| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Lilly Research Laboratories (M.L.H., A.Z., R.L.Q.), Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, Indiana 46285; Departments of Human Services and Medicine (A.W.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; Medical Service (A.R.H.), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California 94304; Stanford University (A.R.H.), Stanford, California 94305; Research and Medicine Services (G.R.M.), Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, Tacoma, Washington 98493; and University of Washington School of Medicine (G.R.M.), Seattle, Washington 98195
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: George R. Merriam, M.D., Research (A-151), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington School of Medicine, 9600 Veterans Drive SW, Tacoma, Washington 98493. E-mail: merriam{at}u.washington.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether improvements in aerobic exercise capacity with GH treatment in adults with GHD are related to changes in physical activity or affected by the GH dosing regimen.
Design: This was a randomized, two-arm, parallel, open-label study.
Setting: The study was conducted at five academic medical centers with exercise physiology laboratories.
Subjects: Study subjects were adults (n = 29) with GHD due to hypothalamic-pituitary disease.
Interventions: The intervention was GH replacement therapy, administered either as a fixed body weight-based dosing regimen as an individualized dose titration regimen for 32 wk.
Main Outcome Measures: Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) and oxygen consumption (VO2) at the lactate threshold, ventilatory threshold using a cycle ergometry protocol, and weekly energy expenditure (physical activity questionnaire), assessed at baseline and end point, were measured.
Results: In the group as a whole, VO2 max increased significantly (by 9%) from baseline (19.1± 0.89 ml/kg·min) to end point (21.6 ± 1.23 ml/kg·min, P = 0.010). Compared with baseline, VO2 max also changed significantly within the individualized dose titration regimen group (+2.5 ± 0.98 ml/kg·min, P =0.034) but not within the fixed body weight-based dosing regimen group (+1.2 ± 0.78 ml/kg·min, P = 0.15), although these changes from baseline were not significantly different between the two groups. VO2 at lactate threshold, VO2 at ventilatory threshold, and weekly energy expenditure also did not change.
Conclusions: GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults improved VO2 max similarly with both dosing regimens, without any influence of physical activity. There was no effect on submaximal exercise performance.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Improvements in submaximal exercise performance may be measured by changes in the lactate threshold (LT) or ventilatory threshold (VT; sometimes referred to as the anaerobic threshold). There are data indicating that LT and VT do not occur at the same oxygen consumption (VO2) or power output and that they adapt differently to exercise training (8, 9). Increases in VT were reported with GH replacement in three studies (2, 4, 6), and this change was significant compared with placebo in two of these trials (2, 6). No study has directly assessed the effect of GH treatment on LT in adults with GHD. In addition, there are few data relating improvements in aerobic exercise capacity to possible changes in spontaneous physical activity that might occur with improved health-related quality of life (QoL) as a result of GH treatment (2, 10).
These early single-center studies of GH-deficient adults used fixed GH doses up to 12.5–25 µg/kg·d without adjustments for serum IGF-I levels (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Individualized GH treatment based on low starting doses and gradual dose titration to normalize serum IGF-I levels results in fewer adverse side effects and similar improvements in body composition and serum lipoproteins, but effects on exercise performance have not been evaluated (11, 12, 13). It is clinically relevant to determine whether individualized GH dosing improves exercise capacity because these regimens, currently recommended by consensus guidelines (14), result in lower GH maintenance doses than were used in the early adult GHD studies that evaluated exercise capacity (11, 12, 13).
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of individualized GH dosing and fixed weight-based GH dosing on maximal (VO2 max) and submaximal (VO2 at LT and VT) exercise capacity in adults with GHD. We also sought to determine whether increases in spontaneous physical activity occur during GH replacement therapy.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was conducted in a subset (29 of 387) of adult subjects with GHD enrolled in a randomized study (61 sites in five countries) comparing an individualized GH dosing regimen (ID) with a fixed body weight-based dosing regimen (FD) (11). For the present substudy, the 29 subjects were enrolled at five U.S. centers with the capability to perform exercise testing. The main study and the substudy used the same inclusion and exclusion criteria (11).
Study design
This investigation was a randomized, two-arm, parallel, open-label study carried out in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, approval of ethical review committees, and signed informed consent of all subjects. The total treatment period was 32 wk, with bimonthly assessments after randomization to therapy. Randomization was carried out centrally within each country at the level of the main study (11). Subjects in the FD arm received GH therapy (Humatrope; Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) at doses of 4.0, 8.0, and 12.0 µg/kg·d for wk 0–16, 16–24, and 24–32, respectively, with dose adjustments for adverse events potentially related to GH therapy (11). Subjects in the ID arm initiated GH therapy at a dose of 200 µg/d for 8 wk, with dose titrations every 8 wk based on an algorithm described previously (11); dose increases were by 200 µg/d increments up to maximal doses of 400, 600, and 800 µg/d for wk 8–16, 16–24, and 24–32, respectively.
Cycle ergometer test
The cycle ergometer test was performed at the screening visit (wk –4), the second baseline visit (wk 0), and at study end point (wk 32). Two baseline measurements were performed to control for any learning effects, either physiological training or improved performance based on developing more familiarity with the exercise protocol. For subjects taking gonadal steroid replacement, women were tested in the first half of the artificial menstrual cycle and men were tested in the middle of their testosterone replacement interval. Exercise tests were performed at least 3 h after consumption of food and after subjects had taken their standard hormone replacement therapy. If the resting blood pressure exceeded 160/100 mm Hg, the exercise test was postponed. An indwelling venous cannula was inserted into a forearm or hand vein before the test to allow periodic blood sampling. An electrically braked cycle ergometer with an adjustable seat height was used; subjects were required to maintain a pedaling frequency of 60–100 rpm throughout the test. The initial power output was 20 W and was increased by 15 W every 3 min until the subject reached volitional exhaustion or could not maintain the required pedaling frequency.
Metabolic data were collected continuously using standard open circuit spirometry. Heart rate was recorded using surface electrocardiography, and electrocardiogram tracings were monitored for clinically significant changes. Blood samples for measurement of blood lactate concentration were obtained before the test (at rest), during the last 15 sec of each 3-min exercise stage, and at termination of the test. The following data were recorded at rest (before start of test), at the end of each 3-min exercise stage, and at the termination of the test: heart rate, blood pressure, power output, VO2, CO2 production (VCO2), expired ventilation (VE), VE/VO2, VE/VCO2, respiratory exchange ratio, and blood lactate concentration. The subjects weight and height measurements were recorded.
Blood lactate measurement
A lactate analyzer was used to determine the whole blood lactate concentration in each blood sample immediately after collection. At four of the five sites, a YSI model 1500L Sport (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH) lactate analyzer was used. At one site (Nashville, TN), a Monarch model 761 (Instrumentation Laboratories, Lexington, MA) was used.
Physical activity questionnaire
To determine whether changes in physical activity occurred during the 32-wk study, a structured interview was conducted by the exercise physiologist with each subject at baseline and at study end point. Subjects were questioned about a variety of physical activities, including activities of daily living, that they performed regularly (at least once a week) over the previous 3 months using the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study Physical Activity Questionnaire (15, 16). The exercise physiologist used an interview technique to increase accuracy of the assessment (17) and recorded the frequency, intensity, and average duration of these activities. Upon completion of the questionnaire, results were converted to weekly energy expenditure (kilocalories per week), using methods previously described (18), and were recorded at the site.
Body composition measurement
Changes in body fat mass and lean body mass were assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), performed at baseline and study end point, as previously described (11).
Exercise data analysis
A single experienced exercise physiologist (A.W.), blinded to the treatment group and the visit number, interpreted all of the exercise tests. Maximal power output and VO2 max were defined as the highest values for power output and VO2, respectively, attained during the cycle ergometer test.
Power output and VO2 associated with LT
Blood lactate concentrations were plotted against cycle ergometer power output or VO2. The power output or VO2 at LT was defined as the maximum value obtained for each parameter before the curvilinear increase in blood lactate concentration (19). An elevation in blood lactate concentration of at least 0.2 mM (the error associated with the lactate analyzer) above baseline was required for LT determination.
Power output and VO2 associated with VT
The VT was determined by examining the VE/VO2 and VE/VCO2 relationships. The point at which VE/VO2 increased abruptly in the absence of an increase in VE/VCO2 was considered the VT (8, 20). Plots of VE/VO2, VE/VCO2, and VO2 vs. power output were used to define the values associated with the VT.
Statistical analysis
A sample size of 20 subjects per treatment group was planned to provide 80% power to detect within-group changes from baseline to end point in VO2 max of 4 ml/kg·min based on a SD of 6 ml/kg·min, a baseline VO2 max of 22 ml/min·kg, and a two-sided significance level of 0.05. The actual number of subjects analyzed was 14 in the FD group and 15 in the ID group, although not every subject contributed to each variable.
To determine whether a learning effect was present, results from the screening visit and the second baseline visit were compared using a t statistic. The treatment effect between the second baseline visit and study end point (last observed value) was of primary interest and was measured by the change from baseline to end point. All subjects were included in the analyses. Differences between groups were assessed using an independent groups t test, but the primary analysis was intended to evaluate the overall effect of GH treatment. This was accomplished by pooling the treatment groups and assessing the pooled change with a t statistic. As a secondary analysis of the change, an analysis of covariance was evaluated with baseline age added as a covariate. Demographics and baseline characteristics were evaluated for group differences using an independent-groups t test for continuous variables and Fishers exact test for categorical variables. Pearsons correlation coefficient was used to assess associations. Data are summarized as mean ± SE. Results were considered statistically significant for P
0.05. SAS (version 8.02; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Serum IGF-I concentrations did not differ significantly between the dosing groups at baseline (FD: 65.1 ± 6.6 µg/liter; ID: 73.4 ± 20.1 µg/liter) or at study end point (FD: 206.5 ± 32.2 µg/liter; ID: 161.2 ± 23.4 µg/liter). The GH dose at study end point was also not significantly different between the FD (0.77 ± 0.09 mg/d) and ID groups (0.58 ± 0.07 mg/d, P = 0.11).
Maximum power output during the cycle ergometer test did not change between the first and second baseline visits in any group (Fig. 1
). A significant increase was observed between the second baseline value and study end point in the all-randomized subjects group (+9.3 ± 3.2 W, P = 0.0086) and the FD group (+12.5 ± 4.1 W, P = 0.011) but not in the ID group (+5.0 ± 5.0 W, P = 0.35).
|
|
A significant increase in VO2 at LT (Fig. 3
) was observed between the first and second baseline visit in the all-randomized subjects group (+1.52 ± 0.56 ml/kg·min, P = 0.011) and the FD group (+2.15 ± 0.94 ml/kg·min, P = 0.041) but not in the ID group (+0.85 ± 0.54 ml/kg·min, P = 0.14). There were no significant differences in VO2 at LT between the second baseline visit and study end point in any group.
|
There were no statistically significant changes in weekly energy expenditure results estimated from physical activity questionnaires at baseline and at study end point in either the FD (–1703.81 ± 1631.32 kcal/wk, P = 0.31) or ID groups (–620.23 ± 1026.74 kcal/wk, P = 0.56).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although LT has been measured during acute exercise in GH-deficient subjects receiving GH (22), this is the first study to measure VO2 at the LT after months of GH replacement therapy. Three studies have previously evaluated VO2 at the VT (2, 4, 6), but ours is the first to evaluate this end point with the lower GH doses attained with individualized dosing. We observed a significant increase in VO2 at LT between the first and second baseline visits in the total group of subjects and the FD group. This suggests that as subjects became more familiar with the testing procedure, they were able to exercise at submaximal levels more economically. However, such an effect was not observed with VO2 at VT or VO2 max. Treatment with GH for 32 wk did not have any statistically significant effect on VO2 at LT or VO2 at VT, suggesting that the doses of GH treatment used in this study did not impact submaximal exercise performance. These results are in contrast to those reported by Woodhouse et al. (6), who observed a significant increase (18%) in VO2 at VT but not VO2 max in adults with GHD treated with GH for 3 months. Compared with the present study, Woodhouse et al. studied younger subjects for a shorter period, used higher GH doses that resulted in greater increases in serum IGF-I (
200 vs.
100 µg/liter), and used a different protocol (treadmill) to assess exercise performance (6). Of interest, VO2 at VT improved with 3 months of exercise training in adults with GHD by similar magnitudes in the absence (+9.4%) or presence (+8.6%) of GH therapy (23). Further research into the effect of GH replacement on submaximal exercise performance is needed.
The fact that GH administration did not affect VO2 at LT is not surprising. Changes in the LT are related to adaptations within skeletal muscle as a result of exercise training and the response is specific to the muscle groups being trained (24, 25). It is well established that the LT is strongly influenced by fiber type distribution (26, 27). A strong direct relationship exists between oxidative characteristics of the actively recruited muscle and the LT (26). The improvement in the blood lactate response to exercise training, even in the absence of an increase in VO2 max, is associated with increased oxidative activity of muscle fibers (particularly slow twitch and high oxidative fast twitch) (27). The limited data from studies that examined fiber type adaptation as a result of GH administration in GH-deficient adults indicate little if any effect on the proportion of fiber types (6, 28, 29). In contrast, it is well known that VO2 max is strongly related to maximal cardiac output (30). Previous investigators have suggested that GH replacement may increase VO2 max by improving cardiac function (due to increased plasma volume and/or a positive inotropic effect) or by increasing erythrocyte mass (resulting in increased oxygen transport capacity) (2, 10, 31, 32, 33). However, studies investigating the effects of GH replacement on cardiac function in GH-deficient adults have yielded mixed results (4, 31, 32). Thus, further research is needed to confirm these suggested mechanisms.
Few studies have evaluated the relationship between physical activity levels and changes in aerobic exercise capacity during adult GH replacement therapy. Cuneo et al. (2) reported that pedometer recordings did not change significantly in either the GH (
23 µg/kg·d) or placebo groups after 6 months, and 7-d physical activity recall also did not differ between groups at 6 months. GH replacement therapy, both with fixed body-weight dosing and individualized dosing, has been reported to improve some aspects of QoL, particularly in subjects with adult-onset GHD and those with a greater degree of QoL impairment (1, 10, 11, 34, 35). In this study, no significant changes in weekly energy expenditure, estimated from physical activity questionnaires, occurred within either the FD or ID groups. The apparent absence of an increase in physical activity during the trial suggests that the improvement in VO2 max was a direct effect of GH treatment.
Limitations of this study must be considered. The study was not designed with a placebo control group because GH had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating adult GHD. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility of a placebo effect accounting for the increase in VO2 max during GH treatment. The lack of statistically significant improvement in VO2 max in the FD group may be related to an inadequate sample size because we were unable to recruit the planned number of subjects despite using five sites. The exercise data for some subjects were incomplete due to inability to complete a maximal test (i.e. criteria for VO2 max were not met) or failure of blood sampling. Hyperthermia during exercise in adult GHD may lead to lower voluntary effort (36). Some subjects could not have DEXA performed due to their high body mass index. Estimates of energy expenditure obtained from physical activity questionnaires are not as accurate as those obtained using the doubly labeled water technique (37). Finally, the higher mean age of the FD group, compared with ID group, might be related to the randomization for the overall trial being conducted at the country level rather than at the site level; only five of the 22 U.S. sites participated in this addendum study (11). Nevertheless, the increase in VO2 max remained statistically significant after correcting for age.
In summary, GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults improved VO2 max similarly with both dosing regimens, without any influence of physical activity. There was no effect on submaximal exercise performance. These results are clinically relevant because they demonstrate that the lower GH doses achieved with individualized dosing regimens now recommended by consensus clinical guidelines will improve aerobic exercise capacity (14).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Summary: M.L.H., A.Z., and R.L.Q. are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Co. A.R.H., G.R.M., and A.W. have received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Co. A.R.H. and G.R.M. have received research grant support from Eli Lilly and Co.
First Published Online October 23, 2007
Abbreviations: DEXA, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; FD, fixed body weight-based dosing regimen; GHD, GH deficiency; ID, individualized GH dosing regimen; LT, lactate threshold; QoL, quality of life; VCO2, CO2 production; VE, expired ventilation; VO2, O2 consumption; VO2 max, maximal oxygen consumption; VT, ventilatory threshold.
Received June 26, 2007.
Accepted October 17, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Goto, S. Doessing, R. H. Nielsen, A. Flyvbjerg, and M. Kjaer Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist Treatment Reduces Exercise Performance in Young Males J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3265 - 3272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Widdowson and J. Gibney The Effect of Growth Hormone Replacement on Exercise Capacity in Patients with GH Deficiency: A Metaanalysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2008; 93(11): 4413 - 4417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |