dominant hypercholesterolaemia. Hum Mol Genet 14:1161–1169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cameron J, Holla OL, Ranheim T, Kulseth MA, Berge KE, Leren TP 2006 Effect of mutations in the PCSK9 gene on the cell surface LDL receptors. Hum Mol Genet 15:1551–1558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Damgaard D, Jensen JM, Larsen ML, Soerensen VR, Jensen HK, Gregersen N, Jensen LG, Faergeman O 2004 No genetic linkage or molecular evidence for involvement of the PCSK9, ARH or CYP7A1 genes in the familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype in a sample of Danish families without pathogenic mutations in the LDL receptor and apoB genes. Atherosclerosis 177:415–422[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Humphries SE, Whittall RA, Hubbart CS, Maplebeck S, Cooper JA, Soutar A, Naoumova R, Thompson GR, Seed M, Durrington PN, Miller JP, Betteridge DJ, Neil HA 2006 Genetic causes of familial hypercholesterolaemia in U.K. patients: relation to plasma lipid levels and coronary heart disease risk. J Med Genet 43:943–949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Robles-Osorio L, Huerta-Zepeda A, Ordonez ML, Canizales-Quinteros S, Diaz-Villasenor A, Gutierrez-Aguilar R, Riba L, Huertas-Vazquez A, Rodriguez-Torres M, Gomez-Diaz RA, Salinas S, Ongay-Larios L, Codiz-Huerta G, Mora-Cabrera M, Mehta R, Gomez Perez FJ, Rull JA, Rabes JP, Tusie-Luna MT, Duran-Vargas S, Aguilar-Salinas CA 2006 Genetic heterogeneity of autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia in Mexico. Arch Med Res 37:102–108[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Tosi I, Toledo-Leiva P, Neuwirth C, Naoumova RP, Soutar AK 2007 Genetic defects causing familial hypercholesterolaemia: identification of deletions and duplications in the LDL-receptor gene and summary of all mutations found in patients attending the Hammersmith Hospital Lipid Clinic. Atherosclerosis 194:102–111[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Chaves FJ, Real JT, Garcia-Garcia AB, Puig O, Ordovas JM, Ascaso JF, Carmena R, Armengod ME 2001 Large rearrangements of the LDL receptor gene and lipid profile in a FH Spanish population. Eur J Clin Invest 31:309–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Garcia-Garcia AB, Real JT, Puig O, Cebolla E, Marin-Garcia P, Martinez Ferrandis JI, Garcia-Sogo M, Civera M, Ascaso JF, Carmena R, Armengod ME, Chaves FJ 2001 Molecular genetics of familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain: ten novel LDLR mutations and population analysis. Hum Mutat 18:458–459[Medline]
  25. Real JT, Chaves FJ, Ejarque I, Garcia-Garcia AB, Valldecabres C, Ascaso JF, Armengod ME, Carmena R 2003 Influence of LDL receptor gene mutations and the R3500Q mutation of the apoB gene on lipoprotein phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemic patients from a South European population. Eur J Hum Genet 11:959–965[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Blesa S, Garcia-Garcia AB, Martinez-Hervas S, Mansego ML, Gonzalez-Albert V, Ascaso JF, Carmena R, Real JT, Chaves FJ 2006 Analysis of sequence variations in the LDL receptor gene in Spain: general gene screening or search for specific alterations? Clin Chem 52:1021–1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Garcia-Garcia AB, Blesa S, Martinez-Hervas S, Mansego ML, Gonzalez-Albert V, Ascaso JF, Carmena R, Real JT, Chaves FJ 2006 Semiquantitative multiplex PCR: a useful tool for large rearrangement screening and characterization. Hum Mutat 27:822–828[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ 2000 Primer3 on the www for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S, eds. Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 365–386
  29. Jeong HJ, Lee HS, Kim KS, Kim YK, Yoon D, Park SW 2008 Sterol-dependent regulation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 expression by sterol-regulatory element binding protein-2. J Lipid Res 49:399–409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dubuc G, Chamberland A, Wassef H, Davignon J, Seidah NG, Bernier L, Prat A 2004 Statins upregulate PCSK9, the gene encoding the proprotein convertase neural apoptosis-regulated convertase-1 implicated in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:1454–1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Alborn WE, Cao G, Careskey HE, Qian YW, Subramaniam DR, Davies J, Conner EM, Konrad RJ 2007 Serum proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 is correlated directly with serum LDL cholesterol. Clin Chem 53:1814–1819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Mayne J, Raymond A, Chaplin A, Cousins M, Kaefer N, Gyamera-Acheampong C, Seidah NG, Mbikay M, Chrétien M, Ooi TC 2007 Plasma PCSK9 levels correlate with cholesterol in men but not in women. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 361:451–456[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Plat J, Mensink RP 2005 Plant stanol and sterol esters in the control of blood cholesterol levels: mechanism and safety aspects. Am J Cardiol 96:15D–22D




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blesa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chaves, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blesa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chaves, F. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
*Genetics Home Reference
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipid
Right arrow Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals