| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
BRIEF REPORT |
Department of Internal Medicine B and the Diabetes Center (M.K., E.L., I.R.), Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (E.R.) and Oral Medicine (S.E.), Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, and Department of Hematology (B.A., S.E.), Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel; and Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine (N.Y.), The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mogher Khamaisi, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Internal Medicine B and the Diabetes Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Kiryat Hadassah, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. E-mail: murir{at}hadassah.org.il; or mogher{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether diabetes mellitus (DM) may be a contributing factor in the development of BON.
Design: From 2004 to 2006, 31 patients were diagnosed with BON. The diagnosis of BON was based on the medical and dental history of each patient as well as the observation of clinical signs and symptoms of this pathological process. DM was based on two consecutive fasting blood glucose levels above 7 mmol/liter.
Setting: The study was completed in the Hebrew University-Hadassah Hospital referral center.
Results: Of the 31 patients with BON, 18 (58%) were found to have DM or impaired fasting glucose. The proportion of diabetic patients was much higher than expected relative to the incidence of DM in the general population (14%) and compared with the proportion of diabetic patients in a control group of oncological patients treated with bisphosphonates and without BON (12%) (P = 0.00003).
Conclusions: This finding indicates that DM may be a risk factor for BON and that DM patients treated with bisphosphonates should be carefully monitored. We discuss here the bone metabolic pathways characteristic of DM patients and the way in which these pathways can augment the effects of bisphosphonates.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bisphosphonate-related osteomyelitis (BON) and necrosis of the jaw possibly results from the inability of hypodynamic and hypovascular bone to meet an increased demand for repair and remodeling owing to physiological stress (mastication), iatrogenic trauma (tooth extraction or denture-induced local injury), or tooth infection in an environment that is both trauma intense and bacteria laden. Coexisting factors may include the use of other medications with antiangiogenic properties such as glucocorticoids, diabetes mellitus (DM), irradiation of the jawbone, peripheral vascular disease, and hyperviscosity syndrome (5).
The pathogenesis of BON and its connection to treatment with high-potency bisphosphonates is unclear. Chronic treatment with zoledronic acid has been implicated as a greater contributor to the development of BON than pamidronate (6, 7). This may be due to its greater potency, as demonstrated by larger reductions in collagen type-I degradation products (N-telopeptide) (8). In addition, the antiangiogenic activity of zoledronic acid that may lead to impairment of blood supply has also been implicated in the development of BON. In a prospective series of 252 patients treated with bisphosphonates, the incidence of BON was highest among patients with myeloma, and the risk increased with duration of exposure, use of zoledronic acid, and oral trauma (either dental procedures or wearing dentures). The incidence of BON was 1.5% among patients treated with these agents for 412 months, rising to 7.7% after treatment for 3748 months (6).
The current study was conducted to examine the possibility that DM has a role in the development of BON in patients treated with bisphosponates. We report here on a group of 19 BON patients with concurrent diabetes-related diagnoses [type 2 DM, impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and previous gestational diabetes]. This study presents the incidence of DM in BON patients, compared with DM incidence in a control group.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All data including age, gender, and medical background including DM were obtained from medical records. Diabetic status was confirmed by personal phone interview and diagnostic blood glucose level. In patients for whom no data were available, diagnosis of DM was based on two consecutive fasting blood glucose levels above 7 mmol/liter. IFG was defined as two consecutive fasting blood glucose levels 100 or greater and 7 mmol/liter or less.
The retrospective control group was selected randomly from the pool of hematooncological patients. The patients were from the same medical center and were treated with bisphosphonates during a time period parallel to that of the patients who were diagnosed with BON. The inclusion criteria for the retrospective control group were: 1) treatment with bisphosphonates; 2) underlying hematooncological disease; and 3) no diagnosis of BON. The control group was matched to the BON patients by age, gender, and the underlying disease requiring bisphosphonate treatment.
The incidence of diabetes in the BON and control (non-BON oncological patients) groups was analyzed statistically using a two-tailed paired t test.
The study was approved by the institutional ethics review board.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fourteen patients were known to have type 2 diabetes before starting bisphosphonate treatment. Of the remaining 17 patients, four were found to have IFG during a retrospective laboratory data search, and 13 had normal fasting blood glucose levels (<5.5 mmol/liter). In addition, one patient had a history of gestational diabetes.
Twelve of the 19 patients of the DM group (including the IFG and gestational diabetes) had received systemic steroids in the past. This number includes a patient who was reported to have received prednisone for only 2 d. Six of the patients were treated with prednisone and six were treated with dexamethasone.
Among the remaining 12 patients suffering from BON but with no diagnosis of DM or IFG, the mean age was 58.75 yr and ranged from 47 to 85 yr. This group included eight females and five males. The most common indications for bisphosphonate therapy were mostly multiple myeloma (five of 12 patients) and cancer (five of 12 patients). The propensity for involvement of the mandibular bone was seen also in BON without DM (69% of cases had mandibular involvement). Only one patient among the non-DM patients had a concurrent diagnosis of hypertension, compared with seven hypertensive patients in the DM group. Seven patients had received steroids.
Of the 33 control patients who were treated with bisphosphonate without developing BON, four (12%) were found to have DM. The patients included 13 females and 20 males, ranging in age from 35 to 79 yr, with a mean age of 63.7 yr. Patients had been treated with bisphosphonate for multiple myeloma (27 patients), diffused large B cell lymphoma (three patients), non-Hodgkin lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and malignant thymoma (one patient for each diagnosis). Eighteen of the 33 control patients had previously been treated with systemic steroids.
The difference in the incidence of DM-related diagnoses between the BON group and the non-BON group (i.e. oncological patients treated with bisphosphonates without BON) was statistically significant (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
The pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis is obscure. The high incidence of jaw osteonecrosis occurring concomitantly with diabetes reported here may have several explanations. Diabetes is generally associated with microvascular ischemia of the bone (11), endothelial cell dysfunction (12), and decreased bone turnover and remodeling (13) as well as induced apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes (14). In vivo and in vitro data uniformly support the concept that new bone formation, as well as bone microarchitectural integrity, is altered in the diabetic state, leading to an increased risk of fragility fracture and inadequate bone regeneration after injury (15). In addition, diabetes is associated with delayed wound healing (16). Bisphosphonates may further exacerbate these states. Recently, it has been shown in a preclinical model in which mice were given high doses of zoledronic acid that bisphosphonate inhibits endothelial cell function and angiogenesis (17), additional processes that are known to be impaired in diabetic patients. However, there is still no evidence in the clinical setting that impaired vascularity occurs.
Decreased cellular reduced glutathione content is a common finding in experimental and human diabetes, in which increased oxidative stress appears to occur. Recently a new nontraumatic rat model was used to investigate the relationship between oxidative stress and the development of osteonecrosis. In this model, glutathione levels were markedly reduced with the prooxidant buthionine sulfoximine. A high rate of osteonecrosis was noted in this animal group. These results suggest that oxidative stress alone may be sufficient to promote the development of osteonecrosis (18). The augmented oxidative stress in the diabetic patients may be one of the explanations for the high incidence of BON in our group of patients.
The accepted incidence of DM in a matched-age population in developed countries is less than 14% (19, 20). This fact emphasizes the unusually high incidence of DM or IFG found among patients suffering from BON.
Clearly, the study presented here has limitations due to its retrospective nature. However, we deem these data valuable because there has been to date no report of DM as a potential risk factor for BON. This poses a challenge to be pursued in a prospective study, including quantitative analysis of bisphosphonates treatment, concomitant medications, severity of BON, and glycemic levels.
We want by this report to alert clinicians to the potential relationship between DM and bone necrosis in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy. Further research is needed to understand the pathogenesis of the disease and its relation to diabetes, including correlative studies between the severity of BON and glycemic control.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online December 19, 2006
Abbreviations: BON, Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis; DM, diabetes mellitus; IFG, impaired fasting glucose.
Received September 19, 2006.
Accepted December 11, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. KHAN, G. K.B. SANDOR, E. DORE, A. D. MORRISON, M. ALSAHLI, F. AMIN, E. PETERS, D. A. HANLEY, S. R. CHAUDRY, B. LENTLE, et al. Bisphosphonate Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw J Rheumatol, March 1, 2009; 36(3): 478 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Khamaisi and S. Elad Re: Intravenous Bisphosphonate Therapy and Inflammatory Conditions or Surgery of the Jaw: A Population-Based Analysis J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2008; 100(2): 155 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Wilkinson, Y.-F. Kuo, J. L. Freeman, and J. S. Goodwin Response: Re: Intravenous Bisphosphonate Therapy and Inflammatory Conditions or Surgery of the Jaw: A Population-Based Analysis J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2008; 100(2): 155 - 156. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Grbic, R. Landesberg, S.-Q. Lin, P. Mesenbrink, I. R. Reid, P.-C. Leung, N. Casas, C. P. Recknor, Y. Hua, P. D. Delmas, et al. Incidence of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly Pivotal Fracture Trial J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2008; 139(1): 32 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Roodman Skeletal Imaging and Management of Bone Disease Hematology, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 313 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Favus Diabetes and the Risk of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 817 - 818. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |