help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2006-2394
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toledo, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dahia, P. L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toledo, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dahia, P. L. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*OMIM
*Protein*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 5 1934-1937
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Germline Mutation in the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein Gene in Familial Somatotropinoma

Rodrigo A. Toledo, Delmar M. Lourenço, Jr., Bernardo Liberman, Malebranche B. C. Cunha-Neto, Maria G. Cavalcanti, Cinthia B. Moyses, Sergio P. A. Toledo and Patricia L. M. Dahia

Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética LIM-25, Endocrinologia (R.A.T., D.M.L., M.G.C., C.B.M., S.P.A.T.) and Neuroendocrine Unit (M.B.C.C.-N.), Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil; Hospital Brigadeiro (B.L.), São Paulo 04107-030, Brazil; and Departments of Medicine and Cellular and Structural Biology (P.L.M.D.), San Antonio Cancer Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sergio Toledo, Unidade de Endocrinologia Genética, Av Dr Arnaldo 455-5° andar, São Paulo-SP, Brazil 01246-903. E-mail: toldo{at}usp.br; or Patricia Dahia, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7880, San Antonio, Texas 78229. E-mail: dahia{at}uthscsa.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Acromegaly is usually sporadic, but familial cases occur in association with several familial pituitary tumor syndromes. Recently mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene were associated with familial pituitary adenoma predisposition.

Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the status of AIP in a pituitary tumor predisposition family.

Settings: The study was conducted at a nonprofit academic center and medical centers.

Patients: Eighteen members of a Brazilian family with acromegaly were studied.

Results: A novel germline mutation in the AIP gene, Y268X, predicted to generate a protein lacking two conserved domains, was identified in four members of this family: two siblings with early-onset acromegaly; a third, 41-yr-old sibling with a microadenoma but no clinical features of disease, and his 3-yr-old son. No changes were found in 14 unaffected at-risk relatives or 92 healthy controls.

Conclusions: We confirm the role of the AIP gene in familial acromegaly. This finding increases the spectrum of molecular defects that can give rise to pituitary adenoma susceptibility. Establishment of genotype-phenotype correlations in AIP mutant tumors will determine whether AIP screening can be used as a tool for clinical surveillance and genetic counseling of families with pituitary tumor predisposition. The underlying basis for the phenotypic variation within AIP-mutant families and the mechanism of AIP-mediated tumorigenesis remain to be defined.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACROMEGALY IS A syndrome of hormone excess characterized by high serum levels of GH mostly due to a GH-producing pituitary adenoma (1). Most cases are sporadic; however, familial acromegaly may also occur in association with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), Carney complex, and also with various hereditary conditions known as pituitary adenoma predisposition (PAP), familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA), and isolated familial somatotropinoma (IFS) (2, 3). IFS is defined by the finding of at least two patients with acromegaly/gigantism in a family not associated with MEN1 or Carney complex and accounts for approximately 18% of FIPAs (4). Typically, both IFS and FIPA patients are younger at diagnosis than their sporadic counterparts; their tumors tend to be larger (88% of IFS cases are macroadenomas) and, in IFS, have a more aggressive course. IFS, and possibly also FIPA, appear to be inherited as an autosomal dominant trait with incomplete penetrance (2, 5). The IFS locus has been mapped to 11q13; however, the molecular etiology of IFS has remained elusive (6).

Recently, germline mutations of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene, also known as ARA9 or XAP2, were identified in familial clusters with PAP (3). These mutations were accompanied by loss of heterozygosity of the remaining allele in the tumor tissue, indicative of a tumor suppressor role for the AIP gene. In the above-referred study, one of three IFS kindreds screened was found to carry a germline AIP mutation (3). There have now been additional reports of AIP mutations in both familial (FIPA and IFS) and sporadic acromegaly, which provide the framework for defining genotype-phenotype correlations in pituitary adenoma syndromes (7, 8, 9). From these recent data, AIP has been suggested to act as a low-penetrance gene in familial pituitary clusters. We report here the identification of a novel AIP mutation in a family with acromegaly, which further validates the role of this gene in human pituitary tumor predisposition, and discuss the current status of the genetics of familial pituitary tumors in light of these new findings.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have followed two siblings with acromegaly (III-15, III-16) for the past 24 yr at the Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Partial results from this family have been described elsewhere (10). Briefly, their age at diagnosis was 24 and 29 yr with reported onset of symptoms at 21 and 17 yr old, respectively, and both presented with invasive macroadenomas, as revealed by pituitary imaging studies (Table 1Go). Moreover, no mutations were detected in the GHRH-R, MEN1, PRKAR1A, GNAS1, or GNAI2 genes in these patients (10, 11).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Summary of the clinical and genetic findings in a family with acromegaly

 
We now expanded the analysis to include a total of 18 at-risk family members, including four siblings (III-15 to III-18, Fig. 1AGo) of the affected generation and their offspring (IV-1 to IV-6). This family is unrelated to other acromegaly families also reported in Brazil (6, 12). In addition, DNA samples from 92 adult healthy individuals were also investigated. This study was approved by the institution’s ethics committee and all subjects provided written informed consent.


Figure 1
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. A, Pedigree of a Brazilian family with acromegaly. Arrow points to the proband. B, AIP genetic analysis: Chromatogram traces showing the heterozygous A to C nucleotide change (arrow; Y268X) in exon 6 of the AIP gene in affected siblings. The Y268X mutation results in a premature TAA-stop signal, leading to a predicted protein lacking its final 63 amino acids. Forward and reverse traces are shown on top and bottom panels, respectively. wt, Wild-type sequence.

 
Peripheral blood was collected for genomic DNA isolation according to standard protocols. Exons 1–6 and intron/exon boundaries of the AIP gene were amplified by PCR using primers described elsewhere (3). PCR conditions are available on request. AIP gene mutation analysis was all carried out by automated sequencing of both DNA strands using the Big Dye Terminator technology (version 3.1; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) at the University of São Paulo Sequencing Core Facility. Results were confirmed using DNA obtained from an independently collected blood sample in all cases.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AIP gene analysis

Mutation analysis revealed a nucleotide substitution A>C at position 804 in exon 6 of the AIP gene coding sequence in four family members (III-15, III-16, III-17 and IV-33, Fig. 1BGo). This variant results in a premature TAA-stop signal at codon 268 (Y268X), leading to a predicted protein lacking the final 63 amino acids (GenBank accession no. EF437945). Missense mutations of this codon have been detected in other FIPA families (7). The Y268X mutation is located at the beginning of the third tetratricopeptide repeat domain, shown to be involved in protein-protein interactions that are critical to AIP function (13). The 268 codon and deleted region span the interacting domains for the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and heat-shock protein 90 (13, 14). However, one possibility is that the mutant transcript is unstable and therefore subject to degradation by the nonsense-mediated decay mechanism with no resulting protein product (15). Thus, the Y268X mutation is expected to alter AIP activity, although the precise mechanism for pituitary cell growth in response to this inactivating mutation remains to be clarified.

Individual III-17 was a 41-yr-old male with no clinical signs of disease. To further establish the extent of disease penetrance, a detailed biochemical and imaging analysis was carried out in this individual (Table 1Go). Both baseline and postoral glucose tolerance test GH was 0.1 ng/ml and less than 1 ng/ml, respectively (normal < 4.4 ng/ml), and IGF was 154 ng/ml (normal 101–267 ng/ml). Serum values of prolactin (PRL), ACTH, TSH, LH, FSH, and cortisol were normal (not shown). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 3-mm hypodense pituitary nodule with slight deviation of the pituitary infundibulum and no extrasellar extension. Visual fields were normal. His 3-yr-old asymptomatic child (75th percentile for height and weight) was also found to carry this mutation. No other Y268X mutation carrier was identified among the remaining 14 relatives.

To exclude that Y268X was an unreported polymorphism, we analyzed an additional 184 chromosomes from 92 healthy controls and did not detect the Y268X allele in these samples.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Until recently the molecular pathogenesis of IFS and sporadic pituitary tumors remained elusive, although loss of heterozygosity at the 11q13 locus has been described in both sporadic and familial pituitary adenomas (6). The MEN1 gene, located at this region, was ruled out in these cases, suggesting that another tumor suppressor gene at the 11q13 locus is involved in pituitary tumorigenesis (6, 10, 16, 17). The AIP gene, which maps to the 11q13 region, was recently associated with PAP (3). Two other recent reports of AIP gene screening in families with pituitary tumors have started to define genotype-phenotype correlations (7, 8). Currently a total of 14 germline AIP mutations, including the novel mutation identified in our study, have been reported in familial pituitary adenoma settings. Of note, mutation rates were higher in IFS families, compared with heterogeneous FIPA families, in which different tumor types are present in affected individuals (50% vs. ~10%, respectively). Among the latter, GH- and PRL-secreting adenomas and also nonsecreting tumors appear to predominate in mutation-positive families (7).

Our present report of a novel germline AIP mutation, Y268X, in a Brazilian family further validates the involvement of the AIP gene in familial acromegaly/pituitary adenoma syndrome. Importantly, the detection of the AIP mutation in a 41-yr-old individual with a nonsecreting pituitary microadenoma, in contrast with the early-onset and aggressive disease of his two affected siblings, is consistent with an emerging profile whereby AIP mutations have incomplete penetrance and associate with pituitary tumors of lineages other than somatotrophs (3, 7). These data support the classification of this kindred as either IFS or FIPA, reflecting the challenges in the nomenclature used to define pituitary predisposition at the clinical level. Future classification algorithms may be called for in the near future and could, for example, be guided primarily by the genetic defect. In this family, unidentified factor(s), either genetic or epigenetic, could be acting to diminish or delay pituitary tumor growth and/or secretion in this mutation carrier. Accordingly, the inheritance pattern and mutation rates observed in IFS as well as PAP and FIPA suggest the existence of additional susceptibility genes and also other modulating factors in somatotropinoma tumorigenesis (3, 7, 8). Identification of additional putative loci for somatotropinoma susceptibility at 2p16–12 and 13q14 supports that view (12, 18). Interestingly, we were able to exclude sequence changes in the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2 and 5 (SSTR2 and SSTR5) genes as candidate modulating factors of the phenotypic diversity in this family (data not shown). These genes are known to be involved in somatostatin-mediated GH suppression and SSTR5 variants have been recently described in association with increased GH and IGF levels of patients with sporadic acromegaly (19) and have not been previously examined in familial acromegaly.

The role of AIP in sporadic acromegaly and pituitary tumors of other lineages is also starting to be addressed. Germline AIP mutations were reported in three of 45 patients (6%) with sporadic acromegaly in Finland (3), one of 156 from various European countries (20) and one of 40 from Japan (8), but none of 35 cases in the United States tested specifically for the three original AIP mutations (9). Our own preliminary data suggest that the contribution of AIP to sporadic acromegaly in Brazilian patients may also be limited (no mutation found in 20 cases, data not shown). We were also able to exclude mutations in the AIP coding sequence in a mother-daughter pair with ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas (Toledo, R. A., and P. L. M. Dahia, unpublished data). This is in agreement with data from Daly et al. (7) and suggests that mutation prevalence may be related to not only population genetic backgrounds but also specific pituitary lineages. The continuing analysis of multiethnic cohorts of pituitary adenomas of various lineages will precisely define AIP’s role in pituitary tumorigenesis.

Identification of AIP mutations increases the spectrum of molecular defects that can give rise to pituitary adenoma susceptibility. The mechanisms of tumor formation due to disruption of this gene and the basis for the variable clinical phenotype are still unknown. Currently due to the scattered nature of the mutations, it is not possible to establish a precise relationship between type or site of mutations and clinical disease. In the near future, however, it is reasonable to suppose that AIP may develop into a screening tool relevant for genetic counseling and clinical surveillance of families with pituitary tumors.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) Grant 02/09860-8. R.A.T. and D.M.L. are recipients of Fundação Faculdade de Medicina fellowships. S.P.A.T. is partially supported by Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq). P.L.M.D. is a recipient of a South Texas Health Research Center Junior Faculty Award, an Executive Research Committee New Investigator Award, and a General Clinical Research Center Award.

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online March 6, 2007

Abbreviations: AIP, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein; FIPA, familial isolated pituitary adenoma; IFS, isolated familial somatotropinoma; MEN1, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PAP, pituitary adenoma predisposition; PRL, prolactin; SSTR, somatostatin receptor.

Received November 1, 2006.

Accepted February 27, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Melmed S 2006 Medical progress: acromegaly. N Engl J Med 355:2558–2573[Free Full Text]
  2. Daly AF, Petrossians P, Beckers A 2005 An overview of the epidemiology and genetics of acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest 28:67–69[Medline]
  3. Vierimaa O, Georgitsi M, Lehtonen R, Vahteristo P, Kokko A, Raitila A, Tuppurainen K, Ebeling TM, Salmela PI, Paschke R, Gundogdu S, De Menis E, Makinen MJ, Launonen V, Karhu A, Aaltonen LA 2006 Pituitary adenoma predisposition caused by germline mutations in the AIP gene. Science 312:1228–1230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Frohman LA, Eguchi K 2004 Familial acromegaly. Growth Horm IGF Res 14(Suppl A):S90–S96
  5. Daly AF, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Ciccarelli A, Valdes-Socin H, Rohmer V, Tamburrano G, Borson-Chazot C, Estour B, Ciccarelli E, Brue T, Ferolla P, Emy P, Colao A, De Menis E, Lecomte P, Penfornis F, Delemer B, Bertherat J, Wemeau JL, De Herder W, Archambeaud F, Stevenaert A, Calender A, Murat A, Cavagnini F, Beckers A 2006 Clinical characterization of familial isolated pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3316–3323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gadelha MR, Prezant TR, Une KN, Glick RP, Moskal 2nd SF, Vaisman M, Melmed S, Kineman RD, Frohman LA 1999 Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 11q13 in two families with acromegaly/gigantism is independent of mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type I gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:249–256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Daly AF, Vanbellinghen JF, Khoo SK, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Naves LA, Guitelman MA, Murat A, Emy P, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Tamburrano G, Raverot G, Barlier A, De Herder W, Penfornis A, Ciccarelli E, Estour B, Lecomte P, Gatta B, Chabre O, Sabate MI, Bertagna X, Garcia Basavilbaso N, Stalldecker G, Colao A, Ferolla P, Wemeau JL, Caron P, Sadoul JL, Oneto A, Archambeaud F, Calender A, Sinilnikova O, Montanana CF, Cavagnini F, Hana V, Solano A, Delettieres D, Luccio-Camelo DC, Basso A, Rohmer V, Brue T, Bours V, Teh BT, Beckers A 2007 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein gene mutations in familial isolated pituitary adenomas: analysis in 73 families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1891–1896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Iwata T, Yamada S, Mizusawa N, Golam H, Sano T, Yoshimoto K 2007 The aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene is rarely mutated in sporadic GH-secreting adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 66:499–502[Medline]
  9. Yu R, Bonert V, Saporta I, Raffel LJ, Melmed S 2006 Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein variants in sporadic pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:5126–5129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Jorge BH, Agarwal SK, Lando VS, Salvatori R, Barbero RR, Abelin N, Levine MA, Marx SJ, Toledo SP 2001 Study of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor, Gs{alpha}, and Gi2{alpha} genes in isolated familial acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:542–544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sandrini F, Kirschner LS, Bei T, Farmakidis C, Yasufuku-Takano J, Takano K, Prezant TR, Marx SJ, Farrell WE, Clayton RN, Groussin L, Bertherat J, Stratakis CA 2002 PRKAR1A, one of the Carney complex genes, and its locus (17q22–24) are rarely altered in pituitary tumours outside the Carney complex. J Med Genet 39:e78
  12. Gadelha MR, Une KN, Rohde K, Vaisman M, Kineman RD, Frohman LA 2000 Isolated familial somatotropinomas: establishment of linkage to chromosome 11q13.1–11q13.3 and evidence for a potential second locus at chromosome 2p16–12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:707–714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Meyer BK, Petrulis JR, Perdew GH 2000 Aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor levels are selectively modulated by hsp90-associated immunophilin homolog XAP2. Cell Stress Chaperones 5:243–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Carver LA, LaPres JJ, Jain S, Dunham EE, Bradfield CA 1998 Characterization of the Ah receptor-associated protein, ARA9. J Biol Chem 273:33580–33587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Amrani N, Sachs MS, Jacobson A 2006 Early nonsense: mRNA decay solves a translational problem. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:415–425[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Tanaka C, Yoshimoto K, Yamada S, Nishioka H, Ii S, Moritani M, Yamaoka T, Itakura M 1998 Absence of germ-line mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene in familial pituitary adenoma in contrast to MEN1 in Japanese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:960–965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Soares BS, Eguchi K, Frohman LA 2005 Tumor deletion mapping on chromosome 11q13 in eight families with isolated familial somatotropinoma and in 15 sporadic somatotropinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6580–6587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Donangelo I, Araujo PB, Antenuzi D, Farage M, Marcondes J, Filho PN, Gadelha MR 2005 Tumor deletion mapping of chromosomal region 13q14 in 43 growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas. Endocrine 28:131–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Filopanti M, Ronchi C, Ballare E, Bondioni S, Lania AG, Losa M, Gelmini S, Peri A, Orlando C, Beck-Peccoz P, Spada A 2005 Analysis of somatostatin receptors 2 and 5 polymorphisms in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:4824–4828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Barlier A, Vanbellinghen JF, Daly AF, Silvy M, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Trouillas J, Tamagno G, Cazabat L, Bours V, Brue T, Enjalbert A, Beckers A 2007 Mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein gene are not highly prevalent among subjects with sporadic pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1952–1955[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J. E Jennings, M. Georgitsi, I. Holdaway, A. F Daly, M. Tichomirowa, A. Beckers, L. A Aaltonen, A. Karhu, and F. J Cameron
Aggressive pituitary adenomas occurring in young patients in a large Polynesian kindred with a germline R271W mutation in the AIP gene
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 161(5): 799 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S K Khoo, R Pendek, R Nickolov, D C Luccio-Camelo, T L Newton, A Massie, D Petillo, J Menon, D Cameron, B T Teh, et al.
Genome-wide scan identifies novel modifier loci of acromegalic phenotypes for isolated familial somatotropinoma
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 1057 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M.-L. Jaffrain-Rea, M. Angelini, D. Gargano, M. A Tichomirowa, A. F Daly, J.-F. Vanbellinghen, E. D'Innocenzo, A. Barlier, F. Giangaspero, V. Esposito, et al.
Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and AHR-interacting protein in pituitary adenomas: pathological and clinical implications
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 1029 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Vargiolu, D. Fusco, I. Kurelac, D. Dirnberger, R. Baumeister, I. Morra, A. Melcarne, R. Rimondini, G. Romeo, and E. Bonora
The Tyrosine Kinase Receptor RET Interacts in Vivo with Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Interacting Protein to Alter Survivin Availability
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2571 - 2578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Georgitsi, E. Heliovaara, R. Paschke, A. V. K. Kumar, M. Tischkowitz, O. Vierimaa, P. Salmela, T. Sane, E. De Menis, S. Cannavo, et al.
Large Genomic Deletions in AIP in Pituitary Adenoma Predisposition
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2008; 93(10): 4146 - 4151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Leontiou, M. Gueorguiev, J. van der Spuy, R. Quinton, F. Lolli, S. Hassan, H. S. Chahal, S. C. Igreja, S. Jordan, J. Rowe, et al.
The Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Interacting Protein Gene in Familial and Sporadic Pituitary Adenomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2390 - 2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed
Update in Pituitary Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 331 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Beckers and A. F Daly
The clinical, pathological, and genetic features of familial isolated pituitary adenomas
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 371 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
L. A Naves, A. F Daly, J.-F. Vanbellinghen, L. A Casulari, C. Spilioti, A. V Magalhaes, M. F Azevedo, L. A Giacomini, P. P Nascimento, R. O Nunes, et al.
Variable pathological and clinical features of a large Brazilian family harboring a mutation in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 383 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A Raitila, M Georgitsi, A Karhu, K Tuppurainen, M J Makinen, K Birkenkamp-Demtroder, K Salmenkivi, T F Orntoft, J Arola, V Launonen, et al.
No evidence of somatic aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein mutations in sporadic endocrine neoplasia
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein and Pituitary Tumorigenesis: Another Interesting Protein
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1617 - 1619.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toledo, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dahia, P. L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toledo, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Dahia, P. L. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*OMIM
*Protein*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals