help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2279
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berna, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berna, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 93, No. 5 1582-1591
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society

A Prospective Study of Gastric Carcinoids and Enterochromaffin-Like Cell Changes in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome: Identification of Risk Factors

Marc J. Berna, Bruno Annibale, Massimo Marignani, Tu Vinh Luong, Vito Corleto, Andrea Pace, Tetsuhide Ito, David Liewehr, David J. Venzon, Gianfranco Delle Fave, Cesare Bordi and Robert T. Jensen

Digestive Diseases Branch (M.J.B., R.T.J.), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), and Biostatistics and Data Management Section (D.L., D.J.V.), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases (B.A., M.M., V.C., G.D.F.), University "La Sapienza," 00189 Rome, Italy; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (T.V.L., C.B.), Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy; Department for Internal Medicine I (M.J.B., A.P.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20245 Hamburg, Germany; and Department of Medicine and Bio-Regulatory Science (T.I.), Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Robert T. Jensen, Building 10, Room 9C-103, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1804. E-mail: RobertJ{at}bdg10.niddk.nih.gov.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients frequently develop Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). These patients can develop proliferative changes of gastric enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells and gastric carcinoids (ECL-cell tumors). ECL-cell changes have been extensively studied in sporadic ZES patients and can be precursor lesions of gastric carcinoids, but little is known about factors influencing their severity or development of carcinoids in MEN1/ZES patients.

Objectives: Our objective was to prospectively analyze ECL-cell changes and gastric carcinoids (ECL-cell tumors) in a large series of MEN1/ZES patients to detect risk factors and deduct clinical guidelines.

Setting and Patients: Fifty-seven consecutive MEN1/ZES patients participated in this prospective study at two tertiary-care research centers.

Interventions and Outcome Measures: Assessment of MEN1, gastric hypersecretion, and gastroscopy with multiple biopsies was done according to a fixed protocol and tumor status. ECL-cell changes and {alpha}-human chorionic gonadotropin staining were assessed in each biopsy and correlated with clinical, laboratory, and MEN1 features.

Results: ECL-cell proliferative changes were universally present, advanced changes in 53% and carcinoids in 23%. Gastric nodules are common and are frequently associated with carcinoids. Patients with high fasting serum gastrin levels, long disease duration, or a strong {alpha}-human chorionic gonadotropin staining in a biopsy are at higher risk for an advanced ECL-cell lesion and/or gastric carcinoid.

Conclusions: Gastric carcinoids and/or advanced ECL-cell changes are frequent in MEN1/ZES patients, and therefore, regular surveillance gastroscopy with multiple routine biopsies and biopsies of all mucosal lesions are essential. Clinical/laboratory data and biopsy results can be used to identify a subgroup of MEN1/ZES patients with a significantly increased risk for developing gastric carcinoids, allowing development of better surveillance strategies.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characteristically, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients develop parathyroid hyperplasia (causing hyperparathyroidism) and pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) as well as pituitary and adrenal adenomas (1). The most characteristic PETs are pancreatic nonfunctional tumors and duodenal gastrinomas, which arise from proliferative precursor lesions in the pancreas and duodenum, respectively (2, 3). Over the last few years, other tumors have been increasingly described, including foregut carcinoids (thymic, bronchial, and gastric) and nonendocrine tumors (skin, smooth muscle, and central nervous system) (4). PETs and foregut carcinoids are receiving increased attention, because with effective treatment of the parathyroid and pituitary disease, they are becoming important determinants of survival (4, 5, 6).

Although there are a number of recent studies of PETs and foregut carcinoids in MEN1 (5, 7, 8), little is known about gastric carcinoids [also called gastric neuroendocrine tumors or enterochromaffin-like (ECL)-cell tumors]. Although it is established that gastric carcinoids occur almost exclusively in patients with MEN1 with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES; 21–70% of MEN1 patients; type 2 carcinoids) (4, 9, 10) and that they can be malignant in 10–30% of cases (11, 12, 13), their frequency, contributing factors, or association with other features of MEN1 are largely unknown. This has occurred because previous studies are limited by small patient numbers, their retrospective nature, and the small number of gastric biopsies analyzed. Furthermore, it is proposed that gastric carcinoids develop in chronic hypergastrinemic states, such as MEN1/ZES, atrophic gastritis, and pernicious anemia, due to proliferative effects of gastrin on gastric ECL cells, resulting in hyperplasia, dysplasia, and finally, carcinoids (10, 14, 15). Therefore, they are more accurately called ECL-cell tumors than gastric carcinoids or gastric neuroendocrine tumor, because the latter terms could also include tumors arising from gastrin- or serotonin-producing cells. Although ECL-cell hyperplastic changes are reported in MEN1/ZES patients (16, 17, 18, 19, 20), there have been no large systematic studies correlating these changes with the development of ECL-cell tumors in these patients.

Therefore, the purpose of this prospective study was to assess the frequency and extent of ECL changes and ECL-cell tumors in a large number of MEN1/ZES patients and to identify for the first time possible predictive factors for each of these. This was accomplished by studying a large number of consecutive MEN1/ZES patients using an established protocol involving a large number of systematic gastric biopsies (10).


   Patients and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

All patients admitted to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with a confirmed diagnosis of MEN1/ZES from 1996–2005 or to La Sapienza University Hospital from 1988–1999 were included. This study was approved at the NIH by the Clinical Research Committee of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases or by the local (La Sapienza) ethical committee in adherence with the declaration of Helsinki (10).

Methods

Diagnostic criteria for MEN1 syndrome and ZES were as described previously (4, 6, 21), and the onset of MEN1 and ZES was determined (4, 6, 21, 22). To establish the diagnosis of ZES, patients underwent a gastric acid analysis [basal/maximal acid output (BAO/MAO)] (23), fasting serum gastrin (FSG) measurements (10, 24), and a secretin test. To define the extent/localization of PETs and other MEN1 tumors, imaging studies were performed (5, 8, 25, 26).

Specific protocol

At the time of gastric biopsy, all patients underwent evaluation of MEN1 status, ZES diagnosis, and determination of tumor location/extent. During the initial evaluation as well as during subsequent yearly assessments, MEN1 status and ZES tumor features were assessed (21). On each follow-up, acid studies were performed to allow assessment of acid secretory control (27, 28). NIH patients were classified as having sustained hypochlorhydria if acid output was less than 0.2 mEq/h for at least 50% of all yearly assessments (10, 27, 29).

Gastroscopic biopsy and processing

Biopsies were performed using an Olympus GIF 2T100 gastroscope (Olympus America Corp., Melville, NY), and 10 Jumbo gastric biopsies (eight body and two antrum; NIH), or eight biopsies (six body and two antrum; La Sapienza) were taken (10, 30). The corporeal routine biopsies were taken in a preset order: at the NIH, four from the greater curvature (three, La Sapienza) and four from the lesser curvature (three, La Sapienza) (10, 30). All gastric nodules were biopsied. Biopsies were processed as described previously (10, 30).

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Serial 5-µm-thick sections perpendicular to the mucosal surface were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for evaluation of the type of mucosa, Giemsa stain for Helicobacter pylori evaluation, and immunostaining for endocrine cells (10). {alpha}-Human chorionic gonadotropin ({alpha}-hCG) immunoreactivity (IR) was determined as described previously (10) and graded from 0–3+ depending on the number of positive cells per linear millimeter as described previously (10).

Endocrine cell evaluation

The distribution of ECL-cell changes was investigated in sections immunostained for chromogranin A, with exclusion of areas of intestinal metaplasia. Biopsies were classified as evaluable or nonevaluable (10, 30). Carcinoids were diagnosed when lesions exceeded 0.5 mm (10, 14). ECL-cell changes were qualitatively evaluated by two independent examiners as proposed by Solcia et al. (14). Biopsies were graded on the severity of each hyperplastic lesion. Results were classified two different ways, either according to the highest grade of ECL-cell hyperplasia (10, 30) or by compiling a patient ECL-cell index as described previously (10, 30). Briefly, this involves assigning a numerical value to each biopsy that increases with increasing grades and severity of hyperplasia (diffuse, linear, micronodular, and adenomatoid) or dysplasia and then averaged for the number of biopsies as described previously (10, 30), with the modification that each individual carcinoid was assigned a score of 14. Gastritis was assessed according to the updated Sydney System, and the expression of {alpha}-hCG was evaluated (10).

Statistics

Fisher’s exact test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Cochran-Armitage test were used. Linear regression was used to find the best fit in simple regression analyses and the Spearman rank-correlation method to determine the correlation coefficients and exact P values. To find the factors that remain significant after adjustment for each other, the ECL-cell index was log-transformed, and linear regression with forward and backward selection was used. The detection of carcinoids was similarly analyzed with the logistic regression model and the {alpha}-hCG-IR with extended logistic regression of ordered categories of less than or equal to 1+, 2+, and 3+. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered significant.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
In this study, 57 consecutive patients with MEN1/ZES were enrolled. This cohort resembled other large series of patients with MEN1/ZES (4, 16, 22, 24, 31) with a mean age in the fifth decade and most of their clinical ZES and MEN1 characteristics. None of the patients were disease free, consistent with reports of the rarity of cure in these patients (8, 32). Therefore, more than 96% of patients were taking antisecretory drugs with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) the most commonly used (91%). All patients were treated with antisecretory drugs at some point, and the duration of treatment with any drug or with PPIs, which are currently the drugs of choice (33), was long. For the NIH patients, 56% showed sustained hypochlorhydria (Table 1Go). Similar to most recent reports, almost all patients had hyperparathyroidism (Table 1Go) (4, 21, 34).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of 57 MEN1/ZES patients

 
Overall, 559 gastric body biopsies were taken. Of these, 437 (78%) were routine with 211 lesser-curvature biopsies (38%) and 226 from the greater curvature (40%) (Fig. 1Go, left panel). In 25 patients, gastric nodules were detected and biopsied for a total of 122 nodule biopsies (Fig. 1Go, right upper panel). Of the 411 evaluable routine and 122 nodule biopsies, 41 carcinoids (Fig. 2Go, E–H, and Fig. 3Go) were detected in 13 patients (23% of patients). Of these, 21 were in nodules (Fig. 2Go, G and H) and 20 in routine (Fig. 2Go, E and F) biopsies. A higher percentage of nodules rather than routine biopsies demonstrated a carcinoid (17.2 vs. 4.6%, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1Go, left and right panels). Sixty-three percent of routine biopsies showed diffuse hyperplasia (DH), 17% linear hyperplasia (LH) (Fig. 2Go, C and D), and 5.5% micronodular hyperplasia (MH) (Fig. 1Go, left panel). Twelve routine (2.9%) and two nodule biopsies (1.64%) showed dysplasia (Figs. 1Go and 2Go, E and F). Significantly fewer nodule biopsies showed dysplasia rather than carcinoids (1.6 vs. 17.2%, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1Go, right lower panel).


Figure 1
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Frequency of ECL-cell changes, {alpha}-hCG immunoreactivity, and ECL-cell tumors in routine gastric body and gastric nodule biopsies from the 57 prospectively studied MEN1/ZES patients. Left panel, The 437 routine gastric biopsies were from the greater (n = 226) and lesser (n = 211) curvature. Results are expressed as the percentage of the routine lesser-curvature (LC) or greater-curvature (GC) biopsies demonstrating the indicated ECL-cell change. Middle panel, Distribution of {alpha}-hCG-IR in 210 greater- and 196 lesser-curvature biopsies. Right upper panel, Frequency of nodules found in 25 patients. Right lower panel, Frequency of ECL-cell tumors and/or dysplasia in gastric nodule biopsies. NE, Not evaluable. *, P < 0.05 compared with greater-curvature result.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Gastric biopsy specimens showing different degrees of ECL cell changes on chromogranin A staining (A, C, E, and G) or {alpha}-hCG expression (B, D, F, and H) in different patients. A, Qualitatively normal distribution of chromogranin A-positive immunoreactive cells (in brown) in the oxyntic mucosa; B, consecutive section of the same area as in A, showing no cells positive for {alpha}-hCG; C, severe LH of ECL cells (in brown); D, section of the same area as in C showing strong (3+) {alpha}-hCG expression by ECL cells; E, small intramucosal ECL-cell tumor (0.9 mm in major axis, on the left) in a routine biopsy of the oxyntic mucosa also presenting association with an ECL-cell dysplastic lesion (in the center) and severe LH of ECl cells (on the right); F, consecutive section of the same area showing strong {alpha}-hCG expression in all types of ECL-cell changes; G, ECL-cell tumor from a mucosal nodule; H, serial section of the same area as in G with the vast majority of tumor cells showing no expression of {alpha}-hCG.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. Correlation of the magnitude of the ECL-cell index, the most advanced ECL-cell change, and the {alpha}-hCG-IR in 533 biopsies from 57 patients with MEN1/ZES. Each point represents data from one patient. The mean and SEM are indicated by horizontal and vertical bars, respectively. The n refers to the number of patients in each category. The upper left panel shows the correlation between the most advanced cell change per patient and the ECL-cell index computed for each patient. The upper right panel shows the correlation between the most intense {alpha}-hCG staining and the ECL-cell index in each patient. The lower left panel shows the correlation between the most advanced cell change per patient and the most intense {alpha}-hCG staining. ECL-cell index was available for 13 patients with ECL-cell tumors, whereas {alpha}-hCG staining intensity was available for only 12 patients with ECL-cell tumors.

 
No patient had all biopsies with a normal pattern (Fig. 3Go). Forty-seven percent had DH as the most advanced ECL-cell change, 25% LH, 3.5% MH, and 1.8% dysplasia, and in 23%, a carcinoid was found. Thirty patients (53%) had advanced ECL-cell changes (at least LH mild) (Fig. 3Go). {alpha}-hCG-IR was pronounced in the whole spectrum of ECL-cell changes, whereas it tended to be sparse or absent in dysplasia and carcinoids (Fig. 2Go).

The ECL-cell index varied from 0.13–14 (mean 3.44). The ECL-cell index was less than 3 in 61%, 3–9 in 30%, and more than 9 in 9% of patients. The ECL-cell index correlated well with the most advanced ECL-cell change per patient (r = 0.94; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3Go).

The mean {alpha}-hCG score for all patients was 2.36 ± 0.12 (Fig. 1Go, middle panel). Seventeen percent of routine biopsies were graded 0, 29% 1+, 22% 2+, and 31% 3+ (Fig. 1Go, middle panel). The majority of patients (34 patients) showed strong {alpha}-hCG-IR (3+) in at least one biopsy (Fig. 3Go, right panel). The {alpha}-hCG-IR correlated significantly with the most advanced ECL-cell change (r = 0.55; P < 0.0001) and the ECL-cell index (r = 0.52; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3Go).

Patients with a higher ECL-cell index had a longer ZES disease duration, had a higher ECL-cell index (Tables 2Go and 3Go and Fig. 4BGo1), longer duration of medical ZES therapy (Tables 2Go and 3Go and Fig. 4DGo1), a longer duration of omeprazole treatment (Tables 2Go and 3Go and Fig. 4CGo1), and a higher FSG (Tables 2Go and 3Go and Fig. 4Go). There was a very strong correlation (r = 0.58; P < 0.0001) between the ECL-cell index and the FSG level (Fig. 4AGo1). Patients with a duodenal primary had a higher ECL-cell index (Tables 2Go and 3Go), and those with localized disease had a lower ECL-cell index. Multivariate analysis showed serum gastrin level (67% increase in ECL-cell index for each factor 10 increase in gastrin, P < 0.0001), the presence of a proven duodenal primary (70% increase, P = 0.0060), and the duration of ZES (27% increase for every 10 yr, P = 0.023) are independently associated with a higher ECL-cell index (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Effect of presence or absence of various clinical, tumor, biochemical, and mucosal variables on ECL-cell index, {alpha} -hCG intensity, and incidence of ECL-cell tumors (gastric carcinoids) in 57 patients with MEN1/ZES

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Sensitivity and specificity of different clinical, tumor, biochemical, and mucosal variables in the detection of patients with ECL-cell tumors

 

Figure 4
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. Correlation between ECL-cell index (left panels) or highest {alpha}-hCG staining intensity per patient (right panels) and various laboratory or clinical ZES features. The mean fasting serum gastrin expressed as a log10 (A1 and A2), duration from onset of ZES to the biopsy (B1 and B2), duration of omeprazole treatment before biopsy (C1 and C2), total duration of any medical acid-reducing treatment (D1 and D2), and the MAO (E1 and E2) are correlated with the ECL-cell index or highest {alpha}-hCG staining intensity of a gastric body biopsy. Data are from 57 patients with MEN1/ZES. The correlation coefficient and regression line were calculated by a least-square analysis. Results considered significant are highlighted. Each dot represents data from one patient.

 
FSG levels strongly correlated with the {alpha}-hCG-IR and the presence of a duodenal primary (Tables 2Go and 3Go and Fig. 4AGo2). The duration of omeprazole treatment or any medical antisecretory treatment was associated with a higher ECL-cell index (Tables 2Go and 3Go). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between {alpha}-hCG-IR and the duration of ZES (Fig. 4BGo2) and of omeprazole treatment (Fig. 4CGo2). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the log-transformed serum gastrin (odds ratio = 18; P = 0.0010) and the square-root transformed duration of omeprazole treatment (odds ratio = 3.1; P = 0.0030) are independently associated with a higher {alpha}-hCG-IR.

In general, clinical, laboratory, or tumor variables factors associated with a high ECL-cell index and a high {alpha}-hCG-IR are also associated with carcinoids (Tables 2Go and 3Go). Especially important was the association of carcinoids with high FSG values (P = 0.0004), long ZES duration (P = 0.0036), or various clinical/tumor factors (duodenal primary, localized disease, and duration of medical treatment) (Tables 2Go and 3Go). Numerous other variables listed in the footnote of Table 3Go did not influence the ECL-cell index, the {alpha}-hCG-IR, or the incidence of carcinoids. Multivariate analysis demonstrated only the FSG (odds ratio = 20; P = 0.0011) and the presence of localized disease (odds ratio = 0.051; P = 0.018) are independently associated with the presence of carcinoids.

To analyze whether patients with carcinoids have more advanced ECL-cell changes in the biopsies not derived from carcinoids, we calculated a modified ECL-cell index that did not assign any score to carcinoids. Patients with carcinoids had a significantly higher modified ECL-cell index than patients without carcinoids (4.94 ± 0.41 vs. 2.01 ± 0.16, P < 0.0001; data not shown).

A number of histological (any biopsy with at least LH severe), endoscopic (nodules present), clinical (MAO > 70 mEq/h), and laboratory (FSG > 1400 pg/ml) findings showed a relatively high sensitivity (80–100%) and specificity (70–100%) (Table 3Go) for the presence of carcinoids and therefore could be clinically helpful in identifying a subset of MEN1/ZES patients at high risk of having a carcinoid.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The aim of this study was to assess ECL-cell changes in MEN1/ZES patients, including the presence of ECL-cell tumors, and to identify risk factors that could be clinically useful. This project was undertaken because a number of studies suggest ECL-cell tumors may not be uncommon in MEN1/ZES patients and can be clinically important (4, 11, 13, 16, 17, 35). However, a review of the literature supports the conclusion that their frequency is unclear, risk factors for their development are not available, and their relationship to other MEN1/ZES features is unclear, as is their relationship to the gastric ECL-cell changes that may precede their development. First, ECL-cell tumors are reported in 0–33% of MEN1/ZES (mean, 6 ± 2%, 11 small series) (4, 9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 36, 37). Second, ECL-cell tumors occurring in ZES are almost all in the 20–25% with MEN1/ZES (16, 18, 19, 20). Third, 10–30% of ECL-cell tumors are malignant and can cause symptoms, including carcinoid syndrome (11). Fourth, studies in animals and in humans led to the proposal that chronic hypergastrinemia causes the development of ECL-cell tumors by inducing increasing proliferative changes in gastric ECL cells (hyperplasia and dysplasia) (10, 14). Although a number of small studies reported such findings in MEN1/ZES, the relationship of the extent of the ECL-cell changes and development of carcinoids has not been systematically studied. Studies on sporadic ZES patients identified a number of factors influencing ECL-cell changes in sporadic ZES patients (10, 38). However, it is currently unclear whether these conclusions apply to MEN1/ZES patients (10, 16, 36, 38). Moreover, there are minimal data on the clinical, laboratory, or tumor variables influencing the incidence of carcinoids in MEN1/ZES patients. This lack of information has occurred for a number of reasons. Almost all series contain small numbers of MEN1/ZES patients (mean 5 ± 1; n = 12 series) (4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 36, 37). Moreover, sufficient numbers of gastric biopsies were not systematically taken in most studies. Recent studies in sporadic ZES show that to adequately assess ECL-cell changes and occurrence of ECL-cell tumors, numerous systematic biopsies (six to eight per patient) from different areas of the stomach (lesser curvature and greater curvature) are needed (10, 30).

The present prospective study has none of these limitations. A large number of biopsies (i.e. six to eight) were systematically taken from the greater/lesser curvature, any mucosal abnormality biopsied, and {alpha}-hCG expression systematically assessed in a large number of patients. Furthermore, assessments were performed in MEN1/ZES patients that were part of a prospective study (4, 21), so findings could be related to other features of MEN1 and ZES.

Our results demonstrate ECL-cell changes are universal in MEN1/ZES patients with no patient having a normal ECL-cell pattern in all biopsies. This result differs from a number of small series (all fewer than 10 patients) that report 14–65% of MEN1/ZES patients have normal ECL-cell patterns (17, 18). However, it is in agreement with other series (16, 19, 20, 38) reporting ECL-cell hyperplasia in 92–100%. These results are also similar to findings in sporadic ZES in which 80–100% show some ECL-cell change (10, 16, 17, 35). In the majority of MEN1/ZES patients, the ECL-cell changes are advanced with 53% having advanced hyperplasia (at least LH mild). This percentage is higher than in most small series of MEN1/ZES patients where 25–47% (mean 35 ± 4%, six series) had this extent of changes (16, 17, 18, 19, 20). It is also a higher percentage than occurs in sporadic ZES, where 7–53% have an ECL change of at least LH (18, 19, 20). Furthermore, 23% of our patients had ECL-cell tumors, which is higher than the 0–14% (mean 2 ± 1.5%, nine series) reported by most, but not all (25–33% incidence) (37), small series of MEN1/ZES patients (4, 17, 18, 19, 20, 36). This percentage is higher than reported in patients with sporadic ZES, where no ECL-cell tumors are reported in most series (16, 18, 19, 20), even though at least one study (10) used a large number of biopsies similar to the present study. Data from this study combined with studies from the literature support the conclusion that ECL-cell tumors are more than 70 times more common in MEN1/ZES than in sporadic ZES patients. Because duration of hypergastrinemia and FSG levels in our MEN1/ZES patients are comparable to those of 106 sporadic ZES patients investigated using a similar protocol (10), the predilection of MEN1/ZES patients for developing carcinoids cannot be explained by more severe hypergastrinemia or more prolonged exposure to the trophic effect of gastrin in our patients. These results support the proposal that the genetic changes in MEN1 patients render ECL cells more sensitive to the proliferative effect of gastrin (39).

The degree of hypergastrinemia correlates with the extent of ECL-cell changes in animal studies and in patients with atrophic gastritis (10, 20, 40). In ZES patients (primarily sporadic), the results are contradictory. Some studies report a positive correlation between these two variables (10, 17, 20, 35); however, no correlation was found in others (36, 41). Furthermore, there are no studies demonstrating that the level of hypergastrinemia correlates with the occurrence of ECL-cell tumors in ZES patients, as it does in atrophic gastritis (40). A number of results in our study support the conclusion that the magnitude of hypergastrinemia is directly correlated to the level of ECL-cell changes and the presence of carcinoids in MEN1/ZES patients. First, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the ECL-cell index and FSG level (Fig. 4AGo1). Second, the MAO, which has been shown to reflect the parietal cell mass, which is affected directly by the magnitude of hypergastrinemia in ZES patients (24, 42), was correlated to the ECL-cell index in the present study (Fig. 4EGo1). Third, patients with low FSG values (<490 pg/ml) or with localized disease, which have been previously reported to have lower FSG levels (24), had a lower ECL-cell index (Tables 2Go and 3Go).

Age or gender have been reported to influence ECL-cell changes and/or the development of ECL-cell tumors in animal and in some (16, 40), but not all (10, 35) human studies. We did not find such a correlation. These results are similar to findings in a recent study of sporadic ZES patients (10). Our results support the proposal that gender or age might be affecting the extent of hypergastrinemia in these different non-ZES groups of patients, which then affects the severity of ECL-cell changes. In contrast, in the current study, there was no significant difference in FSG levels in male and female or in old and young ZES patients (data not shown).

Although there are no data specifically on MEN1/ZES patients, the duration of hypergastrinemia and treatment with PPIs have been associated with increased ECL-cell changes in some (17, 38), but not all (10, 18, 35, 36, 37, 41), studies of ZES patients. In the present study, ZES duration was independently associated with the severity of ECL-cell changes and the presence of carcinoids (Fig. 4BGo1 and Tables 2Go and 3Go). This result differs from findings in sporadic ZES patients (10). The reason for this difference is currently unclear, although it could be related to the earlier onset of ZES in MEN1 patients (4). Also, hypercalcemia from the hyperparathyroidism can increase serum gastrin levels in MEN1/ZES patients (4, 34, 43), and at the time of the biopsies in the present study, more than half of the MEN1 patients had a prior parathyroidectomy, so the serum gastrin levels were very likely higher in the past. Previous studies demonstrated ectopic expression/overexpression of {alpha}-hCG by neuroendocrine tumors (42). In the stomach, {alpha}-hCG was associated with hypergastrinemic states, which in some cases correlated with the presence of malignancy (10, 44). We found proliferative ECL cells ectopically express {alpha}-hCG in most MEN1/ZES patients, and overexpression correlates with the severity of ECL-cell changes, similar to results in sporadic ZES (10). Both high FSG and long duration of omeprazole treatment independently correlated with high {alpha}-hCG-IR. Strong {alpha}-hCG-IR was present in virtually all patients with carcinoids, even those with a low ECL-cell index (Fig. 3Go), supporting the proposal that high {alpha}-hCG-IR may be an independent predictor for carcinoids in ZES (10). Whereas in the pancreas in some studies (45), {alpha}-hCG-IR is associated with tumor malignancy, in the stomach in our study and others, it is largely restricted to preneoplastic changes (15).

Our study identified important findings/risk factors for the presence of advanced ECL-cell changes and/or ECL-cell tumors, from which can be proposed guidelines summarized in Table 4Go. Particularly important findings were that 53% of MEN1/ZES patients have advanced ECL-cell changes and 23% ECL-cell tumors and the demonstration of the necessity to biopsy all gastric nodules. Our study shows that gastric nodules are more frequent than previously reported (36), occurring in 44% of patients, and they frequently harbor carcinoids. The use of the risk factors summarized in Tables 2Go and 3Go should allow identification of a subgroup of MEN1/ZES patients at greater risk for developing ECL-cell tumors and allow stratification for follow-up. Long-term follow-up studies of these patients will be particularly important to attempt to identify risk factors for malignancy, the best methods to assess growth, and the best treatment methods for patients with multiple ECL-cell tumors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4. Guidelines and summary of clinically important findings of ECL-cell changes in patients with MEN1/ZES

 
In conclusion, this study provides important insights into the effect of chronic hypergastrinemia on ECL cells sensitized to the mitogenic effect of gastrin in MEN1/ZES patients. Our data provide risk factors, which can be used to develop guidelines for the management of these patients. Most importantly, our study shows that patients with MEN1/ZES, especially those with high FSG, gastric nodules and severe ECL-cell changes, are at significantly increased risk for developing carcinoids and should be monitored accordingly.


   Footnotes
 
This work was supported by intramural research funds of NIDDK and National Cancer Institute, NIH, as well as by interuniversity cofinanced programs 990218982 and 200162472 from the Italian Ministero dell’Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica e Technologica.

Disclosure Summary: All authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online February 12, 2008

Abbreviations: BAO, Basal acid output; DH, diffuse hyperplasia; ECL, enterochromaffin-like; FSG, fasting serum gastrin; {alpha}-hCG, {alpha}-human chorionic gonadotropin; IR, immunoreactivity; LH, linear hyperplasia; MAO, maximal acid output; MEN1, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; MH, micronodular hyperplasia; PET, pancreatic endocrine tumor; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; ZES, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Received October 11, 2007.

Accepted January 31, 2008.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Thakker RV 2000 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 29:541–567[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Anlauf M, Perren A, Meyer CL, Schmid S, Saremaslani P, Kruse ML, Weihe E, Komminoth P, Heitz PU, Kloppel G 2005 Precursor lesions in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated duodenal gastrinomas. Gastroenterology 128:1187–1198[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Anlauf M, Schlenger R, Perren A, Bauersfeld J, Koch CA, Dralle H, Raffel A, Knoefel WT, Weihe E, Ruszniewski P, Couvelard A, Komminoth P, Heitz PU, Kloppel G 2006 Microadenomatosis of the endocrine pancreas in patients with and without the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 30:560–574[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Gibril F, Schumann M, Pace A, Jensen RT 2004 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. A prospective study of 107 cases and comparison with 1009 patients from the literature. Medicine 83:43–83[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gibril F, Chen YJ, Schrump DS, Vortmeyer A, Zhuang ZP, Lubensky IA, Reynolds JG, Louie JV, Entsuah L, Huang K, Asgharian B, Jensen RT 2003 Prospective study of thymic carcinoids in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1066–1081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gibril F, Venzon DJ, Ojeaburu JV, Bashir S, Jensen RT 2001 Prospective study of the natural history of gastrinoma in patients with MEN1: definition of an aggressive and a nonaggressive form. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5282–5293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sachithanandan N, Harle RA, Burgess JR 2005 Bronchopulmonary carcinoid in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Cancer 103:509–515[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Norton JA, Alexander HR, Fraker DL, Venzon DJ, Gibril F, Jensen RT 2001 Comparison of surgical results in patients with advanced and limited disease with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Ann Surg 234:495–506[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Rindi G, Luinetti O, Cornaggia M, Capella C, Solcia E 1993 Three subtypes of gastric argyrophil carcinoid and the gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study. Gastroenterology 104:994–1006[Medline]
  10. Peghini PL, Annibale B, Azzoni C, Milione M, Corleto VD, Gibril F, Venzon DJ, Delle Fave G, Bordi C, Jensen RT 2002 Effect of chronic hypergastrinemia on human enterochromaffin-like cells: insights from patients with sporadic gastrinomas. Gastroenterology 123:68–85[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Norton JA, Melcher ML, Gibril F, Jensen RT 2004 Gastric carcinoid tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome can be symptomatic, demonstrate aggressive growth, and require surgery. Surgery 136:1267–1274[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Ruszniewski P, Delle Fave G, Cadiot G, Komminoth P, Chung D, Kos-Kudla B, Kianmanesh R, Hochhauser D, Arnold R, Ahlman H, Pauwels S, Kwekkeboom DJ, Rindi G 2006 Well-differentiated gastric tumors/carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology 84:158–164[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bordi C, Falchetti A, Azzoni C, D’Adda T, Canavese G, Guariglia A, Santini D, Tomassetti P, Brandi ML 1997 Aggressive forms of gastric neuroendocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1075–1082[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Solcia E, Bordi C, Creutzfeldt W, Dayal Y, Dayan AD, Falkmer S, Grimelius L, Havu N 1988 Histopathological classification of nonantral gastric endocrine growths in man. Digestion 41:185–200[Medline]
  15. Bordi C, D’Adda T, Azzoni C, Pilato FP, Caruana P 1995 Hypergastrinemia and gastric enterochromaffin-like cells. Am J Surg Pathol 19:S8–S19
  16. Lehy T, Cadiot G, Mignon M, Ruszniewski P, Bonfils S 1992 Influence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 on gastric endocrine cells in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Gut 33:1275–1279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Cadiot G, Lehy T, Ruszniewski P, Bonfils S, Mignon M 1993 Gastric endocrine cell evolution in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Influence of gastrinoma growth and long-term omeprazole treatment. Dig Dis Sci 38:1307–1317[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Hirschowitz BI, Mohnen J, Shaw S 1996 Long-term treatment with lansoprazole for patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 10:507–522[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Delle Fave G, Marignani M, Corleto VD, Angeletti S, D’Ambra G, Ferraro G, D’Abba T, Azzoni C, Jensen RT, Annibale B, Bordi C 2002 Progression of gastric enterochromaffin-like cells growth in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and atrophic body gastritis patients. Dig Liver Dis 34:270–278[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Delle Fave G, Marignani M, Moretti A, D’Ambra G, Martino G, Annibale B 1998 Hypergastrinemia and enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia. Yale J Biol Med 71:291–301[Medline]
  21. Benya RV, Metz DC, Venzon DJ, Fishbeyn VA, Strader DB, Orbuch M, Jensen RT 1994 Zollinger-Ellison syndrome can be the initial endocrine manifestation in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Am J Med 97:436–444[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Roy P, Venzon DJ, Shojamanesh H, Abou-Saif A, Peghini P, Doppman JL, Gibril F, Jensen RT 2000 Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: clinical presentation in 261 patients. Medicine 79:379–411[Medline]
  23. Roy P, Venzon DJ, Feigenbaum KM, Koviack PD, Bashir S, Ojeaburu JV, Gibril F, Jensen RT 2001 Gastric secretion in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: correlation with clinical expression, tumor extent and role in diagnosis: a prospective NIH study of 235 patients and review of the literature in 984 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 80:189–222[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Berna MJ, Hoffmann KM, Serrano J, Gibril F, Jensen RT 2006 Serum gastrin in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. I. Prospective study of fasting serum gastrin in 309 patients from the National Institutes of Health and comparison with 2229 cases from the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 85:295–330[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Termanini B, Gibril F, Reynolds JC, Doppman JL, Chen CC, Stewart CA, Sutliff V, Jensen RT 1997 Value of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy: a prospective study in gastrinoma of its effect on clinical management. Gastroenterology 112:335–347[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Frucht H, Doppman JL, Norton JA, Miller DL, Dwyer AJ, Frank JA, Vinayek R, Maton PN, Jensen RT 1989 Gastrinomas: comparison of MR Imaging with CT, angiography and US. Radiology 171:713–717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Maton PN, Frucht H, Vinayek R, Wank SA, Gardner JD, Jensen RT 1988 Medical management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who have had previous gastric surgery: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 94:294–299[Medline]
  28. Metz DC, Pisegna JR, Fishbeyn VA, Benya RV, Feigenbaum KM, Koviack PD, Jensen RT 1992 Currently used doses of omeprazole in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome are too high. Gastroenterology 103:1498–1508[Medline]
  29. Termanini B, Gibril F, Sutliff VE, Yu F, Venzon DJ, Jensen RT 1998 Effect of long-term gastric acid suppressive therapy on serum vitamin B12 levels in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Am J Med 104:422–430[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Bordi C, Azzoni C, Ferraro G, Corleto VD, Gibril F, Delle Fave G, Lubensky IA, Venzon DJ, Jensen RT 2000 Sampling strategies for analysis of enterochromaffin-like cell changes in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Am J Clin Pathol 114:419–425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Berna MJ, Hoffmann KM, Long SH, Serrano J, Gibril F, Jensen RT 2006 Serum gastrin in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. II. Prospective study of gastrin provocative testing in 293 patients from the National Institutes of Health and comparison with 537 cases from the literature: evaluation of diagnostic criteria, proposal of new criteria, and correlations with clinical and tumoral features. Medicine (Baltimore) 85:331–364[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Norton JA, Jensen RT 2004 Resolved and unresolved controversies in the surgical management of patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Ann Surg 240:757–773[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Jensen RT 1999 Use of omeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. In: Olbe L, ed. Milestones in drug therapy. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlag; 205–221
  34. Jensen RT 1998 Management of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Intern Med 243:477–488[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Lehy T, Mignon M, Cadiot G, Elouaer-Blanc L, Ruszniewski P, Lewin MJ, Bonfils S 1989 Gastric endocrine cell behavior in Zollinger-Ellison patients upon long-term potent antisecretory treatment. Gastroenterology 96:1029–1040[Medline]
  36. Maton PN, Lack EE, Collen MJ, Cornelius MJ, David E, Gardner JD, Jensen RT 1990 The effect of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and omeprazole therapy on gastric oxyntic endocrine cells. Gastroenterology 99:943–950[Medline]
  37. Hirschowitz BI, Haber MM 2001 Helicobacter pylori effects on gastritis, gastrin and enterochromaffin-like cells in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and non-Zollinger-Ellison syndrome acid hypersecretors treated long-term with lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 15:87–103[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Cadiot G, Lehy T, Mignon M 1993 Gastric endocrine cell proliferation and fundic argyrophil carcinoid tumors in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Acta Oncol 32:135–140[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Debelenko LV, Emmert-Buck MR, Zhuang Z, Epshteyn E, Moskaluk CA, Jensen RT, Liotta LA, Lubensky IA 1997 The multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene locus is involved in the pathogenesis of type II gastric carcinoids. Gastroenterology 113:773–782[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Borch K, Renvall H, Liedberg G, Andersen BN 1986 Relations between circulating gastrin and endocrine cell proliferation in the atrophic gastric fundic mucosa. Scand J Gastroenterol 21:357–363[Medline]
  41. Helander HF, Rutgersson K, Helander KG, Pisegna JP, Gardner JD, Jensen RT, Maton PN 1992 Stereologic investigations of human gastric mucosa. II. Oxyntic mucosa from Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol 27:875–883[Medline]
  42. Jensen RT, Doppman JL, Gardner JD 1986 Gastrinoma. In: Go VLW, Brooks FA, DiMagno EP, Gardner JD, Lebenthal E, Scheele GA, eds. The exocrine pancreas: biology, pathobiology and disease. 1st ed. New York: Raven Press; 727–744
  43. Norton JA, Cornelius MJ, Doppman JL, Maton PN, Gardner JD, Jensen RT 1987 Effect of parathyroidectomy in patients with hyperparathyroidism, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type I: a prospective study. Surgery 102:958–966[Medline]
  44. Bordi C, Pilato FP, Bertele A, D’Adda T, Missale G 1988 Expression of glycoprotein hormone {alpha}-subunit by endocrine cells of the oxyntic mucosa is associated with hypergastrinemia. Hum Pathol 19:580–585[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Heitz PU, Kasper M, Kloppel G, Polak JM, Vaitukaitis JL 1983 Glycoprotein-hormone {alpha}-chain production by pancreatic endocrine tumors: a specific marker for malignancy. Immunocytochemical analysis of 155 patients. Cancer 51:277–282[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. S. Landry, G. Brock, C. R. Scoggins, K. M. McMasters, and R. C. G. Martin II
A Proposed Staging System for Gastric Carcinoid Tumors Based on an Analysis of 1,543 Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2009; 16(1): 51 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berna, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berna, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, R. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals