| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
BRIEF REPORT |
Stanford University School of Medicine (N.A.C., L.C.G.), Stanford, California 94305; Duke University School of Medicine (H.X.B., E.R.M.), Durham, North Carolina 27701; Pennsylvania State University School of Medicine (R.S.L.), Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033; University of Colorado (W.D.S.), Denver, Colorado 80218; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (B.R.C.), Dallas, Texas 75235; Wayne State University (M.P.D.), Detroit, Michigan 48202; Baylor College of Medicine (S.A.C.), Houston, Texas 77030; University of Alabama at Birmingham (M.P.S.), Birmingham, Alabama 35294; University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (C.C.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104; University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (P.G.M.), Newark, New Jersey 07101-1709; University of Pittsburgh (G.G.), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260; and Department of Medicine (J.E.N.), Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0565
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Richard S. Legro, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033. E-mail: RSL1{at}psu.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: Our objective was to determine if cotreatment with extended-release metformin (metformin XR) can lower the threshold dose of clomiphene needed to induce ovulation in women with PCOS.
Design: A secondary analysis of data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Multicenter Reproductive Medicine Network prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial, Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, was performed.
Setting: Study volunteers at multiple academic medical centers were included.
Participants: Women with PCOS and elevated serum testosterone who were randomized to clomiphene alone or with metformin (n = 209 in each group) were included in the study.
Interventions: Clomiphene citrate, 50 mg daily for 5 d, was increased to 100 and 150 mg in subsequent cycles if ovulation was not achieved; half also received metformin XR, 1000 mg twice daily. Treatment was for up to 30 wk or six cycles, or until first pregnancy.
Main Outcome Measures: Ovulation was confirmed by a serum progesterone more than or equal to 5 ng/ml, drawn prospectively every 1–2 wk.
Results: The overall prevalence of at least one ovulation after clomiphene was 75 and 83% (P = 0.04) for the clomiphene-only and clomiphene plus metformin groups, respectively. Using available data from 314 ovulators, the frequency distribution of the lowest clomiphene dose (50, 100, or 150 mg daily) resulting in ovulation was indistinguishable between the two treatment groups.
Conclusion: Metformin XR does not reduce the lowest dose of clomiphene that induces ovulation in women with PCOS.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clomiphene citrate is the conventional first-line agent to induce ovulation in PCOS when pregnancy is desired. For the roughly 25% of women with PCOS resistant to clomiphene ovulation induction (3), the conventional next step is either exogenous gonadotropin injections, or ovarian diathermy or drilling. Both of these modalities bring significant risks as well as increased cost, making an alternative approach desirable. Metformin has been used to promote ovulation in PCOS with considerable, though variable, success (4). Insulin sensitization is an attractive strategy for clomiphene-resistant women, who as a group have greater insulin excess than those who ovulate after clomiphene (5). Whether or not metformin is a similarly attractive therapy for unselected women with PCOS remains a subject of debate.
Not all women with PCOS who ovulate after clomiphene conceive readily, in part because clomiphene may have unfavorable antiestrogenic effects on cervical mucus and endometrium (3). Because these clomiphene effects appear to be dose dependent, a strategy that can induce ovulation at lower clomiphene doses might improve live birth rates. Given reports of successful ovulation in previously clomiphene-resistant women after combined clomiphene and metformin treatment (6), it is reasonable to hypothesize that metformin cotreatment can reduce the threshold clomiphene dose for ovulation in an unselected PCOS population. To test this hypothesis, we determined the lowest clomiphene dose that led to ovulation in a large cohort of women with PCOS seeking fertility who were enrolled in a study of extended-release metformin (metformin XR), taken along with clomiphene in doses that were escalated in standard fashion.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a secondary analysis, we determined the clomiphene dose taken in the first ovulatory cycle achieved by each participant enrolled in the clomiphene-only (with placebo for metformin) and the clomiphene plus metformin (no placebo) treatment groups. The number of women and the frequency of first ovulation in response to each clomiphene dose were tabulated for each treatment group, and the outcomes compared by
2 testing. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The PPCOS study was designed to find a superior first-line treatment strategy in PCOS for achieving a live birth. The study includes the largest cohort to date of women with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction with clomiphene and metformin alone and in combination. The ovulation rates found after clomiphene 50 mg and cumulatively after up to six cycles of escalating dose treatment are comparable to those reported previously (3). The ovulation rate with the clomiphene-metformin combination was slightly greater than with clomiphene alone.
This secondary analysis found that the distribution of first ovulations occurring with each clomiphene dose was indistinguishable between the group also taking metformin and the group taking placebo for metformin. This finding argues strongly against a significant effect of metformin to reduce the clomiphene dose required to induce ovulation in unselected women with PCOS seeking fertility. Given literature suggesting that metformin can lower the clomiphene dose necessary to achieve ovulation from greater than 150 mg (resistance to this dose or lower doses) to as low as 50 mg (6, 8), the contrasting result found in the PPCOS study population could be the result of the use of the extended-release formulation of metformin, of intrinsic differences in the subject population (in previous studies, requiring previous clomiphene resistance for entry may have produced a more metabolically abnormal and, therefore, more susceptible population), or of insufficient power with the sample size of 314 ovulators to detect significance in the observed small difference in rates of ovulation at each clomiphene dose. A power calculation shows that to detect the observed 6.7% difference in ovulation rate after 50-mg clomiphene with 80% power, nearly 900 subjects would be needed in each treatment group. Alternatively, the previous studies noting a clomiphene-sparing effect of metformin (6, 8) may have been biased by inadequate blinding of treatment allocation and/or study medication, which the double-blind design of PPCOS averted, and by significantly smaller sample sizes.
In regard to the PPCOS study design, the near-simultaneous initiation of metformin and clomiphene and gradual increase in metformin dose during the first 15 d of the first clomiphene cycle may have meant that the full effect of metformin was not achieved in all subjects in the first (50 mg) clomiphene cycle. Subjects failing to ovulate in this first, 50-mg clomiphene cycle would then have been advanced to higher clomiphene doses, and the ability of metformin at full therapeutic doses to synergize with 50-mg clomiphene may not have been adequately assessed. Our own data support a benefit of time on the live birth rate in the metformin plus clomiphene treatment group, but not in the metformin-alone group (7). In contrast, previous reports have found metformin to have effects in PCOS within 2 wk of its start on both ovulation (9, 10) and testosterone excess (11). The lack of difference we found in ovulation rates between the 100 and 150-mg clomiphene doses supports the concept that the negative findings are not the result of the delayed effect of metformin.
In conclusion, metformin appears to have no benefit to decrease the clomiphene dose needed to induce ovulation in anovulatory women with PCOS seeking fertility. For this reason cotreatment with metformin is not an effective strategy to avoid the potential adverse effects on fecundity of higher clomiphene doses in an unselected population of women with PCOS seeking pregnancy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Glucophage XR and matching placebo were provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: R.S.L. served as a consultant to Glaxo Smith Kline and Ferring. He has had paid lecture fees by Serono, meeting support from Abbott, and grant support from Pfizer. J.E.N. has equity ownership/stock options in Bristol Myers Squibb. E.R.M., and H.X.B. report grant support from Tap, and H.X.B. also reports grant support from Ortho Biotech, and E.R.M. has received research support from Merck and is also a consultant. W.D.S. has grant support from Organon and Wyeth. N.A.C. consults for Organon. P.G.M. has grant support from Ferring and Serono. M.P.D. reports grant support from Serono, Tap, Glaxo Smith Klein, and Merck, and has served as a consultant for Tap and Serono. S.A.C., C.C., L.C.G., M.P.S., G.G., and B.R.C. have no disclosures.
First Published Online May 27, 2008
1 For a list of members of the Reproductive Medicine Network, see Acknowledgments. ![]()
Abbreviations: metformin XR, Extended-release metformin; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; PPCOS, Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
Received February 5, 2008.
Accepted May 19, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Palomba, A. Falbo, F. Zullo, and F. Orio Jr. Evidence-Based and Potential Benefits of Metformin in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2009; 30(1): 1 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |