| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Neuroendocrine Unit, Department of Medicine (A.L.U., A.Y., K.K.M.), and Department of Pathology (P.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and Clinical Research Center (J.B.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Karen K. Miller, Neuroendocrine Unit, Bulfinch 457B, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. E-mail: KKMiller{at}Partners.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether IGF-I levels are reduced and to investigate determinants of GH and IGF-I in healthy overweight and obese women.
Design: A cross-sectional study was performed.
Setting: The study was conducted at a General Clinical Research Center.
Study Participants: Thirty-four healthy women without pituitary/hypothalamic disease participated, including 11 lean [body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2], 12 overweight (BMI
25 kg/m2 and <30 kg/m2), and 11 obese (BMI
30 kg/m2) women of comparable age (overall mean age, 30.7 ± 7.8 yr).
Intervention: There was no intervention.
Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were frequent sampling (every 10 min for 24 h) for GH, peak GH after GHRH-arginine stimulation, IGF-I, IGF binding protein-3, estrone, estradiol, testosterone, free testosterone, SHBG, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and abdominal fat.
Results: Mean 24-h GH and peak stimulated GH were lower in overweight than lean women and lowest in obese women. Mean IGF-I levels trended lower in obese, but not overweight, compared with lean women. Free testosterone was positively associated with IGF-I (R = 0.36, P = 0.04) but not with GH measures. Visceral fat was the only determinant of mean 24-h GH (R2 = 0.66, P < 0.0001) and of peak stimulated GH (R2 = 0.63, P < 0.0001), and mean 24-h GH accounted for 39% of the variability of IGF-I (P = 0.0002), with an additional 28% (P < 0.0001) attributable to free testosterone levels.
Conclusions: Despite a linear decrease in GH secretion and peak stimulated GH levels with increasing BMI in healthy overweight and obese women, IGF-I levels were not commensurately reduced. Androgens may contribute to this relative preservation of IGF-I secretion in overweight and obese women despite reduced GH secretion.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because GH receptor activation is the primary determinant of IGF-I levels, the underlying mechanisms for the dissociation between GH and IGF-I levels in this group of women are not clear, and we therefore investigated whether body composition, estrogens, androgens, and/or elevated IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 levels predict GH or IGF-I levels. There are few published studies that have investigated gonadal steroids, either estrogens or androgens, as potential determinants of GH and IGF-I. In addition, although androgens are known to stimulate the GH-IGF-I axis in men (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23), little is known about their effects in women with low GH secretion, either hypopituitary or obese. Relative hyperestrogenemia or hyperandrogenemia in overweight and obese women might be expected to stimulate GH secretion, and are therefore unlikely to be primary determinants of the reduced GH secretion observed in these groups of women. However, when we found that endogenous IGF-I secretion was relatively preserved compared with GH secretion in our group of obese and overweight women, we hypothesized that because testosterone augments the GH-dependent stimulatory effect on IGF-I production (24), relative hyperandrogenemia might stimulate liver IGF-I production in opposition to diminished GH action in overweight and obese women. This is in contrast to the known effects of estrogens to cause GH resistance in the liver, resulting in a relative reduction of IGF-I production per unit of GH secretion (25, 26, 27, 28). We therefore investigated putative determinants of GH and IGF-I levels to characterize the effects of androgens in comparison to other known determinants, including estrogens body composition parameters and insulin resistance, on GH and IGF-I secretion in healthy young overweight and obese women.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied 34 healthy volunteers recruited from the community through advertisements. To participate in the study, volunteers were required to be eumenorrheic and to have serum testosterone levels in the normal female range. Exclusion criteria included hypothalamic or pituitary disorders, diabetes mellitus or other chronic illnesses, estrogen or glucocorticoid use, and weight greater than 280 pounds [due to the limitations of the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography (CT) scanners].
Materials and methods
The study was approved by the Partners Healthcare Inc. Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained from each study participant.
Each participant was admitted to the General Clinical Research Center at the Massachusetts General Hospital, where serum was collected every 10 min for 24 h starting at 0800 h during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. During this admission to the General Clinical Research Center, vigorous activity, including exercise, was prohibited. Fasting blood was obtained for IGF-I, IGFBP-3, estrone, estradiol, testosterone, and SHBG. A fasting GHRH-arginine stimulation test was performed as follows. GHRH (1 µg/kg) plus arginine (0.5 g/kg; maximum, 30 g) was administered iv, and GH levels were drawn at baseline and every 30 min for 2 h. This test has been validated in comparison to the gold standard insulin tolerance test, with proposed cut-offs for the diagnosis of GH deficiency of 4.1 to 9 ng/ml (29, 30). Baseline clinical characteristics, GHRH-arginine stimulation test results, IGF-I, waist circumference, and fasting insulin and glucose levels in these study subjects were included in a previously published manuscript (31).
Body composition measures
Fat and fat-free mass were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry using a Hologic QDR-4500 densitometer (Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA), with an accuracy error for body fat mass of 1.7% and for fat-free mass of 2.4% (32). Total, sc fat, and visceral abdominal fat compartments were measured in duplicate using single-slice quantitative CT scans at the level of L4 with 10-mm-thick axial images (General Electric RP High Speed Helical CT Scanner, Milwaukee, WI) and graphical analysis software (General Electric Advantage Windows Work Station Version 2.0, General Electric). Technical factors for the scanning were 80 kVp, 70 mA, and 2-sec scan time. Midwaist circumference was measured as the midpoint between the iliac crest and the lowest rib, measured in a horizontal plane parallel to the floor.
Biochemical analyses
Serum samples were collected and stored at –80 C. Serum GH was measured using an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) kit [Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (DSL), Inc., Webster, TX], with a minimum detection limit of 0.01 ng/ml, an intraassay coefficient of variation (cv) of 3.1–5.4%, and an interassay cv of 5.9–11.5%. Serum IGF-I levels were measured using an Immulite 2000 automated immunoanalyzer [Diagnostic Products Corporation (DPC), Inc., Los Angeles, CA], by a solid-phase enzyme-labeled chemiluminescent immunometric assay, with an interassay cv of 3.7- 4.2%. IGFBP-3 was measured by IRMA kit (DSL, Inc.) with a minimum detection limit of 0.5 ng/ml, an intraassay cv of 1.8–3.9%, and an interassay cv of 0.5–1.9%. Estrone was measured by RIA kit (DSL, Inc.) with a minimum detection limit of 1.2 pg/ml, an intraassay cv of 4.4–9.4%, and interassay cv of 6.0–11.1%. Estradiol was measured by ultrasensitive RIA kit (DSL, Inc.) with a minimum detection limit of 2.2 pg/ml, intraassay cv of 6.5–8.9%, and interassay cv of 7.5–12.2%. Serum testosterone was measured by RIA kit (DPC, Inc.) with a minimum detection limit of 2 ng/dl, an intraassay cv of 4.1–10.5%, and an interassay cv of 5.9–12%. SHBG was measured by IRMA (DPC, Inc.) with a minimum detection limit of 0.5 nmol/liter, an intraassay cv of 2.8–5.3%, and an interassay cv of 7.9–8.5%. Free testosterone was calculated from total testosterone and SHBG by the laws of mass action, which has been validated in comparison to free testosterone by equilibrium dialysis (33). Insulin was measured using a RIA kit (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO) with a sensitivity of 2 µU/ml, an intraassay cv of 2.2–4.4%, and an interassay cv of 2.9–6.0%. The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) has been validated as an accurate measurement of insulin resistance and was calculated as [insulin(µIU/ml)*glucose(mmol/liter)]/22.5 (34).
Statistical analysis
JMP Statistical Discoveries Software (version 4.0.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used for statistical analyses. All variables were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Means were compared with ANOVA for variables with normal distributions and with the Wilcoxon test for those with non-normal distributions. Corrections for multiple comparisons were made by Tukey-Kramer. Univariate regression models were constructed, and Spearman coefficients are reported. Forward stepwise regression models, with 0.250 for probability to enter and 0.100 for probability to leave, were constructed to determine predictors of 24-h mean GH, peak stimulated GH, and IGF-I levels. The variables entered into the models are delineated in the Results section and were log-transformed before entry into the models if not normally distributed. Linear regressions were controlled for body mass index (BMI) by constructing multivariate least-squares regression models and entering BMI as a covariate into the models. All variables that were not normally distributed were log-transformed before being entered into these regression analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P value <0.05. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical characteristics, body composition, and endocrine data are shown in Table 1
. Study subjects were categorized as lean (n = 11) if less than 25 kg/m2, overweight (n = 12) if at least 25 but less than 30 kg/m2, or obese (n = 11) if 30 kg/m2 or greater, based on World Health Organization definitions (35). The mean age of the three groups was similar. Study participants ranged in age from 19–45 yr and in BMI from 19.2 to 40.6 kg/m2. Mean 24-h GH and mean peak stimulated GH were lower in overweight than lean women and lowest in obese women (Fig. 1
). Mean IGF-I was lower in obese than overweight women, and there was a trend toward a lower mean IGF-I level in obese compared with lean women. However, the mean IGF-I level was not reduced in overweight women (Fig. 1
). Mean free testosterone levels were higher in overweight and obese than lean women (Table 1
). Mean levels of other gonadal steroids and IGFBP-3 were similar among the groups (Table 1
).
|
|
Linear regression models investigating potential body composition and endocrine determinants of 24-h mean GH, peak GH after stimulation with GHRH and arginine, and IGF-I were constructed in the group as a whole (n = 34), and results (correlation coefficients and P values) are shown in Table 2
. BMI and all measures of fat mass were strong inverse predictors of mean 24-h GH and peak GH after stimulation. BMI, total fat mass, and visceral adipose tissue were also negative predictors of IGF-I levels. Free testosterone (R = 0.36, P = 0.04) was positively associated with IGF-I (Fig. 2A
), and there was a trend toward an association between total testosterone and IGF-I levels (R = 0.30, P = 0.08). After controlling for BMI, the association of total testosterone and IGF-I became significant (P = 0.006). After controlling for BMI, the statistical significance of the association between free testosterone and IGF-I increased (P = 0.002). Free testosterone was inversely associated with peak stimulated GH (R = –0.37, P = 0.04) (Fig. 2B
), but this relationship was no longer significant after controlling for BMI. There was a trend toward an inverse association of estrone (R = –0.31, P = 0.09), but not estradiol, with peak stimulated GH levels; the association was no longer evident after controlling for BMI using multivariate regression modeling. Although neither estrone nor estradiol levels correlated with IGF-I levels, after controlling for BMI a positive association between estrone, but not estradiol, and IGF-I became evident (R = 0.33, P = 0.03).
|
|
Predictors of gonadal steroid and binding protein levels
Predictors of gonadal steroid levels are shown in Table 3
. Estrone was positively associated with BMI (R = 0.35, P = 0.04), total abdominal fat (R = 0.38, P = 0.03), and sc abdominal fat (R = 0.41, P = 0.02). Free testosterone was positively associated with BMI (R = 0.36, P = 0.04), as well as with total abdominal fat (R = 0.38, P = 0.03), visceral adipose tissue (R = 0.36, P = 0.04), sc abdominal fat (R = 0.36, P = 0.04), and fat-free mass (R = 0.35, P = 0.04). Neither estradiol, total testosterone, nor IGFBP-3 levels were associated with BMI or any body composition measures.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IGF-I levels have been variably shown to be low (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), normal (8, 9), or high (10, 11) in overweight and obese women. Although IGF-I has been shown in one study to increase in concert with GH secretion after gastric bypass (36), in two other studies, mean IGF-I levels failed to increase despite increases in mean stimulated GH after a significant reduction in BMI (37, 38). In addition, data from two studies suggest that the relationship between BMI and IGF-I levels may be nonlinear, following an inverse "U" shape, with a peak at a BMI of about 25 kg/m2 (9, 39). Our data suggest that although IGF-I levels may be modestly reduced in women with obesity, they are normal in overweight women. Because GH stimulation is thought to be the primary determinant of IGF-I levels, the underlying mechanisms for the dissociation between GH and IGF-I levels in this group of women are not clear, and we therefore investigated whether body composition, estrogens, androgens, insulin resistance, or elevated IGFBP-3 levels predict GH or IGF-I levels.
The effects of androgens on GH secretion and IGF-I levels have been studied in men, but little is known about the relationship between androgens and the GH-IGF-I axis in women. In men, evidence from studies using several different physiological models demonstrates that testosterone stimulates GH release, thereby contributing to an increase in IGF-I levels. In hypogonadal men, GH levels are decreased, and restoration of testosterone levels, with androgen replacement or pulsatile GnRH therapy, results in normalization of GH (16, 17, 18, 19); testosterone replacement also increases IGF-I secretion in hypogonadal men (16, 18, 19). Similarly, administration of testosterone to prepubertal and peripubertal boys (20, 21, 22), as well as elderly men (23), increases endogenous GH and IGF-I secretion. In addition, and of note, there is evidence of a direct, independent effect of testosterone to stimulate IGF-I levels in men, as shown by Gibney et al. (24) who investigated the effects on IGF-I of testosterone administration alone, GH alone, or the combination to 12 hypopituitary men. Although testosterone administration alone did not increase IGF-I, the combination of GH plus testosterone increased IGF-I more than GH alone, suggesting that testosterone exerts an independent effect to increase IGF-I in the presence, but not absence, of GH in men. As expected, free testosterone levels in our study negatively correlated with stimulated GH levels, the former increasing and the latter decreasing with weight. Also, as predicted, after controlling for BMI, no independent association of GH, either 24-h or peak stimulated, could be detected. However, an interesting finding was that free testosterone levels positively predicted IGF-I levels and that the level of significance of this relationship increased after controlling for the effects of BMI. In addition, in stepwise regression models that included HOMA-IR, a validated measure of insulin resistance, free testosterone was chosen by the model over HOMA-IR as a significant predictor of IGF-I levels. These data suggest a direct stimulatory effect of testosterone on IGF-I production. Although the degree of hyperandrogenemia was similar in overweight and obese women, GH levels (both mean 24-h and peak stimulated) were lower in obese than overweight women. This combination of effects may at least partially explain our finding of normal mean IGF-I levels in overweight women and a lower mean IGF-I level in obese women, but a mean IGF-I that was relatively higher than would be predicted from decreased GH stimulation alone.
To our knowledge, we are the first to report evidence of a possible dissociation of the effects of testosterone on hypothalamic vs. pituitary function in the GH-IGF-I axis in women. Data exploring the relationship between GH and androgens in obese women have not been published. In contrast, there is a small literature on androgens as determinants of IGF-I levels in women without organic hypothalamic or pituitary disease. Our data investigating determinants of IGF-I are consistent with three reports of associations of androgen and androgen precursors with IGF-I levels, including dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (7, 40, 41), testosterone, and androstenedione (7), in healthy women. Androstenedione is the most prevalent, although not most potent, circulating androgen in women, and it is a precursor to both testosterone and estrone. Further investigation into the role of androstenedione as a moderator of the GH-IGF-I axis is merited. Morevoer, additional studies investigating the effects of androgens on hepatic IGF-I production in women are warranted to determine whether our data suggesting that relative hyperandrogenemia in overweight and obese women may be one mechanism underlying a relative preservation of endogenous IGF-I despite reduced GH secretion in this population.
In contrast to our data suggesting that androgen levels may influence IGF-I levels in overweight and obese women, our data do not suggest an important role for estrogens as determinants of GH or IGF-I secretion in healthy obese and overweight women. Our data are consistent with data from Maccario et al. (7) of 234 healthy women in which androgens were positively associated with IGF-I levels in contrast to estradiol levels, which were not; estrone levels were not assessed, nor was GH secretion. Studies in healthy women have suggested a stimulatory role for endogenous estradiol on GH secretion as supported by periovulatory increases in GH secretion associated with the rise in estradiol and higher GH levels in pre- than postmenopausal women (42, 43). Oral estrogens induce a state of GH resistance at the level of the liver, resulting in decreased IGF-I levels despite increased GH secretion (43, 44, 45). In addition, it has been demonstrated that women have lower levels of IGF-I for comparable endogenous GH levels than their male counterparts or a relative GH resistance state compared with men. This has been shown in healthy women as well as women with GH deficiency and those with acromegaly, and it has been attributed to the effects of estrogens (25, 26, 27). In contrast, our data do not support an important role for estrogens in the determination of the variability GH or IGF-I levels among lean, overweight and obese otherwise healthy women of reproductive age.
Similarly, our data do not support dysregulation of IGFBP-3 levels as a mechanism underlying the relatively high IGF-I levels in overweight and obese women. If IGFBP-3, the most ubiquitous IGF-I binding protein (46, 47, 48), were elevated in overweight and obese women, a relative preservation of total IGF-I levels could belie depressed free IGF-I levels. Our data do not suggest this to be the case because IGFBP-3 levels were not increased in overweight or obese women and were not positively associated with BMI, consistent with published data from other groups (9, 11). Our data reporting normal IGFBP-3 levels in overweight and obese women suggest that the relative sparing of IGF-I levels likely reflects biological activity. However, measurement of IGF-I action using a bioassay would be an important next step to investigate this hypothesis further. In addition, Roelen et al. (49) have demonstrated a strong positive correlation between visceral adipose tissue and GH binding protein, such that, in general, those men and women with more visceral adiposity had higher levels of circulating GH binding protein levels. Therefore, a reduction in GH binding protein is not a likely cause of low total GH levels. Instead, low total GH levels in obesity likely do reflect low free GH levels, and the reasons for the lack of a commensurate decrease in IGF-I levels are not evident.
Our data confirm reports from other groups of the importance of body fat, particularly visceral stores of abdominal fat, as determinants of GH (50, 51, 52) and, less so, IGF-I (15) levels in obese healthy women. We also previously have demonstrated truncal fat to be an important determinant of GH levels in healthy overweight women (53), and a number of studies have demonstrated that visceral adipose tissue is an important determinant of GH secretion in healthy lean men and women (12, 13, 14). Therefore, our data are consistent with these studies in that they demonstrate that body fat, particularly visceral fat mass, is a strong predictor of GH and a predictor, although a less important one, of IGF-I secretion in healthy women.
In summary, our data suggest that despite a linear decrease in GH secretion with increasing BMI in young women of reproductive age, IGF-I levels are relatively preserved. Our data also suggest that relative hyperandrogenemia in such women may be one mechanism underlying the maintenance of relatively higher IGF-I levels than would be expected based solely on the degree of GH stimulation. Estrogen levels were not important determinants of the variability in GH or IGF-I levels in the group of women studied. Our data are also consistent with published results that have established that body fat, particularly visceral adipose stores, are important inverse determinants of GH levels in young women and significant, though weaker, predictors of IGF-I levels. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effects of androgens on the GH-IGF-I axis in women.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have no conflicts to declare.
First Published Online July 22, 2008
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CT, computed tomography; cv, coefficient of variation; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; IRMA, immunoradiometric assay.
Received April 29, 2008.
Accepted July 11, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Imrie, A. Abbas, H. Viswambharan, A. Rajwani, R. M. Cubbon, M. Gage, M. Kahn, V. A. Ezzat, E. R. Duncan, P. J. Grant, et al. Vascular Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Resistance and Diet-Induced Obesity Endocrinology, October 1, 2009; 150(10): 4575 - 4582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Frystyk, D. J. Brick, A. V. Gerweck, A. L. Utz, and K. K. Miller Bioactive Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in Obesity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2009; 94(8): 3093 - 3097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bredella, A. L. Utz, M. Torriani, B. Thomas, D. A. Schoenfeld, and K. K. Miller Anthropometry, CT, and DXA as predictors of GH deficiency in premenopausal women: ROC curve analysis J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2009; 106(2): 418 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |