| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Medicine (S.G., L.M.S., P.K., D.C.M., M.C.G.) and Surgery (M.M.M., M.A.M.), State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Shai Gavi, Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8154. E-mail: sgavi{at}notes.cc.sunysb.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether an association between retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) and insulin resistance exists in nonobese individuals without a family history or diagnosis of diabetes. The secondary objective was to determine by a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan which adipose tissue depot most closely relates to RBP4 levels.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of 92 study participants ranging in age from 20 to 83 yr was performed. The range of body mass index (BMI) was from 18 to 30 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria were a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, family history of diabetes, or a diagnosis of diabetes. Insulin sensitivity was determined by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Body fat was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan.
Results: RBP4 values were lower in females (35.8 ± 1.7 µg/ml) compared with males (39.9 ± 1.4 µg/ml; P = 0.06). RBP4 levels were found to correlate negatively with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.32; P = 0.002) and positively with age (r = 0.38; P < 0.001). RBP4 levels did not correlate with BMI (r = 0.13; P = 0.22), trunk fat (r = 0.16; P = 0.22), or percent body fat (r = 0.07; P = 0.65). However, RBP4 levels did correlate with percent trunk fat (r = 0.36; P = 0.001).
Conclusion: These findings indicate a relationship between RBP4, insulin sensitivity, and percent trunk fat in individuals who may not have features of insulin resistance.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increasing abdominal fat is a main predictor of insulin resistance (14, 15, 16). In a group of subjects with a range of body mass index (BMI) from lean to obese, RBP4 levels correlated with waist-to-hip ratios, suggesting a linkage to abdominal adiposity (12). However, waist-to-hip ratios are also affected by muscle mass and do not provide a quantitative measure of adipose tissue content (12, 17, 18). A relationship of RBP4 to the body fat distribution between the limbs and trunk with a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, exclusively in nonobese subjects, has not been reported. The current study evaluates the relationship of RBP4 to insulin resistance by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in nonobese, young, and elderly subjects, without a family history or a diagnosis of diabetes. A greater understanding of an association of insulin resistance with RBP4 levels may reveal a marker of insulin resistance in individuals who are not obese before the development of diabetes. In addition, this work evaluates the relationship of RBP4 to body fat distribution between the limbs and trunk as measured by a DEXA scan. Identifying an association of RBP4 with body fat distribution between the limbs and trunk will provide insight as to which fat depots may be responsible for the elevated RBP4 and insulin resistance. This may especially be true in nonobese subjects who may have a body fat distribution between the limb and trunk that is difficult to appreciate clinically or may have waist-to-hip ratios that may not be significantly high.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All subjects who participated in this study were approved by the Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects at the University Medical Center of the State University of New York at Stony Brook. All subjects gave their written informed consent. Younger subjects were included in the study if they were between 20 and 50 yr of age. Elderly subjects were 60 yr of age or older, healthy, and ambulatory. Exclusion criteria included an acute illness 3 months before enrollment, diagnosis of diabetes, family history of diabetes, any medications that would affect insulin resistance, or fasting glucose level equal to or greater than 126 mg/dl.
Insulin sensitivity
Insulin sensitivity was determined as the rate of infused glucose necessary to maintain euglycemia during infusion of insulin (assessed by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp) (19). Subjects were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center the night before the study, ate a uniform snack at 2200 h, and then fasted from 2400 h. At 0700 h, after basal sampling, the subjects were infused with 1.2 µU of human insulin/(kg body weight x min) (human insulin from Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) to elevate plasma insulin levels sufficient to suppress hepatic glucose production in insulin-resistant states. Dextrose (10%) was administered iv at variable rates to maintain the plasma level at 90 mg/dl. Plasma glucose levels were assessed in arterialized blood samples obtained by the heated hand technique. Insulin sensitivity was determined between the second and third hour of insulin infusion. To normalize for differences in body composition, insulin sensitivity was expressed as milligrams of glucose per kilogram of lean body mass (LBM). LBM was quantified by a DEXA scan.
Body composition
Body composition, including LBM and total body fat, was determined by a DEXA scan performed with a whole-body scanner (Hologic, Bedford, MA) (20). Trunk fat was the amount of fat measured by the DEXA from below the neck to the pelvis, excluding the limbs. Percent trunk fat was calculated as trunk fat divided by total body fat (total body fat includes limb fat and trunk fat).
Biochemical analysis
Plasma glucose levels were determined by the glucose oxidase method, using a Beckman Glucose Analyzer II (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA). Serum RBP4 levels were measured by a human ELISA kit (ALPCO Diagnostics, Salem, NH) (12). The coefficient of variation within each assay was less than 5%. The coefficient of variation between assays was less than 10%.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed with the Students t test. Pearson correlations were used to assess bivariate associations, and multiple regression modeling was used to assess multivariate associations and to identify factors predictive of RBP4 and insulin resistance, body fat distribution, and age. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05. All analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is known that age is a strong risk factor for the development of insulin resistance and diabetes, such that 50% of the elderly have insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes (23, 24). The expanding incidence of diabetes is compounded by the rapidly expanding elderly population (23, 24). Identifying new therapeutic targets in the elderly is essential; lowering RBP4 may be a new target for treating insulin resistance and diabetes (10, 12). Previous work has not evaluated the role of RBP4 in elderly, but the current study indicates that serum RBP4 levels are associated with age and are elevated in the elderly compared with young adults (12). However, the association between RBP4 and aging does not ensure that RBP4 directly causes insulin resistance in aging. This may indicate that future therapies targeted at reducing RBP4 levels in the young may improve insulin resistance in the elderly as well (10, 12).
RBP4 is secreted by adipocytes (10). A previous study revealed a correlation of RBP4 to waist-to-hip ratio, suggesting an association between RBP4 levels and abdominal adiposity; however, there was no correlation between RBP4 levels and percent body fat (11, 12). The relationship of RBP4 to abdominal adiposity was established in subjects with a range of BMI from lean to severe obesity. A correlation in those subjects was also found between RBP4 levels and BMI (12). A subsequent study similarly identified a relationship between RBP4 levels and waist circumference, but no association to percent body fat or absolute amount of fat (11). In our study, DEXA scans were used to define body fat distribution of the limbs and trunk. DEXA scans have been validated by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to assess body composition (25). In our population with an upper limit of BMI of 30 kg/m2, we did not find a correlation of RBP4 levels and BMI. Interestingly, we also did not find an association between either the total amount of trunk fat or the total amount of body fat and RBP4 levels. These results indicate that RBP4 may not uniformly be secreted from all adipose tissues, because total body fat did not correlate to RBP4 levels. More so, RBP4 is not predominantly secreted by the trunk fat, because trunk fat did not correlate to RBP4. However, we did find a correlation between RBP4 levels and percent trunk fat. The correlation of RBP4 levels to percent trunk fat suggests that RBP4 relates to the distribution of body fat between the central (trunk) and peripheral fat (limb) depots, rather than an association of RBP4 to the total fat (total body fat or percent body fat). These findings also suggest that interventions that affect the distribution of adipose tissue from the central depot to the periphery may have a greater impact on reducing RBP4 levels, than overall reduction of body fat (central and peripheral).
Interestingly, a recent study of lean and obese women did not find a difference in RBP4 levels (13). This may be due to the narrow range of insulin sensitivity between the lean and obese subjects, which may have impacted the ability to demonstrate a correlation with RBP4 levels (13). The narrow range of insulin sensitivity between the lean and obese subjects is also evident by the lack of statistical difference in the high-density lipoprotein and triglyceride values (13).
A limitation of this study is that the DEXA scan measures trunk fat and does not discriminate between visceral and sc adipose tissue in this region. Therefore, we can conclude that RBP4 levels correlate with percent trunk fat, but we cannot discern whether the RBP4 is related to visceral or sc abdominal adipose tissue. This will require future evaluations via computed tomography imaging.
In summary, we report for the first time an association between RBP4 levels and insulin sensitivity in nonobese subjects without a family history or diagnosis of diabetes. However, adjustment for body fat distribution and age results in a nonsignificant association between RBP4 levels and insulin sensitivity. In addition, we show that RBP4 levels are higher in the elderly, who are also more insulin resistant. Last, we identify that RBP4 levels correlate more strongly to the distribution of adipose tissue between the central and peripheral fat depots (expressed as percent trunk fat), rather than to the total body fat (total body fat or percent body fat).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Summary: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online February 13, 2007
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; DEXA, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; LBM, lean body mass; RBP4, retinol-binding protein 4.
Received August 18, 2006.
Accepted February 2, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol and carotenoids in diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 53:630635[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Mohlig, M. O Weickert, E. Ghadamgahi, A. M Arafat, J. Spranger, A. F H Pfeiffer, and C. Schofl Retinol-binding protein 4 is associated with insulin resistance, but appears unsuited for metabolic screening in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 158(4): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mody, T. E. Graham, Y. Tsuji, Q. Yang, and B. B. Kahn Decreased clearance of serum retinol-binding protein and elevated levels of transthyretin in insulin-resistant ob/ob mice Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2008; 294(4): E785 - E793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Qi, Z. Yu, X. Ye, F. Zhao, P. Huang, F. B. Hu, O. H. Franco, J. Wang, H. Li, Y. Liu, et al. Elevated Retinol-Binding Protein 4 Levels Are Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese People J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4827 - 4834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shea, E. Randell, S. Vasdev, P. P. Wang, B. Roebothan, and G. Sun Serum retinol-binding protein 4 concentrations in response to short-term overfeeding in normal-weight, overweight, and obese men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1310 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Promintzer, M. Krebs, J. Todoric, A. Luger, M. G. Bischof, P. Nowotny, O. Wagner, H. Esterbauer, and C. Anderwald Insulin Resistance Is Unrelated to Circulating Retinol Binding Protein and Protein C Inhibitor J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4306 - 4312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ziegelmeier, A. Bachmann, J. Seeger, U. Lossner, J. Kratzsch, M. Bluher, M. Stumvoll, and M. Fasshauer Serum Levels of Adipokine Retinol-Binding Protein-4 in Relation to Renal Function Diabetes Care, October 1, 2007; 30(10): 2588 - 2592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Jia, H. Wu, Y. Bao, C. Wang, J. Lu, J. Zhu, and K. Xiang Association of Serum Retinol-Binding Protein 4 and Visceral Adiposity in Chinese Subjects with and without Type 2 Diabetes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 3224 - 3229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Qatanani and M. A. Lazar Mechanisms of obesity-associated insulin resistance: many choices on the menu Genes & Dev., June 15, 2007; 21(12): 1443 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |