help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2737
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murdolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jansson, P.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murdolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jansson, P.-A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Obesity
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 93, No. 7 2764-2773
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society

Effects of Intrabrachial Metacholine Infusion on Muscle Capillary Recruitment and Forearm Glucose Uptake during Physiological Hyperinsulinemia in Obese, Insulin-Resistant Individuals

Giuseppe Murdolo1, Mikaela Sjöstrand1, Lena Strindberg, Soffia Gudbjörnsdóttir, Lars Lind, Peter Lönnroth and Per-Anders Jansson

The Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research (G.M., M.S., L.S., S.G., P.L., P.-A.J.), Center of Excellence for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden; Department of Internal Medicine (G.M.), Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, Perugia University, I-06122, Perugia, Italy; and Department of Medicine (L.L.), Uppsala University Hospital, SE-431 80 Mölndal, Sweden

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: G. Murdolo, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, Perugia University, Via Enrico Dal Pozzo, I-06122, Perugia, Italy. E-mail: tugiuseppe.murdolo{at}medic.gu.seut and tugmurdolo{at}tiscalinet.itut.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Impairment of insulin-mediated capillary recruitment in skeletal muscle contributes to a hampered glucose uptake in obesity.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether metacholine (MCh), a nitric oxide vasodilator, potentiates muscle capillary recruitment and forearm glucose uptake (FGU) during physiological hyperinsulinemia.

Design: The double-forearm technique [i.e. infused vs. control (Ctrl) forearm] was combined with im microdialysis during an oral glucose tolerance test in 15 nondiabetic, obese subjects divided into a group of insulin-resistant (IR) (n = 7) and insulin-sensitive (n = 8) individuals.

Results: After the oral glucose tolerance test, forearm blood flow in the Ctrl forearm was unchanged, whereas it increased about 3-fold (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline) in response to MCh. Capillary permeability surface area product for glucose (PSglu) (capillary recruitment), FGU, and interstitial insulin concentrations increased significantly over time (P < 0.001) in both forearms. Compared with insulin-sensitive, the IR subjects exhibited lower PSglu (P < 0.001) and FGU (P < 0.01) in the Ctrl arm, whereas this difference was insignificant in the MCh arm despite the blunted forearm blood flow increase. Moreover, in IR individuals MCh significantly (P < 0.05) ameliorated the delayed onset of insulin action, i.e. the FGU response to hyperinsulinemia. Finally, we found PSglu to be a strong and independent predictor of FGU response (adjusted R2 0.72; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: MCh-induced vasodilation may improve the microvascular and metabolic responses to physiological hyperinsulinemia in obese, IR individuals. Further studies are required to unravel whether stimulation of nitric oxide production in skeletal muscle may represent an attractive therapeutic approach to bypassing cellular resistance to glucose disposal.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Overwhelming evidence indicates that, beyond the intracellular defects of insulin signaling, the metabolic resistance to glucose uptake in skeletal muscle is importantly coupled with impairments of insulin-mediated effects on the vasculature (1, 2, 3, 4). However, different human studies support the concept that the increase in total blood flow to muscle is not necessarily mirrored by a further enhancement of glucose uptake (1, 5, 6) or by the improvement of insulin resistance (7). By contrast, a key site for early insulin action in muscle seems to lie at the microvascular level (8, 9, 10). Indeed, even in the absence of increments in bulk blood flow, physiological hyperinsulinemia may induce a flow switching from so-called "non-nutritive" vessels to "nutritive" capillaries (2, 8, 9, 11), which have a large surface area for optimal exchange with the myocytes. Therefore, the fine-tuning of muscle microvascular recruitment may critically contribute to tissue resistance to glucose disposal by regulating the density of the endothelial surface area, and, thereby, orchestrating the transport of nutrients and insulin to the interstitial (i) compartment.

The notion that in resting muscle exists a "reserve" of unperfused capillaries that can be recruited by insulin or exercise has recently been questioned by other authors that, by intravital microscopy, showed red blood cells flow in the majority of muscle capillaries (12). These latter findings prompted to speculate that the increased substrate delivery to skeletal muscle seems to occur within already flowing capillaries, rather than through the recruitment of unperfused vessels, and the number/velocity of red blood cells within the muscle microvasculature may critically modulate the overall metabolic response.

Our laboratory has previously validated the use of im microdialysis to estimate directly, in vivo, the capillary permeability surface area product for glucose (PSglu), a composite measure that describes the capacity of a substance to reach the (i)fluid in relation to the extent of capillary recruitment (11, 13, 14). In those studies we reported that, under hyperinsulinemic conditions, glucose uptake is closely linked with the PSglu rather than with the forearm muscle flow, and the PSglu is further reduced among type 2 diabetic patients as compared with nondiabetic, obese subjects (11, 13). In harmony with these findings, insulin resistance to glucose uptake in obesity and type 2 diabetes has strongly been associated with impairment of insulin-mediated capillary recruitment (13, 14, 15). Interestingly, the transcapillary delivery of insulin to the muscle interstitium and the onset of insulin action to stimulate glucose uptake are equally delayed among obese, insulin-resistant (IR) individuals (14), supporting the hypothesis that, beyond the signaling defects, the dysfunctional capillary recruitment in skeletal muscle may further attenuate the overall action of insulin on glucose disposal.

Although the mechanisms underlying insulin-mediated microvascular recruitment remain unclear, compelling circumstantial data suggest nitric oxide (NO) as an important modulator (1, 5, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Metacholine (MCh), a muscarinic receptor agonist also known as a potent stimulator of NO production in the forearm vascular bed (22), emerges as a suitable pharmacological tool in evaluation of the insulin-mediated metabolic and vascular effects in skeletal muscle (5, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Remarkably, in humans, local vasodilation with MCh has increased the forearm glucose uptake (FGU) either in the postabsorptive state (5) or after systemic insulin infusion (18, 19), implying that MCh affects both muscle capillary recruitment and glucose disposal over a wide range of levels of ambient insulinemia.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether MCh-induced vasodilation potentiates insulin-mediated capillary recruitment and ameliorates the FGU in obese, IR individuals during physiological hyperinsulinemia.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

There were 15 nondiabetic, obese subjects selected from individuals recruited through an advertisement in a local newspaper. The participants were enrolled if they met the following criteria: 1) abdominal obesity, defined by both a body mass index of more than 30 and less than 40 kg/m2, and a waist circumference more than or equal to 102 cm in male or more than or equal to 88 cm in female subjects; 2) a healthy state, as determined by medical history, physical examination, and screening laboratory evaluations; 3) a fasting plasma glucose concentration less than 5.6 mmol/liter; and 4) no current regular medication. Based on the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at the screening visit, the subjects were divided into a group of IR (HOMA-IR ≥ 2.6; seven males) and insulin-sensitive (IS) (HOMA-IR < 2.6; seven men and one woman) individuals. Clinical characteristics of the study subjects are described in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics of the study subjects

 
All volunteers gave informed consent to the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Göteborg University and performed according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.

Study procedures

The investigation started at 0800 h after an overnight fast, with the subjects lying supine in a quiet room kept at a constant temperature (25 C). Under local anesthesia (Xylocaine 2%; AstraZeneca, Molndal, Sweden), two catheters were inserted retrogradely into a deep antecubital vein in each forearm. Another cannula was inserted into the brachial artery of the dominant arm for the regional MCh infusion and arterial blood sampling. Hereinafter, the forearm instrumented with the arterial catheter will be referred to as the "MCh forearm" and the contralateral forearm as the "control (Ctrl) forearm." Another catheter was inserted into an antecubital vein of the Ctrl forearm for the inulin infusion.

After the cannulation procedures were completed, basal blood samples were withdrawn. Thus, a bolus injection of inulin (50 mg/kg) (Inutest 25%; Fresenius Kabi GmbH, Graz, Austria) was administered, followed by a constant iv infusion (100 mg/min for 300 min) (23). Moreover, three microdialysis catheters (CMA Microdialysis AB; CMA, Stockholm, Sweden) were inserted through the steel mandarin of a 20-gauge cannula into the brachioradialis muscle in both forearms. For insulin and inulin measurements, two catheters with a 12 x 0.5-mm dialysis membrane and a 100-kDa molecular mass cutoff were used, while for glucose and lactate, another catheter with a 16 x 0.5-mm 20-kDa molecular mass cutoff was applied. Finally, two mercury in-silastic strain gauges (Hokanson, Inc., Bellevue, WA) were placed on the upper third of both forearms for forearm blood flow (FBF) measurements by venous occlusion plethysmography (5, 22).

Study protocol

The study design is depicted in Fig. 1Go. After the baseline determinations, the volunteers underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (75 g). MCh chloride (0.1 mg/ml) was dissolved in isotonic saline to a concentration of 4 µg/ml, and infused into the brachial artery at 2 µg/min–1 for 60 min. This dosage was designed to induce an approximate 3-fold increase of FBF in obese individuals.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Study design.

 
During the whole study, FBF measurements were performed in both forearms at 15-min intervals, and FBF values were determined from the mean of at least three consecutive recordings. Moreover, after a 45-min equilibration period after the probe insertion, microdialysate sampling for insulin, glucose, and lactate measurements was done at 15-min intervals, and paralleled by arterial and deep venous blood withdrawal. Finally, after the 240-min period of inulin infusion, dialysates for inulin were additionally collected at 30-min intervals for 60 min. Each sample was immediately stored at –20 C until analyzed.

Muscle microdialysis

The principle of muscle microdialysis has previously been described in detail (11, 13, 14, 23). Calibration of the catheters for glucose and lactate measurements was performed using urea as an internal reference (24). Measurements of (i)insulin were taken according to the external reference calibration technique (13, 23, 25). In this study the mean relative recovery of inulin (dialysate inulin/plasma inulin) in vivo was 6.7 ± 0.4%, and the mean calculated in vivo recovery of insulin was 3.0 ± 0.4%.

Calculations

The permeability surface area product (PS) was calculated using the method for estimating the extraction fraction:

Formula
where V is the venous plasma concentration, A is the arterial plasma concentration, I is the (i)concentration, e is the base of the natural logarithm (e = 2.71828), and Q is the plasma flow rate.

Plasma flow rate was calculated by multiplying the FBF by hematocrit (%)/100. Finally, FGU was estimated using Fick’s principle, whereby: FGU = blood flow x (A – V) (blood concentrations).

Analytical methods

Glucose, lactate, and urea concentrations in the dialysate and plasma fractions were determined using a colorimetric (glucose and lactate) and UV (urea) method on a CMA 600 microdialysis analyzer (CMA Microdialysis AB).

In plasma and microdialysates, insulin concentrations were measured by an ultrasensitive assay (Ultra-Sensitive Insulin ELISA; Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden), with a detection limit of 0.4 pmol/liter, and intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation of 5.3 and 2.7%, respectively. HOMA-IR was calculated as: fasting insulin (mU/liter) x fasting glucose (mmol/liter)/22.5. Finally, inulin concentrations were evaluated photometrically (26).

Statistical analysis

Comparisons within and between the subject groups in the two forearms over time were performed using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures, with Geisser-Greenhouse adjustment for nonsphericity and Bonferroni’s post hoc comparison, where appropriate. Before statistical analysis, the Box-Cox transformation was used to normalize approximately the skewed distributed variables (Shapiro-Wilk test). Area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated by the trapezoidal integration method. The correlation between pairs of variables was assessed by a simple linear regression analysis, whereas multivariate relationships were analyzed using a general linear model.

Data are shown as means ± SEM for parametric and as medians (25th percentile; 75th percentile) for nonparametric variables, respectively. A P value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the NCSS software (Kaysville, UT).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Insulin

The postabsorptive insulin concentrations in arterial plasma (P = 0.01) as well as in the veins of both the forearms (P < 0.05) were higher in IR than IS subjects (data not shown). After the OGTT, arterial and venous plasma insulin levels increased from 15 min onward (P < 0.0001 vs. basal), and the response was larger in IR than IS subjects (Table 1Go).

The fasting (i)insulin concentrations were similar in the two forearms, and after the glucose challenge, both increased significantly (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline) (Fig. 2Go, panels A and B). Notably, in the MCh arm, the increase of (i)insulin occurred in both subject groups from 45 min onward (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). However, the (i)insulin levels in the Ctrl forearm significantly increased from 45 and 105 min (P < 0.0001) onward in IS and IR subjects, respectively. Moreover, the (i)insulin concentrations in MCh [116.0 (68.0; 169.0) vs. 75.0 (37.0; 119.0) pmol/liter; P < 0.001] and Ctrl [121.0 (87.5; 203.5) vs. 84.0 (51.0; 117.0) pmol/liter; P < 0.001] arms, as well as the arterial plasma insulin levels [374.4 (211.8; 483.6) vs. 258.7 (190.4; 328.9) pmol/liter; P < 0.001] were higher in IR than IS subjects. Finally, the arterial-to-interstitial concentration gradient (AIG) for insulin increased after the OGTT (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline), but it did not differ between the groups and across the forearms.


Figure 2
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Arterial plasma (P-Artery) (A) and (i)insulin levels in the MCh and Ctrl forearm in IR (B) and IS (C) individuals. Data are presented as means ± SEM. {ddagger}, P < 0.05 vs. IS subjects, §, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline in arterial plasma. *, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline in the MCh forearm. {dagger}, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline in the Ctrl forearm.

 
Glucose and lactate

In the fasting state, (i)glucose levels were significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than arterial plasma glucose (Fig. 3Go). The postabsorptive AIG for glucose increased (P < 0.0001) after the OGTT, but it was similarly maintained in the two forearms and between the groups.


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Arterial plasma (P-Artery) and (i)glucose levels in MCh and Ctrl arm of the IR (A) and IS (B) subjects. Data are means ± SEM. *, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline. {dagger}, P < 0.001 vs. (i)levels in the MCh and Ctrl forearms.

 
The IR individuals exhibited higher postabsorptive arterial plasma (P < 0.0001) but similar (i)lactate levels compared with the IS subjects (Fig. 4Go). After the glucose load, arterial plasma lactate was unchanged in the IR subjects, whereas it increased significantly among the IS individuals from 45 min onward (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Accordingly, in response to the glucose challenge, a significant increase (P < 0.0001 vs. basal) in (i)lactate was seen, and the (i)lactate formation in IR subjects was lower than in IS subjects in both the MCh [0.87 (0.53; 1.06) vs. 1.04 (0.79; 1.52); P < 0.01] and Ctrl [(0.89 (0.65; 1.39) vs. 1.19 (0.82; 1.53); P = 0.01] arms.


Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Arterial (a) plasma (A) and (i)lactate levels in the MCh (B) and Ctrl (C) forearm of IR (filled circles) and IS (open circles) individuals. Data are medians (circles) with 25th and 75th percentiles (error bars). #, P < 0.001 vs. IS individuals. *, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline in IS subjects. {dagger}, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline in IR subjects.

 
FBF

At baseline the FBF in the two forearms was similar between the subject groups. After the OGTT, in both groups, the FBF rate in the Ctrl forearm remained stable, whereas it significantly increased in response to MCh at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline and vs. Ctrl forearm) (Fig. 5Go, panels A and B).


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. FBF (A and B), PSglu (C and D), and FGU (E and F) in the MCh and Ctrl forearm of IR and IS subjects. Data are given as means ± SEM. *, P < 0.0001 vs. baseline. §, P < 0.001 vs. baseline. {dagger}, P < 0.0001 vs. MCh forearm. NS, Not significant.

 
Compared with IS subjects, the IR subjects tended to show a blunted vascular response [AUC during the OGTT (AUC0–120min)] in the MCh arm (P = 0.058) but similar FBF rate in the Ctrl arm (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. AUC for FBF, PSglu, PSins, and FGU: differences between the subject groups for the MCh and Ctrl forearm

 
Capillary PSglu, insulin, and tissue uptake

In the postabsorptive state, neither the PSglu nor the PS for insulin (PSins) or the FGU differed between the forearms. In both groups, PSglu (P < 0.001 vs. baseline) and FGU (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline) increased significantly after the glucose challenge from 30 min onward, and the increase was observed in both forearms (Fig. 5Go, panels C–F). However, in the Ctrl arm, the IR individuals exhibited lower PSglu (P < 0.001) and FGU (P < 0.01) AUCs compared with the IS subjects, whereas in the MCh arm, the differences between the groups did not reach significance (Table 2Go). On the other hand, compared with the Ctrl forearm, the PSglu and the FGU AUCs in the MCh arm tended to be more pronounced in IR subjects and slightly reduced in IS individuals, respectively.

To more formally ascertain MCh effect on insulin action, we characterized the slope of the tangent to the initial activation curve of FGU (14, 27). In IR subjects, the FGU activation slope was reduced by approximately 55% (P < 0.05) in the Ctrl compared with the MCh arm, whereas in IS subjects the kinetic delay in activation between the forearms was not significant (Fig. 6Go, panels A and B).


Figure 6
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Slope of the tangent to the initial activation curve of FGU in the MCh and Ctrl arm in IR (A) and IS subjects (B). Scatter plot of the AUC differences in the MCh vs. the Ctrl arm ({Delta}AUC) of the FGU and PSglu in the IR and IS individuals (C). Solid and dotted lines indicate the regression line and 95% confidence intervals for IR and IS subjects, respectively.

 
The AUC difference in the MCh vs. the Ctrl arm ({Delta}AUC) of the FGU was strongly correlated with the {Delta}AUC PSglu, both in the IR and IS individuals (Fig. 6CGo). Multiple regression analysis revealed that {Delta}PSglu was a strong and independent predictor of {Delta}FGU (adjusted R2 0.72; P < 0.0001), and the addition of other potential confounders did not significantly improve the prediction by PSglu alone, explaining about 8% additional variance (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Multiple linear regression analysis for AUC differences in MCh vs. Ctrl arm ({Delta}AUC) for FGU (dependent variable) and PSglu alone (model 1) or combined with other predictors (models 2 and 3)

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we investigated for the first time the metabolic and vascular effects of the NO vasodilator MCh among a group of obese, IR and IS individuals during glucose-stimulated physiological hyperinsulinemia. The results clearly show that, in obesity, even in the absence of measurable increments in FBF, capillary recruitment (i.e. PSglu) and forearm glucose disposal increased in response to a glucose challenge, which effect was expectedly blunted in the IR individuals. Likewise, we demonstrated that in the obese, IR subjects, an intrabrachial MCh infusion may attenuate the impairment of muscle microvascular recruitment and the kinetic defects in insulin action.

In obesity, although the diminished glucose uptake and utilization in the skeletal muscle have been attributed to a cellular defect of the insulin signaling network (28, 29), it is still debated whether the impairments of insulin-mediated actions on muscle vasculature may affect overall glucose disposal (1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13). Human studies suggest that insulin may differentially induce total muscle flow and capillary recruitment (4, 8, 9, 10), with important consequences for the glucose disposal rate. Indeed, insulin-stimulated capillary recruitment (independent of total blood flow) has been suggested to account for more than 50% of insulin-mediated glucose uptake (30). Moreover, even in the absence of changes in total muscle flow, increments in plasma insulin within the physiological range (4, 8, 10) or local insulin administrations (4, 9) enhance muscle capillary recruitment and concurrently increase glucose uptake. The "dissociation" between the microvascular and bulk blood flow responses to insulin has been explained by the higher "sensitivity" and the more rapid kinetics of the precapillary arterioles, which regulate the number of perfused capillaries, as compared with the larger resistance vessels, which modulate overall muscle flow (8, 10, 31).

In line with these observations, our present finding demonstrating a significant increase in both the PSglu and the FGU in the Ctrl forearm, in which FBF remained unchanged, agrees with the concept that, under physiological hyperinsulinemia, changes in glucose disposal rate closely follow the increase in microvascular recruitment rather than variations in FBF (10, 31). In addition, in line with previous results in lean IS volunteers (11), the present data in obese individuals show PSglu as a better predictor than FBF of the glucose uptake rate, especially when obesity is accompanied by insulin resistance. Consequently, inasmuch as an optimal metabolic response to insulin in muscle requires adequate "capillarization," the blunted capillary recruitment and the perturbed expansion of the permeability surface area appear to be a prerequisite for the relative resistance of the muscle cell to insulin action on glucose metabolism. However, from the present data, we cannot conclude as to whether the reduced PSglu, observed in the IR subjects’ Ctrl forearm, was due to a lower number of recruitable capillaries or was related to a blunted recruitment signal, or both (11, 13, 14).

So far, the bulk of experimental evidence indicates that the dynamics of muscle glucose uptake correlate closely to those of (i), rather than plasma insulin, implicating transcapillary insulin delivery as a rate-limiting step for insulin-mediated glucose disposal (32). Insulin availability to the skeletal muscle is virtually limited by either transport across endothelium or preferential distribution of microvascular flow between the "nutritive" and the "non-nutritive" route. Insofar as the permeability characteristics of muscle endothelium do not permit the transcellular transport of most macromolecules (such as insulin), insulin transfer to the interstitium largely occurs at the level of capillaries (30, 33). However, in IR states, transendothelial transport of insulin is rather "insufficient," and the rate of passage of insulin from the bloodstream to the muscle (i)space regulates the rate of activation of glucose disposal (14, 15). Therefore, delayed transcapillary transport of insulin may induce kinetic defect of insulin action. Indeed, the delayed distribution of insulin-to-muscle (i)fluid and the slower activation of the glucose uptake in obesity-linked insulin resistance occur concomitantly with the presence of a blunted insulin-mediated capillary recruitment (14, 15).

This study provides the first evidence that, in the obese IR state, intrabrachial MCh may circumvent the blunted PSglu and, importantly, ameliorate the slower onset of insulin action, as well as the delay of insulin transcapillary delivery in response to physiological hyperinsulinemia. In both groups the rate of FGU was largely accounted for (i.e. ~70% of its variance) by the changes in PSglu rather than by variations in FBF. Altogether, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that in obesity linked insulin resistance, MCh may attenuate the hindered glucose uptake by virtue of its action on the microvasculature. Indeed, in vivo studies have demonstrated that, in contrast to the endothelium-independent vasodilators, MCh enhances the FGU by augmenting capillary recruitment (1, 5, 18, 19, 20, 21). Accordingly, in human forearm vascular bed MCh has substantially increased the production/release of NO (22), a critical mediator of the insulin-stimulated hemodynamic actions (1, 5, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). It is also known that the NO pathway is defective in insulin resistance (34), and that inhibition of the NO synthase blocks microvascular recruitment and concomitantly blunts muscle glucose uptake in response to insulin (35). Together, the expansion of the endothelial surface area and the increase of the FGU in response to MCh may well be explained by the enhancement of capillary recruitment through the increased NO formation. Interestingly, whereas in IR subjects the magnitude of FBF increase after MCh infusion was roughly proportional to the increase of PSglu, in IS individuals MCh tended to decrease PSglu and FGU. This observation may imply that most of the NO produced in response to MCh was released in feed and resistance arteries outside the nutritive capillaries, and blood flow was partly shunted via the nonnutritive route, bypassing the muscle fibers. Alternatively, the more prominent FBF response to MCh in IS subjects may also explain such an "opposite" effect because the PS for a small molecule like glucose appears critically dependent on blood flow variations.

However, other mechanisms may underlie the microvascular and the metabolic response to MCh. First, in isolated rat skeletal muscle, NO per se has increased glucose transport through a mechanism that is distinct from the insulin pathway (16, 17). Second, by considering that the method we used to measure PSglu does not discriminate between microvascular recruitment and increase in the diameter of already open capillaries, we cannot exclude that MCh may have enhanced the number/velocity of red blood cells within the nutritive capillaries via a vasodilation of the upstream terminal arterioles (12). Third, in human forearm vasculature, cholinergic-induced vasodilation is predominantly mediated by the M3 receptor subtype (36, 37), which, in turn, induces the vascular effects via NO-dependent and NO-independent endothelial hyperpolarizing factor-mediated pathways (38). Finally, it is also possible that muscle capillary recruitment could be regulated by lactate (23, 39, 40, 41). In this study we found lower (i)lactate in IR than IS subjects after the OGTT, and the reduced ability to produce lactate in response to glucose and insulin may harmonize with the concept that the nonoxidative glucose metabolism modulates capillary recruitment (40). Furthermore, hyperinsulinemia failed to increase muscle (i)lactate in type 2 diabetes patients (13), and lactate has elsewhere exerted vascular effects independently of insulin-induced NO synthesis (40). Consequently, we cannot exclude that in obesity linked insulin resistance, reduced lactate formation may have exerted a more important effect on capillary recruitment and glucose uptake than insulin and NO did.

Another relevant finding in this study was the increase in the AIG for insulin and glucose after the OGTT, which was accompanied by a reduction in the transcapillary gradient for lactate. These data again concur with the hypothesis that, in obesity, the capillary wall appears partly rate limiting for muscle insulin delivery and glucose metabolism (14, 39, 40). However, in both the forearms, (i)insulin concentrations were higher in IR than IS subjects, implicating that the impairment of FGU was not due to failing capillary delivery of insulin but, likely, to the kinetic defect in delivery. Therefore, in addition to the intracellular defects, the increased (i)insulin concentrations, along with the delayed transcapillary insulin transport, may well contribute to the impairment of insulin-mediated glucose uptake by desensitizing insulin receptor signaling (42) and slowing the onset of insulin action (14), respectively.

Regarding the study limitations, it needs to be mentioned that this work was based on a relatively low number of participants. Thus, we may have missed significant differences within the forearms in each of the groups. In addition, it is important to emphasize that caution must prevail when extrapolating our data to the whole body either because of heterogeneity of the human muscles in intermediate metabolism or due to the limitations of Fick’s principle for calculation of net substrate uptake under "non-steady-state" conditions.

In summary, the present data show that local vasodi-lation with MCh may attenuate the impairment of insulin actions on muscle capillary recruitment and concurrently improve the glucose disposal rate in obese, IR individuals. Because NO availability drives both the vascular and metabolic responses induced by MCh, further studies are warranted to establish whether therapies that target the NO production/release in skeletal muscle may represent a strategy to bypassing the cellular resistance to insulin-mediated glucose disposal.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mrs. Annika Johansson and Mrs. Christina Cullberg for their invaluable collaboration and contribution to the study.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Diabetes Association, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Swedish Medical Research Council (K2005-72X-10864-12A and K2005-72X-15389-01A). Additional support came from the Swedish Society of Medicine and the Göteborg Medical Society.

Disclosure Statement: G.M., L.S., S.G., P.L., and P.-A.J. have nothing to disclose. M.S. and L.L. are employed by AstraZeneca R&D, Sweden.

First Published Online May 6, 2008

1 G.M. and M.S. contributed equally to the work. Back

Abbreviations: AIG, Arterial-to-interstitial concentration gradient; AUC, area under the curve; AUC0–120min, area under the curve during the oral glucose tolerance test; Ctrl, control; FBF, forearm blood flow; FGU, forearm glucose uptake; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; (i), interstitial; IR, insulin-resistant; IS, insulin-sensitive; MCh, metacholine; NO, nitric oxide; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PS, permeability surface area product; PSglu, permeability surface area product for glucose; PSins, permeability surface area product for insulin.

Received December 12, 2007.

Accepted April 29, 2008.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Baron A 1994 Hemodynamic actions of insulin. Am J Physiol 267(2 Pt 1):E187–E202
  2. Clark MG, Wallis MG, Barrett EJ, Vincent MA, Richards SM, Clerk LH, Rattigan S 2003 Blood flow and muscle metabolism: a focus on insulin action. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284:E241–E258
  3. Wasserman D, Ayala JE 2005 Interaction of physiological mechanisms in control of glucose uptake. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 32:319–323[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Serné EH, de Jong RT, Eringa EC, IJzerman RG, Stehouwer CD 2007 Microvascular dysfunction: a potential pathophysiological role in the metabolic syndrome. Hypertension 50:204–211[Free Full Text]
  5. Sarabi M, Lind L, Millgard J, Hanni A, Hagg A, Berne C, Lithell H 1999 Local vasodilatation with metacholine, but not with nitroprusside, increases forearm glucose uptake. Physiol Res 48:291–295[Medline]
  6. Pitkanen O, Laine H, Kemppainen J, Eronen E, Alanen A, Raitakari M, Kirvela O, Ruotsalainen U, Knuuti J, Koivisto VA, Nuutila P 1999 Sodium nitroprusside increases human skeletal muscle blood flow, but does not change flow distribution or glucose uptake. J Physiol 521(Pt 3):729–737
  7. Natali A, Quinones Galvan A, Pecori N, Sanna G, Toschi E, Ferrannini E 1998 Vasodilation with sodium nitroprussiate does not improve insulin action in essential hypertension. Hypertension 31:632–636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vincent MA, Dawson D, Clark AD, Lindner JR, Rattigan S, Clark MG, Barrett EJ 2002 Skeletal muscle microvascular recruitment by physiological hyperinsulinemia precedes increases in total blood flow. Diabetes 51:42–48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Coggins M, Lindner J, Rattigan S, Jahn L, Fasy E, Kaul S, Barrett EJ 2001 Physiologic hyperinsulinemia enhances human skeletal muscle perfusion by capillary recruitment. Diabetes 50:2682–2690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Vincent MA, Clerk HL, Lindner JR, Klibanov AL, Clark MG, Rattigan S, Barrett EJ 2004 Microvascular recruitment is an early insulin effect that regulates skeletal muscle glucose uptake in vivo. Diabetes 53:1418–1423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gudbjörnsdóttir S, Sjöstrand M, Strindberg L, Wahren J, Lönnroth P 2003 Direct measurement of the permeability surface area for insulin and glucose. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:4559–4564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Clark M, Rattigan S, Barrett E, Vincent M 2008 Last word on Point:Counterpoint: There is/is not capillary recruitment in active skeletal muscle during exercise. J Appl Physiol 104:900
  13. Gudbjörnsdóttir S, Sjöstrand M, Strindberg L, Lönnroth P 2005 Decreased muscle permeability surface area in type 2 diabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:1078–1082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sjöstrand M, Gudbjörnsdóttir S, Holmang A, Lönn L, Strindberg L, Lönnroth P 2002 Delayed transcapillary transport of insulin to muscle interstitial fluid in obese subjects. Diabetes 51:2742–2748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Clerk HL, Vincent MA, Jahn LA, Liu Z, Lindner JR, Barrett EJ 2006 Obesity blunts insulin-mediated microvascular recruitment in human forearm muscle. Diabetes 55:1436–1442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Higaki Y, Hirshman MF, Fujii N, Goodyear LJ 2001 Nitric oxide increases glucose uptake through a mechanism that is distinct from insulin and contraction pathways in rat skeletal muscle. Diabetes 50:241–247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Young ME, Radda JK, Leighton B 1997 Nitric oxide stimulates glucose transport and metabolism in rat skeletal muscle in vitro. Biochem J 322(Pt 1):223–228
  18. Baron DA, Steinberg H, Brechtel G, Johnson A 1994 Skeletal muscle blood flow independently modulates insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Am J Physiol 226(2 Pt 1):E248–E253
  19. Baron DA, Tarshoby M, Hook G, Lazaridis EN, Cronin J, Johnson A, Steinberg HO 2000 Interaction between insulin-sensitivity and muscle perfusion on glucose uptake in human skeletal muscle. Evidence for capillary recruitment. Diabetes 49:768–774[Abstract]
  20. Mahajan H, Richards SM, Rattigan S, Clark MG 2004 Local metacholine but not bradykinin potentiates insulin-mediated glucose uptake in vivo by augmenting capillary recruitment. Diabetologia 47:2226–2234[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Mahajan H, Kolka CM, Newman JM, Rattigan S, Richards SM, Clark MG 2006 Vascular and metabolic effects of metacholine in relation to insulin action in muscle. Diabetologia 49:713–723[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lind L, Hall J, Larsson A, Annuk M, Fellström B, Lithell H 2000 Evaluation of endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the human peripheral circulation. Clin Physiol 20:440–448[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Sjöstrand M, Holmang A, Strindberg L, Lönnroth P 2000 Estimations of muscle interstitial insulin, glucose, and lactate in type 2 diabetic subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 279:E1097–E1103
  24. Strindberg L, Lönnroth P 2000 Validation of an endogenous reference technique for the calibration of microdialysis catheters. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 60:205–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Schachter D, Freinkel N, Schwartz IL 1950 Movement of insulin between plasma and interstitial fluid. Am J Physiol 160:532–535[Free Full Text]
  26. Waugh WH 1977 Photometry of inulin and polyfructosan by use of a cysteine/tryptophan reaction. Clin Chem 23:639–644[Medline]
  27. Nolan JJ, Ludvik B, Baloga J, Reichart D, Olefsky JM 1997 Mechanisms of the kinetic defect in insulin action in obesity and NIDDM. Diabetes 46:994–1000[Abstract]
  28. Goodyear LJ, Giorgino F, Sherman LA, Carey J, Smith RJ, Dohm GL 1995 Insulin receptor phosphorylation, insulin receptor substrate-1 phosphorylation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity are decreased in intact skeletal muscle strips from obese subjects. J Clin Invest 95:2195–2204[Medline]
  29. Cusi K, Maezono K, Osman A, Pendergrass M, Patty ME, Pratipanawatr T, De Fronzo R, Kahn CR, Mandarino LJ 2000 Insulin resistance differentially affects the PI 3-kinase- and MAP kinase-mediated signaling in human muscle. J Clin Invest 105:301–320[Medline]
  30. Muniyappa R, Montagnani M, Koh KK, Quon MJ 2007 Cardiovascular actions of insulin. Endocr Rev 28:463–491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Zhang L, Vincent MA, Richards SM, Clerk LH, Rattigan S, Clark MG, Barrett EJ 2004 Inulin sensitivity of muscle capillary recruitment in vivo. Diabetes 53:447–453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bergman RN 2007 Orchestration of glucose homeostasis: from a small acorn to the California oak. Diabetes 56:1489–1501[Free Full Text]
  33. Simionescu M, Gafencu A, Another F 2002 Transcytosis of plasma macromolecules in endothelial cells: a cell biological survey. Microsc Res Tech 57:269–288[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Scherrer U, Sartori C 2000 Defective nitric oxide synthesis: a link between metabolic insulin resistance, sympathetic overactivity and cardiovascular morbidity. Eur J Endocrinol 142:315–323[Abstract]
  35. Vincent MA, Barrett EJ, Lindner JR, Clark MG, Rattigan S 2003 Inhibiting NOS blocks microvascular recruitment and blunts muscle glucose uptake in response to insulin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285:E123–E129
  36. Bruning TA, Hendrics MG, Chang PC, Kuypers EA, van Zwieten PA 1994 In vivo characterization of vasodilating muscarinic-receptor subtypes in humans. Circ Res 74:912–919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Bruning TA, Chang PC, Hendrics MG, Vermeij P, Pfaffendorf M, van Zwieten PA 1995 In vivo characterization of muscarinic-receptor subtypes that mediate vasodilation in patients with essential hypertension. Hypertension 26:70–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. McCulloch AI, Bottrill FE, Randall MD, Hiley CR 1997 Characterization and modulation of EDHF-mediated relaxations in the rat isolated superior mesenteric arterial bed. Br J Pharmacol 120:1431–1438[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Holmang A, Nilsson C, Niklasson M, Larsson BM, Lönnroth P 1999 Induction of insulin resistance by glucosamine reduces blood flow but not interstitial levels of either glucose or insulin. Diabetes 48:106–111[Abstract]
  40. Holmang A, Muller M, Andersson OK, Lönnroth P 1998 Minimal influence of blood flow on interstitial glucose and lactate-normal and insulin-resistant muscle. Am J Physiol 274(3 Pt 1):E446–E452
  41. Chen YL, Wolin MS, Messina EJ 1996 Evidence for cGMP mediation of skeletal muscle arteriolar dilation to lactate. J App Physiol 81:349–354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Dunaif A, Xia J, Book CB, Schenker E, Tang Z 1995 Excessive insulin receptor phosphorylation in cultured fibroblasts and in skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest 96:801–810[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. G. Clark
Impaired microvascular perfusion: a consequence of vascular dysfunction and a potential cause of insulin resistance in muscle
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2008; 295(4): E732 - E750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murdolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jansson, P.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murdolo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jansson, P.-A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Obesity


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals