| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética LIM-25, Endocrinologia (R.A.T., D.M.L., M.G.C., C.B.M., S.P.A.T.) and Neuroendocrine Unit (M.B.C.C.-N.), Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil; Hospital Brigadeiro (B.L.), São Paulo 04107-030, Brazil; and Departments of Medicine and Cellular and Structural Biology (P.L.M.D.), San Antonio Cancer Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sergio Toledo, Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética, Av Dr Arnaldo 455-5° andar, São Paulo-SP, Brazil 01246-903. E-mail: toldo{at}usp.br; or Patricia Dahia, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7880, San Antonio, Texas 78229. E-mail: dahia{at}uthscsa.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the status of AIP in a pituitary tumor predisposition family.
Settings: The study was conducted at a nonprofit academic center and medical centers.
Patients: Eighteen members of a Brazilian family with acromegaly were studied.
Results: A novel germline mutation in the AIP gene, Y268X, predicted to generate a protein lacking two conserved domains, was identified in four members of this family: two siblings with early-onset acromegaly; a third, 41-yr-old sibling with a microadenoma but no clinical features of disease, and his 3-yr-old son. No changes were found in 14 unaffected at-risk relatives or 92 healthy controls.
Conclusions: We confirm the role of the AIP gene in familial acromegaly. This finding increases the spectrum of molecular defects that can give rise to pituitary adenoma susceptibility. Establishment of genotype-phenotype correlations in AIP mutant tumors will determine whether AIP screening can be used as a tool for clinical surveillance and genetic counseling of families with pituitary tumor predisposition. The underlying basis for the phenotypic variation within AIP-mutant families and the mechanism of AIP-mediated tumorigenesis remain to be defined.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, germline mutations of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene, also known as ARA9 or XAP2, were identified in familial clusters with PAP (3). These mutations were accompanied by loss of heterozygosity of the remaining allele in the tumor tissue, indicative of a tumor suppressor role for the AIP gene. In the above-referred study, one of three IFS kindreds screened was found to carry a germline AIP mutation (3). There have now been additional reports of AIP mutations in both familial (FIPA and IFS) and sporadic acromegaly, which provide the framework for defining genotype-phenotype correlations in pituitary adenoma syndromes (7, 8, 9). From these recent data, AIP has been suggested to act as a low-penetrance gene in familial pituitary clusters. We report here the identification of a novel AIP mutation in a family with acromegaly, which further validates the role of this gene in human pituitary tumor predisposition, and discuss the current status of the genetics of familial pituitary tumors in light of these new findings.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutation analysis revealed a nucleotide substitution A>C at position 804 in exon 6 of the AIP gene coding sequence in four family members (III-15, III-16, III-17 and IV-33, Fig. 1B
). This variant results in a premature TAA-stop signal at codon 268 (Y268X), leading to a predicted protein lacking the final 63 amino acids (GenBank accession no. EF437945). Missense mutations of this codon have been detected in other FIPA families (7). The Y268X mutation is located at the beginning of the third tetratricopeptide repeat domain, shown to be involved in protein-protein interactions that are critical to AIP function (13). The 268 codon and deleted region span the interacting domains for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and heat-shock protein 90 (13, 14). However, one possibility is that the mutant transcript is unstable and therefore subject to degradation by the nonsense-mediated decay mechanism with no resulting protein product (15). Thus, the Y268X mutation is expected to alter AIP activity, although the precise mechanism for pituitary cell growth in response to this inactivating mutation remains to be clarified.
Individual III-17 was a 41-yr-old male with no clinical signs of disease. To further establish the extent of disease penetrance, a detailed biochemical and imaging analysis was carried out in this individual (Table 1
). Both baseline and postoral glucose tolerance test GH was 0.1 ng/ml and less than 1 ng/ml, respectively (normal < 4.4 ng/ml), and IGF was 154 ng/ml (normal 101267 ng/ml). Serum values of prolactin (PRL), ACTH, TSH, LH, FSH, and cortisol were normal (not shown). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 3-mm hypodense pituitary nodule with slight deviation of the pituitary infundibulum and no extrasellar extension. Visual fields were normal. His 3-yr-old asymptomatic child (75th percentile for height and weight) was also found to carry this mutation. No other Y268X mutation carrier was identified among the remaining 14 relatives.
To exclude that Y268X was an unreported polymorphism, we analyzed an additional 184 chromosomes from 92 healthy controls and did not detect the Y268X allele in these samples.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10%, respectively). Among the latter, GH- and PRL-secreting adenomas and also nonsecreting tumors appear to predominate in mutation-positive families (7). Our present report of a novel germline AIP mutation, Y268X, in a Brazilian family further validates the involvement of the AIP gene in familial acromegaly/pituitary adenoma syndrome. Importantly, the detection of the AIP mutation in a 41-yr-old individual with a nonsecreting pituitary microadenoma, in contrast with the early-onset and aggressive disease of his two affected siblings, is consistent with an emerging profile whereby AIP mutations have incomplete penetrance and associate with pituitary tumors of lineages other than somatotrophs (3, 7). These data support the classification of this kindred as either IFS or FIPA, reflecting the challenges in the nomenclature used to define pituitary predisposition at the clinical level. Future classification algorithms may be called for in the near future and could, for example, be guided primarily by the genetic defect. In this family, unidentified factor(s), either genetic or epigenetic, could be acting to diminish or delay pituitary tumor growth and/or secretion in this mutation carrier. Accordingly, the inheritance pattern and mutation rates observed in IFS as well as PAP and FIPA suggest the existence of additional susceptibility genes and also other modulating factors in somatotropinoma tumorigenesis (3, 7, 8). Identification of additional putative loci for somatotropinoma susceptibility at 2p1612 and 13q14 supports that view (12, 18). Interestingly, we were able to exclude sequence changes in the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2 and 5 (SSTR2 and SSTR5) genes as candidate modulating factors of the phenotypic diversity in this family (data not shown). These genes are known to be involved in somatostatin-mediated GH suppression and SSTR5 variants have been recently described in association with increased GH and IGF levels of patients with sporadic acromegaly (19) and have not been previously examined in familial acromegaly.
The role of AIP in sporadic acromegaly and pituitary tumors of other lineages is also starting to be addressed. Germline AIP mutations were reported in three of 45 patients (6%) with sporadic acromegaly in Finland (3), one of 156 from various European countries (20) and one of 40 from Japan (8), but none of 35 cases in the United States tested specifically for the three original AIP mutations (9). Our own preliminary data suggest that the contribution of AIP to sporadic acromegaly in Brazilian patients may also be limited (no mutation found in 20 cases, data not shown). We were also able to exclude mutations in the AIP coding sequence in a mother-daughter pair with ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas (Toledo, R. A., and P. L. M. Dahia, unpublished data). This is in agreement with data from Daly et al. (7) and suggests that mutation prevalence may be related to not only population genetic backgrounds but also specific pituitary lineages. The continuing analysis of multiethnic cohorts of pituitary adenomas of various lineages will precisely define AIPs role in pituitary tumorigenesis.
Identification of AIP mutations increases the spectrum of molecular defects that can give rise to pituitary adenoma susceptibility. The mechanisms of tumor formation due to disruption of this gene and the basis for the variable clinical phenotype are still unknown. Currently due to the scattered nature of the mutations, it is not possible to establish a precise relationship between type or site of mutations and clinical disease. In the near future, however, it is reasonable to suppose that AIP may develop into a screening tool relevant for genetic counseling and clinical surveillance of families with pituitary tumors.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online March 6, 2007
Abbreviations: AIP, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein; FIPA, familial isolated pituitary adenoma; IFS, isolated familial somatotropinoma; MEN1, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PAP, pituitary adenoma predisposition; PRL, prolactin; SSTR, somatostatin receptor.
Received November 1, 2006.
Accepted February 27, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and Gi2
genes in isolated familial acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:542544This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E Jennings, M. Georgitsi, I. Holdaway, A. F Daly, M. Tichomirowa, A. Beckers, L. A Aaltonen, A. Karhu, and F. J Cameron Aggressive pituitary adenomas occurring in young patients in a large Polynesian kindred with a germline R271W mutation in the AIP gene Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 161(5): 799 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S K Khoo, R Pendek, R Nickolov, D C Luccio-Camelo, T L Newton, A Massie, D Petillo, J Menon, D Cameron, B T Teh, et al. Genome-wide scan identifies novel modifier loci of acromegalic phenotypes for isolated familial somatotropinoma Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 1057 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Jaffrain-Rea, M. Angelini, D. Gargano, M. A Tichomirowa, A. F Daly, J.-F. Vanbellinghen, E. D'Innocenzo, A. Barlier, F. Giangaspero, V. Esposito, et al. Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and AHR-interacting protein in pituitary adenomas: pathological and clinical implications Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 1029 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vargiolu, D. Fusco, I. Kurelac, D. Dirnberger, R. Baumeister, I. Morra, A. Melcarne, R. Rimondini, G. Romeo, and E. Bonora The Tyrosine Kinase Receptor RET Interacts in Vivo with Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Interacting Protein to Alter Survivin Availability J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2571 - 2578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Georgitsi, E. Heliovaara, R. Paschke, A. V. K. Kumar, M. Tischkowitz, O. Vierimaa, P. Salmela, T. Sane, E. De Menis, S. Cannavo, et al. Large Genomic Deletions in AIP in Pituitary Adenoma Predisposition J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 4146 - 4151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Leontiou, M. Gueorguiev, J. van der Spuy, R. Quinton, F. Lolli, S. Hassan, H. S. Chahal, S. C. Igreja, S. Jordan, J. Rowe, et al. The Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Interacting Protein Gene in Familial and Sporadic Pituitary Adenomas J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2390 - 2401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Melmed Update in Pituitary Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 331 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Beckers and A. F Daly The clinical, pathological, and genetic features of familial isolated pituitary adenomas Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 371 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A Naves, A. F Daly, J.-F. Vanbellinghen, L. A Casulari, C. Spilioti, A. V Magalhaes, M. F Azevedo, L. A Giacomini, P. P Nascimento, R. O Nunes, et al. Variable pathological and clinical features of a large Brazilian family harboring a mutation in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 383 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Raitila, M Georgitsi, A Karhu, K Tuppurainen, M J Makinen, K Birkenkamp-Demtroder, K Salmenkivi, T F Orntoft, J Arola, V Launonen, et al. No evidence of somatic aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein mutations in sporadic endocrine neoplasia Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 901 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Melmed Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein and Pituitary Tumorigenesis: Another Interesting Protein J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1617 - 1619. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |