| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Endocrinology (J.F., E.M.S., M.D.B., D.J.M., S.J.S.), Department of Medicine, and Department of Surgery (M.B., N.R., L.O.-R.), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: S. J. Silverberg, Professor of Clinical Medicine, 630 West 168th Street, PH8 West–864, New York, New York 10032. E-mail: sjs5{at}columbia.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: Our objective was to assess bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Design and Setting: We conducted a 1-yr prospective longitudinal study at a university hospital bariatric surgery practice and metabolic bone disease unit.
Participants: Participants included 23 obese (mean body mass index 47 kg/m2) men and women, aged 20–64 yr.
Main Outcome Measures: Serum PTH, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, osteocalcin, and urinary N-telopeptide, and BMD were assessed.
Results: Patients lost 45 ± 2 kg 1 yr postoperatively (P < 0.01). PTH increased early (3 months, 43–50 pg/ml; P < 0.001) and urinary calcium dropped (161–92 mg/24 h; P < 0.01), despite doubling of calcium intake (1318–2488 mg/d; P < 0.001). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were unchanged (23–26 ng/ml), although vitamin D intake increased by 260% (658 IU/d at baseline to 1698 IU/d at 12 months; P < 0.05). Markers of bone remodeling rose (P < 0.01 for both urinary N-telopeptide and osteocalcin), whereas BMD decreased at the femoral neck (9.2%, P < 0.005) and at the total hip (8.0%, P < 0.005). These declines were strongly associated with the extent of weight loss (femoral neck: r = 0.90, P < 0.0001; and total hip: r = 0.65, P = 0.02). Lumbar spine and distal radius sites did not change.
Conclusions: After Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, there was evidence of calcium and vitamin D malabsorption. Bone turnover increased, and hip bone density rapidly declined. The decline in hip BMD was strongly associated with weight loss itself. Vigilance for nutritional deficiencies and bone loss in patients both before and after bariatric surgery is crucial.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several putative mechanisms may explain the changes in bone metabolism observed after bariatric surgery. Malabsorption of minerals and fat-soluble vitamins, including calcium and vitamin D, has been documented (9, 10) and may result in secondary hyperparathyroidism and bone loss. Low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and elevated PTH concentrations have been frequently reported (8, 9, 10). Longstanding vitamin D deficiency in obese patients (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19) may result in metabolic and skeletal abnormalities that antedate but are detected only after surgery. Increased bone turnover and reduced bone mineral density (BMD) (7, 11) may occur as physiological adaptations to weight loss and alterations in mechanical loading of the skeleton or as pathophysiological responses to the surgery.
The majority of research performed in this area has been cross-sectional and provides little evidence as to the possible mechanisms for the observed abnormalities in bone metabolism. The impact of preoperative 25OHD and PTH levels on postoperative findings has not been well explored. Furthermore, there are limited data documenting the longitudinal changes in bone density and bone turnover that occur during the postoperative period.
This prospective study was designed to evaluate changes in mineral metabolism and bone mineral density after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the most commonly performed bariatric surgery procedure (6). We hypothesized that significant weight loss from RYGB would be associated with alterations in the calcium-vitamin D-PTH axis, increased bone turnover, and decreased BMD.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Calciotropic hormones and markers of bone turnover were measured before surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after RYGB. Assessments included serum calcium, 25OHD [Nichols Advantage RIA (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA), interassay coefficient of variation (CV) 12.9% and intraassay CV 8.4%], 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] (DiaSorin, Stillwater MN; interassay CV 9.7% and intraassay CV 4.6%), and intact PTH (Scantibodies Laboratories, Santee, CA; interassay CV 3.3% and intraassay CV 4.8%). Biochemical markers of bone turnover included serum osteocalcin (Immunotopics International, San Clemente, CA; interassay CV 12.5% and intraassay CV 4.6%), and urinary N-telopeptide (NTx) (Inverness Medical, Princeton, NJ; interassay CV 10.3% and intraassay CV 10.0%). BMD was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (LS; L1–L4), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) in those subjects who did not exceed the weight criteria of 300 pounds (n = 13). Forearm (one third distal radius) BMD was measured in all subjects (Hologic Model Delphi W; Hologic, Waltham, MA). BMD was measured preoperatively and 1 yr postoperatively. To control for changes in BMD that may have occurred due to changes in body size, volumetric, three-dimensional estimation of bone density, known as bone mineral apparent density (BMaD), was calculated at the LS and FN. BMaD (grams per cubic centimeter) was calculated as follows: BMaD = BMD/
bone area (20).
All subjects were instructed to take calcium and vitamin D supplements according to surgical protocol. Patients between the ages of 19 and 50 yr were prescribed 1500 mg calcium citrate and 600 IU of vitamin D daily; patients over the age of 50 were prescribed 1800 mg of calcium citrate and 800 IU vitamin D daily. Standardized questionnaires were administered at each visit to assess calcium and vitamin D intake from food sources and supplements (21).
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results are presented as mean ± SEM except where otherwise noted. Two-sided P values
0.05 were considered significant. Changes in biochemistries and densitometric measures over time were analyzed with linear mixed models with a fixed effect of time of measurement and an autoregressive structure for the within-subject covariance. Pearson correlations were used to assess strength of association between changes in indices of bone mineral metabolism and changes in bone density after weight loss.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Subjects seemed to follow postoperative dietary instructions, because dietary calcium intake nearly doubled during the first 3 months (from 1318–2488 mg/d; P < 0.01), and remained significantly elevated at 6 (P < 0.01) and 12 months (P < 0.01) postoperatively. Similarly, vitamin D intake increased significantly from baseline to 6 months (658 ± 117 IU/d to 1195 ± 188 IU/d; P < 0.05) and was increased by 2.5-fold at 12 months (658 ± 117 IU/d to 1698 ± 354 IU/d; P < 0.05). Despite this, serum 25OHD levels did not increase at any time point (see Fig. 1
), and the majority of subjects continued to have suboptimal vitamin D levels at 12 months (91% were <30 ng/ml, and 35% were <20 ng/ml).
|
|
|
|
Biochemical markers of bone turnover (urinary NTx and serum osteocalcin) began to increase as early as 3 months and continued to rise progressively throughout the first postoperative year (Table 1
). There was robust evidence of bone resorption early after surgery, with a rise in urinary NTx levels by 57% at 3 months (P < 0.01), 86% at 6 months (P < 0.01), and 106% at 12 months (P < 0.01). A less dramatic, but significant increase was seen in the bone formation marker osteocalcin, which gradually rose to 39% above baseline at 12 months (P < 0.01).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Calcium malabsorption (8, 24) and hypocalcemia (25) have been reported after RYGB. In this report, there was evidence of impaired calcium absorption at the earliest postoperative measurement (3 months). Our data confirm a prior report (7) of reduced urinary calcium excretion in patients with declining bone density after gastric bypass. We extend previously available data with the finding of a concomitant rise in PTH levels. Furthermore, this study documents the parathyroid response despite a doubling of calcium intake. Malabsorption of vitamin D is also shown, because patients had no increase in 25OHD concentrations in the face of a 2.6-fold increase in vitamin D intake.
Low 25OHD levels have been well described in obese cohorts (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19) and are no longer assumed to be a simply a sequelae of bariatric surgery. The majority of our subjects did indeed have vitamin D insufficiency before surgery. No further decline in levels of 25OHD was noted postoperatively. This lack of change, seen despite more than doubling of vitamin D intake to mean levels well above the recommended daily allowance, implies malabsorption and confirms previous findings (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 26, 27). The data suggest that patients who have insufficient vitamin D stores preoperatively may be at greater risk for developing postoperative deficiencies, and consuming amounts well above the recommended daily allowance may not be adequate to meet their postoperative needs. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that vitamin D is sequestered in the adipose tissue of obese subjects (15) and may be released into the circulation over time with weight loss. Although we are unable to comment on this in our cohort, if vitamin D release from adipose tissue did occur during the postoperative period, the absence of an increase in circulating 25OHD levels would suggest the presence of even more severe malabsorption. Many (8, 9, 25, 26, 27, 28), but not all (7, 11, 29), studies have documented hyperparathyroidism after bariatric surgery. Differences in PTH levels observed by these authors may have been related to disparities in preoperative vitamin D status, different repletion protocols for calcium and vitamin D, or varying length of follow-up. Differences in surgical techniques could also explain the presence or absence of secondary hyperparathyroidism, as longer Roux limbs have been associated with lower vitamin D levels and subsequently higher PTH concentrations (30). We observed a transient rise in PTH at 3 months. The frequent longitudinal follow-up we performed may have allowed us to capture patterns in PTH missed by other studies.
To date, there have been limited data on the skeletal sequelae of alterations in mineral metabolism after bariatric surgery. Several reports on bone markers do not include preoperative data (8, 27). In one longitudinally followed cohort, NTx increased by 319% 9 months after RYGB, but levels of bone formation markers did not significantly change (7). Our data suggest a high bone turnover state after bypass surgery, with significant, progressive increases in markers of both formation and resorption persisting throughout the first year (NTx, 106%; osteocalcin, 39%).
Although several cross-sectional studies have reported a decline in hip bone density 3 (27) and 10 (31) years after bariatric surgery, prospective data on bone density response to bariatric surgery are limited. The two small prospective studies done to date reported declines in both LS and TH BMD. The results of this report confirm the decline at the TH and extend the findings to include a significant loss at the FN.
Although decreased BMD at the hip after RYGB seems to be a uniform finding, changes reported at the LS have been more variable. Our study did not find any decline in spine BMD, as did Coates et al. (7). Their extremely modest decline (3%) may have been within machine error, or missed in this small cohort. Alternatively, it is possible that whereas the effect of weight loss on BMD predominated at the hip sites (discussed below), the more cancellous LS may have benefited from a contribution of the anabolic effect of the increased PTH. In our study, as well as in the other reports in which postoperative PTH levels increased, LS BMD did not decline (27, 31).
The decrement in bone density was strongly associated with extent of weight loss, a finding not reported in previous cohorts after bariatric surgery. The preferential loss of bone at the hip, a weight-bearing site, suggests that this could be a response to unloading of the skeleton. This change in mechanical stress as a cause for remodeling leads to elevations in bone turnover and subsequent reductions in BMD. The strong association between extent of weight loss and amount of bone loss provides further support for this hypothesis. Bone loss has been shown to occur in individuals who lose even small amounts of weight from caloric restriction, both in observational studies (32) and interventional trials using energy-restrictive diets (33, 34). In one such intervention trial, women in the highest quartile for weight loss had a decrease in hip BMD almost three times greater than those in the other quartiles (33). As in our cohort, no changes in LS BMD were observed with weight loss. It should also be noted that the decline in BMD at the FN tended to be associated with increases in PTH levels, suggesting that the reasons for the decline we observed may be multifactorial. In addition to the mechanical unloading of weight loss, a component of PTH-mediated bone loss, as seen in other hyperparathyroid states, may have contributed at this site as well.
This study has several limitations. As with other prospective studies in this field, the sample size, and particularly the number of subjects in whom axial BMD measurements could be obtained, is limited. Anomalies in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement have also been reported with weight loss, related to changes in adipose tissue density and distribution (35, 36). These artifactual changes appear to be significant at the spine and hip sites but not the radius (37). Although the results of these studies are not uniform, it is possible that some of the observed changes could be accounted for by the measurement tool itself. However, data suggest that Hologic machines, which were used in this study, may artifactually elevate BMD with weight loss (36). Thus, it is possible that the measurement artifact related to weight loss blunted even more significant declines at the TH and FN and could possibly hide declines at the LS as well. Furthermore, to minimize the potential effects of artifactual changes in areal BMD measurements that are found with significant weight loss, we confirmed our findings with a calculation of BMaD at the sites of interest.
Furthermore, because of ethical considerations, our study did not include a randomized control group. Finally, there are no data on the clinical sequelae of the decline in hip bone density we observed.
In summary, after bariatric surgery, we found evidence of calcium and vitamin D malabsorption and secondary hyperparathyroidism early in the postoperative period despite marked increases in calcium (100%) and vitamin D (260%) intake. In association with substantial weight loss after bariatric surgery, bone turnover increased and hip bone density rapidly declined. The decline in hip BMD was strongly associated with the weight loss itself. The small sample size of this study argues for larger, long-term studies to answer the critical question of how these losses relate to bone quality and fracture risk. For the present, a high degree of vigilance for nutritional deficiencies and bone loss in patients both before and after bariatric surgery is crucial.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online July 22, 2008
Abbreviations: BMaD, Bone mineral apparent density; BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; FN, femoral neck; LS, lumbar spine; NTx, N-telopeptide; 25OHD, 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D; 1,25(OH)2D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; TH, total hip.
Received February 29, 2008.
Accepted July 15, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. T Aasheim, S. Bjorkman, T. T Sovik, M. Engstrom, S. E Hanvold, T. Mala, T. Olbers, and T. Bohmer Vitamin status after bariatric surgery: a randomized study of gastric bypass and duodenal switch Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2009; 90(1): 15 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Monitor Bone Density Carefully After Bariatric Surgery Journal Watch Women's Health, October 30, 2008; 2008(1030): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |