| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Medicine (L.J., A.K., H.Y.-J.), Division of Diabetes, University of Helsinki, Minerva Medical Research Institute (L.J., A.K.), and Department of Internal Medicine (M.G.), Division of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Anna Kotronen, M.B., Department of Medicine, Division of Diabetes, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 700, Room C418B, FIN-00029 HUCH Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: anna.kotronen{at}helsinki.fi.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agonists reduce liver fat. We therefore hypothesized that type 2 diabetic patients using exceptionally high doses of insulin might respond well to addition of a PPAR
agonist.
Methods: We determined the effect of the PPAR
agonist rosiglitazone on liver fat and directly measured hepatic insulin sensitivity in 14 patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 51 ± 3 yr, body mass index 36.7 ± 1.1 kg/m2), who were poorly controlled (glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.9 ± 0.4%) despite using high doses of insulin (218 ± 22 IU/d) in combination with metformin. Liver fat content (1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy), hepatic insulin sensitivity [6 h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (insulin 0.3 mU/kg·min) combined with [3-3H]glucose], body composition (magnetic resonance imaging), substrate oxidation rates (indirect calorimetry), clinical parameters, and liver enzymes were measured before and after rosiglitazone treatment (8 mg/d) for 8 months.
Results: During rosiglitazone, HbA1c decreased from 8.9 ± 0.4% to 7.8 ± 0.3% (P = 0.007) and insulin requirements from 218 ± 22 to 129 ± 20 IU/d (P = 0.002). Liver fat content decreased by 46 ± 9% from 20 ± 3% to 11 ± 3% (P = 0.0002). Hepatic insulin sensitivity, measured from the percent suppression of endogenous glucose production by insulin, increased from –40 ± 7% to –89 ± 12% (P = 0.001). The percent change in liver fat correlated with the percent decrease in HbA1c (r = 0.53, P = 0.06), insulin dose (r = 0.66, P = 0.014), and suppression of endogenous glucose production (r = 0.76, P = 0.003).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that rosiglitazone may be particularly effective in type 2 diabetic patients who are poorly controlled despite using high insulin doses. The mechanism is likely to involve reduced liver fat and enhanced hepatic insulin sensitivity.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-
agonists have been shown to decrease liver fat content (15, 16, 17, 18, 19). When used in combination with insulin, these agents have had a modest insulin sparing effect (mean decrease 9% or 13 IU/d) (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28) and improved glycemic control, compared with placebo (20, 22, 23, 26). Because of fear of hepatotoxicity after withdrawal of troglitazone due to idiosyncratic liver reactions, patients with elevated liver enzymes were carefully excluded from these studies (21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28). The currently available PPAR
agonists rosi- and pioglitazone have reduced not only liver enzymes (29, 30, 31) and steatosis (15, 16, 17, 18, 19) but also inflammation, ballooning necrosis, and possibly fibrosis (19). Given the potentially harmful cardiovascular effects of rosiglitazone (32) and other side effects, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) might become an indication for PPAR
agonists. If used for treatment of type 2 diabetes, it would be useful to identify patients who respond particularly well to these agents.
In the present mechanistic study, we hypothesized that patients requiring high doses of insulin are particularly responsive to PPAR
agonist treatment and that PPAR
agonism would markedly reduce insulin requirements and liver fat and improve hepatic insulin sensitivity. We searched for patients who had been chronically using a stable high dose of insulin combined with metformin and then added rosiglitazone to the treatment regimen. We have previously shown that metformin has no effect on liver fat in insulin-naive patients (15) and that adding insulin to previous metformin treatment in insulin-naive patients has only a minor effect on liver fat content (10).
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was an investigator-initiated study not financially supported by the industry. We recruited, by contacting specialists in southern Finland, 14 patients (nine men and five women, mean duration of diabetes 12 yr) with type 2 diabetes who were poorly controlled despite high-dose insulin therapy (>100 IU/d, range 115–400 IU/d) combined with metformin (2 g/d for more than 2 yr) to be treated with additional rosiglitazone (8 mg once a day) for 8 months. The insulin treatment regiments varied from basal insulin alone (n = 5) to use of multiple insulin injection therapy (n = 9). The patients were instructed to decrease their insulin doses by 4–10 IU whenever hypoglycemia (fasting plasma glucose < 4 mmol/liter) occurred. Additional inclusion criteria were stable insulin dose for at least 2 yr and body weight and glycemic control for at least 6 months before participation. Exclusion criteria were clinical or echocardiographic evidence of heart failure, other cardiovascular disease, or any other significant disease that would make implementation of the study protocol impossible; treatment with drugs that may alter glucose metabolism (steroids, β-blockers, and thiazide diuretics); abnormal serum creatinine, macroalbuminuria, and excessive alcohol consumption (>20 g/d); and drug abuse. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed at a screening visit, during which the patients underwent a history and physical examination, and blood samples were taken for measurement of the blood count, serum creatinine, electrolytes, fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), liver enzymes, and lipids. An electrocardiogram was recorded, and a urine sample was taken to exclude patients with infections and macroalbuminuria. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed by one of the investigators (M.G.) using Vivid 7 digital ultrasonography system (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horton, Norway). The left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated by M-mode echocardiography from the parasternal long-axis view. Measurements were made while the subject was lying in the left lateral recumbent position from three consecutive beats. The average of three beats was used for analysis. Subjects with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% were excluded.
If a patient was considered eligible after the screening visit, metabolic studies [measurement of liver fat, insulin sensitivity of the glucose rate of appearance (Ra) and rate of disappearance (Rd), body composition, and substrate oxidation rates] were performed before and after 8 months of additional treatment with rosiglitazone as detailed below. The nature and potential risks of the study were explained to all subjects before obtaining their written, informed consent. The experimental protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Helsinki University Central Hospital.
In vivo insulin action on glucose production and use
Patients were admitted to the hospital on the evening before the study. At 1800 h, an indwelling 18-gauge catheter (Venflon; Viggo-Spectramed, Helsingborg, Sweden) equipped with an obturator was inserted in an antecubital vein. On this evening before the study, the patients did not take their bedtime insulin injection. To determine glucose Ra and Rd, a primed continuous iv infusion of [3-3H]glucose was started at 0400 h and continued for a total of 11 h. The priming dose of [3-3H]glucose was adjusted according to the fasting blood glucose concentration measured at 0400 h as follows: priming dose = [glucose (millimoles per liter) at 0400 h/5] x 20 µCi/min. This dose was infused iv over 10 min and was followed by a continuous-rate infusion of [3-3H]glucose at a rate of 0.2 µCi/min as previously described (3). Before the start of the insulin infusion, another catheter was inserted in a retrograde position in a heated dorsal hand vein for withdrawal of arterialized venous blood. Baseline blood samples were taken for measurement of fasting plasma glucose; glucose specific activity (SA); HbA1c; triglycerides; total, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol; free fatty acids; and serum-free insulin concentrations. At 0900 h, after a 300-min equilibrium period, a primed continuous (0.3 mU/kg·min) infusion of insulin (Actrapid Human; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) was started (0 min), as previously described (33).
Because hepatic glucose production is more sensitive to suppression by insulin than muscle glucose uptake (8, 34), we chose a low insulin infusion rate to be able to accurately assess hepatic insulin sensitivity. Plasma glucose was adjusted to and then maintained at approximately 8 mmol/liter (144 mg/dl) for 360 min. This was done using a variable-rate infusion of 20% glucose based on plasma glucose measurements, which were made from arterialized venous blood every 5–10 min. Blood samples for measurement of glucose SA were taken basally at –30, –20, and 0 min and at 120, 180, 240, 280, 300, 330, and 360 min during the insulin infusion. Serum-free insulin concentrations were measured every 60 min.
Insulin clearance We have previously found rosiglitazone to increase insulin clearance, possibly via a decrease in liver fat content (15). To evaluate this possibility in the present study, insulin clearance [milliliters per kilogram fat-free mass (FFM) per minute] was calculated by dividing the rate of insulin infusion (milliunits per kilogram FFM per minute) by the increment in serum insulin concentration (mean concentration measured during the insulin infusion minus fasting serum insulin).
[3-3H]glucose SA and calculation of glucose kinetics To determine glucose SA, plasma was deproteinized with Ba(OH)2 and ZnSO4 and evaporated as described (35). Glucose Ra and Rd were calculated using the Steele equation, assuming a pool fraction of 0.65 for glucose and distribution volume of 200 ml/kg for glucose. Endogenous glucose Ra was calculated by subtracting the exogenous glucose infusion rate required to maintain euglycemia during hyperinsulinemia (0–360 min) from the rate of total glucose Ra. The percent suppression of basal endogenous glucose Ra during the last 2 h (240–360 min) by insulin was used as a measure of hepatic insulin sensitivity, i.e. the sensitivity of endogenous glucose production to insulin (percent suppression of endogenous Ra).
Liver fat content (proton spectroscopy)
Localized single voxel (2 x 2 x 2 cm3) proton spectra were acquired using a 1.5-T whole-body system (Magnetom Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), which consisted of a combination of whole-body and loop surface coils for radiofrequency transmitting and signal receiving, as previously described (3). T1-weighted high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were used for localization of the voxel of interest within the right lobe of the liver. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements of the liver fat were performed in the middle of the right lobe of the liver at a location that was individually determined for each subject; vascular structures and sc fat tissue were avoided when selecting the voxel. Subjects lay on their stomachs on the surface coil, which was embedded in a mattress to minimize abdominal movement due to breathing. In one patient, the spectroscopic recording after therapy was technically unsuccessful. Spectroscopic intracellular triglyceride content (liver fat) was expressed as a ratio of the area under the methylene peak to that under the methylene and water peaks (x 100 = liver fat percent). This measurement has been validated against histologically determined lipid content in our laboratory (36) and against estimates of fatty degeneration or infiltration by x-ray computer-assisted tomography (3). All spectra were analyzed by physicists who were unaware of any of the clinical data. The reproducibility of repeated measurements of liver fat in nondiabetic subjects studied on two occasions in our laboratory is 11% (37).
Intraabdominal fat and sc fat (MRI)
A series of 16 T1-weighted transaxial scans were acquired from a region extending from 8 cm above to 8 cm below the fourth and fifth lumbar interspace (16 slices, field of view 375 x 500 mm2, slice thickness 10 mm, breath-hold repetition time 138.9 msec, echo time 4.1 msec). Intraabdominal and sc fat areas were measured using an image analysis program (Alice 3.0; Parexel, Waltham, MA). A histogram of pixel intensity in the intraabdominal region was displayed, and the intensity corresponding to the nadir between the lean and fat peaks was used as a cutoff point. Intraabdominal adipose tissue was defined as the area of pixels in the intraabdominal region above this cutoff point. For calculation of sc adipose tissue area, a region of interest was first manually drawn at the demarcation of sc adipose tissue and intraabdominal adipose tissue, as previously described (3).
Substrate oxidation rates
Glucose and lipid oxidation rates were measured with indirect calorimetry using the Deltatrac metabolic monitor (Datex, Helsinki, Finland) as previously described (38, 39). The measurements were performed for 40 min during the basal period and the last hour of insulin clamp. Samples of inspired and expired air, which were suctioned at 40 liters/min, were analyzed for O2 and CO2 concentration differences using paramagnetic O2 and CO2 analyzers, respectively. The hood was placed on the subjects head 10 min before the measurement was started. Urine was collected during the study, and the protein oxidation rate was estimated from urea nitrogen excretion (1 g nitrogen = 6.25 g protein). The following constants were used for calculation of glucose and lipid oxidation rates from gas exchange data: oxidation of 1 g of protein requires 966 ml O2 and produces 782 ml CO2, oxidation of 1 g of glucose requires 746 ml O2 and produces 746 ml CO2, and oxidation of 1 g of lipid requires 2029 ml O2 and produces 1430 ml CO2. Energy production rates (joules per kilogram FFM per minute) were calculated assuming oxidation of 1 mg carbohydrate produces 15.65 J; 1 mg lipid, 39.75 J; and 1 mg protein, 17.15 J (38).
Analytical procedures, calculations, and other measurements
Plasma glucose concentrations were measured in duplicate with the glucose oxidase method using Glucose Analyzer II (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) (40). Serum-free insulin concentrations were measured with the Auto-DELFIA kit (Wallac, Turku, Finland), and C-peptide concentrations by RIA (41). Fasting serum (fS)-HDL cholesterol and fS-triglyceride concentrations were measured with the enzymatic kits from Roche Diagnostics using an autoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics Hitachi, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The concentrations of LDL cholesterol were calculated using the Friedewald formula (42). Serum (S)-alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and S-aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activities were determined as recommended by the European Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.
The percent body fat was determined using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BioElectrical Impedance Analyzer System, model BIA-101A; RJL Systems, Detroit, MI) (43). Waist circumference was measured midway between spina iliaca superior and the lower rib margin and hip circumference at the level of the greater trochanters (44).
Statistical analyses
The paired t test was used to compare changes before and after additional rosiglitazone treatment. Logarithmic transformation was performed if necessary. Correlation analyses were performed using the Spearman nonparametric correlation coefficient. All data are shown as mean ± SEM. Calculations were made using GraphPad Prism version 4.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and SPSS 14.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HbA1c decreased by 1.1 ± 0.3%, from 8.9 ± 0.4 to 7.8 ± 0.3% (P = 0.007) during 8 months of rosiglitazone therapy. Insulin dose decreased by 89 ± 24 IU/d (40 ± 8%) from 218 ± 22 to 129 ± 20 IU/d (P = 0.002, Fig. 1
). Body weight increased by 3.2 ± 0.9 kg, which was due to an increase in FFM (1.7 ± 0.7 kg) and fat mass (1.6 ± 0.7 kg). Subcutaneous but not intraabdominal fat increased significantly when measured with MRI (Table 1
). Insulin regimens at the end of the study remained unchanged.
|
|
Liver fat content decreased by 46 ± 9% from 20 ± 3 to 11 ± 3% (P = 0.0002, Fig. 1
). Serum ALT, AST,
-glutamyl transpeptidase (
GT), and alkaline phosphatase concentrations also decreased significantly (Table 1
). The percent change in liver fat correlated with the percent changes in serum ALT (r = 0.50, P = 0.08), AST (0.63, P = 0.02), and serum
GT concentrations (r = 0.72, P = 0.01).
Associations between liver fat content and glycemic parameters
The percent change in liver fat content was positively correlated with percent change in insulin dose (r = 0.66, P = 0.014) and almost significantly with that in HbA1c (r = 0.53, P = 0.06, Fig. 2
).
|
Steady-state plasma glucose concentrations during euglycemia (240–360 min) averaged 8.1 ± 0.05 and 8.2 ± 0.04 mmol/liter before and after rosiglitazone (P = NS). Fasting serum-free insulin decreased by 48% (Table 1
). Serum-free insulin concentrations (60–360 min) averaged 77 mU/liter (47–106 mU/liter, median, interquartile range) vs. 59 mU/liter (39–93 mU/liter), respectively (P = 0.07). The increment in serum-free insulin concentrations was similar before [28 mU/liter (15–34 mU/liter)] and after [25 mU/liter (13–36 mU/liter), P = NS] rosiglitazone therapy, implying that insulin clearance remained unchanged [17 ml/kg FFM per minute (13–29 ml/kg FFM per minute) vs. 16 ml/kg FFM per minute (13–26 ml/kg FFM per minute), P = NS].
Rates of basal endogenous glucose production were similar before (2.82 ± 0.25 mg/kg FFM per minute) and after (2.33 ± 0.33 mg/kg FFM per minute, P = NS) rosiglitazone treatment. During the insulin infusion, the rate of endogenous glucose production decreased (1.69 ± 0.25 vs. 0.61 ± 0.24 mg/kg FFM per minute, P = 0.007), and the percent suppression by insulin increased from –40 ± 7 to –89 ± 12% (P = 0.001) by rosiglitazone. The change in the percent suppression of endogenous glucose production correlated positively with the percent change in liver fat content (r = 0.76, P = 0.003). The rate of basal glucose disposal decreased from 2.90 ± 0.24 to 2.06 ± 0.27 mg/kg FFM per minute (P = 0.028), whereas the rate of insulin-stimulated glucose disposal remained unchanged (2.87 ± 0.16 vs. 2.48 ± 0.18 mg/kg FFM per minute, P = NS).
Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation rates
During insulin therapy, energy expenditure in the basal (83.2 ± 3.2 vs. 78.2 ± 2.1 J/kg FFM per minute, P = 0.05) and insulin-stimulated (80.1 ± 3.0 vs. 75.1 ± 1.9 J/kg FFM per minute, P = 0.017) states decreased significantly by rosiglitazone. The rate of lipid oxidation during insulin stimulation decreased significantly (1.81 ± 0.12 vs. 1.51 ± 0.12 mg/kg FFM per minute, P = 0.04). Rates of carbohydrate and protein oxidation remained unchanged (Fig. 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
agonist treatment. During 8 months of rosiglitazone therapy, HbA1c decreased significantly despite a 40% reduction in the insulin dose. Liver fat content decreased by 50%, and hepatic insulin sensitivity increased significantly. The changes in liver fat content correlated with both decreases in insulin requirements and increase in hepatic insulin sensitivity. Due to the invasive measurements performed, it was not ethically possible to study a time-control group. A study effect could thus have contributed to the results, which is a potential limitation. However, we have preciously shown that addition of metformin alone for 4 months has no effect on liver fat content (15), whereas rosiglitazone alone decreases liver fat by 50% (15). Given that insulin requirements correlate closely and linearly with hepatic fat content (3, 10), and S-ALT predicts insulin requirements independent of body mass index (11), one could predict insulin requirements to decrease by 50% if liver fat decreases by 50%. This indeed happened after patients had been treated with stable insulin doses for 2 yr. These considerations make it likely that the changes were due to rosiglitazone rather than time, metformin, or continued insulin therapy.
In the present study, liver fat content was increased in each patient because it exceeded its upper limit of normal [5.6% measured by 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (45)]. In the previous PPAR
agonist insulin combination studies, the decrease in insulin doses averaged 13 IU/d (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27), which is much less than the 90 IU/d in the present patients. In keeping with the present results, in previous studies, which had the highest baseline insulin doses, the percent reduction was also the greatest (27, 28). In these clinical studies, liver fat content was not measured. Heterogeneity analyses from the Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication trial (DREAM) (29) and A Diabetes Outcome Progression trial (ADOPT) (30) suggested that patients with a large waist circumference respond best to PPAR
agonist treatment. Waist circumference is tightly correlated with liver fat content (46). These data support the idea that patients with a fatty liver respond particularly well to PPAR
agonists.
In the present study, no improvement in peripheral insulin sensitivity, as determined from glucose rate of disappearance, was observed. However, given that low physiological insulin infusion rates are optimal for assessment of hepatic rather than peripheral insulin sensitivity (8, 34, 47, 48), the lack of improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was not unexpected.
When glycemic control is improved, the energy need for glucose production in the liver decreases (49). The improvement in glycemic control is likely to be at least one reason for the decrease in energy expenditure found in the present study. When calculated from our previous data (49), the predicted change in the basal metabolic rate due to changes in fasting glucose and body weight in the present study corresponds to 6.3 ± 19 J/kg FFM per minute, which is not different from the observed change (5.2 ± 2.3 J/kg FFM per minute). The increase in body weight, which accompanies reduction in glucosuria, tends to increase energy expenditure but is not sufficient to keep net energy expenditure unchanged (49). Consistent with previous data regarding PPAR
agonists (50), weight gain (3.2 kg) was greater than would be expected from improvement in glycemic control [1.5–2.0 kg per 1% decrease in HbA1c (49)]. Weight gain was due to a roughly similar increase in FFM and fat mass, in keeping the data showing improved glycemia to increase predominantly FFM (10) and PPAR
agonists mainly fat mass (50).
Adverse effects of thiazolidinediones include fluid retention and the risk of heart failure (30, 31). A recent metaanalysis suggested rosiglitazone use to significantly increase the risk of myocardial infarction (32), although there is no randomized, adequately powered clinical trial to support this finding (51). In Europe, combination therapy with insulin and PPAR
agonists is contraindicated because of an increased risk of heart failure (http://www.emea.europa.eu/). In the Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events, a controlled study of 5238 type 2 diabetic patients at high risk of cardiovascular events randomized to receive either pioglitazone or placebo, 31% of patients were treated with insulin, but it is unknown whether the rate of cardiovascular events differed between insulin-treated and insulin-naive patients using pioglitazone (31). Because of the increased risk of heart failure, we performed echocardiographies in all patients before their participation to exclude heart failure at baseline.
In conclusion, we have shown that type 2 diabetic patients who are poorly controlled despite using unusually high doses of insulin do respond to rosiglitazone. We suggest the main mechanism underlying improved glycemic control despite reduced insulin requirements is enhanced hepatic insulin sensitivity. At least in monotherapy studies, pioglitazone is as effective as rosiglitazone (52) and may be associated with a better cardiovascular outcome during long-term treatment than rosiglitazone (30, 31).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online October 23, 2007
Abbreviations: ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase;
GT,
-glutamyl transpeptidase; FFM, fat-free mass; fS, fasting S; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; Ra, rate of appearance; Rd, rate of disappearance; S, serum; SA, specific activity.
Received August 14, 2007.
Accepted October 17, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Fraser, N. Sattar, S. Ebrahim, and D.A. Lawlor Is Serum-Glutamylatransferase a Biomarker of Xenobiotics Which Are Conjugated by Glutathione? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2008; 28(4): e29 - e29. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |