help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2006-2729
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Alford, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Alford, F. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Metabolism
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 8 3314-3320
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Altered Activity of 11ß-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Types 1 and 2 in Skeletal Muscle Confers Metabolic Protection in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes

Christina Jang, Varuni R. Obeyesekere, Rodney J. Dilley, Zygmunt Krozowski, Warrick J. Inder and Frank P. Alford

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes (C.J., V.R.O., W.J.I., F.P.A.), St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne 3065, Australia; Department of Medicine (C.J., R.J.D., W.J.I., F.P.A.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia; and Laboratory of Molecular Hypertension (Z.K.), Baker Heart Research Institute, Melbourne 3004, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Christina Jang, M.B., B.S., FRACP, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy 3065, Australia. E-mail: christina.jang{at}svhm.org.au.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: There is little information regarding the regulation of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD) enzymes in skeletal muscle in the setting of type 2 diabetes.

Objective: Our objective was to investigate whether there is differential mRNA expression and enzyme activity of 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 in the skeletal muscle of diabetic subjects compared with controls at baseline and in response to dexamethasone.

Design: Participants underwent muscle biopsy of vastus lateralis at baseline and after dexamethasone.

Setting: The study took place at a university teaching hospital.

Participants: Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes and 12 age- and sex-matched controls participated.

Intervention: Subjects were given oral dexamethasone, 4 mg/d for 4 d.

Main Outcome Measures: We assessed 11ß-HSD1, 11ß-HSD2, and H6PDH mRNA levels by quantitative RT-PCR and enzyme activity by percent conversion of [3H]cortisone and [3H]cortisol, respectively.

Results: At baseline, mRNA levels were similar in diabetic and control subjects for 11ß-HSD1, 11ß-HSD2, and H6PDH. 11ß-HSD1 activity was reduced in diabetic subjects (percent conversion of [3H]cortisone to [3H]cortisol was 11.4 ± 2.5% vs. 18.5 ± 2.2%; P = 0.041), and 11ß-HSD2 enzyme activity was higher in diabetic subjects (percent conversion of [3H]cortisone to [3H]cortisol was 17.2 ± 2.6% vs. 9.2 ± 1.3%; P = 0.012). After dexamethasone, 11ß-HSD1 mRNA increased in both groups (P < 0.001), whereas 11ß-HSD2 mRNA decreased (P = 0.002). 11ß-HSD1 activity increased in diabetic subjects (P = 0.021) but not in controls, whereas 11ß-HSD2 activity did not change in either group. At baseline, there was a significant negative correlation between 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 enzyme activity (r = –0.463; P = 0.026).

Conclusions: The activities of skeletal muscle 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 are altered in diabetes, which together may reduce intracellular cortisol generation, potentially conferring metabolic protection.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GLUCOCORTICOIDS HAVE A RANGE of metabolic actions, including effects on carbohydrate metabolism. Glucocorticoid excess shares a spectrum of clinical features with the metabolic syndrome (1). The postulate that tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoid hormone action is a factor in insulin resistance has led to examination of the 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD) enzymes (2). Together with the glucocorticoid receptor, these enzymes act as autocrine regulators of tissue-specific cortisol metabolism (2).

11ß-HSD1 is a bidirectional enzyme, most abundantly expressed in glucocorticoid target tissues such as liver and adipose. It displays predominant oxoreductase activity in intact cells, generating active cortisol from inactive cortisone (3). In adipose tissue, studies show increased oxoreductase activity in omental compared with sc adipocytes, suggesting that differential amplification of glucocorticoid in this tissue is a potential mechanism in the pathogenesis of central obesity (4). In contrast, 11ß-HSD2 has dehydrogenase activity only, converting cortisol to cortisone (3). It is expressed in mineralocorticoid target tissues (5), where its main role is to protect the mineralocorticoid receptor from cortisol, thereby conferring specificity of aldosterone to its receptor (6, 7), whereas expression in the placenta protects the fetus from elevated circulating maternal glucocorticoids (8, 9).

Skeletal muscle is a major site of insulin resistance and accounts for the majority of peripheral glucose disposal (10). There are few data, however, about the role of the 11ß-HSD enzymes and their impact on cortisol metabolism in skeletal muscle. We have recently demonstrated that 11ß-HSD1 is present and biologically active in fresh muscle of nondiabetic subjects (11). However, whether there is any alteration of 11ß-HSD1 activity in skeletal muscle of diabetic subjects is unknown. Previous studies examining muscle 11ß-HSD1 have been performed on myoblasts (12) or have examined 11ß-HSD1 mRNA expression without quantification of enzyme activity (13, 14). Such in vitro data may not be applicable in vivo, because enzyme expression and activity may change during cellular differentiation as demonstrated in adipose tissue (15). Furthermore, in the basal state, skeletal muscle 11ß-HSD1 mRNA levels do not correlate with oxoreductase activity (11).

The direction of 11ß-HSD1 activity depends on the provision of cofactor by hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (H6PDH) (16, 17). Its location within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (18) serves the crucial role of generating the cofactor reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) phosphate (NADPH), which is required for oxoreductase activity. Cotransfection of Chinese hamster ovary cells with 11ß-HSD1 and H6PDH increases oxoreductase activity and virtually eliminates dehydrogenase activity compared with 11ß-HSD1 alone. This highlights the importance of H6PDH in regulating the in vivo direction of 11ß-HSD1 conversion from cortisone to cortisol.

Previous in vitro studies in myoblasts have demonstrated that addition of glucocorticoid up-regulates 11ß-HSD1 mRNA and activity (19). To date, no study has examined whether exogenous glucocorticoid up-regulates 11ß-HSD1 activity in adult human skeletal muscle. The effect of glucocorticoids on H6PDH is also unknown. Increased local generation of active glucocorticoid within skeletal muscle may contribute to the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome and be a possible mechanism for glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance.

The potential role of 11ß-HSD2 in glucocorticoid inactivation in muscle has similarly not been explored. Early studies using Northern blotting or conventional RT-PCR did not detect 11ß-HSD2 mRNA in skeletal muscle (14, 19, 20). However, to our knowledge, there have been no studies using the more sensitive technique of TaqMan-based quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

The aims of this study are therefore to determine whether 1) 11ß-HSD2 is present and biologically active in fresh skeletal muscle; 2) 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 mRNA expression and enzyme activities are altered in the skeletal muscle of diabetic compared with control subjects; 3) there is a relationship between skeletal muscle H6PDH and 11ß-HSD1 expression in these two groups; and 4) short-term administration of exogenous dexamethasone differentially affects muscle 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 mRNA expression and activities in human subjects with and without diabetes.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

The protocol was approved by the institutional Human Research Ethics Committee. Twelve subjects with type 2 diabetes and 12 healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects gave written informed consent for participation. Control subjects had fasting blood glucose levels less than 6.0 mmol/liter, normal glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and no family history of diabetes. Subjects with type 2 diabetes were treated by diet alone (n = 4) or oral hypoglycemic agents (metformin, a sulfonylurea, or both; n = 8). No patient was using insulin or thiazolidinediones. Exclusion criteria included poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic ≥ 90 mm Hg), a history of liver or renal disease, and evidence of unstable angina or peripheral vascular disease.

Experimental design

After an overnight 10-h fast, subjects had venous blood samples drawn between 0800 and 0830 h for glucose and HbA1c. Body weight, body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were determined for each subject (Table 1Go). After sedation with iv midazolam and administration of local anesthetic, biopsy of vastus lateralis was performed using a 5-mm Bergstrom needle as previously described (21). Fresh muscle was rapidly dissected of visible adipose and connective tissue and placed in DMEM for activity studies. Additional samples were immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for mRNA analysis and homogenate activity studies and in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen for immunohistochemistry and then stored at –70 C for later analysis. Within 28 d, subjects were administered oral dexamethasone 4 mg daily as a single evening dose for 4 d before repeat blood sampling and muscle biopsy. Subjects with type 2 diabetes monitored their capillary blood glucose levels at least twice daily during dexamethasone therapy and were contacted by an investigator on a daily basis. Blood glucose levels before and after dexamethasone were 8.6 ± 0.9 and 9.8 ± 1.5 mmol/liter, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics of study population

 
Laboratory assays

Plasma glucose was analyzed by a glucose oxidase method employing a YSI 1500 Sidekick analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, OH), with a coefficient of variation of 2.4%. HbA1c was measured by an HPLC assay.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Relative skeletal muscle mRNA levels for 11ß-HSD1, 11-HSD2, and H6PDH were determined using quantitative real-time RT-PCR (TaqMan chemistry). One hundred milligrams of snap-frozen tissue were homogenized in buffer RLT (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) using Ika-ultraturrex T25 homogenizer (Janke and Kunkle, Stauten, Germany). Total RNA from skeletal muscle was then extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using TaqMan RT reagents according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). 11ß-HSD1-specific primers and a probe were designed using Primer Express 1.5 software (ABI, Foster City, CA): forward primer, 5'-GCAAAGGGATCGGAAGAGAGA-3'; reverse primer, 5'-GCT GAGGCTGCTCCAAGCT-3'; MGB FAM probe, 5'-CCA CAT GGG CTC CCA-3'. For 11ß-HSD2 and H6PDH, a specific assay-on-demand gene expression assay was obtained from Applied Biosystems. Singleplex reactions were performed and normalized to the endogenous control human 18S rRNA (Applied Biosystems). Relative 11ß-HSD1, 11ß-HSD2, and H6PDH mRNA levels were calculated using the {Delta}{Delta}CT methodology (2{Delta}{Delta}CT, where CT is cycle threshold) (ABI User Bulletin no. 2). Total RNA from commercially obtained human skeletal muscle (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA) was reverse transcribed to cDNA and was used as the calibrator in all experiments. The {Delta}CT value for 11ß-HSD1, 11ß-HSD2, and H6PDH mRNA for each subject was expressed as a ratio with the {Delta}CT measured from the commercially obtained skeletal muscle cDNA.

11ß-HSD enzyme activity

Oxoreductase enzyme activity of 11ß-HSD1 was determined by measuring the conversion of radiolabeled [3H]cortisone to [3H]cortisol by thin-layer chromatography performed within 4 h of the biopsy, as previously described (11). Sample transport difficulties resulted in missing data in one diabetic subject; therefore, results were obtained on 11 subjects for this group. Fresh muscle was weighed and incubated in serum-free, low-glucose DMEM containing [3H]cortisone (1 nM), 100 nM cold cortisone, and 5 µg insulin at 37 C for 24 h. The mean weight of muscle specimens collected from 48 muscle biopsies was 198 mg. We previously demonstrated that the relationship between muscle mass and oxoreductase enzyme activity is linear (11). To correct for the different mass of each biopsy specimen, oxoreductase activity results are expressed as a percentage conversion standardized to 200 mg muscle.

Additionally, total 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 dehydrogenase activities were determined by measuring the conversion of radiolabeled [3H]cortisol to [3H]cortisone in a cell-free system. Specificity in homogenates was conferred by the addition of the enzyme-specific cofactor in excess (NADP for 11ß-HSD1 and NAD for 11ß-HSD2) (22). Homogenates were also incubated with no cofactor to measure any activity due to endogenous cofactor and subtracted. Snap-frozen muscle samples were homogenized using Ika-ultraturrex T25 homogenizer (Janke and Kunkle) in 4 vol homogenizing/assay buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride, pH 7.4). Protein concentrations were determined colorimetrically by the Bradford method (23). Activity was measured by incubating 3 mg/ml of homogenate for 3.5 h at 37 C in assay buffer in the presence of 10 nM [3H]cortisol and 1 mM cofactor. Human placenta, which expresses both 11ß-HSD1 (24) and 11ß-HSD2 (8) was used as a positive control. All reactions were terminated by the addition of 3 vol ethyl acetate. The steroids were extracted from either the media or assay buffer and were analyzed by thin-layer chromatography. The labeled steroid and its converted product were visualized by phosphoimager (Fujix BAS 1000; Fuji Film Co., Tokyo, Japan) scanning, and the result is expressed as a percentage conversion, after correcting each sample to 3 mg protein.

Immunohistochemistry

Assessment of skeletal muscle 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 distribution was performed using immunohistochemistry. We have previously demonstrated 11ß-HSD1 immunostaining in the skeletal muscle of nondiabetic subjects (11), and the present study was performed on two diabetic subjects before and after dexamethasone. 11ß-HSD2 immunohistochemistry was performed in two diabetic and five nondiabetic subjects, with human placenta as a positive control. Frozen sections of skeletal muscle were fixed in acetone at –20 C for 20 min. Sections were air dried and then blocked at room temperature for 30 min in Dako protein block serum-free ready-to-use solution (Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA). For 11ß-HSD1, sections were incubated with a 1:100 dilution of sheep antihuman 11ß-HSD1 antiserum (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) in 5% donkey serum/PBS. For 11ß-HSD2, sections were incubated with a 1:100 dilution of rabbit antihuman antiserum (8) in 5% goat serum/PBS. For von Willebrand factor (vWF), sections were incubated with a 1:50 dilution of rabbit antihuman vWF (Dako). Primary antibody was incubated for 60 min followed by PBS washes. Secondary antibodies were donkey antisheep antibody for 11ß-HSD1 and goat antirabbit for 11ß-HSD2; both antibodies were conjugated to AlexaFluor 488 and vWF (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The sections were then rinsed in PBS and mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). A Bio-Rad MRC1024 confocal system was used to analyze the sections (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 13.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. A repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to compare the response to dexamethasone between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups. The outcome variables analyzed were 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 mRNA and enzyme activity and H6PDH mRNA levels.

The effect of dexamethasone was analyzed as a within-subjects effect; however, it should be noted that the difference in the response to dexamethasone in the two groups is a between-person effect. To test the relationships between different variables, Pearson correlation analysis was employed. The unpaired t test was used to compare baseline data in the control vs. diabetic group.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subject characteristics

Baseline characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1Go. Diabetic and control subjects were well matched for age and sex. As expected, there was a significant difference in HbA1c and fasting glucose.

mRNA expression

At baseline, there was no difference in mRNA levels as estimated by {Delta}CT between diabetic and control subjects for 11ß-HSD1 (19.59 ± 0.18 vs. 19.52 ± 0.23, P = 0.838), 11ß-HSD2 (21.18 ± 0.41 vs. 20.78 ± 0.39, P = 0.497), or H6PDH (14.40 ± 0.37 vs. 14.43 ± 0.31, P = 0.948). There was a significant difference in the relative expression of 11ß-HSD1 vs. 11ß-HSD2 for the combined groups ({Delta}CT, 19.55 ± 0.14 vs. 20.98 ± 0.28, P = 0.006). This equates to a 2.7-fold higher level of expression for 11ß-HSD1 in skeletal muscle compared with 11ß-HSD2. There were no gender differences in 11ß-HSD1 or 11ß-HSD2 mRNA levels. H6PDH was significantly more abundant than 11ß-HSD1 ({Delta}CT, 14.41 ± 0.24 vs. 19.55 ± 0.14, P < 0.001), equating to a 35-fold higher expression in muscle for H6PDH.

To examine the effect of dexamethasone on mRNA levels, {Delta}CT values were expressed as a ratio to the commercially available skeletal muscle cDNA library as described. After dexamethasone, relative 11ß-HSD1 mRNA levels increased significantly in both groups (Fig. 1AGo) to a similar degree (P < 0.001 by ANOVA). In contrast, 11ß-HSD2 mRNA levels were significantly reduced by dexamethasone (Fig. 2AGo) when the groups were analyzed together (P = 0.002 by ANOVA, Fig. 2AGo). When 11ß-HSD2 mRNA levels was analyzed in the diabetic and control groups separately, the response to dexamethasone was significant in the diabetic group only (P = 0.010) and approached significance in the control group (P = 0.059) due mainly to the wide scatter of the dexamethasone response in the control group. H6PDH expression was unchanged in response to dexamethasone.


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. 11ß-HSD1 mRNA expression (A) and enzyme activity (B) in diabetic and control subjects before and after dexamethasone. Results for 11ß-HSD1 activity in diabetic subjects are based on n = 11. Other results are based on n = 12 diabetic and n = 12 control subjects. {blacksquare}, Before dexamethasone; {square}, after dexamethasone. *, P < 0.01 compared with baseline; {dagger}, P < 0.05 compared with baseline; {ddagger}, P < 0.05 compared with control group.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. 11ß-HSD2 mRNA expression and enzyme activity in diabetic (n = 12) and control (n = 12) subjects before and after dexamethasone. {blacksquare}, Before dexamethasone; {square}, after dexamethasone. *, P < 0.05 compared with baseline; {dagger}, P < 0.05 compared with control group.

 
Enzyme activity

Basal 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity in intact skeletal muscle was significantly lower in diabetic subjects (percent conversion of [3H]cortisone to [3H]cortisol was 11.4 ± 2.5% per 200 mg muscle/24 h in diabetics compared with 18.5 ± 2.2% per 200 mg muscle/24 h in controls, P = 0.041, Fig. 1BGo). When total 11ß-HSD1 dehydrogenase activity (cofactor NADP) was estimated in cell homogenates, very low levels of conversion from [3H]cortisol to [3H]cortisone were observed (mean, 4.3 ± 0.37%; range, 1.8–9.2%). 11ß-HSD1 dehydrogenase activity was significantly higher in the diabetic group (percent conversion of [3H]cortisol to [3H]cortisone was 5.3 ± 0.6% per 3 mg protein in diabetics compared with 3.3 ± 0.3% per 3 mg protein/3.5 h in controls, P = 0.007). Baseline 11ß-HSD2 enzyme activity (cofactor NAD) was significantly higher in the diabetic group compared with the control group (percent conversion [3H]cortisol to [3H]cortisone per 3 mg protein per 3.5 h was 17.2 ± 2.6% in diabetics vs. 9.2 ± 1.3% in controls, P = 0.012, Fig. 2BGo). 11ß-HSD2 activity in placenta was essentially 100%.

After dexamethasone, there was a significant increase in 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity in the intact muscle system (P = 0.021, Fig. 1BGo). Oxoreductase activity was now similar in the diabetic and control groups after dexamethasone. There was no significant group effect (P = 0.489), but there was a significant group x treatment interaction (P = 0.041), indicating that the response to dexamethasone differed between the diabetic group and controls. As can be seen in Fig. 1BGo, the increase in 11ß-HSD1 activity was confined to the diabetic group. There was no significant change in 11ß-HSD1 dehydrogenase activity in the cell-free system or in 11ß-HSD2 activity in response to dexamethasone (Fig. 2BGo).

Correlations

There was no correlation between basal 11ß-HSD1 mRNA expression and oxoreductase (intact muscle) or dehydrogenase (homogenates) enzyme activity. 11ß-HSD2 mRNA expression also did not correlate with its enzyme activity. There was a highly significant correlation between basal H6PDH and 11ß-HSD1 mRNA expression (r = 0.65; P = 0.001) but not with 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity (r = 0.08; P = 0.79). Across all subjects, a significant negative correlation between 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 enzyme activity was observed (r = 0.46; P = 0.03). There was no correlation between the incremental response to dexamethasone of 11ß-HSD1 mRNA and enzyme activity (r = 0.33; P = 0.12) or H6PDH mRNA levels for the combined groups (r = 0.24; P = 0.26). However, when the diabetic group was analyzed separately, there was a highly significant correlation between the 11ß-HSD1 mRNA increment and change in oxoreductase enzyme activity (r = 0.77; P = 0.006).

There were no significant correlations between 11ß-HSD1 or 11ß-HSD2 mRNA or enzyme activities with age, BMI, WHR, or fasting glucose.

Immunohistochemistry

11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 immunoreactivity was observed within the muscle fibers of all specimens. Higher-intensity staining of 11ß-HSD1 was observed after dexamethasone treatment in the diabetic subject whose increase in oxoreductase activity was the largest (Fig. 3Go). 11ß-HSD2 immunostaining was observed, predominantly within the interstitium of the myocytes (Fig. 3Go) and vascular structures but also within the muscle fiber.


Figure 3
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. A–D, Representative photomicrographs of adjacent muscle sections taken from a diabetic subject before dexamethasone, showing 11ß-HSD1 immunofluorescence (A), 11ß-HSD2 immunofluorescence (B), hematoxylin and eosin staining (C), and vWF staining (D) demonstrating distribution of blood vessels; E and F, 11ß-HSD1 immunofluorescence in a diabetic subject before and after dexamethasone, respectively, at high power; G, 11ß-HSD1 negative control; H, 11ß-HSD2 positive control (placenta); I, 11ß-HSD2 negative control. Arrows indicate a blood vessel.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Interest in 11ß-HSD1 has arisen because of its postulated link to obesity and insulin resistance (2). We focused on skeletal muscle because it is the main site of peripheral insulin resistance (10). Extending the findings of our previous work (11), we explore whether the mRNA levels and activity of both 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 are similar in intact muscle taken from diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. In addition, we test whether there are differential responses of 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 to short-term exposure to dexamethasone in these two groups.

11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity was found to be significantly lower in diabetic subjects at baseline but increased significantly after dexamethasone. Although previous work has demonstrated that in myoblasts, 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity is up-regulated in vitro by glucocorticoids (19), baseline differences between diabetic and control subjects were not examined. In a subsequent study employing myotubes established from diabetic and control subjects, increased expression of 11ß-HSD1 mRNA was described in the diabetic myotubes (14), but enzyme activity was not examined. Our study is the first to be done in fresh intact muscle, and the findings support the hypothesis that reduced oxoreductase enzyme activity in the basal state may represent a potential compensatory metabolic mechanism (2, 25, 26). Similarly, conversion of cortisone to cortisol, a marker of hepatic 11ß-HSD1 activity, was impaired in a group of 25 diabetic and/or glucose-intolerant lean subjects (27). Other studies have examined whole-body (hepatic) and adipose tissue 11ß-HSD1 metabolism in diabetic subjects, with variable results (28, 29).

The biological relevance of 11ß-HSD1 in skeletal muscle is incompletely understood. Our previous studies have demonstrated the presence of skeletal muscle 11ß-HSD1 in nondiabetic subjects, although the relative contribution of muscle cortisol production to whole-body levels appears to be small. Studies using in vivo measurements taken from forearm (30) and leg (31) circulations demonstrate minimal cortisol production at these sites, suggesting that cortisone-cortisol turnover in skeletal muscle is relatively low. Furthermore, carbenoxelone has also not been found to alter insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (32). Nevertheless, the fact that 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 enzyme activities were demonstrated in both our study and other in vivo studies (31) indicates a potentially important local effect of glucocorticoid within skeletal muscle. Glucocorticoids are well known to have a paracrine effect in adipose tissue; cortisol production within adipose stromal cells promotes their differentiation into mature skeletal muscle cells (33). In skeletal muscle, an autocrine/paracrine effect of cortisol may exist and contribute to insulin resistance.

Catheterization of hepatic and leg vasculature followed by infusion of isotopically labeled cortisol with 4 deuteriums in the steroid skeleton (d4-cortisol) has found that the splanchnic bed contributes significantly to plasma cortisol levels, whereas in the leg, there is net uptake of cortisol that tends to increase during hyperinsulinemic conditions (31). Increased d4-cortisol extraction in the leg implies 11ß-HSD dehydrogenase activity; in vivo, this is more likely to be from 11ß-HSD2. Furthermore, d3-cortisol generation (from 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity) also increased with insulin infusion. These findings are consistent with those of our study; biologically active 11ß-HSD1 explains the generation of d3-cortisol, and 11ß-HSD2 activity explains net d4-cortisol uptake (by 11ß-HSD2 dehydrogenation). The net release of d3-cortisol may be underestimated because it can be metabolized to d3-cortisone by 11ß-HSD2 or irreversibly degraded via the 5{alpha}-reductase pathway to other metabolites (31). Our study also demonstrates a positive correlation between 11ß-HSD2 and fasting insulin levels, which may be consistent with the acute increase in leg d4-cortisol uptake observed after insulin infusion (31).

11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity depends on the generation of cofactor NADPH via the enzyme H6PDH in intact cells. Cell damage during tissue dispersal of the muscle specimen might underestimate the extent of 11ß-HSD1 activity. To investigate this possibility, we measured 11ß-HSD1 dehydrogenase activity in cell homogenates as a marker of total enzyme activity. However, muscle 11ß-HSD1 dehydrogenase activity using this method was low, whereas there was significant conversion in placenta, which was used as a positive control. Using this latter assay, it is difficult to quantitate biological activity of 11ß-HSD1 or interpret the small absolute difference between the diabetic and control group. There was also no change in dehydrogenase activity in response to dexamethasone. Therefore, fresh skeletal muscle oxoreductase activity appears to be a more reliable and direct measure of biological 11ß-HSD1 activity.

The novel finding of expression and functional enzyme activity of 11ß-HSD2 in skeletal muscle, albeit at low levels, is of considerable interest. Earlier studies that did not detect 11ß-HSD2 mRNA used less sensitive techniques such as Northern blotting (20) or RT-PCR with ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels (14, 19). Skeletal muscle is not a known mineralocorticoid target tissue where 11ß-HSD2 is abundantly expressed (5). We demonstrate that baseline 11ß-HSD2 activity is significantly higher in subjects with type 2 diabetes than control subjects. Within skeletal muscle, inactivation of glucocorticoid may impact on whole-body glucose metabolism. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was observed between 11ß-HSD1 and 11ß-HSD2 enzyme activity. The findings of reduced 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity with increased 11ß-HSD2 dehydrogenase activity suggest that the 11ß-HSD enzymes’ set-point appears to be directed toward reducing a diabetic individual’s exposure to active cortisol, serving as a protective mechanism in the metabolically adverse state.

Consistent with our previous findings, we found a lack of correlation between 11ß-HSD1 mRNA levels and enzyme activity. A similar lack of correlation was seen for 11ß-HSD2 mRNA and enzyme activity. Furthermore, for 11ß-HSD2, a decrease in mRNA levels with dexamethasone did not translate into a significant down-regulation of enzyme activity. These data support the notion that mRNA expression of the 11ß-HSD enzymes in skeletal muscle cannot be used as a surrogate marker for biological enzyme behavior.

Dexamethasone was used in this study as a stimulus for 11ß-HSD1 activity, inducing a metabolic state comparable to a physiological stress response. One striking observation was the up-regulation of 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity in the diabetic group not seen in control subjects. The potential protective mechanism of reduced activity in diabetic subjects in the basal state is lost in the presence of dexamethasone and may be involved in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia. After exogenous glucocorticoid administration, 11ß-HSD1 mRNA levels increased, whereas 11ß-HSD2 mRNA levels decreased. In contrast, only 11ß-HSD1 enzyme activity in the diabetic subjects was up-regulated in response to dexamethasone. This highlights the complex relationship between gene expression and functional activity of these two enzymes at a cellular level.

Our earlier immunohistochemical results demonstrated 11ß-HSD1 protein distribution to be most prominent around the periphery of the muscle cell in control subjects (11). In contrast, in the subject with a large increment in 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase activity, myocyte immunoreactivity was increased throughout the muscle fiber. Protein expression of 11ß-HSD2 was also established in muscle by immunohistochemistry. Immunostaining for 11ß-HSD2 was most intense around the periphery of the muscle cell, suggesting that it is more abundant in interstitial cells including fibroblasts and vascular structures, although weak immunoreactivity was observed within the fiber.

In summary, muscle 11ß-HSD1 oxoreductase enzyme activity is reduced in diabetic subjects but significantly up-regulated in response to the administration of a potent glucocorticoid. This up-regulation is not associated with changes in H6PDH, which is present in excess, acting to steer 11ß-HSD1 strongly in the oxoreductase direction. 11ß-HSD2 is expressed and biologically active in human skeletal muscle. Its function is increased in the muscle of diabetic subjects, promoting inactivation of cortisol. Our results are consistent with the skeletal muscle 11ß-HSD enzyme system acting as a protective mechanism, reducing the adverse metabolic consequences of high tissue levels of cortisol in diabetic subjects. This protective mechanism is lost after dexamethasone, which may in part be a factor in the etiology of glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia. Specific inhibitors of 11ß-HSD1 may prove to be useful agents in the treatment of glucocorticoid or metabolic stress-induced insulin resistance.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Associate Professor Stephen Farish for his statistical advice.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, and Novo Nordisk Regional Diabetes Support Scheme.

Disclosure Statement: C.J. has received lecture fees from Novo Nordisk. W.J.I. has received lecture fees from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Eli Lilly. V.R.O., R.J.D., Z.K., and F.P.A. have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online May 22, 2007

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; H6PDH, hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; 11ß-HSD, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADPH, reduced NAD phosphate; vWF, von Willebrand factor; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

Received December 11, 2006.

Accepted May 10, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Seckl JR, Walker BR 2001 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific amplifier of glucocorticoid action. Endocrinology 142:1371–1376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Tomlinson JW, Walker EA, Bujalska IJ, Draper N, Lavery GG, Cooper MS, Hewison M, Stewart PM 2004 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific regulator of glucocorticoid response. Endocr Rev 25:831–866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stewart PM 1996 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: implications for clinical medicine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 44:493–499[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Bujalska IJ, Kumar S, Stewart PM 1997 Does central obesity reflect "Cushing’s disease of the omentum"? Lancet 349:1210–1213[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Edwards CR, Stewart PM, Burt D, Brett L, McIntyre MA, Sutanto WS, de Kloet ER, Monder C 1988 Localisation of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: tissue specific protector of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Lancet 2:986–989[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Edwards CR, Benediktsson R, Lindsay RS, Seckl JR 1996 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: key enzymes in determining tissue-specific glucocorticoid effects. Steroids 61:263–269[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Stewart PM, Corrie JE, Shackleton CH, Edwards CR 1988 Syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess. A defect in the cortisol-cortisone shuttle. J Clin Invest 82:340–349[Medline]
  8. Krozowski Z, MaGuire JA, Stein-Oakley AN, Dowling J, Smith RE, Andrews RK 1995 Immunohistochemical localization of the 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II enzyme in human kidney and placenta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2203–2209[Abstract]
  9. Stewart PM, Rogerson FM, Mason JI 1995 Type 2 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase messenger ribonucleic acid and activity in human placenta and fetal membranes: its relationship to birth weight and putative role in fetal adrenal steroidogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:885–890[Abstract]
  10. DeFronzo RA, Gunnarsson R, Bjorkman O, Olsson M, Wahren J 1985 Effects of insulin on peripheral and splanchnic glucose metabolism in noninsulin-dependent (type II) diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 76:149–155[Medline]
  11. Jang C, Obeyesekere VR, Dilley RJ, Alford FP, Inder WJ 2006 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 is expressed and is biologically active in human skeletal muscle. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 65:800–805[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Whorwood CB, Donovan SJ, Wood PJ, Phillips DI 2001 Regulation of glucocorticoid receptor {alpha} and ß isoforms and type I 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in human skeletal muscle cells: a key role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2296–2308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Nair S, Lee YH, Lindsay RS, Walker BR, Tataranni PA, Bogardus C, Baier LJ, Permana PA 2004 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: genetic polymorphisms are associated with type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians independently of obesity and expression in adipocyte and muscle. Diabetologia 47:1088–1095[Medline]
  14. Abdallah BM, Beck-Nielsen H, Gaster M 2005 Increased expression of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in type 2 diabetic myotubes. Eur J Clin Invest 35:627–634[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Bujalska IJ, Walker EA, Hewison M, Stewart PM 2002 A switch in dehydrogenase to reductase activity of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 upon differentiation of human omental adipose stromal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1205–1210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Bublitz C, Steavenson S 1988 The pentose phosphate pathway in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 263:12849–12853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bujalska IJ, Draper N, Michailidou Z, Tomlinson JW, White PC, Chapman KE, Walker EA, Stewart PM 2005 Hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase confers oxo-reductase activity upon 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. J Mol Endocrinol 34:675–684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Banhegyi G, Benedetti A, Fulceri R, Senesi S 2004 Cooperativity between 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 279:27017–27021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Whorwood CB, Donovan SJ, Flanagan D, Phillips DI, Byrne CD 2002 Increased glucocorticoid receptor expression in human skeletal muscle cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes 51:1066–1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Albiston AL, Obeyesekere VR, Smith RE, Krozowski ZS 1994 Cloning and tissue distribution of the human 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 enzyme. Mol Cell Endocrinol 105:R11–R17
  21. Christopher M, Hew FL, Oakley M, Rantzau C, Alford F 1998 Defects of insulin action and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in growth hormone-deficient adults persist after 24 months of recombinant human growth hormone therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1668–1681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Li KX, Obeyesekere VR, Krozowski ZS, Ferrari P 1997 Oxoreductase and dehydrogenase activities of the human and rat 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 enzyme. Endocrinology 138:2948–2952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bradford MM 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Sun K, Yang K, Challis JR 1997 Differential expression of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase types 1 and 2 in human placenta and fetal membranes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:300–305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Draper N, Stewart PM 2005 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and the pre-receptor regulation of corticosteroid hormone action. J Endocrinol 186:251–271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tomlinson JW, Moore JS, Clark PM, Holder G, Shakespeare L, Stewart PM 2004 Weight loss increases 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 expression in human adipose tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2711–2716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Andrews RC, Herlihy O, Livingstone DE, Andrew R, Walker BR 2002 Abnormal cortisol metabolism and tissue sensitivity to cortisol in patients with glucose intolerance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5587–5593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Valsamakis G, Anwar A, Tomlinson JW, Shackleton CH, McTernan PG, Chetty R, Wood PJ, Banerjee AK, Holder G, Barnett AH, Stewart PM, Kumar S 2004 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity in lean and obese males with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:4755–4761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kerstens MN, Riemens SC, Sluiter WJ, Pratt JJ, Wolthers BG, Dullaart RP 2000 Lack of relationship between 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase setpoint and insulin sensitivity in the basal state and after 24h of insulin infusion in healthy subjects and type 2 diabetic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 52:403–411[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. van Uum SH, Hermus AR, Sweep CG, Walker BR, Ross HA, de Leeuw PW, Lenders JW 2002 Short-term cortisol infusion in the brachial artery, with and without inhibiting 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, does not alter forearm vascular resistance in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Eur J Clin Invest 32:874–881[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Basu R, Singh RJ, Basu A, Chittilapilly EG, Johnson CM, Toffolo G, Cobelli C, Rizza RA 2004 Splanchnic cortisol production occurs in humans: evidence for conversion of cortisone to cortisol via the 11-ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD) type 1 pathway. Diabetes 53:2051–2059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sandeep TC, Andrew R, Homer NZ, Andrews RC, Smith K, Walker BR 2005 Increased in vivo regeneration of cortisol in adipose tissue in human obesity and effects of the 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor carbenoxolone. Diabetes 54:872–879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Hauner H, Schmid P, Pfeiffer EF 1987 Glucocorticoids and insulin promote the differentiation of human adipocyte precursor cells into fat cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:832–835[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S. A. Morgan, M. Sherlock, L. L. Gathercole, G. G. Lavery, C. Lenaghan, I. J. Bujalska, D. Laber, A. Yu, G. Convey, R. Mayers, et al.
11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Regulates Glucocorticoid-Induced Insulin Resistance in Skeletal Muscle
Diabetes, November 1, 2009; 58(11): 2506 - 2515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Jang, V. R Obeyesekere, F. P Alford, and W. J Inder
Skeletal muscle 11{beta} hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity is upregulated following elective abdominal surgery
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 160(2): 249 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Alford, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jang, C.
Right arrow Articles by Alford, F. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals