help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1053
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/1796    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fanchin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Taieb, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fanchin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Taieb, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 5 1796-1802
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentrations in the Follicular Fluid of the Preovulatory Follicle Are Predictive of the Implantation Potential of the Ensuing Embryo Obtained by in Vitro Fertilization

Renato Fanchin, Daniel H. Mendez Lozano, Nelly Frydman, Alain Gougeon, Nathalie di Clemente, René Frydman and Joëlle Taieb

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine (R.Fa., D.H.M.L., R.Fr.), Biology and Genetics of Reproduction (N.F.), and Biochemistry and Hormonology (J.T.), Université Paris XI, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U782 (R.Fa., D.H.M.L., N.d.C., R.Fr.), 92141 Clamart, France; and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U407 (A.G.), 69921 Oullins, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Renato Fanchin, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte de Trivaux, 92141 Clamart, France. E-mail: renato.fanchin{at}abc.ap-hop-paris.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: The strong relationship between serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and the number of antral follicles supports the use of AMH measurements as a quantitative marker of the ovarian follicular status. Yet, it still is unclear whether the aptitude of an individual follicle to produce AMH reflects its reproductive competence.

Objective: This study examined the possible relationship between serum or follicular fluid (FF) AMH concentrations and the fate of the ensuing oocytes and embryos obtained by in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer conducted in monodominant follicle cycles.

Design and Setting: We conducted a prospective study at the University of Paris XI, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U782.

Patients: Patients included 118 infertile in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer candidates.

Interventions: Concentrations of AMH, progesterone, and estradiol were measured in the serum on cycle d 3 and on the day of oocyte pickup (dOPU), and in FF. Cycles were sorted into three sets of three distinct groups according to whether serum d 3, serum dOPU, and FF AMH concentrations were 30th centile or below (low AMH), between the 31st and the 70th centiles (average AMH), or above the 70th centile (high AMH) of measurements.

Main Outcome Measure: Clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation rates were assessed.

Results: Clinical pregnancy rates (5.7, 20.0, and 39.5%, respectively; P < 0.002) and embryo implantation rates (11.8, 30.8, and 65.4, respectively; P <0.001) were markedly different among the low, moderate, and high FF AMH groups but not among the serum (d 3 or dOPU) AMH groups. Fertilization rates and embryo morphology remained similar irrespective of AMH concentrations in the serum or in FF. Incidentally, FF AMH concentrations were negatively correlated with FF progesterone (r = –0.27; P <0.003) and FF estradiol (r = –0.21; P <0.02) concentrations.

Conclusions: Concentrations of AMH in the FF, but not in the serum, constitute a useful follicular marker of embryo implantation and are negatively related to FF progesterone and estradiol concentrations.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GROWING EVIDENCE INDICATES that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a glycoprotein that is exclusively produced by the granulosa cells of ovarian follicles in the adult female (1), is a unique biomarker of ovarian follicular status. In contrast with inhibin B and estradiol, AMH is produced, presumably FSH-independently (2, 3), in a wide range of follicles that goes from the primary to the small antral stages of folliculogenesis (4, 5, 6). In line with this, on cycle d 3 (d3), peripheral AMH levels have shown greater sensitivity to ovarian ageing (7), a stronger relationship with the number of early antral follicles (8), and improved cycle-to-cycle reproducibility (9) compared with inhibin B, estradiol, and FSH levels. In addition, serum AMH levels are a useful predictor of the ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) (10, 11, 12).

Yet, the possible relationship between AMH production by an individual follicle and its functional quality (i.e. follicle aptitude to release an oocyte able to become a developing embryo) remains to be demonstrated. Indeed, previous studies conducted in different species such as the rat (4), the sheep (13), and humans (6) have shown that granulosa cells from atretic follicles fail to express AMH. In addition, in regularly ovulating women, AMH content in individual follicles is related to both the number of early antral follicles on d3 and their responsiveness to COH (14). These data indicate that women endowed with more antral follicles may also show increased per-follicle AMH levels, which implicitly suggests that peripheral AMH levels reflect not only antral follicle count but also per-follicle AMH production. Because direct information on the relationship between per-follicle AMH production and the outcome of the oocyte/embryo still is lacking, new insights into this sensitive issue could help to clarifying the role of AMH as a qualitative indicator of ovarian follicular status.

The present study was conducted to investigate the possible relationship between AMH concentrations, measured both in the serum and in the follicular fluid (FF), and the fate of oocytes and embryos generated in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) conducted in monodominant follicle cycles. Indeed, contrary to COH, in this modality of treatment, a single follicle achieves preovulatory maturation, and only one oocyte and embryo are obtained. This may be particularly instrumental in investigating this issue because it allows adequate traceability between the single follicle and the ensuing oocyte and embryo.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

One hundred eighteen infertile women, 26–41 yr of age, were studied prospectively. All of them met the following inclusion criteria: 1) both ovaries present, deprived of morphological abnormalities, and adequately visualized in transvaginal ultrasound scans; 2) menstrual cycle length range between 25 and 35 d; 3) no current or past diseases affecting ovaries or gonadotropin or sex steroid secretion, clearance, or excretion; 4) no clinical signs of hyperandrogenism; and 5) body mass indexes (BMI) ranging between 18 and 25 kg/m2. Infertility was due to sperm abnormalities (39%), tubal abnormalities (30%), or endometriosis (12%) or was unexplained (19%). In agreement with the inclusion criteria, no patient suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome has been enrolled. An informed consent was obtained from all women, and this investigation received the approval of our internal institutional review board.

Cycle monitoring

On d3, women underwent blood sampling by venipuncture at approximately 0900 h. Sera were separated and frozen in aliquots at –80 C for subsequent centralized analysis. Later in the morning, the number and the sizes of early antral follicles were assessed by ultrasound. From cycle d 8 onward, selection of the dominant follicle was monitored by ultrasound. When the mean diameter of the dominant follicle exceeded 12 mm, to prevent the risk of premature LH peak and to control additional follicular maturation, women were administered sc 0.5 mg of a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix acetate, Cetrotide 0.25 mg; Serono Pharmaceuticals, Boulogne, France) and 150 IU human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) (Menopur; Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gentilly, France) daily until the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (Gonadotrophine Chorionique Endo; Organon Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Denis, France) administration. The choice of starting hMG treatment once follicle dominance had been achieved aimed at preventing the rescue of additional subordinated follicles. Eventually, women received a 5000-IU hCG injection im when the dominant follicle diameter exceeded 16 mm. The single oocyte was picked up approximately 34 h after hCG administration [day of oocyte pickup (dOPU)], and ET was performed 2 d after oocyte pickup. Top-quality embryos were defined on d 2 as those having no multinucleated blastomeres, four or five blastomeres, and less than 20% anucleated fragments (15). According to the present study’s design, each patient had only one oocyte retrieved and only one embryo obtained and transferred. Luteal phase was supported with micronized progesterone (Estima Gé; Effik Pharmaceuticals, Bièvres, France; 600 mg/d) administered daily by vaginal route starting on the evening of ET.

Serum and FF collection

On dOPU, women underwent a blood sampling by venipuncture at approximately 0900 h. Sera were separated and frozen in aliquots at –80 C for subsequent centralized analysis. Under transvaginal ultrasound guidance, the FF from the dominant follicle was gently and thoroughly aspirated using a 10-ml syringe and then maintained at steady temperature conditions (37 C) until the oocyte was found and isolated. Meanwhile, the aspiration needle was kept steady inside the follicle and, in case of negative oocyte recovery, sequential follicular flushings were performed using 10-ml syringes filled with 3 ml of a balanced salt solution (Tyrode’s salt solution; Eurobio Pharmaceuticals, Courtaboeuf, France). All flushing volumes were discarded. Oocyte pickup failure was defined by a negative oocyte recovery after three consecutive follicular flushings. The FF was then centrifuged at 3000 x g for 15 min at 4 C to eliminate cellular elements and subsequently frozen at –80 C for centralized hormonal analysis. Time elapsed between follicular aspiration and FF cryopreservation did not exceed 30 min.

Hormonal measurements in serum and FF

Blood samples obtained on d3 and dOPU were assayed for AMH, progesterone, and estradiol. Serum AMH levels were determined using a second-generation ELISA (reference A16507; Immunotech Beckman Coulter Laboratories, Villepinte, France). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 6% and less than 10%, respectively, lower detection limit was at 0.13 ng/ml, and linearity was up to 21 ng/ml for AMH. Serum progesterone and estradiol levels were determined by an automated multi-analysis system using a chemiluminescence technique (Advia-Centaur; Bayer Diagnostics, Puteaux, France). For progesterone, the lower detection limit was 0.1 ng/ml, linearity was up to 60 ng/ml, and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 8 and 9%, respectively. For estradiol, the lower detection limit was 15 pg/ml, linearity was up to 1000 pg/ml, and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 8 and 9%, respectively. Conversion factors to SI units are 7.14 for AMH, 3.18 for progesterone, and 3.67 for estradiol.

For AMH, progesterone, and estradiol assays in the FF, we used similar methodology as described above. To avoid possible bias due to FF volume variability, hormone concentrations in the FF were adjusted to its protein content, as reported elsewhere (14, 16). Proteins were measured according to the conventional Biuret reaction (17) using an automated multi-analysis system (AU640; Olympus, Rungis, France). FF hormone levels were expressed as nanograms per gram of protein for both AMH and progesterone and milligrams per gram of protein for estradiol.

Ultrasonographic measurements

Ultrasonographic measurements were performed using a 5.0- to 9.0-MHz multi-frequency transvaginal probe (Voluson 730 Expert; General Electric Medical Systems, Paris, France) according to a methodology previously described (8, 9). In brief, on d3, all antral follicles that measured 3–10 mm in mean diameter were carefully counted in both ovaries. On the day of hCG administration, the size of the dominant follicle was the mean of two orthogonal diameters.

Definition of AMH groups

Cycles were sorted arbitrarily into three sets of three different groups according to serum d3 and dOPU and FF AMH concentrations. Cutoffs for defining low, average, and high AMH concentrations corresponded arbitrarily to the round values of the 30th and 70th centiles of each measurement. Hence, according to these criteria, serum d3 AMH levels determined three different groups of patients: low-d3 (AMH ≤ 1.0 ng/ml; n = 31), average-d3 (AMH = 1.1–2.0 ng/ml; n = 45), and high-d3 (AMH > 2.0 ng/ml; n = 42). Serum dOPU AMH levels determined three other distinct groups: low-dOPU (AMH ≤ 1.0 ng/ml; n = 39), average-dOPU (AMH = 1.1–2.0 ng/ml; n = 33), and high-dOPU (AMH > 2.0 ng/ml; n = 46). FF AMH levels determined three additional groups: low-dOPU (AMH ≤ 50.0 ng/g protein; n = 35), average-dOPU (AMH = 50.1–100.0 ng/g protein; n = 40), and high-dOPU (AMH > 100.0 ng/g protein; n = 43).

Statistics

The measure of central tendency used was the mean and the measure of variability was the SE. Medians and ranges were used when normality of data distribution could not be ascertained. Comparisons between continuous variables from the low, average, and high AMH groups were performed using ANOVA when data distribution was normal or the Kruskal-Wallis test when normality could not be confirmed. To determine the respective influence of different independent variables such as ages, number of antral follicle count, hormonal values on pregnancy, and implantation rates, we used binomial logistic regression, and results were expressed as P and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Paired comparisons were made with the paired Student’s t test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test when appropriate. Relationship between two continuous variables was assessed by correlation when they were independent from each other and by simple regression when there was a dependency relationship. The Spearman’s test was used to determine whether coefficients of correlation (r) were significantly different from zero. The present study was powered to detect anticipated differences of 25% in embryo implantation rates at greater than 80% power at 0.05 significance level. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient characteristics, cycle monitoring, and embryology data

Population characteristics in the low, average, and high serum and FF AMH groups are summarized in Table 1Go. As mentioned, women’s ages, BMIs, menstrual cycle lengths, and indications for IVF-ET were comparable in the three sets of AMH groups (d3, dOPU, and FF). In line with this, neither serum nor FF AMH levels were significantly correlated with women’s ages, BMIs, or menstrual cycle lengths. Overall, on d3, median antral follicle (3–10 mm) count was 9 (range, 1–24). As expected, this measure was positively correlated with AMH levels on d3 (r = 0.74; P < 0.0001) and dOPU (r = 0.71; P < 0.0001) and in the FF (r = 0.29; P < 0.002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics in the low, average, and high AMH groups

 
Cycle monitoring and embryology data in the low, average, and high serum and FF AMH groups are presented in Table 2Go. The total dose of hMG used for maintaining dominant follicle growth was similar irrespective of AMH levels in the serum and FF. It is noteworthy that the time necessary to achieve follicle maturation (>16 mm in diameter) was longer in patients showing higher serum d3 AMH. Indeed, the day of hCG administration was positively correlated with serum AMH levels on d3 (r = 0.31; P < 0.001) and on dOPU (r = 0.29; P < 0.001) but not with FF AMH levels. Because serum AMH levels on d3 (r = 0.29; P < 0.003) and on dOPU (r = 0.26; P < 0.008) were correlated with the day in which GnRH antagonist-hMG treatment was started but not with the remaining time required to reach follicle maturation, it is possible that the slower follicular growth in patients having higher serum AMH levels occurred exclusively before GnRH antagonist-hMG treatment. Moreover, on the day of hCG administration, the mean size of the dominant follicle and serum estradiol levels were comparable in the three sets of AMH groups and were not correlated with serum or FF AMH levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Cycle monitoring and embryology data in low, average, and high AMH groups

 
We observed a decrease in the prevalence of oocyte retrieval failure from the low to the high FF AMH groups, irrespective of the number of follicular flushings performed. This phenomenon was not observed in the d3 and dOPU AMH groups. Fertilization rates and the prevalence of top-quality embryos available remained comparable in the three sets of groups.

Hormonal data

Overall fluctuations of serum AMH, progesterone, and estradiol levels from d3 to dOPU and their absolute FF concentrations are illustrated in Fig. 1Go. Whereas progesterone and estradiol levels increased significantly (P < 0.0001), median AMH levels remained steady between d3 at 1.56 ng/ml (range, 0.13–7.26) and dOPU at 1.50 ng/ml (range, 0.13–6.96). Furthermore, we observed on dOPU a positive correlation between serum and FF levels of AMH (r = 0.47; P < 0.0001), progesterone (r = 0.53; P < 0.0001), and estradiol (r = 0.37; P < 0.0001). In addition, FF AMH levels were negatively correlated with FF progesterone (r = –0.27; P < 0.0004) and estradiol (r = –0.21; P < 0.03) levels. In contrast, serum AMH, progesterone, and estradiol levels were correlated neither on d3 nor on dOPU. Furthermore, serum AMH levels (d3 and dOPU) and FF AMH levels were correlated with early antral follicle counts on d3 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001; r = 0.71, P < 0.0001; and r = 0.29, P < 0.002, respectively). Incidentally, as expected, before adjustment of values to protein content, AMH was roughly 2.5-fold as concentrated in the FF of preovulatory follicles as in the serum on dOPU (3.82 vs. 1.50 ng/ml, respectively).


Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. White box-and-whiskers depict the dynamics of serum AMH, progesterone, and estradiol levels from d3 to dOPU in monodominant follicle IVF-ET cycles. Horizontal lines inside the boxes represent median levels. Upper and lower limits of the boxes-and-whiskers represent the 75th and 25th centiles and 90th and 10th centiles. Values outside the 90th and 10th centile limits are represented as dots. Note that, contrary to serum progesterone and estradiol levels, which showed an expected significant increase (P < 0.0001), serum AMH levels remained steady from d3 to dOPU. Gray box-and-whiskers illustrate FF hormone levels, in particular, the residual yet sizeable AMH production by follicles having undergone preovulatory maturation and luteinization. Note that conversion factors to SI units are 7.14 for AMH, 3.18 for progesterone, and 3.67 for estradiol.

 
Clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and implantation rates

Clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and embryo implantation rates are presented in Fig. 2Go. As shown, clinical pregnancy (gestational sac observed at ultrasound scans at around 7 wk of amenorrhea) and ongoing pregnancy (>12 wk of amenorrhea) rates per oocyte retrieval as well as embryo implantation rates (total number of gestational sacs x 100/total number of embryos transferred) increased dramatically from the low to the high FF AMH groups (5.7, 20.0, and 39.5%, P < 0.002; 5.7, 17.5, and 32.6%, P < 0.01; and 11.8, 30.8, and 65.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). In contrast, the slight differences among these IVF-ET outcome parameters did not reach statistical significance in the two sets of serum AMH groups.


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Clinical pregnancy (gestational sac observed at ultrasound scans at around 7 wk of amenorrhea; gray bars) and ongoing pregnancy (>12 wk of amenorrhea; black bars) rates per oocyte retrieval as well as embryo implantation rates (total number of gestational sacs x 100/total number of embryos transferred; white bars) in the three AMH concentration groups. Notice that all three IVF-ET outcome parameters increased dramatically from the low to the high FF AMH groups (C) (P < 0.002, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, respectively) but remained similar in the two sets of serum AMH groups (d3 and dOPU; A and B, respectively). Note that conversion factors to SI units are 7.14 for AMH, 3.18 for progesterone, and 3.67 for estradiol.

 
Accordingly, binomial logistic regression analysis indicated that only FF AMH levels were significantly associated with clinical pregnancy (P < 0.001; CI, 1.00–1.01) and embryo implantation rates (P < 0.003; CI, 1.00–1.01), in contrast with other parameters such as patient’s ages (P < 0.86; CI, 0.87–1.17, and P < 0.40; CI, 0.89–1.30, respectively), antral follicle count on d3 (P < 0.15; CI, 0.96–1.24, and P < 0.06; CI, 0.98–1.34), d3 AMH (P < 0.80; CI, 0.55–2.13, and P < 0.35; CI, 0.27–1.59), and dOPU AMH (P < 0.23; CI, 0.31–1.32, and P < 0.73; CI, 0.30–2.31). Furthermore, the present study was not adequately powered to address the possible relationship between ovarian AMH production and pregnancy loss. Overall, four first-trimester pregnancy losses of 27 clinical pregnancies (14.8%) were observed in our series, and we could not detect any statistically significant variation in the incidence of this event among women who displayed low, intermediate, or high d3, dOPU, and FF AMH levels.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study used the clinical model of monodominant follicle IVF-ET to determine whether AMH production by a single preovulatory follicle, assessed by FF AMH measurements, is positively related to the fate of the ensuing oocyte and embryo. Although peripheral AMH levels have hitherto been shown to reflect quantitatively the available antral follicle pool (8, 7, 10, 11), a qualitative relationship between AMH production and follicle competence is also conceivable.

The present results support the hypothesis that a direct link exists between aptitude of granulosa cells to produce AMH and functional quality of the oocyte, as reflected by its competence to become an embryo endowed with adequate implantation potential. This striking relationship implies a number of cellular mechanisms. First, it is possible that granulosa cell metabolism and embryogenic competence of the oocyte are interrelated. Indeed, some previous studies have shown that the degree of apoptosis of both mural and cumulus granulosa cells negatively affects the developmental competence of the oocyte (18, 19). In agreement with this, atretic human (6) and animal (4, 13) follicles do not express AMH. In addition, a plethora of studies have identified a relationship between granulosa cell by-products measured in pooled FF, such as steroids, glycoproteins, proteolytic enzymes, etc., and oocyte/embryo outcome (16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Furthermore, growing evidence indicates that in preovulatory follicles, the oocyte directly activates several physiological processes that occur in its surrounding granulosa cells, including plasminogen activator production (25) and LH receptor (26), kit ligand (27), and AMH (28) gene expression. Incidentally, the observation that AMH mRNA expression is lower in mural than in cumulus granulosa cells (29) is in keeping with this hypothesis.

Moreover, we observed a remarkable lack of variation of serum AMH levels between two distinct points in the menstrual cycle (d3 and dOPU). This finding corroborates the hypothesis that circulating AMH levels remain steady throughout the cycle, probably due to multistaged follicular production (4, 5, 6) and presumable FSH independence (2, 3) of AMH. In addition, in contrast to FF AMH concentrations, we failed to relate peripheral AMH levels on d3 or dOPU with embryo implantation. Accordingly, the incidence of oocyte retrieval failure, a phenomenon that has been attributed to follicle quality defects (30), was related to FF but not serum AMH levels. The differential predictability of FF vs. serum AMH levels may be explained by the fact that circulating AMH levels reflect quantitatively the whole pool of AMH-producing follicles but are less effective to discriminate per-follicle AMH production. In keeping with this hypothesis is our observation that antral follicle counts are more strongly related to serum AMH levels than FF AMH levels as well as the conflicting literature on the possible link between peripheral AMH levels and embryo implantation (12, 31). Finally, our observation of a positive correlation between serum AMH levels (d3 and dOPU) and the time necessary to achieve follicle maturation (>16 mm in diameter), mainly due to a shorter time to dominance in low AMH patients, is in conformity with the putative reduction in the follicular phase length in ovarian-aged women (32).

It is also noteworthy that the negative impact of low per-follicle AMH production on pregnancy and implantation outcome could not be anticipated by the analysis of oocyte fertilization and top-quality embryo rates. Indeed, oocyte fertilization aptitude and embryo morphology remained statistically similar among FF or serum AMH groups, although a trend for better-quality embryos was noted in high AMH groups. Given that serum AMH levels have been recently associated with embryo morphology (33), this issue deserves further confirmation in adequately powered studies.

The present data indicated a negative relationship between AMH and steroid levels in the FF. Although the exact reasons for this phenomenon remain unknown, the reported inhibiting effect of AMH on aromatase activity and estrogen production (34) constitutes a plausible explanation for the negative correlation between FF AMH and estradiol levels. Furthermore, the remarkable negative correlation between FF AMH and progesterone concentrations confirm our previous results (14) and may be explained by at least two mechanisms. On the one hand, AMH may be implicated in the regulation of progesterone production by the preovulatory follicle. Accordingly, Kim et al. (35) have previously demonstrated that the administration of recombinant human AMH to cultured luteinized granulosa cells inhibits their basal and epidermal growth factor-stimulated progesterone production. On the other hand, luteinization itself may lead to an additional decrease of AMH production by the granulosa cells. This hypothesis is strengthened by the reduced expression of AMH and its type II receptor mRNA in corpora lutea compared with small or large antral follicles from rats (4), and the decline in serum AMH levels observed after hCG administration in COH cycles (36). The mechanisms underlying the decrease of AMH production by luteinized follicles and its physiological role remain unclear. Yet, the present results are in line with previous reports indicating that, despite preovulatory maturation and luteinization, follicles still contain sizeable amounts of AMH (1, 14). The issue on whether this phenomenon represents an active AMH production by preovulatory luteinized follicles and/or is merely the result of an early-stage follicle production remains to be studied.

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that FF AMH concentrations are strongly and positively associated with embryo implantation. They suggest that FF AMH levels reflect granulosa cell functioning and oocyte health better than do serum AMH levels and may constitute an alternative marker of ovarian ageing. In addition, by extrapolation, FF AMH measurements should help to distinguish the embryos that are the most likely to achieve implantation in IVF-ET conducted in stimulated cycles. Indeed, embryo selection is a precondition to improve outcome of IVF-ET in stimulated cycles without increasing multiple pregnancy rates. This issue is of special interest because the present investigation failed to find any significant difference in the morphological scoring of embryos originated from high- or low-AMH-producing follicles. Yet, additional prospective studies are necessary to challenge the hypothesis that FF AMH concentrations are useful to assist the selection of the best embryos to transfer.


    Footnotes
 
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online February 27, 2007

Abbreviations: AMH, Anti-Müllerian hormone; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; COH, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; d3, cycle d 3; dOPU, day of oocyte pickup; FF, follicular fluid; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; hMG, human menopausal gonadotropin; IVF-ET, in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Received May 15, 2006.

Accepted February 15, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vigier B, Picard JY, Tran D, Legeai L, Josso N 1984 Production of anti-Müllerian hormone: another homology between Sertoli and granulosa cells. Endocrinology 114:1315–1320[Abstract]
  2. Bath LE, Wallace WH, Shaw MP, Fitzpatrick C, Anderson RA 2003 Depletion of ovarian reserve in young women after treatment for cancer in childhood: detection by anti-Mullerian hormone, inhibin B and ovarian ultrasound. Hum Reprod 18:2368–2374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM, Rabinowitz R, Markowitz E, Mimoni T, Gal M, Zylber-Haran E, Margalioth EJ 2005 Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 20:3178–3183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Baarends WM, Uilenbroek JT, Kramer P, Hoogerbrugge JW, van Leeuwen EC, Themmen AP, Grootegoed JA 1995 Anti-Mullerian hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat ovaries during postnatal development, the estrous cycle, and gonadotropin-induced follicle growth. Endocrinology 136:4951–4962[Abstract]
  5. Durlinger AL, Visser JA, Themmen AP 2002 Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Mullerian hormone. Reproduction 124:601–609[Abstract]
  6. Weenen C, Laven JS, Von Bergh AR, Cranfield M, Groome NP, Visser JA, Kramer P, Fauser BC, Themmen AP 2004 Anti-Mullerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 10:77–83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. De Vet A, Laven JS, de Jong FH, Themmen AP, Fauser BC 2002 Antimullerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging. Fertil Steril 77:357–362[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Fanchin R, Schonauer LM, Righini C, Guibourdenche J, Frydman R, Taieb J 2003 Serum anti-Mullerian hormone is more strongly related to ovarian follicular status than serum inhibin B, estradiol, FSH and LH on day 3. Hum Reprod 18:323–327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Fanchin R, Taieb J, H Mendez Lozano D, Ducot B, Frydman R, Bouyer J 2005 High reproducibility of serum anti-Mullerian hormone measurements suggests a multi-staged follicular secretion and strengthens its role in the assessment of ovarian follicular status. Hum Reprod 20:923–927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Seifer DB, MacLaughlin DT, Christian BP, Feng B, Shelden RM 2002 Early follicular serum mullerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril 77:468–471[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, te Velde ER, Fauser BC, Bancsi LF, de Jong FH, Themmen AP 2002 Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 17:3065–3071[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hazout A, Bouchard P, Seifer DB, Aussage P, Junca AM, Cohen-Bacrie P 2004 Serum antimullerian hormone/mullerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol. Fertil Steril 82:1323–1329[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bezard J, Vigier B, Tran D, Mauleon P, Josso N 1987 Immunocytochemical study of anti-Mullerian hormone in sheep ovarian follicles during fetal and post-natal development. J Reprod Fertil 80:509–516[Abstract]
  14. Fanchin R, Louafi N, Mendez Lozano DH, Achour-Frydman N, Frydman R, Taieb J 2005 Per-follicle measurements indicate that anti-Müllerian hormone secretion is modulated by the extent of follicular development and luteinization and may qualitatively reflect the ovarian follicular status. Fertil Steril 84:167–173[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Van de Meerssche M, Ryckaert G, Eestermans W, Gerris J 1999 Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 14:2345–2349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Franchimont P, Hazee-Hagelstein MT, Hazout A, Frydman R, Schatz B, Demerle F 1989 Correlation between follicular fluid content and the results of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. I. Sex steroids. Fertil Steril 52:1006–1011[Medline]
  17. Weichselbaum TE 1946 An accurate and rapid method for determination of proteins in small amounts of blood serum and plasma. Am J Clin Pathol 16:40–48
  18. Nakahara K, Saito H, Saito T, Ito M, Ohta N, Takahashi T, Hiroi M 1997 The incidence of apoptotic bodies in membrana granulosa can predict prognosis of ova from patients participating in in vitro fertilization programs. Fertil Steril 68:312–317[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zeuner A, Muller K, Reguszynski K, Jewgenow K 2003 Apoptosis within bovine follicular cells and its effect on oocyte development during in vitro maturation. Theriogenology 59:1421–1433[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Botero-Ruiz W, Laufer N, DeCherney AH, Polan ML, Haseltine FP, Behrman HR 1984 The relationship between follicular fluid steroid concentration and successful fertilization of human oocytes in vitro. Fertil Steril 41:820–826[Medline]
  21. Rom E, Reich R, Laufer N, Lewin A, Rabinowitz R, Pevsner B, Lancet M, Shenker JG, Miskin R, Adelmann-Grill BC, Tsafriri A 1987 Follicular fluid contents as predictors of success of in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2:505–510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Itskovitz J, Rubattu S, Rosenwaks Z, Liu HC, Sealey JE 1991 Relationship of follicular fluid prorenin to oocyte maturation, steroid levels, and outcome of in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:165–171[Abstract]
  23. Andersen CY 1993 Characteristics of human follicular fluid associated with successful conception after in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1227–1234[Abstract]
  24. Mendoza C, Ruiz-Requena E, Ortega E, Cremades N, Martinez F, Bernabeu R, Greco E, Tesarik J 2002 Follicular fluid markers of oocyte developmental potential. Hum Reprod 17:1017–1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Canipari R, Epifano O, Siracusa G, Salustri A 1995 Mouse oocytes inhibit plasminogen activator production by ovarian cumulus and granulosa cells. Dev Biol 167:371–378[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Eppig JJ, Wigglesworth K, Pendola F, Hirao Y 1997 Murine oocytes suppress expression of luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid by granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 56:976–984[Abstract]
  27. Joyce IM, Pendola FL, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ 1999 Oocyte regulation of kit ligand expression in mouse ovarian follicles. Dev Biol 214:342–353[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Salmon NA, Handyside AH, Joyce IM 2004 Oocyte regulation of anti-Mullerian hormone expression in granulosa cells during ovarian follicle development in mice. Dev Biol 266:201–208[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Munsterberg A, Lovell-Badge R 1991 Expression of the mouse anti-mullerian hormone gene suggests a role in both male and female sexual differentiation. Development 113:613–624[Abstract]
  30. Zreik TG, Garcia-Velasco JA, Vergara TM, Arici A, Olive D, Jones EE 2000 Empty follicle syndrome: evidence for recurrence. Hum Reprod 15:999–1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Penarrubia J, Fabregues F, Manau D, Creus M, Casals G, Casamitjana R, Carmona F, Vanrell JA, Balasch J 2005 Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment. Hum Reprod 20:915–922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Klein NA, Harper AJ, Houmard BS, Sluss PM, Soules MR 2002 Is the short follicular phase in older women secondary to advanced or accelerated dominant follicle development? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5746–5750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Silberstein T, MacLaughlin DT, Shai I, Trimarchi JR, Lambert-Messerlian G, Seifer DB, Keefe DL, Blazar AS 2006 Mullerian inhibiting substance levels at the time of HCG administration in IVF cycles predict both ovarian reserve and embryo morphology. Hum Reprod 21:159–163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Vigier B, Forest MG, Eychenne B, Bezard J, Garrigou O, Robel P, Josso N 1989 Anti-Mullerian hormone produces endocrine sex reversal of fetal ovaries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:3684–3688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kim JH, Seibel MM, MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK, Ransil BJ, Hametz PA, Richards CJ 1992 The inhibitory effects of Mullerian-inhibiting substance on epidermal growth factor induced proliferation and progesterone production of human granulosa-luteal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:911–917[Abstract]
  36. Fanchin R, Mendez Lozano DH, Louafi N, Achour-Frydman N, Frydman R, Taieb J 2005 Dynamics of serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels during the luteal phase of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod 20:747–751[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Ledee, R. Lombroso, L. Lombardelli, J. Selva, S. Dubanchet, G. Chaouat, F. Frankenne, J.M. Foidart, E. Maggi, S. Romagnani, et al.
Cytokines and chemokines in follicular fluids and potential of the corresponding embryo: the role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2001 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Monniaux, N. d. Clemente, J.-L. Touze, C. Belville, C. Rico, M. Bontoux, J.-Y. Picard, and S. Fabre
Intrafollicular Steroids and Anti-Mullerian Hormone During Normal and Cystic Ovarian Follicular Development in the Cow
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Yding Andersen, M. Rosendahl, and A. G. Byskov
Concentration of Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Inhibin-B in Relation to Steroids and Age in Follicular Fluid from Small Antral Human Follicles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2344 - 2349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
C. Tatone, F. Amicarelli, M. C. Carbone, P. Monteleone, D. Caserta, R. Marci, P. G. Artini, P. Piomboni, and R. Focarelli
Cellular and molecular aspects of ovarian follicle ageing
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 131 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/5/1796    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fanchin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Taieb, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fanchin, R.
Right arrow Articles by Taieb, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals