help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1231
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catteau-Jonard, S.
Right arrow Articles by di Clemente, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catteau-Jonard, S.
Right arrow Articles by di Clemente, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 93, No. 11 4456-4461
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society

Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Its Receptor, FSH Receptor, and Androgen Receptor Genes Are Overexpressed by Granulosa Cells from Stimulated Follicles in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Soazik P. Jamin, Arnaud Leclerc, Jacques Gonzalès, Didier Dewailly and Nathalie di Clemente

Department of Endocrine Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine (S.C.-J., D.D.), Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, and Faculty of Medicine of Lille, Université de Lille II, 59037 Lille, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unit 782 (S.P.J., A.L., J.G., N.d.C.), Clamart F-92140, France; and University of Paris-Sud, Unit Mixed of Research S0782 (S.P.J., A.L., J.G., N.d.C.), Clamart F-92140, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dewailly Didier, Department of Endocrine Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, C.H.R.U., 59037 Lille, France. E-mail: ddewailly{at}chru-lille.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: In the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), in addition to intrinsic thecal dysregulation leading to hyperandrogenism, a granulosa cell (GC) dysregulation may occur. Expression of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), FSH receptor (FSHR) and androgen receptor (AR) are suspected to be altered in PCOS GCs.

Design: The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the expression of these genes at the last stages of follicular maturation in GCs from 17 patients with PCOS and 15 controls undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during a cycle with in vitro fertilization.

Materials and Methods: On the day of oocyte retrieval, follicular fluids were collected from small follicles (SF; 8–13 mm) and large follicles (17–22 mm) in separate tubes. Total RNAs and proteins were extracted from GCs. Reverse transcription was performed and quantification of gene expression levels was achieved by real-time quantitative PCR.

Results: AMH and FSHR mRNA levels were significantly higher in PCOS than in controls in GCs from both SF and large follicles. Likewise, AR and AMH receptor II mRNA levels in GCs from SF were significantly higher in PCOS compared with controls. In both PCOS patients and controls, AMH and AR mRNA levels correlated strongly, positively, and independently to FSHR mRNA levels.

Conclusion: Using quantitative RT-PCR, AMH, AMH receptor II, FSHR, and AR genes were shown to be overexpressed by GCs from stimulated follicles of women with PCOS undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. This could be the sign of a maturation defect or may reflect hyperandrogenism.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of oligoanovulation, infertility, and hyperandrogenism in women, affecting between 5 and 10% of women of reproductive-age worldwide (1, 2). The pathophysiology of the ovulatory disorder is still unclear. Resulting from intrinsic thecal dysregulation with an up-regulation of genes encoding steroidogenic enzymes (3), hyperandrogenism has been considered the main culprit (4). It would favor an abnormally rich pool of growing follicles from classes 1 to 5 (until 5 mm) (4, 5). Second, the selection of one follicle from the increased pool of selectable follicles and its further maturation to a dominant follicle does not occur. This follicular arrest is still unexplained. Like in theca cells, a granulosa cell (GC) dysregulation may occur. For example, the expression of LH receptors seems to be premature in PCOS follicles (6). Likewise, androgen receptor (AR) expression is increased in GCs of testosterone-treated monkeys from the preantral to the large antral follicle stage (7). Also, PCOS GCs were reported to express high amounts of FSH receptors at the last stages of follicular maturation whereas they are resistant to FSH in vivo (8). This suggests the presence of a FSH inhibitor that could impair follicle maturation. We suspected recently that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) may be this FSH inhibitor, acting as a negative regulator of follicle growth and being perhaps involved in follicular arrest (9). The excess of AMH found in the serum of women with PCOS (10) may be due to the increased number of small antral follicles in PCOS (11) and/or an increased production per GC (12). So far, only in vitro data obtained in follicular fluid after ovarian dissection and cell-conditioned media from cultured GCs support this last hypothesis (12).

Whether such abnormalities persist in the dominant follicles obtained under controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is unknown. If so, this could explain in part the impaired oocyte quality that has been reported in PCOS during IVF (13, 14). We therefore chose to study GCs from small and large follicles (SF and LF, respectively) collected during oocyte retrieval in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with IVF. SF and LF were examined separately to point differences between mature and immature dominant follicles. The aim of this study was therefore to perform a functional analysis of GC and compare the expression of AMH, FSH receptor (FSHR), and AR genes by GCs from mature and immature dominant follicles in PCOS patients and controls. AMH type II receptor (AMHR-II) expression was also studied as a marker of AMH bioactivity. LH receptor expression was not studied because it is suppressed by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (15, 16).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

This prospective study included 17 patients with PCOS and 15 women with normal ovulatory function undergoing IVF for treatment of tubal and/or male infertility. Women were between 20 and 40 yr old. The study required no modification of our routine IVF protocol.

According to the Rotterdam criteria (17), the diagnosis of PCOS was based on the association of at least two of three following criteria: 1) ovulatory disturbance, mainly oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea; 2) hyperandrogenism, as defined clinically by hirsutism (modified Ferriman and Gallway score >6), severe acne/seborrhea, and/or biologically by a testosterone serum level greater than 0.6 ng/ml and/or {delta}-4-androstenedione greater than 2.2 ng/ml; and 3) more than 12 follicles in the 2- to 9-mm range in each ovary at ultrasonography and/or an ovarian volume higher than 10 ml.

The control population was referred to our department for IVF because of tubal and/or male infertility. Exclusion criteria were a history of menstrual disturbances (i.e. cycle length either <25 d or >35 d), hirsutism, abnormal serum level of prolactin or androgens (i.e. serum testosterone above 0.6 ng/ml), and PCO at ultrasonography.

All patients gave informed consent before their inclusion in this study. This study was approved by the institutional Review Board of the University Hospital of Lille.

Ovarian stimulation

Pituitary desensitization was started with the GnRH agonist triptorelin 0.1 mg/day (Decapeptyl; Ferring, Malmö, Sweden) during the luteal phase before IVF treatment or the first day of menses for the patients with dysovulation. Follicle growth was stimulated after 12 d of desensitization by injecting recombinant FSH (rFSH; Puregon; Organon Laboratories, Saint-Denis, France) at 150–250 IU/d. Follicle growth was monitored according to serum estradiol levels and transvaginal ultrasound. Human chorionic gonadotropin (Merck Serono, Geneva, Switzerland), 5000 IU, was administered when the leading follicle reached 18–20 mm in diameter together with at least three follicles greater than 16 mm detected by ultrasonography. Oocyte retrieval was performed 36 h later under transvaginal ultrasound guidance.

Collection of GCs

Follicle size was determined immediately before retrieval under ultrasound, and follicular fluids (FF) from SF (8–13 mm) and LF (17–22 mm) were collected in separate tubes. The size of SF and LF was chosen approximately similar to a previous study of Fanchin et al. (18). The 8- to 13-mm follicles (SF) are intermediate dominant follicles lastly recruited. SF and LF were examined separately to point differences between mature and immature dominant follicles. To avoid mixing fluids of SF vs. LF from one ovary in the same aspirating needle, FF of LF were aspired first. Then two SF were aspired but their FF were not used for the study. Lastly, FF of the other SF were aspired. Oocytes were isolated and follicular fluids from SF and LF were pooled separately and centrifuged through a one-step density Percoll gradient [(vol/vol) phosphate-buffered saline/Percoll] at 350 x g for 15 min to remove red blood cells. Luteinized GCs were collected at the interface, washed with PBS, and stored in lysis buffer at –20 C until mRNAs and proteins analysis.

For each patient, GC from either SF or LF were pooled to extract enough RNA to allow their quantification and to study the expression of several genes.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNAs were extracted from GCs using the NucleoSpin RNA/protein kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). For each patient and each category of follicle, reverse transcription was performed in a total volume of 20 µl with the first-strand cDNA synthesis kit for RT-PCR (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) using 0.37 µg RNA, avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase, and random primers p(dN)6 as recommended by the manufacturer.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Evaluation of gene expression levels was achieved by real-time quantitative PCR kinetics using the SYBR Green I chemistry. Real-time PCR was performed with 5 µl of appropriate diluted cDNA, 500 nM of forward and reverse specific primers for human AMH, AMHR-II, FSHR, AR (Table 1Go), 3 mM MgCl2, and 1x LightCycler FastStart reaction mix SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics) in a LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics). The PCR protocol used an initial denaturing step at 95 C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles at 95 C for 10 sec, annealing temperature (Table 1Go) for 10 sec, 72 C for 2–10 sec (Table 1Go) with a transition rate of 20 C/sec. Crossing point values were acquired using the second derivative maximum method of the LightCycler software 3.3 (Roche). The specificity of the desired product was documented with the analysis of the melting curve. The melting curve was achieved by first cooling samples to 60 C at a transition rate of 20 C/sec after 30 sec of incubation, and a slow-heating step at a rate of 0.1 C/sec until a maximum temperature of 95 C. The mix was next cooled at 40 C for 1 min, at a transition rate of 20 C/sec. Quantification of gene expression was based on a standard curve for each target gene with known amounts of testicular cDNAs and was included in each LightCycler real-time PCR experiment. Relative gene expression was calculated as a ratio of each target gene concentration to housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) concentration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Primers and PCR conditions used in the study

 
Western blot analysis

Proteins were purified according to the total RNA and protein isolation kit (Macherey-Nagel). After loading cell lysates on the Nucleospin RNA/protein column, flow-throughs were precipitated with an equal volume of protein precipitator. After a 10-min incubation and a centrifugation for 5 min at 11000 rpm, protein pellets were washed with 50% ethanol and resuspended in 50 µl of protein loading buffer. Proteins were then dissolved during 3 min at 98 C and centrifuged for 1 min at 11000 rpm to remove insoluble material. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). Ten micrograms of proteins were loaded on 7.5% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) under reducing conditions [3% (vol/vol) 2β-mercaptoethanol] and transferred onto a Protran BA85 nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) as previously described (19). AMH was detected using an anti-AMH monoclonal antibody specific of the N-terminal domain of AMH (20) (monoclonal antibody 10.6) at 1 µg/ml and horseradish peroxidase-labeled antimouse IgG antibody at 1:5000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME). Bands were visualized with the ECL Plus detection reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).

Statistics

Because values from any parameter were not normally distributed, all comparisons between PCOS and controls were performed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Wilcoxon test was used for paired comparisons between SF and LF.

Univariate analysis of correlations between expression of the different genes was performed with the nonparametric Spearman test. Multiple linear regression was then performed to test these different correlations using log-transformed values.

All statistical procedures were run on SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Population

Main clinical parameters in normoovulatory controls and patients with PCOS are summarized in Table 2Go. No difference between the two populations was found for the age, the total dose of rFSH received by each patient and the number of LF aspired. Mean body mass index and number of SF aspired were significantly higher in the PCOS group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Clinical parameters in normoovulatory controls and patients with PCOS

 
AMH gene expression in GCs

AMH expression determined by quantitative RT-PCR was about 3-fold higher in PCOS patients than controls (P = 0.016 and P = 0.008, respectively) (Table 3Go) in both SF and LF. AMH mRNAs in SF tended to be higher than in LF in patients with PCOS (P = 0.08) and controls (P = 0.25) (Table 3Go and Fig. 1AGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Results of quantitative RT-PCR for AMH, FSHR, AR, and AMHR-II in SF and LF of PCOS patients and in SF and LF of controls

 

Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Box-and-whisker plots showing the AMH (A), FSHR (B), AR (C), and AMHR-II (D) mRNA levels in SF and LF from PCOS patients and in SF and LF from controls. Horizontal small bars represent the 10th to 90th percentile range, and the boxes indicate the 25th to 75th percentile range. The horizontal line in each box corresponds to the median.

 
Western blot analysis confirmed an increased amount of AMH protein in GCs from SF of PCOS compared with controls (Fig. 2Go). The 70-kDa band corresponds to noncleaved AMH and the 56-kDa band to the N-terminal domain of AMH. In LF, no difference was found between PCOS and controls (Fig. 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Detection of AMH protein in GC lysates from SF and LF. Ten micrograms of proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels, immunoblotted, and probed with monoclonal antibody 10.6. Ten nanograms of recombinant human AMH (rhAMH) were loaded as a positive control. To normalize the results, blots were then stripped using the Restore Western blot stripping buffer (Pierce) and reincubated with a monoclonal antibody against {alpha}-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France). The 70-kDa band corresponds to noncleaved AMH and the 56-kDa band to the N-terminal domain of AMH.

 
FSHR gene expression in GCs

In GCs from both SF and LF, FSHR mRNA level was significantly higher in PCOS patients than controls (P = 0.004 and P = 0.007, respectively). FSHR expression was significantly higher in SF than LF, both in PCOS and controls (P = 0.019 and P = 0.048, respectively) (Table 3Go and Fig. 1BGo).

AR and AMHR-II gene expression in GCs

In GCs from SF only, AR and AMHR-II mRNA levels were significantly higher in PCOS patients than controls (P = 0.007 and P = 0.024, respectively). In PCOS patients only, AR (and not AMHR-II) expression was significantly higher in SF than LF (P = 0.049) (Table 3Go and Fig. 1Go, C and D).

Relationships between the expression of the different genes

Using a Spearman test, no correlation was found between the expression of the different genes in LF from controls. AMH and FSHR mRNA levels correlated strongly and positively in both SF (Spearman’s Rho = 0.644, P = 0.013) and LF (Table 4Go) from PCOS patients and SF from controls (R = 0.776, P = 0.003). AR and FSHR mRNA levels were also significantly and positively correlated in both SF (R = 0.510, P = 0.037) and LF (Table 4Go) from PCOS patients and in SF from controls (R = 0.591, P = 0.026). In PCOS patients, AMHR-II expression significantly and positively correlated with AR expression in SF (R = 0.672, P = 0.003) and LF and with AMH and FSHR messengers in LF (Table 4Go). In SF from controls, there was no correlation between the expression of AMHR-II and those of AR, AMH, and FSHR. Because of the numerous univariate correlations (Table 4Go), multiple linear regression was performed on the data from LF in PCOS patients. When FSHR expression was introduced as the dependent variable, its relationships with AMH and AR mRNAs persisted in an independent manner, whereas AMHR-II was rejected by the model.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Univariate correlations between the expression of the different genes in LF from PCOS

 
No significant relationship was found between body mass index and AMH mRNA level (P = 0.56).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Using quantitative RT-PCR, we report for the first time an in vivo expression of the AMH gene in rFSH- and hCG-stimulated GCs from follicles at last stages of maturation, with a trend to declining levels in largest follicles. AMH is known to be secreted in women by GCs of growing follicles from the primary to the large antral follicle stage (4–6 mm) (21). AMH staining was nearly undetectable in follicles with a diameter greater than 8 mm and seemed restricted to the GCs of the cumulus (21). Our study showed that AMH expression was still present at low levels in GCs from immediately preovulatory follicles. To explain this discrepancy, we hypothesize that AMH expression has been induced by hCG used to trigger ovulation in both PCOS and controls. These results are partially supported by in vitro data showing that AMH production by GCs from patients with PCOS (but not from controls) is increased when they are cultured in presence of LH (12). Because an expression of AMH was also detected in GCs from controls, we hypothesize that rFSH-stimulated GCs retain the potential to secrete AMH in both PCOS and controls and that this secretion may be under the influence of LH. In agreement, we recently reported a positive and independent relationship between serum LH and AMH in patients with PCOS receiving low dose of rFSH (22). However, it would be necessary to study GCs from large follicles just before LH surge or hCG injection to confirm this hypothesis.

Second, both AMH mRNA and protein levels were higher in GCs from PCOS than from controls (Figs. 1AGo and 2Go). These results are in agreement with Pellatt et al. (12), who reported that in vitro, GCs from PCOS patients secrete more AMH than GCs from controls. Serum levels of AMH are 2- to 3-fold higher in women with PCOS, compared with ovulatory women with normal ovaries (11, 23, 24). We previously hypothesized that AMH excess in PCOS was due only to the increased number of small antral follicles, each follicle presumably secreting the same amount of AMH than in a normal ovary (11). Conversely, the present study as well as the data of Pellatt et al. (12) argue for an increased expression of AMH per GC in PCOS. Consequently, the high levels of serum AMH in PCOS are likely a combination of an increased number of small follicles and an increased production of AMH per cell. Given that GCs from each category of follicle were pooled, it was not possible to determine whether all or only some of the follicles from PCOS expressed more AMH.

In our study, the increased expression of AMH by GCs from PCOS was associated with higher AR, FSHR, and AMHR-II mRNA levels. The presence of AR at advanced stages of maturation was in agreement with the immunocytochemical data from Horie et al. (25). However, using quantitative immunocytochemistry, Hillier et al. (26) reported that in the primate (common marmoset) ovary, ARs were most abundant in healthy preantral and early antral follicles, being scarce or absent in preovulatory follicles. To our knowledge, this is the first time that an expression of the AR gene is reported in GCs from human stimulated preovulatory follicles. The higher expression of AR in SF than LF in PCOS is in agreement with the decline of AR expression during follicle maturation (26), thus indicating that AR synthesis in PCOS follicles is still under physiological regulation. The absence of such a decrease in controls may be explained by lower levels of AR mRNAs in follicles from normal women. The higher expression of AR in PCOS follicles than controls follicles is in agreement with Weil et al (7), who reported an increased AR expression in GCs of testosterone-treated monkeys from the preantral to the large antral follicle stage. This suggests that hyperandrogenism stimulates AR expression. A relationship between intrafollicular androgen concentration and its receptor level should be studied to confirm this hypothesis in human follicles.

In our study FSHR expression was significantly higher in PCOS patients than controls in GCs from both SF and LF. This is in agreement with previous studies showing that GCs from PCOS cells express high amounts of FSHRs and are highly responsive to this hormone in culture (8, 27). This excess of FSHR mRNAs in PCOS patients is perhaps an amplification of a physiological phenomenon. Indeed, in controls, FSHRs were also expressed in SF and LF but at lower levels. Second, in the normal ovary, the total number of FSHR was about 2-fold higher at midfollicular phase than at the other periods (28). Moreover, other authors reported that human GCs in the late follicular phase bound less FSH than GCs in the midfollicular phase (29). In agreement, in our study, the amount of FSHR mRNAs was significantly lower in LF than SF from both PCOS patients and controls, although cells were terminally differentiated by hCG administration.

Whether these two phenomenons (i.e. excessive AR and FSHR expression) may reflect exaggeration and/or abnormal persistence of physiological properties is further supported by the tight relationship we observed between FSHR and AR expression. Both were strongly and positively correlated in SF from PCOS patients and controls and in LF from PCOS patients. This correlation persisted after controlling for confounding factors by multiple linear regression. In keeping with this result, Weil et al. (30) reported a highly significant positive correlation between FSHR and AR mRNA levels in GCs from testosterone-treated or control primate follicles. Hyperandrogenism is likely the culprit because androgen treatment significantly increased FSHR mRNAs in GCs (by ~50–100%, depending on follicle size) (30). So we hypothesize that FSHR expression is increased by androgens through the increase of AR mRNAs. In our study, FSHR expression was also strongly and positively correlated with the amount of AMH mRNAs both in SF and LF from PCOS patients and in SF from controls. This strong relationship persisted after multiple linear regression analysis. Therefore, we hypothesize that AMH, FSHR, and AR excessive expression in PCOS patients are linked and are all a consequence of hyperandrogenism. However, androgen assays in FF and further experimental data are necessary to confirm this hypothesis, in particular the relationship between hyperandrogenism and the AMH increase. Indeed, a relationship between androgens and AMH in follicular fluid was established in a first study (31) but not a second one (32).

Our data suggest that AMH is probably not just residual to an anterior secretion but still has an action in the final phase of follicle maturation. Indeed, in our study, the expression pattern of AMH and its receptor was found similar. This is in agreement with previous studies in rodents reporting that AMHR-II expression colocalizes with AMH mRNAs in GCs of the postnatal ovary (33). The AMH action on the follicle is probably more important in PCOS patients compared with controls, and the question then arises about its possible impact on oocyte quality that is known to be poor in PCOS patients (13, 14). In support of this assumption, a lower oocyte quality has been reported in patients with high serum AMH levels (34).

In this study, we have shown that the expression of AMH, AR, FSHR, and AMHR-II was higher in follicles from PCOS patients compared with controls, under rFSH and hCG stimulation. This may reflect an intrinsic GC dysregulation, in which LH (or hCG) and hyperandrogenism could be involved. The higher levels of AMH, AR, FSHR, and AMHR-II mRNAs in PCOS and their tendency to be lower in dominant mature follicles compared with immature follicles strengthen the hypothesis of a delayed GC maturation in PCOS patients (35, 36). Finally, despite an apparent normal development under rFSH, PCOS dominant follicles retain some of their basal abnormalities possibly impacting on oocyte quality. However, further data on the relationships between hCG, AMH, and androgens in FF are necessary to elucidate the pathophysiological relevance of such findings.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Grant 3734 from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (to N.d.C.).

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online August 12, 2008

Abbreviations: AMH, Anti-Müllerian hormone; AMHR-II, AMH type II receptor; AR, androgen receptor; FF, follicular fluid; FSHR, FSH receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GC, granulosa cell; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; IVF, in vitro fertilization; LF, large follicles; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; rFSH, recombinant FSH; SF, small follicles.

Received June 6, 2008.

Accepted August 5, 2008.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Norman RJ, Dewailly D, Legro RS, Hickey TE 2007 Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet 370:685–697[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Franks S 1995 Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 333:853–861[Free Full Text]
  3. Wickenheisser JK, Quinn PG, Nelson VL, Legro RS, Strauss 3rd JF, McAllister JM 2000 Differential activity of the cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoters in normal and polycystic ovary syndrome theca cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2304–2311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Jonard S, Dewailly D 2004 The follicular excess in polycystic ovaries, due to intra-ovarian hyperandrogenism, may be the main culprit for the follicular arrest. Hum Reprod Update 10:107–117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hughesdon PE 1982 Morphology and morphogenesis of the Stein-Leventhal ovary and of so-called "hyperthecosis." Obstet Gynecol Surv 37:59–77[Medline]
  6. Jakimiuk AJ, Weitsman SR, Navab A, Magoffin DA 2001 Luteinizing hormone receptor, steroidogenesis acute regulatory protein, and steroidogenic enzyme messenger ribonucleic acids are overexpressed in thecal and granulosa cells from polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1318–1323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Weil SJ, Vendola K, Zhou J, Adesanya OO, Wang J, Okafor J, Bondy CA 1998 Androgen receptor gene expression in the primate ovary: cellular localization, regulation, and functional correlations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2479–2485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Almahbobi G, Anderiesz C, Hutchinson P, McFarlane JR, Wood C, Trounson AO 1996 Functional integrity of granulosa cells from polycystic ovaries. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 44:571–580[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Dewailly D, Catteau-Jonard S, Reyss AC, Maunoury-Lefebvre C, Poncelet E, Pigny P 2007 The excess in 2–5 mm follicles seen at ovarian ultrasonography is tightly associated to the follicular arrest of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 22:1562–1566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pigny P, Merlen E, Robert Y, Cortet-Rudelli C, Decanter C, Jonard S, Dewailly D 2003 Elevated serum level of anti-mullerian hormone in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: relationship to the ovarian follicle excess and to the follicular arrest. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5957–5962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pigny P, Jonard S, Robert Y, Dewailly D 2006 Serum anti-Mullerian hormone as a surrogate for antral follicle count for definition of the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:941–945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Pellatt L, Hanna L, Brincat M, Galea R, Brain H, Whitehead S, Mason H 2007 Granulosa cell production of anti-Mullerian hormone is increased in polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:240–245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ludwig M, Finas DF, al-Hasani S, Diedrich K, Ortmann O 1999 Oocyte quality and treatment outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Hum Reprod 14:354–358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Wood JR, Dumesic DA, Abbott DH, Strauss 3rd JF 2007 Molecular abnormalities in oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome revealed by microarray analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:705–713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kash JC, Menon KM 1998 Identification of a hormonally regulated luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor mRNA binding protein. Increased mRNA binding during receptor down-regulation. J Biol Chem 273:10658–10664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nair AK, Peegel H, Menon KM 2006 The role of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptor-specific mRNA binding protein in regulating receptor expression in human ovarian granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2239–2243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. 2004 Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 19:41–47[CrossRef]
  18. Fanchin R, Louafi N, Mendez Lozano DH, Frydman N, Frydman R, Taieb J 2005 Per-follicle measurements indicate that anti-mullerian hormone secretion is modulated by the extent of follicular development and luteinization and may reflect qualitatively the ovarian follicular status. Fertil Steril 84:167–173[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Faure E, Gouedard L, Imbeaud S, Cate R, Picard JY, Josso N, di Clemente N 1996 Mutant isoforms of the anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor are not expressed at the cell membrane. J Biol Chem 271:30571–30575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Belville C, Van Vlijmen H, Ehrenfels C, Pepinsky B, Rezaie AR, Picard JY, Josso N, di Clemente N, Cate RL 2004 Mutations of the anti-mullerian hormone gene in patients with persistent mullerian duct syndrome: biosynthesis, secretion, and processing of the abnormal proteins and analysis using a three-dimensional model. Mol Endocrinol 18:708–721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Visser JA, Kramer P, Fauser BC, Themmen AP 2004 Anti-Mullerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 10:77–83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Catteau-Jonard S, Pigny P, Reyss AC, Decanter C, Poncelet E, Dewailly D 2007 Changes in serum anti-mullerian hormone level during low-dose recombinant follicular-stimulating hormone therapy for anovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4138–4143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Cook CL, Siow Y, Brenner AG, Fallat ME 2002 Relationship between serum mullerian-inhibiting substance and other reproductive hormones in untreated women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal women. Fertil Steril 77:141–146[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Laven JS, Mulders AG, Visser JA, Themmen AP, De Jong FH, Fauser BC 2004 Anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations in normoovulatory and anovulatory women of reproductive age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:318–323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Horie K, Takakura K, Fujiwara H, Suginami H, Liao S, Mori T 1992 Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the human ovary throughout the menstrual cycle in relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression. Hum Reprod 7:184–190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hillier SG, Tetsuka M, Fraser HM 1997 Location and developmental regulation of androgen receptor in primate ovary. Hum Reprod 12:107–111[Abstract]
  27. Mason HD, Willis DS, Beard RW, Winston RM, Margara R, Franks S 1994 Estradiol production by granulosa cells of normal and polycystic ovaries: relationship to menstrual cycle history and concentrations of gonadotropins and sex steroids in follicular fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:1355–1360[Abstract]
  28. Minegishi T, Tano M, Igarashi M, Rokukawa S, Abe Y, Ibuki Y, Miyamoto K 1997 Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in human ovary. Eur J Clin Invest 27:469–474[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Yamoto M, Shima K, Nakano R 1992 Gonadotropin receptors in human ovarian follicles and corpora lutea throughout the menstrual cycle. Horm Res 37(Suppl 1):5–11
  30. Weil S, Vendola K, Zhou J, Bondy CA 1999 Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2951–2956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Andersen CY, Lossl K 2007 Increased intrafollicular androgen levels affect human granulosa cell secretion of anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin-B. Fertil Steril 89:1760–1765[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Yding Andersen C, Rosendahl M, Byskov AG 2008 Concentration of Anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin-B in relation to steroids and age in follicular fluid from small antral human follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2344–2349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Baarends WM, Uilenbroek JT, Kramer P, Hoogerbrugge JW, van Leeuwen EC, Themmen AP, Grootegoed JA 1995 Anti-mullerian hormone and anti-mullerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat ovaries during postnatal development, the estrous cycle, and gonadotropin-induced follicle growth. Endocrinology 136:4951–4962[Abstract]
  34. Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Moser M, Shebl O, Schreier-Lechner E, Tews G 2006 Basal level of anti-Mullerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 21:2022–2026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Maciel GA, Baracat EC, Benda JA, Markham SM, Hensinger K, Chang RJ, Erickson GF 2004 Stockpiling of transitional and classic primary follicles in ovaries of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5321–5327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Webber LJ, Stubbs SA, Stark J, Margara RA, Trew GH, Lavery SA, Hardy K, Franks S 2007 Prolonged survival in culture of preantral follicles from polycystic ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1975–1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, A. Piouka, S. Livadas, C. Piperi, I. Katsikis, A. G Papavassiliou, and D. Panidis
Anti-mullerian hormone is associated with advanced glycosylated end products in lean women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 160(5): 847 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. H Ortega, N. R Salvetti, and V. Padmanabhan
Developmental programming: prenatal androgen excess disrupts ovarian steroid receptor balance
Reproduction, May 1, 2009; 137(5): 865 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catteau-Jonard, S.
Right arrow Articles by di Clemente, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Catteau-Jonard, S.
Right arrow Articles by di Clemente, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals