help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1895
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golden, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golden, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Metabolism
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 4 1289-1295
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Endogenous Sex Hormones and Glucose Tolerance Status in Postmenopausal Women

Sherita Hill Golden, Adrian S. Dobs, Dhananjay Vaidya, Moyses Szklo, Susan Gapstur, Peter Kopp, Kiang Liu and Pamela Ouyang

Departments of Medicine (S.H.G., A.S.D., D.V., P.O.) and Epidemiology (S.H.G., M.S.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; and Divisions of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine (P.K.) and Department of Preventive Medicine (S.G., K.L.), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sherita Hill Golden, M.D., M.H.S., Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 East Monument Street, Suite 2-600, Baltimore, Maryland 21205. E-mail: sahill{at}jhmi.edu.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: In postmenopausal women, endogenous estradiol (E2) and free testosterone (T) have been positively associated with glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. Most studies have not examined these associations in a large group of postmenopausal women.

Objective: The objective was to examine the association between endogenous sex hormones and glucose tolerance in postmenopausal women.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study of 1973 postmenopausal women ages 45–84 yr, not taking hormone replacement therapy, in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis baseline examination.

Main Outcome Measures: Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes were defined based on fasting blood sugar and/or treatment for diabetes. In women with normal glucose tolerance, insulin resistance was estimated using homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

Results: Increasing quartiles of bioavailable T and E2 and decreasing quartiles of SHBG were associated with significantly increased odds of IFG and diabetes (all P for trend < 0.001). Except for the association of bioavailable T with diabetes, the other associations persisted after multivariable adjustment. Although higher dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA) was associated with greater odds of IFG (P for trend = 0.02), it was not associated with diabetes. Of 1100 women with normal glucose tolerance, E2 and DHEA were positively associated, and SHBG was inversely associated with HOMA-IR (all P < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Bioavailable T was associated with HOMA-IR (P < 0.001), but not fasting glucose.

Conclusion: Of postmenopausal women, endogenous bioavailable T, E2, and DHEA were positively associated and SHBG was negatively associated with insulin resistance.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BOTH ANDROGENS AND estradiol (E2) are associated with diabetes mellitus and altered glucose tolerance. Testosterone (T) given to healthy women leads to impaired glucose metabolism (1, 2, 3, 4). Endogenous free T is positively correlated with insulin resistance (5, 6, 7, 8, 9), fasting plasma glucose (6, 10, 11), and adiposity (6, 10). Both low levels of SHBG, a marker of hyperandrogenicity (12, 13, 14) that is inversely related to insulin (15), adiposity (6, 10), and glucose tolerance (13, 16), and high levels of free T (6), predict the incidence of type 2 diabetes in women. In a recent analysis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, we found that higher free androgen index was associated with the hyperinsulinism and hyperglycemia components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women (17). However, only having sex hormone data on a select group of women and not on the entire cohort limited this study. The association between dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA), another androgen, and glucose tolerance status in postmenopausal women is less clear.

Previous studies have also shown that postmenopausal women with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes have higher E2 levels than postmenopausal women with normal glucose tolerance (10, 14, 18). Of healthy postmenopausal women without diabetes or glucose intolerance, E2 was significantly associated with insulin (7) and insulin resistance (19), independent of adiposity. Bioavailable E2 is associated with incident insulin resistance but not with the incidence of type 2 diabetes (6). One study failed to find an association between free E2 and fasting plasma glucose levels (11), and other studies in human and rodent models suggest that E2 may have a beneficial effect on glucose metabolism (20).

Previous studies of premenopausal and perimenopausal women from the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN) cohort found that although E2 was not associated with markers of glucose tolerance, free androgen index was positively correlated with glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (21, 22). To examine further these associations, we determined the relation between endogenous T, E2, SHBG, and DHEA and glucose tolerance status in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Our study is unique in that it: 1) is one of largest cohort studies with complete ascertainment of sex hormone data on all postmenopausal women; 2) expands on the SWAN Study of premenopausal and perimenopausal women to evaluate associations in an ethnically diverse group of postmenopausal women; and 3) examined the association between DHEA and glucose tolerance status, which has not been consistently studied in large cohorts.


   Subjects and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population

MESA is a multicenter, longitudinal cohort study of the prevalence and correlates of subclinical cardiovascular disease and the factors that influence its progression (23). Individuals were excluded if they had clinical cardiovascular disease, including physician-diagnosed angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or heart failure, use of nitroglycerine, current atrial fibrillation, or had undergone a procedure related to cardiovascular disease (coronary artery bypass surgery, angioplasty, valve replacement, pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, or any surgery on the heart or arteries) (www.mesa-nhlbi.org). Between July 2000 and August 2002, 6814 men and women who identified themselves as white, Black, Hispanic, or Chinese, and were 45–84 yr of age, were recruited from portions of six U.S. communities: Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Maryland; Chicago, Illinois; Forsyth County, North Carolina; Los Angeles County, California; Northern Manhattan and the Bronx, New York; and St. Paul, Minnesota. Details on the sampling frames and the cohort examination procedures have been published previously (23). Informed consent was obtained from each participant, and the Institutional Review Boards of each institution approved the study.

Sex hormone levels were measured in 3246 women. Women were excluded from this analysis if they were current users of hormone replacement therapy (n = 1273) or if insulin was their first diabetes treatment medication, indicating the likely presence of type 1 diabetes (n = 17). Thus, the current analyses were based on 1956 postmenopausal women. A woman was considered postmenopausal if she self-reported being postmenopausal, had undergone a prior oophorectomy, and/or was more than 55 yr of age.

Assessment of exposures: endogenous sex hormones

Participants fasted for 12 h and avoided smoking and heavy physical activity for 2 h before each examination. Fasting blood samples were drawn between 0730 and 1030 h. Serum samples, extracted by centrifugation at 2000 x g for 15 min or 3000 x g for 10 min, were immediately stored at –70 C and shipped to the University of Vermont for long-term freezer storage. Since MESA began, these samples have not been thawed.

Serum hormone concentrations were measured from stored samples in the Sex Hormone Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center in Worcester, Massachusetts. Total T and DHEA were measured directly using RIA kits, and SHBG was measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assay using Immulite kits obtained from Diagnostic Products Corporation (Los Angeles, CA). An ultrasensitive RIA kit from Diagnostic System Laboratories (Webster, TX) was used to measure E2. Percent-free T was calculated according to the method of Södergard et al. (47), and free-T concentration was calculated as: [total T x (percent-free T x 0.01)]. Including approximately 5% blind quality control samples in each batch of samples analyzed was performed to monitor assay variability. The quality control serum was obtained from a large pool that was aliquoted into storage vials and labeled identical to MESA participant samples. The overall coefficient of variation (CV) for total T, SHBG, DHEA, and E2 were 12.3, 9.0, 11.2, and 10.5%, respectively.

Assessment of outcomes

Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/liter (126 mg/dl) or use of hypoglycemic medication. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was defined as a fasting glucose of 5.5–6.9 mmol/liter (range 100–125 mg/dl). Serum glucose was measured by rate reflectance spectrophotometry using thin-film adaptation of the glucose oxidase method on the Vitros analyzer (Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics, Inc., Rochester, NY) (laboratory CV: 1.1%). Insulin was determined by a RIA method using the Linco Human Insulin Specific RIA Kit (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO) (lower limit of sensitivity: 2 U/liter; laboratory CV: 4.9%). Insulin resistance was estimated using the HOMA-IR [glucose (mmol/liter)*insulin (mIU/liter)/22.5] because it has been strongly correlated with fasting insulin, and the euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps (24). HOMA-IR has also predicted type 2 diabetes (25).

Covariates

Self-reported information included sex, age, race/ethnicity, smoking, and prescription medication use. Weight and height were measured using a balance beam and a vertical ruler with participants wearing light clothing and no shoes. Height was recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm and weight to the nearest 0.5 lb. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight (kilograms) divided by the height squared (meters2). Waist circumference was measured at the minimum abdominal girth, and the hip circumference was measured at the level of the symphysis pubis and the maximum protrusion of the buttocks. All anthropometric measures were taken in duplicate and averaged. Smoking status was categorized as never, former, or current, and current alcohol use was coded as yes or no. Physical activity was assessed using the MESA Typical Week Physical Activity Survey. The 28-item questionnaire assesses the time and frequency spent in various household, outdoor, sporting, conditioning, and volunteer activities during a typical week in the past month. Moderate and vigorous activities were categorized as low intensity [0–500 metabolic equivalent (MET) min/wk], medium intensity (501–1000 MET min/wk), and high intensity (>1000 MET min/wk).

Analysis

In univariate analyses, median concentrations of each hormone were compared among women with normal glucose tolerance, IFG, and diabetes using the Kruskal-Wallis test because hormone levels were not distributed normally. For the purpose of multivariable analyses, sex hormones were divided into quartiles. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from multiple logistic regression models to determine the odds of having IFG and diabetes by quartile of each sex hormone, using quartile 1 as the reference. In the multivariable model, adjustment was made for age, race/ethnicity, MESA site, waist circumference, alcohol use, smoking status, and physical activity to examine the independent association between sex hormones and glucose tolerance status. We further adjusted for HOMA-IR in the multivariable model examining the association of sex hormones and SHBG with IFG. Adjustment for HOMA-IR was not made in the models examining the association of sex hormones with diabetes status because diabetes treatment could alter glucose and insulin levels. Linear regression analyses were also performed using log-transformed sex hormone values.

In a second set of univariate analyses excluding women with IFG and treated diabetes, the mean values of fasting glucose and HOMA-IR were estimated for each quartile of each sex hormone. Because HOMA-IR was not normally distributed, it was log-transformed. Multiple linear regression models were used to calculate the mean difference in glucose and mean difference in the natural log of HOMA-IR in each quartile of each sex hormone compared with the lowest quartile. For ease of interpretation, the ß coefficients from the HOMA-IR model were exponentiated to values that represented the percent difference in HOMA-IR for each hormone quartile compared with the first quartile. Multivariable adjustment was made for the same covariates as indicated previously. Linear regression analyses were also performed using log-transformed sex hormone values.

Analyses were also stratified by race/ethnicity and BMI (<25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2) to determine whether there were race/ethnicity by hormone or adiposity by hormone interactions. Statistical additive interaction was assessed using likelihood ratio tests of nested linear regression models to determine which model best described the data, in which one model included a term for ethnicity by hormone interaction, and the other model did not. Similar models were constructed and their significance tested for the BMI by hormone interaction. P < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata, version 8.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Baseline characteristics

Table 1Go displays the biological characteristics of postmenopausal women not taking hormone replacement therapy. Chinese-American women had significantly lower BMI and waist circumference, and were less likely to be current smokers or be physically active compared with white, Black, and Hispanic women. Black and Hispanic women were the least likely to be current alcohol users. Chinese-American women had similar fasting glucose levels, and prevalence of IFG and diabetes as high-risk Black and Hispanic women, with white women having significantly lower glucose levels and the lowest prevalence of both conditions; however, Chinese women had significantly lower fasting insulin and HOMA-IR. White women had significantly lower fasting insulin and insulin resistance compared with Black and Hispanic women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Baseline characteristics of 1956 postmenopausal women in the MESA not taking hormone replacement therapy

 
Chinese women had significantly lower total T levels and higher DHEA levels compared with the other women. Black women had higher bioavailable T and E2 levels compared with the other women, and white women had the highest SHBG levels. After adjustment for BMI, racial differences in total and bioavailable T and E2 were no longer significant; however, white women had significantly lower DHEA levels, and Chinese and Hispanic women had significantly lower SHBG than Black and white women (data not shown).

Relative odds of IFG and diabetes

Compared with women in the lowest quartile of bioavailable T, those in the highest quartile had greater than 2-fold odds of having IFG and diabetes (Table 2Go, model 1). Although the association with IFG persisted after multivariable adjustment, the association with diabetes was no longer significant (Table 2Go, model 2). There was a strong, graded relation between quartiles of E2 and the odds of IFG, with women in the highest quartile of E2 having greater than 3-fold odds of having IFG. The strength of this association was attenuated but remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Similar statistically significant patterns were seen for diabetes (Table 2Go, model 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Relative odds of impaired fasting glucose and diabetes by quartile of each endogenous sex hormone among 1956 postmenopausal women not taking hormone replacement therapy

 
There were strong, graded inverse associations between SHBG and the odds of IFG and diabetes. Compared with women in the lowest quartile of SHBG, those in the highest quartile had 75% lower odds of having IFG and 81% lower odds of having diabetes (Table 2Go, model 1). These associations were weaker but remained statistically significant after multivariable adjustment (Table 2Go, model 2). Finally, although DHEA was associated with significantly greater odds of IFG, it was not associated with greater odds of diabetes. Total T was not associated with IFG or diabetes (data not shown). We found similar associations when we excluded individuals who were taking diabetes medications (insulin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and biguanides; data not shown).

In a sensitivity analysis, we sought to determine if the association between sex hormones and SHBG and IFG was mediated by insulin resistance by further adjusting for HOMA-IR in the multivariable model. The associations of bioavailable T, SHBG, and DHEA with IFG were no longer significant after adjustment for HOMA-IR. There was a trend toward increased odds of IFG with increasing quartiles of E2; however, this association was markedly attenuated (P value for trend 0.03).

Association of endogenous sex hormones with fasting glucose and HOMA-IR in women with normal glucose tolerance

In multivariable analyses, E2 and DHEA showed a strong, graded positive association, and SHBG showed a strong, graded, inverse association with fasting glucose and HOMA-IR (Figs. 1Go and 2Go). Although bioavailable T was strongly associated with HOMA-IR, it was not associated with fasting glucose. After multivariable adjustment, percent difference in HOMA-IR was 24% higher among women in the highest quartile of bioavailable T compared with those in the lowest quartile (P value for trend < 0.001; Fig. 2Go). Similar results were seen for the associations between E2 and DHEA, and glucose and HOMA-IR (Figs. 1Go and 2Go). Total T was not associated with fasting glucose or HOMA-IR in univariate or multivariable analyses.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Mean difference in fasting glucose for each quartile vs. quartile 1 of each endogenous sex hormone among 1100 postmenopausal women with normal glucose tolerance not taking hormone replacement therapy, adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, MESA site, waist circumference, physical activity, alcohol intake, and smoking status.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Percent difference in HOMA-IR for each quartile vs. quartile 1 of each endogenous sex hormone among 1100 postmenopausal women with normal glucose tolerance not taking hormone replacement therapy, adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, MESA site, waist circumference, physical activity, alcohol intake, and smoking status.

 
SHBG showed a strong inverse association with mean fasting glucose and percent difference in HOMA-IR, which were 0.12 mmol/liter and 23% lower, respectively, among women in the highest quartile of SHBG compared with those in the lowest quartile in multivariable analysis (P value for trend < 0.001; Figs. 1Go and 2Go).

Additional exploratory analyses and assessment for interaction

When linear regression analyses were conducted using log-transformed hormone values as continuous variables, our results were identical to those obtained when sex hormones were modeled as quartiles (data not shown). No interaction was seen between sex hormones and BMI or between sex hormones and race/ethnicity with regard to glucose tolerance status or measures of insulin resistance.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We found that among postmenopausal women not taking hormone replacement therapy, higher levels of bioavailable T were associated with greater odds of having IFG, but it was not associated with diabetes in multivariable analyses. Higher levels of E2 and lower levels of SHBG were strongly associated with greater odds of having both IFG and diabetes. There was a trend toward higher levels of DHEA being associated with greater odds of having IFG, but it was not associated with diabetes. These associations persisted after multivariable adjustment; however, adding HOMA-IR to the model explained all of the associations of sex hormones and SHBG with IFG. In a subsidiary analysis of postmenopausal women with normal glucose tolerance, bioavailable T was positively associated with HOMA-IR; however, it was not associated with fasting glucose. E2 and DHEA were positively associated, and SHBG was negatively associated with both fasting glucose and HOMA-IR in multivariable analyses.

In women with normal glucose tolerance in MESA, bioavailable T was more strongly associated with our measure of insulin resistance than with fasting glucose. We have previously found that free androgen index was strongly associated with the glucose and insulin components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women (17). In another cohort, free T has been positively associated with fasting plasma glucose (6, 10, 11), higher fasting and post-challenge insulin levels (6, 7), and higher insulin to glucose ratio (8). Free androgen index has been inversely associated with insulin sensitivity, assessed by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemia clamp (5). Elevated free T has also predicted incident type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance, independent of age, adiposity, and systolic blood pressure (6). Recently, in the SWAN Study, free androgen index was positively correlated with glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR, even after adjustment for BMI (22). In short-term clinical trials, androgen administration to healthy women has reduced insulin sensitivity and impaired glucose utilization (1, 4, 26). Antiandrogen therapy given to women with polycystic ovary syndrome and hyperandrogenism has resulted in partial improvement in insulin sensitivity (27, 28) and a decrease in visceral abdominal fat (29). In postmenopausal women, androgen therapy resulted in a gain in visceral abdominal fat, but there was no change in fasting glucose or insulin sensitivity (30). As we recently summarized (17), there are several potential mechanisms by which androgens and glucose metabolism may be associated.

We found that E2 was positively associated with fasting glucose and HOMA-IR, and with IFG and diabetes. Sutton-Tyrrell et al. (22) did not find an association between E2 and markers of glucose metabolism in premenopausal and perimenopausal women whose E2 levels were significantly higher than those of the postmenopausal women in our study. Our results may have also differed because the SWAN participants were predominantly Caucasian, with fewer Hispanic and Chinese subjects compared with our MESA population. However, our results are similar to other studies in postmenopausal women showing that impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes are associated with higher E2 levels than normal glucose tolerance (10, 14, 18). E2 has also been associated with insulin (7) and insulin resistance (19), independent of adiposity, and has predicted incident insulin resistance (6).

The literature regarding the effects of estrogen on glucose metabolism is mixed. Rodent models of E2 deficiency have insulin resistance, and rodent models of type 2 diabetes show that ovariectomy makes female rats susceptible to ß-cell destruction (20). These defects are reversed with E2 administration. Several studies have shown that treating healthy women with unopposed E2 or continuous equine estrogen improves insulin sensitivity and decreases blood glucose (31, 32, 33, 34), and among women with diabetes, unopposed E2 (35, 36, 37) or combination hormone replacement therapy (38) improves insulin sensitivity and glycemic control. However, although exogenous estrogen administered via hormone replacement therapy was associated with a reduced risk of developing diabetes in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease (39), pregnancy, a state of high endogenous estrogen, is associated with insulin resistance (26).

Our findings that higher SHBG was associated with better insulin sensitivity confirm those from previous studies (15, 16, 22). Low SHBG has also predicted type 2 diabetes in men and women (12, 14). Insulin is a potent inhibitor of SHBG secretion in vitro in hepatoma cells, and, thus, low levels of SHBG may reflect underlying insulin resistance (40). In our study, this is strongly suggested by the association between SHBG and IFG becoming nonsignificant after adjusting for HOMA-IR. Physiologically, SHBG binds T, dihydrotestosterone, and E2 with high affinity, and, thus, regulates their free concentrations, with lower SHBG, reflecting greater androgenicity (41).

In our study we found that DHEA was associated with higher glucose levels, higher HOMA-IR, and increased odds of IFG. DHEA declines significantly with age, and lower levels have been shown cross-sectionally to be associated with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and insulin resistance (26, 42). Administration of DHEA to postmenopausal women resulted in reduction in insulin and glucose levels (43). However, a recent study found that higher DHEA levels were associated with insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (44). Together, the relation between DHEA and glucose metabolism in postmenopausal women remains unclear and requires further study. In addition, future studies are needed to examine the relation between DHEA-sulfate, a more stable marker of long-term DHEA bioavailability, and glucose tolerance status.

Finally, we found some differences in endogenous sex hormone levels by ethnicity. Chinese women had the lowest total T and highest DHEA levels, and Black women had the highest total and bioavailable T levels and the highest E2 levels in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for BMI, race/ethnic differences in total and bioavailable T and E2 were no longer significant. In premenopausal and perimenopausal women, Randolph et al. (21) similarly found that Chinese women had the highest DHEA-sulfate levels; however, in contrast to our study, T levels were slightly lower in the African-American and Hispanic women. However, in both of our studies, adiposity was an important confounder of the race/ethnic differences in sex hormone levels; they also found that E2 and free T index did not differ by race/ethnicity once BMI was accounted for (21). In another study, Chinese women had lower E2 levels than white women (45). In our study, as in the SWAN Study, the associations between endogenous hormones and glucose metabolism variables were similar for all race/ethnicities (22).

Our study has several strengths. First, we had a large sample size of nearly 2000 postmenopausal women to examine these associations. With the exception of the Rancho-Bernardo Study (6, 10, 11), the majority of other studies have been small. Second, because MESA is an ethnically diverse sample, this allowed us to examine the association between endogenous sex hormones and insulin resistance by race/ethnicity. The SWAN Study is the only other study that we are aware of that has examined these associations in a multiethnic population (22). Third, because individuals with prevalent cardiovascular disease were excluded, this is a healthier, population-based sample, compared with a clinic-based sample. Finally, in contrast to our previous study (17), bioavailable T and other sex hormone measurements were available on the entire cohort of women and not a preselected subset.

Nonetheless, several limitations should be kept in mind in interpreting our data. This was a cross-sectional analysis, which does not allow us to elucidate the temporal association between hormones and glucose parameters; however, the structure of subsequent MESA follow-up examinations will allow for longitudinal analyses in the future. Also, only one measurement of sex hormones was used to characterize each woman’s hormonal status; however, it has been previously suggested that a single measure can reliably characterize a person’s androgen status (6, 46). We also did not have data on estrone, the primary estrogen present in postmenopausal women.

Our study suggests an association of androgens and estrogens with insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the temporal relation between endogenous sex hormones, and the risk of insulin resistance and diabetes. Additional studies are needed to elucidate further the mechanisms by which endogenous sex hormones are related to glucose metabolism and diabetes risk. Finally, studies aimed at altering the endogenous hormonal milieu may have implications for altering glucose metabolism and diabetes risk.


   Footnotes
 
This work was supported by RO1 HL074406 and contracts NO1-HC-95159 through NO1-HC-95165 and NO1-HC-95169 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org. S.H.G. was supported by a grant through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Minority Medical Faculty Development Program (Princeton, NJ) and by a Patient-Oriented Mentored Scientist Award through the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (Bethesda, MD) (5 K23 DK071565).

Disclosure Statement: S.H.G., A.S.D., D.V., M.S., S.G., P.K., and K.L. have nothing to disclose. P.O. serves on the CV Therapeutics Women’s Advisory Board and receives lecture fees from the American College of Cardiology Grand Round Series on Emerging Concepts in Lipid Lowering.

First Published Online January 23, 2007

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; DHEA, dehydroepiandrostenedione; E2, estradiol; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; MESA, Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis; MET, metabolic equivalent; SWAN, Study of Women Across the Nation; T, testosterone.

Received August 29, 2006.

Accepted January 9, 2007.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Polderman KH, Gooren LJ, Asscheman H, Bakker A, Heine RJ 1994 Induction of insulin resistance by androgens and estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:265–271[Abstract]
  2. Dunaif A 1993 Insulin resistance in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Ann NY Acad Sci 687:60–64[Medline]
  3. Lando J, Wynn V, Samols E 1963 The effect of anabolic steroids on blood sugar and plasma insulin levels in man. Metabolism 12:294–297
  4. Diamond MP, Grainger D, Diamond MC, Sherwin RS, Defronzo RA 1998 Effects of methyltestosterone on insulin secretion and sensitivity in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:4420–4425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Larsson H, Ahren B 1996 Androgen activity as a risk factor for impaired glucose tolerance in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 19:1399–1403[Abstract]
  6. Oh JY, Barrett-Connor E, Wedick NM, Wingard DL 2002 Endogenous sex hormones and the development of type 2 diabetes in older men and women: the Rancho Bernardo study. Diabetes Care 25:55–60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Andersson B, Marin P, Lissner L, Vermeulen A, Bjorntorp P 1994 Testosterone concentrations in women and men with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 17:405–411[Abstract]
  8. Falkner B, Sherif K, Sumner A, Kushner H 1999 Hyperinsulinism and sex hormones in young adult African Americans. Metabolism 48:107–112[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Maturana MA, Spritzer PM 2002 Association between hyperinsulinemia and endogenous androgen levels in peri- and postmenopausal women. Metabolism 51:238–243[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Goodman-Gruen D, Barrett-Connor E 2000 Sex differences in the association of endogenous sex hormone levels and glucose tolerance status in older men and women. Diabetes Care 23:912–918[Abstract]
  11. Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E 1991 Fasting plasma glucose levels and endogenous androgens in non-diabetic postmenopausal women. Clin Sci (Lond) 80:199–203[Medline]
  12. Haffner SM, Valdez RA, Morales PA, Hazuda HP, Stern MP 1993 Decreased sex hormone-binding globulin predicts noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women but not in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:56–60[Abstract]
  13. Lindstedt G, Lundberg PA, Lapidus L, Lundgren H, Bengtsson C, Bjorntorp P 1991 Low sex-hormone-binding globulin concentration as independent risk factor for development of NIDDM. 12-yr follow-up of population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Diabetes 40:123–128[Abstract]
  14. Ding EL, Song Y, Malik VS, Liu S 2006 Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 295:1288–1299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Haffner SM, Dunn JF, Katz MS 1992 Relationship of sex hormone-binding globulin to lipid, lipoprotein, glucose, and insulin concentrations in postmenopausal women. Metabolism 41:278–284[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Goodman-Gruen D, Barrett-Connor E 1997 Sex hormone-binding globulin and glucose tolerance in postmenopausal women. The Rancho Bernardo Study. Diabetes Care 20:645–649[Abstract]
  17. Golden SH, Ding J, Szklo M, Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Dobs A 2004 Glucose and insulin components of the metabolic syndrome are associated with hyperandrogenism in postmenopausal women: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol 160:540–548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Phillips GB, Tuck CH, Jing TY, Boden-Albala, B, Lin, IF, Dahodwala, N, Sacco RL 2000 Association of hyperandrogenemia and hyperestrogenemia with type 2 diabetes in Hispanic postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 23:74–79[Abstract]
  19. Kalish GM, Barrett-Connor E, Laughlin GA, Gulanski BI 2003 Association of endogenous sex hormones and insulin resistance among postmenopausal women: results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Intervention Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1646–1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Louet JF, LeMay C, Mauvais-Jarvis F 2004 Antidiabetic actions of estrogen: insight from human and genetic mouse models. Curr Atheroscler Rep 6:180–185[Medline]
  21. Randolph Jr JF, Sowers M, Gold EB, Mohr BA, Luborsky J, Santoro N, McConnell DS, Finkelstein JS, Korenman SG, Matthews KA, Sternfeld B, Lasley BL 2003 Reproductive hormones in the early menopausal transition: relationship to ethnicity, body size, and menopausal status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1516–1522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Wildman RP, Matthews KA, Chae C, Lasley BL, Brockwell S, Pasternak RC, Lloyd-Jones D, Sowers MF, Torrens JI 2005 Sex-hormone-binding globulin and the free androgen index are related to cardiovascular risk factors in multiethnic premenopausal and perimenopausal women enrolled in the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN). Circulation 111:1242–1249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, Greenland P, Jacob Jr DR, Kronmal R, Liu K, Nelson JC, O’Leary D, Saad MF, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP 2002 Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 156:871–881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC 1985 Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and ß-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Hanley AJ, Williams K, Gonzalez C, D’Agostino Jr RB, Wagenknecht LE, Stern MP, Haffner SM 2003 Prediction of type 2 diabetes using simple measures of insulin resistance: combined results from the San Antonio Heart Study, the Mexico City Diabetes Study, and the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes 52:463–469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Livingstone C, Collison M 2002 Sex steroids and insulin resistance. Clin Sci (Lond) 102:151–166[Medline]
  27. Moghetti P, Tosi F, Castello R, Magnani CM, Negri C, Brun E, Furlani L, Caputo M, Muggeo M 1996 The insulin resistance in women with hyperandrogenism is partially reversed by antiandrogen treatment: evidence that androgens impair insulin action in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:952–960[Abstract]
  28. Buffington CK, Kitabchi AE 1994 Evidence for a defect in insulin metabolism in hyperandrogenic women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Metabolism 43:1367–1372[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Gambineri A, Pagotto U, Tschop M, Vicennati V, Manicardi E, Carcello A, Cacciari M, De Iasio R, Pasquali R 2003 Anti-androgen treatment increases circulating ghrelin levels in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Invest 26:629–634[Medline]
  30. Lovejoy JC, Bray GA, Bourgeois MO, Macchiavelli R, Rood JC, Greeson C, Partington C 1996 Exogenous androgens influence body composition and regional body fat distribution in obese postmenopausal women–a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:2198–2203[Abstract]
  31. Espeland MA, Hogan PE, Fineberg SE, Howard G, Schrott H, Waclawiw MA, Bush TL 1998 Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on glucose and insulin concentrations. PEPI Investigators. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions. Diabetes Care 21:1589–1595[Abstract]
  32. Crespo CJ, Smit E, Snelling A, Sempos CT, Andersen RE 2002 Hormone replacement therapy and its relationship to lipid and glucose metabolism in diabetic and nondiabetic postmenopausal women: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Diabetes Care 25:1675–1680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Saglam K, Polat Z, Yilmaz MI, Gulec M, Akinci SB 2002 Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on insulin resistance. Endocrine 18:211–214[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Li C, Samsioe G, Borgfeldt C, Bendahl PO, Wilawan K, Aberg A 2003 Low-dose hormone therapy and carbohydrate metabolism. Fertil Steril 79:550–555[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Andersson B, Mattsson LA, Hahn L, Marin P, Lapidus L, Holm G, Bengtsson BA, Bjorntorp P 1997 Estrogen replacement therapy decreases hyperandrogenicity and improves glucose homeostasis and plasma lipids in postmenopausal women with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:638–643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Brussaard HE, Gevers Leuven JA, Frolich M, Kluft C, Krans HM 1997 Short-term oestrogen replacement therapy improves insulin resistance, lipids and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women with NIDDM. Diabetologia 40:843–849[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Friday KE, Dong C, Fontenot RU 2001 Conjugated equine estrogen improves glycemic control and blood lipoproteins in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:48–52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Perera M, Sattar N, Petrie JR, Hillier C, Small M, Connell JM, Lowe GD, Lumsden MA 2001 The effects of transdermal estradiol in combination with oral norethisterone on lipoproteins, coagulation, and endothelial markers in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1140–1143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kanaya AM, Herrington D, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Grady D, Bittner V, Cauley JA, Barrett-Connor E 2003 Glycemic effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 138:1–9[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Pugeat M, Crave JC, Elmidani M, Nicolas MH, Garoscio-Cholet M, Lejeune H, Dechaud H, Tourniaire J 1991 Pathophysiology of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG): relation to insulin. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 40:841–849[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Haffner SM, Katz MS, Dunn JF 1991 Increased upper body and overall adiposity is associated with decreased sex hormone binding globulin in postmenopausal women. Int J Obes 15:471–478[Medline]
  42. Labrie F, Luu-The V, Belanger A, Lin SX, Simard J, Pelletier G, Labrie C 2005 Is dehydroepiandrosterone a hormone? J Endocrinol 187:169–196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Diamond P, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Labrie F 1996 Metabolic effects of 12-month percutaneous dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. J Endocrinol 150(Suppl):S43–S50
  44. Saruc M, Yuceyar H, Ayhan S, Turkel N, Tuzcuoglu I, Can M 2003 The association of dehydroepiandrosterone, obesity, waist-hip ratio and insulin resistance with fatty liver in postmenopausal women–a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic insulin clamp study. Hepatogastroenterology 50:771–774[Medline]
  45. Key TJ, Chen J, Wang DY, Pike MC, Boreham J 1990 Sex hormones in women in rural China and in Britain. Br J Cancer 62:631–636[Medline]
  46. Cauley JA, Gutai JP, Kuller LH, Powell JG 1991 Reliability and interrelations among serum sex hormones in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 133:50–57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Södergard R, Backstrom T, Shanbhag V, Carstensen H 1982 Calculation of free and bound fractions of testosterone and estradiol-17ß to human plasma proteins at body temperature. J Steroid Biochem 16:801–810[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. R. Kalyani, M. Franco, A. S. Dobs, P. Ouyang, D. Vaidya, A. Bertoni, S. M. Gapstur, and S. H. Golden
The Association of Endogenous Sex Hormones, Adiposity, and Insulin Resistance with Incident Diabetes in Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4127 - 4135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
E. L. Ding, Y. Song, J. E. Manson, D. J. Hunter, C. C. Lee, N. Rifai, J. E. Buring, J. M. Gaziano, and S. Liu
Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women and Men
N. Engl. J. Med., September 17, 2009; 361(12): 1152 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Diabetes CareHome page
L. A. Colangelo, P. Ouyang, K. Liu, P. Kopp, S. H. Golden, A. S. Dobs, M. Szklo, D. Vaidya, M. Cushman, and S. M. Gapstur
Association of Endogenous Sex Hormones With Diabetes andImpaired Fasting Glucose in Men: Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2009; 32(6): 1049 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
J. H. Page, J. Ma, K. M. Rexrode, N. Rifai, J. E. Manson, and S. E. Hankinson
Plasma Dehydroepiandrosterone and Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Women
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1190 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golden, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golden, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ouyang, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Metabolism

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals