help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-2213
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1058    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgenthaler, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Minich, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgenthaler, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Minich, W. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Autoimmunity
Right arrow Thyroid
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 3 1058-1065
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Stimulating and Blocking Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Receptor Autoantibodies from Patients with Graves’ Disease and Autoimmune Hypothyroidism Have Very Similar Concentration, TSH Receptor Affinity, and Binding Sites

Nils G. Morgenthaler, Su Chin Ho and Waldemar B. Minich

Institut für Experimentelle Endokrinologie und Endokrinologisches Forschungszentrum EnForCé (N.G.M.), Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Department of Endocrinology (S.C.H.), Thyroid Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Republic of Singapore 169608; and Bioassays GmbH (N.G.M., W.B.M.), Biotechnology Centre Hennigsdorf/Berlin, D-16761 Hennigsdorf/Berlin, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nils G. Morgenthaler, Institut für Experimentelle Endokrinologie und Endokrinologisches Forschungs-Centrum, EnForCé der Charité, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: n.morgenthaler{at}brahms.de.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objective: The distinct biological properties of TSH receptor (TSH-R) autoantibodies (TRAbs) from patients with Graves’ disease (GD) are yet unexplained on the molecular level. Here we compare serum concentration, affinity to the TSH-R, and binding sites on the TSH-R of stimulating (TSAb) and blocking (TBAb) TRAbs.

Methods and Patients: Four-step affinity purification using human recombinant TSH-R was performed with 22 TRAb-positive sera from GD patients (11 with only TSAb and 11 with only TBAb) and five control sera. Antibody concentration, TSH binding inhibition (TBII), and TSAb/TBAb activity of the purified TRAb were assessed. Labeled purified TRAbs were used for displacement studies with TRAb and an additional 30 patients and 10 control sera.

Results: TRAbs could be purified to 80–93% purity with recovery of the TBII and TSAb and TBAb activity. No TRAbs could be purified from healthy individuals. The mean ± SD concentration of TRAb was 17.3 ± 5.4 µg/IU for the TSAb sera (range, 9.6–25.9) and 18.2 ± 8.5 µg/IU for the TBAb sera (range, 4.6–29.2), respectively (P = 0.79). Affinity was in the picomolar range for both TRAb subtypes with mean ± SD dissociation constant of 167 ± 109 pM (60–410 pM) for TSAb and 253 ± 132 pM (80–410 pM) for TBAb (P = 0.12). Purified and labeled TSAb and TBAb showed a very similar binding pattern to the TSH-R in displacement studies with unlabeled TSAb/TBAb or unpurified patients sera, indicating binding sites on the TSH-R in close proximity to each other.

Conclusion: TSAbs and TBAbs in the serum of patients with GD have similar characteristics. They are of low concentration with high affinity and have also similar binding epitopes on the TSH-R.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TSH RECEPTOR (TSH-R) autoantibodies (TRAbs) in patients with Graves’ disease (GD) are functionally heterogeneous; they include mainly thyroid-stimulating antibodies (TSAbs) and occasionally also thyroid-blocking antibodies (TBAbs). TSAbs activate the receptor and cause hyperthyroidism, whereas receptor occupancy by nonstimulatory TBAbs inhibits TSH action and may cause hypothyroidism. Together TSAbs and TBAbs comprise the TSH binding inhibition (TBII) activity detected by TRAb assays.

Despite a plethora of information over the last decades, it is yet unclear what renders a TRAb a stimulator or a blocker. Although of interest in the assessment of the patient, the difference between a TSAb and a TBAb on the molecular level is still unsolved. Potential discriminators include antibody concentration, affinity to the TSH-R, and (most favored) binding epitopes on the TSH-R. Here TSAbs and TBAbs have been discussed for a long time to be directed to different and distinct parts of the TSH-R (1). However, recent evidence from monoclonal antibodies (2, 3, 4, 5) suggests similar binding sites for both subtypes of TRAb (6).

We recently developed a method for the affinity purification of TRAb from human serum and the subsequent usage of this purified TRAb for affinity studies and diagnostic assay formats (7).

In the present study, we apply this technology to purify TRAb from sera from patients with GD or autoimmune hypothyroidism (AH) with strong TSAb or TBAb activity. We then compared the purified subtypes with respect to autoantibody concentration, affinity to the TSH-R and competition with autoantibodies in serum.


   Patients and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient sera

GD sera and sera from patients with AH were obtained from selected patients on the basis of their high TRAb levels and their TSAb or TBAb antibody subtypes. Patients with a history of GD were selected from blood donors recruited for the development of in vitro diagnostics (Invent GmbH, Hennigsdorf/GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany). This blood donation was approved by a national ethical committee. GD was defined on clinical terms by a physician. Sera of 11 patients with high TBII and TSAb but no TBAb activity were selected for antibody purification and are termed TSAb 1–11 in this study. These patients, who presented initially with hyperthyroidism, were at the time of blood withdrawal either under antithyroid drug (ATD) treatment (n = 5, two for < than 1 month) or had had an operation (n = 2) or radioiodine treatment (n = 4) during the course of their disease. A further 21 serum samples from patients with similar characteristics (high TBII; high TSAb, no TBAb) were used for displacement studies.

Sera from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease, who were clinically hypothyroid but contained high levels of TBII, were recruited from Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Again, sera of 11 patients with high TBII were selected for antibody purification. In contrast to the first lot, these patients had strong TBAb but no TSAb activity and are termed TBAb 1–11 in this study. Four of these patients had hyperthyroid GD at the onset and turned hypothyroid during the course of their disease, whereas seven patients presented at the beginning with AH without a prior episode of hyperthyroidism. A further 10 serum samples from patients with similar characteristics (high TBII; high TBAb, no TSAb) were used for displacement studies. These patients are described in detail elsewhere (8).

As reference control, the purification protocol was also used with five serum samples from healthy individuals, who had neither TBII nor TSAb or TBAb. These are termed controls 1–5 in this study. Another 10 serum samples from healthy individuals were used for displacement studies.

Written consent was given by all blood donors. Table 1Go shows the clinical and biochemical characterization of the patients at the time of blood withdrawal.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Characteristics of patients selected for purification

 
Assays for TRAb detection

TBII activity was measured with the TRAK human LIA (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG, Hennigsdorf/Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The technical and clinical evaluation of this product is described in detail elsewhere (9, 10). This assay is calibrated 1:1 to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard 90/672, and data are expressed as international units (international units per liter), where 1 IU/liter represents about 10% inhibition of TSH binding, 8 IU/liter about 50% inhibition, and 40 IU/liter (the highest standard) greater than 85% inhibition (10). All samples with TRAb greater than 40 IU/liter were diluted to obtain quantitative data.

TSAbs and TBAbs were measured in a bioassay as described (11). Briefly, the detection was carried out in low salt conditions using JPO9 Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the human TSH-R (12). cAMP was measured in a commercial RIA (Amersham, Aylesbury, UK). Thyroid stimulation index (SI) was calculated as: SI (percent) = 100 x (cAMP patient/cAMP euthyroid control). For TBAb detection, bovine TSH (1 mU/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added with either euthyroid control or test serum. The inhibition index (InI) was calculated as: InI (percent) = 100 x [1 – (counts per minute patient/counts per minute euthyroid control)].

TRAb purification from serum and acridiniumester labeling

TRAb was affinity purified from patients and control serum using a four-step protocol as described in detail elsewhere (7). The first step involved total IgG preparation on solid phase bound streptococcal Protein G (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY).

The second step was removal of IgG directed to the expression cell line K562 using wild-type K562 cells, which were produced in a 30-liter fermenter as described (13). Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended with the IgG preparation at a concentration of 10% (vol/vol) in buffer. The total amount of cells was 5 x 108 cells for 1 IU of TRAb. After incubation at 4 C over night under slow agitation, the suspension was centrifuged and the IgG containing supernatant was removed by aspiration to reduce contamination by cell debris.

The third step was to repeat this procedure with K562 cells expressing the human TSH-R (9) under identical conditions. The optimal purification was obtained at a ratio of 5 x 108 cells for 1 IU of Graves’ IgG. After incubation at 4 C overnight under slow agitation, cells were washed twice with PBS, three times with HEPES buffer and once with water. Supernatant was removed by aspiration. TRAbs were eluted three times by centrifugation with elution buffer [25 mM citric acid, 100 mM NaCl (pH 2.1)]. Fractions were combined, neutralized with 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and centrifuged at 100,000 x g to remove any cellular debris. To prevent subsequent adsorption of TRAb to surfaces, 1% (wt/vol) BSA (Sigma) was added, and the preparation was stored at –80 C.

The fourth and final purification round was performed using recombinant TSH-R bound to a specific monoclonal antibody [BA8 (9)] on Carbolink gel (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Coupling was performed overnight according to the manual with a yield of 70–90%. TSH-R extract from K562 cells was obtained as described (9), and 200 ml membrane extract were incubated with 2.5 ml gel in batch for 5 h at 4 C under mild agitation. Two hundred milliliters membrane extract represent the detergent preparation of around 5 x 109 cells. Gel material was three times resuspended with washing buffer and centrifuged. After the last washing step, the gel material was resuspended in the TRAb-enriched buffer from the third purification step at a ratio of 1 ml gel to 15 IU TRAbs and incubated overnight at 4 C under mild agitation, allowing the TRAb to bind specifically to the solid-phase bound human TSH-R. The gel material was washed three times with 50 ml washing buffer, and acidic elution was done with 15 ml freshly prepared elution buffer [50 mM citric acid, 1% BSA, 150 mM NaCl (pH 2.1)]. Immediately after elution, the fraction was neutralized by adding 15 ml PBS containing 1% BSA and as additional neutralization buffer 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 10) to a final pH of 6.8. Before freezing, the buffer was centrifuged at 100,000 x g to remove precipitated TSH-R and other cellular debris.

Purified TRAbs were diluted with buffer [20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% BSA, 10% glycerol] to a concentration of 20 IU/liter TRAbs and incubated over night at 4 C with an equal amount of acridinium ester (MACN; Invent GmbH, Hennigsdorf, Germany) labeled goat antihuman antibodies. At the end of the incubation, 1 mg/ml total human IgG was added to block unbound tracer.

Calculation of dissociation constant (Kd) of TRAb

Different concentrations (5–3000 pM) of indirectly labeled TRAbs were added in 0.3 ml buffer [20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% BSA, 10% glycerol, 1 mg/ml human IgG] to TSH-R-coated tubes (TRAK human RIA). Tubes were incubated for 24 h at room temperature, washed four times with 2 ml washing buffer, and bound relative light units (RLUs) were measured in a luminometer. Nonspecific binding, determined in excess of unlabeled purified TRAbs, was subtracted. The Kd was calculated at 50% saturation by nonlinear regression analysis (Prism 4; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data are shown as saturation curve and in the conventional Scatchard plot (14).

Displacement studies

For antibody displacement studies, 0.125 mU of purified and labeled TRAbs were added in duplicate to 0.3 ml of buffer [20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 1% BSA, 10% glycerol] together with increasing amounts of unlabeled purified TRAbs to TSH-R-coated tubes (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG). Tubes were incubated overnight at 4 C, washed four times with 2 ml washing buffer (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG), and bound RLUs were measured in a luminometer (Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany). The total RLUs added were 126,000–240,000, depending on the purified and labeled TRAb used.

For serum displacement studies, 100 µl of patients’ serum or TRAK human standards (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG) were added in duplicate to TSH-R-coated tubes (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG), followed by 100 µl buffer [100 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 20 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM N-ethyl-maleimide, 1% BSA, 0.5% Triton X-100] and 50 µl PBS containing 0.25 mIU of labeled TRAbs as a tracer (80,000–300.000 RLU). Tubes were incubated overnight at 4 C, washed four times with 2 ml washing buffer (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG), and bound RLUs were measured in a luminometer (Berthold). Results were expressed in international units per liter according to the WHO standard used for calibration.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
TRAb were purified from 22 selected patients with GD or AH. All sera were tested for TBII, TSAbs, and TBAbs. All patients had very high levels of TBII, ranging from 135 to 6550 IU/liter based on the WHO standard 90/672 calibration. In terms of inhibition of TSH binding, all patients had near total inhibition of binding, even at high dilutions. All 11 patients with a history of hyperthyroidism had high levels of TSAbs (mean ± SD stimulation index 121 ± 41.7) but no TBAbs. Inversely, all 11 patients with hypothyroidism had high levels of TBAbs (mean ± SD inhibition: 98.9 ± 0.9%) but were negative for TSAbs. Thus, the patients selected for this study represent both extreme ends of the autoimmune response to the TSH-R. Table 2Go lists all sera grouped according to their bioactivity. The mean ± SD TBII activity in the TBAb patients was 1736 ± 1778 IU/liter, which is significantly higher (P = 0.03) than the mean TBII activity in the TSAb-positive patients (432 ± 242 IU/liter). Serum obtained from the five healthy blood donors had no TBII or TSAb/TBAb activity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Affinity purification of TSH-R autoantibodies from patients’ serum

 
Four-step affinity purification was performed with all 22 patients and five control sera (Table 2Go). Purification was successful with 21 of 22 patients sera. The purified TRAbs of patient TBAb 7 were lost due to technical difficulties with the elution buffer. This sample was excluded from further calculations. After affinity purification, TBII and TSAb/TBAb activity of the TRAbs was still present. Figure 1Go shows dose-response curves with increasing TRAb concentration in a cAMP bioassay for two purified TSAb (Fig. 1AGo) and one purified TBAb sample (Fig. 1BGo). The complete cAMP bioassay data of all purified TRAbs is shown in Table 2Go at a TRAb concentration of 10 IU/liter.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. cAMP bioassay with purified TSAbs and TBAbs. Increasing concentrations of purified TRAb were incubated in a Chinese hamster ovary cell bioassay with cAMP readout. Shown is the dose-response curve for two purified TSAbs and one TBAb.

 
The total TRAb international units recovered based on TBII activity was 26.9 ± 17.2% for TSAb samples and 21.9 ± 15.2% for TBAbs, respectively. Measurement of total IgG in purified samples of patients and controls showed a clear difference. Patients had mean ± SD total IgG concentrations of 375 ± 151 µg/liter for TSAbs and 458 ± 88 µg/liter for TBAbs, respectively, whereas controls had only 47.6 ± 15.6 µg/liter. However, the purified material from both TSAb and TBAb patients still had strong TBII activity, whereas the control material did not show any interaction with the TSH-R. The IgG still present in control samples after the same purification protocol indicates nonspecific background carried through the process and allows the estimation of the purity of IgG from patients samples to be 80–93% pure TRAbs.

A comparison of total IgG and TRAb international units allowed calculation of the amount of IgG per international unit of TRAb. This was very similar for each individual serum purified and showed no difference between TSAbs and TBAbs. The mean ± SD was 17.3 ± 5.4 µg/IU for the TSAb sera (range 9.6–25.9), and 18.2 ± 8.5 µg/IU for the TBAb sera (range 4.6–29.2), respectively (P = 0.78). Therefore, the concentration of TRAbs in the serum of patients with GD is between 5 and 30 µg/liter for 1 international WHO unit (IU), irrespective of the TSAb or TBAb subtype. The patients in this study with very high levels of TRAbs had antibodies in the milligram per liter range, whereas the average patient with GD (usually with TRAb/TBII < 40 IU/liter) is likely to have antibodies in the medium to high microgram per liter range.

Affinity of the purified TRAbs to the TSH-R was measured by saturation experiments, in which increasing amounts of indirectly labeled purified TRAbs were incubated on TSH-R-coated tubes. Figure 2Go shows the Scatchard plot for two representative TSAb and two TBAb patients. The Kd for all TRAb samples is shown in Table 3Go, again grouped according to TSAb or TBAb activity. Affinity was in the picomolar range for both TRAb subtypes, and there was no difference between TSAb and TBAb samples. Mean ± SD Kd for TSAb was 167 ± 109 pM (60–410 pM) and 253 ± 132 pM (80–410 pM) for TBAb, respectively (P = 0.12).


Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Saturation curve and Scatchard plot for purified and labeled TRAbs. The Kd was calculated with nonlinear regression analysis. Shown are two representative purified TSAbs and two TBAbs. The complete affinity data are listed in Table 3Go.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Affinity of purified TRAb to the TSH-R

 
Finally, we tested purified TRAb material in competition studies to see whether a different displacement pattern indicates differences in the binding sites of TSAbs and TBAbs. First, competition was done among the purified samples in a cross-over design. Different TSAb samples as tracer were competed with increasing concentration of other TSAbs (Fig. 3AGo) or TBAbs (Fig. 3BGo). The same was done with labeled TBAb samples, which were brought into competition with TSAb samples (Fig. 3CGo) or other TBAb samples (Fig. 3DGo). The dose-response curves shown are examples of several experiments and demonstrate similar displacement among all purified TRAb and no difference between TSAbs and TBAbs.


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. TSAb tracer and TBAb tracer displacement by purified autoantibodies. Shown are representative examples of a purified TSAb sample as tracer in competition with increasing concentration of other purified TSAbs (A) or purified TBAbs (B). Inversely, a labeled TBAb sample competed with purified TSAb samples (C) or other purified TBAb samples (D).

 
Then competition studies were done with labeled TSAb or TBAb samples and unpurified sera from additional patients (20 patients with GD, 10 patients with autoimmune thyroid disease containing only TBAbs, and 10 controls). Figure 4Go shows six representative experiments (three with labeled TSAbs and three with labeled TBAbs), which demonstrate a very similar binding pattern of both TSAbs and TBAbs. In all experiments, purified TSAbs competed with patients sera containing only TSAbs but also with sera containing only TBAbs. The identical pattern was seen for purified TBAbs, which competed with not only TBAb-containing sera but also TSAb-positive GD sera. In all experiments, the interaction with TBAb-containing sera was higher than with TSAb sera, irrespective of the tracer used. No interaction was seen with control sera. Using the standard bovine TSH tracer from the TRAb kit gave very similar results (Fig. 5Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 4. TSAb tracer and TBAb tracer displacement by sera from patients. Total tracer added to TSH-R-coated tubes 80,000–300,000 RLU. Control, Healthy blood donors without thyroid disease; TSAb, patients with GD containing only TSAbs; TBAb, patients with AH. The line shows the median for each group.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 5. TBII assay with bovine TSH as tracer with sera from patients. The same patients shown in Fig. 4Go together with purified TSAbs or TBAbs as tracer had a similar displacement pattern in a coated tube second-generation TBII assay with bovine TSH as tracer.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
This study took advantage of a recently established purification method for TRAbs (7) and examined the differences between TSAbs and TBAbs purified from patients with GD and hypothyroid autoimmune disease. The results can be summarized as follows. First, the concentration of TRAbs in patients with GD is about 18 µg/liter IgG (5–30 µg/liter) per international WHO unit, with no difference between TSAb and TBAb. Second, the affinity of both TSAbs and TBAbs to the TSH-R is in the picomolar range (60–410 pM), again without a significant difference between TSAbs and TBAbs. Third, both TSAbs and TBAbs show a very similar binding pattern to the TSH-R in displacement studies with purified TRAbs and patients’ sera, indicating binding sites on the TSH-R in very close proximity. Because the binding of TSH shows the same pattern, this binding site of TSAbs and TBAbs is most likely in the TSH binding part of the TSH-R, which according to present models of the receptor lies within the horseshoe of the ectodomain (15, 16, 17).

This study confirms our preliminary report, that TRAbs are of low concentration with high affinity (7). The 14–28 µg/liter per international unit reported initially are well in concordance with the figures in this study. Although there were earlier estimates of TRAb concentration based on neutralizing studies with soluble TSH-R (18, 19), the concentration (and also affinity) of TRAb is a constant matter of debate. It should be pointed out that the TRAb concentration per 1 IU is relatively low, and most GD patients have less than 40 IU/liter TRAbs. However, a few patients may have several thousand international units per liter TRAbs, which is equivalent to a TRAb concentration in the milligram per liter range.

The affinity of TRAbs to the TSH-R in this study confirms our preliminary report. It is noteworthy that the linear Scatchard plot indicates the presence of TRAbs with very similar Kd in each patient preparation. This is also supported by the comparable results in all experiments. TRAbs may be heterogeneous within and between patients, but all TRAbs have a very similar affinity to the TSH-R. This affinity is comparable with that found for bovine TSH (7, 19) and with a human TSAb monoclonal antibody (5).

The identification of the binding sites of TSAbs and TBAbs to the TSH-R is still controversial. Over decades data were presented that supported a rather simple concept: TSAbs bind to the N-terminal part of the TSH-R ectodomain and TBAbs to the C-terminal part close to the membrane (20, 21, 22). Following this concept, we tried to develop different in vitro assays for the discrimination of TSAbs and TBAbs by changing either the receptor (23) or tracer (24), albeit with moderate results. After the establishment of monoclonal antibodies with TSAb or TBAb activity (2, 3, 4, 5), the model of distinct and distant TSAb and TBAb epitopes could no longer be supported. Three groups examined independently the interaction of labeled monoclonal antibodies with autoantibodies from patients to the TSH-R and reported similar results: monoclonal TSAbs seem to interact with binding sites for TSH, TSAbs, and TBAbs (2, 5, 6, 25), whereas monoclonal TBAbs likewise do exactly the same (6). Our study offers independent proof for this with purified TRAbs from patients. We also found no differences between TSAb and TBAb interaction with the TSH-R in competition studies with purified TRAb or patient sera.

If concentration, affinity for, and binding site on the TSH-R are similar for TSAbs and TBAbs, what makes the biological difference? A possible explanation was proposed by a recent study on the interaction of TSAb and TBAb monoclonal antibodies and TSH-R mutants with single amino acid substitutions in the crucial leucine-rich horseshoe part of the receptor (26). This study showed that TSAb and TBAb epitopes are in very close steric proximity, but they are nevertheless distinct on the molecular level (6). Single amino acid differences in the binding site could be the reason for the dramatic difference in bioactivity. However, alternative explanations may exist. The recent crystal structure of the FSH-R together with its ligand FSH (27) suggests that similar approaches for the TSH-R and TSH or TSAb/TBAb could be helpful in solving this riddle.

Two limitations of our study should be addressed. First, the patients selected for this study had high levels of TRAbs, some even after treatment, which may not be representative for the average patient with GD. Second, the stringent purification conditions might have been selective for high-affinity TRAbs. Whereas the average recovery of TRAbs after purification was reasonable (27%), low-affinity TRAbs could have been lost during the process. Therefore, our study does not exclude the existence of TRAb with lower affinity than reported here.

Finally, it should be noted that we were unable to purify TRAbs from healthy individuals. This is in contrast to a study on affinity enrichment of TRAbs from GD patients and healthy individuals (28). In this study the evidence for TRAbs in healthy individuals was (besides fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis) based on a weak interaction of the enriched material in a competitive TBII system. It is important to keep in mind that the detection of TRAbs by any competitive radioreceptor assay is an indirect method and therefore subject to artifacts. Any substance (i.e. residual chemicals from the purification protocol or a high salt concentration) that negatively influences the TSH-R TSH interaction will reduce the binding of the tracer, which results in a positive readout. However, it is also possible that this discrepancy between the two studies is due to differences in the affinity purification protocol, particularly the loss of low-affinity TRAbs in our system.

As we have pointed out before (7), the strongest evidence for a successful purification of TRAbs by our protocol is not necessarily the recovery of TBII activity but a clear stimulation in the bioassay and the fact that we are able to label the purified TRAbs for saturation and displacement studies. Here the purified autoantibodies from patients behave similar to studies we did with monoclonal TSH-R antibodies (6, 24), indicating a high level of purity and functionality.


   Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. W. Weglöhner, S. Karasch, and C. Schwiebert (InVivo GmbH, Hennigsdorf/Berlin, Germany) for the production of large amounts of TSH-R-expressing K562 cells and Dr. Daphne Khoo (Singapore General Hospital), Dr. Andreas Bergmann, and Dr. Joachim Struck (B.R.A.H.M.S. AG, Hennigsdorf/Berlin, Germany) for helpful discussions.


   Footnotes
 
Present address for W.B.M.: KreLo GmbH Medical Diagnostics, Ulm, Germany.

Disclosure Summary: N.G.M., S.C.H., and W.B.M. have no conflict of interest related to this study.

First Published Online December 19, 2006

Abbreviations: AH, Autoimmune hypothyroidism; ATD, antithyroid drug; GD, Graves’ disease; InI, inhibition index; Kd, dissociation constant; RLU, relative light unit; SI, stimulation index; TBAb, thyroid-blocking autoantibody; TBII, TSH binding inhibition; TRAb, TSH-R autoantibodies; TSAb, thyroid-stimulating autoantibody; TSH-R, TSH receptor.

Received October 11, 2006.

Accepted December 12, 2006.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM 1998 The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev 19:673–716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sanders J, Jeffreys J, Depraetere H, Richards T, Evans M, Kiddie A, Brereton K, Groenen M, Oda Y, Furmaniak J, Rees Smith B 2002 Thyroid-stimulating monoclonal antibodies. Thyroid 12:1043–1050[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ando T, Latif R, Pritsker A, Moran T, Nagayama Y, Davies TF 2002 A monoclonal thyroid-stimulating antibody. J Clin Invest 110:1667–1674[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Costagliola S, Franssen JD, Bonomi M, Urizar E, Willnich M, Bergmann A, Vassart G 2002 Generation of a mouse monoclonal TSH receptor antibody with stimulating activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 299:891–896[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Sanders J, Evans M, Premawardhana LD, Depraetere H, Jeffreys J, Richards T, Furmaniak J, Rees Smith B 2003 Human monoclonal thyroid stimulating autoantibody. Lancet 362:126–128[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Costagliola S, Bonomi M, Morgenthaler NG, Van Durme J, Panneels V, Refetoff S, Vassart G 2004 Delineation of the discontinuous-conformational epitope of a monoclonal antibody displaying full in vitro and in vivo thyrotropin activity. Mol Endocrinol 18:3020–3034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Morgenthaler NG, Minich WB, Willnich M, Bogusch T, Hollidt JM, Weglohner W, Lenzner C, Bergmann A 2003 Affinity purification and diagnostic use of TSH receptor autoantibodies from human serum. Mol Cell Endocrinol 212:73–79[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Khoo DH, Eng PH, Ho SC, Fok AC 1999 Differences in the levels of TSH-binding inhibitor immunoglobulins in goitrous and agoitrous autoimmune thyroiditis after twelve months of L-thyroxine therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51:73–79[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Costagliola S, Morgenthaler NG, Hoermann R, Badenhoop K, Struck J, Freitag D, Poertl S, Weglohner W, Hollidt JM, Quadbeck B, Dumont JE, Schumm-Draeger PM, Bergmann A, Mann K, Vassart G, Usadel KH 1999 Second generation assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies has superior diagnostic sensitivity for Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:90–97[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schott M, Feldkamp J, Bathan C, Fritzen R, Scherbaum WA, Seissler J 2000 Detecting TSH-receptor antibodies with the recombinant TBII assay: technical and clinical evaluation. Horm Metab Res 32:429–435[Medline]
  11. Morgenthaler NG, Pampel I, Aust G, Seissler J, Scherbaum WA 1998 Application of a bioassay with CHO cells for the routine detection of stimulating and blocking autoantibodies to the TSH-receptor. Horm Metab Res 30:162–168[Medline]
  12. Perret J, Ludgate M, Libert F, Gerard C, Dumont JE, Vassart G, Parmentier M 1990 Stable expression of the human TSH receptor in CHO cells and characterization of differentially expressing clones. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:1044–1050[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Stiens LR, Buntemeyer H, Lutkemeyer D, Lehmann J, Bergmann A, Weglohner W 2000 Development of serum-free bioreactor production of recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone receptor. Biotechnol Prog 16:703–709[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Scatchard G 1949 The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51:600–672
  15. Kajava AV, Vassart G, Wodak SJ 1995 Modeling of the three-dimensional structure of proteins with the typical leucine-rich repeats. Structure 3:867–877[Medline]
  16. Kleinau G, Jaeschke H, Neumann S, Laettig J, Paschke R, Krause G 2004 Identification of a novel epitope in the TSH receptor ectodomain acting as intramolecular signalling interface. J Biol Chem 279:51590–51600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nunez Miguel R, Sanders J, Jeffreys J, Depraetere H, Evans M, Richards T, Blundell TL, Rees Smith B, Furmaniak J 2004 Analysis of the thyrotropin receptor-thyrotropin interaction by comparative modeling. Thyroid 14:991–1011[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 1997 Engineering the human thyrotropin receptor ectodomain from a non-secreted form to a secreted, highly immunoreactive glycoprotein that neutralizes autoantibodies in Graves’ patients’ sera. J Biol Chem 272:18959–18965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cornelis S, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Panneels V, Vassart G, Costagliola S 2001 Purification and characterization of a soluble bioactive amino-terminal extracellular domain of the human thyrotropin receptor. Biochemistry 40:9860–9869[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Nagayama Y, Wadsworth HL, Russo D, Chazenbalk GD, Rapoport B 1991 Binding domains of stimulatory and inhibitory thyrotropin (TSH) receptor autoantibodies determined with chimeric TSH-lutropin/chorionic gonadotropin receptors. J Clin Invest 88:336–340[Medline]
  21. Kosugi S, Ban T, Akamizu T, Valente W, Kohn LD 1993 Use of thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) mutants to detect stimulating TSHR antibodies in hypothyroid patients with idiopathic myxedema, who have blocking TSHR antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:19–24[Abstract]
  22. Schwarz-Lauer L, Chazenbalk GD, McLachlan SM, Ochi Y, Nagayama Y, Rapoport B 2002 Evidence for a simplified view of autoantibody interactions with the thyrotropin receptor. Thyroid 12:115–120[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Minich WB, Lenzner C, Bergmann A, Morgenthaler NG 2004 A coated tube assay for the detection of blocking thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:352–356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Minich WB, Lenzner C, Morgenthaler NG 2004 Antibodies to TSH-receptor in thyroid autoimmune disease interact with monoclonal antibodies whose epitopes are broadly distributed on the receptor. Clin Exp Immunol 136:129–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ando T, Latif R, Daniel S, Eguchi K, Davies TF 2004 Dissecting linear and conformational epitopes on the native thyrotropin receptor. Endocrinology 145:5185–5193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Smits G, Campillo M, Govaerts C, Janssens V, Richter C, Vassart G, Pardo L, Costagliola S 2003 Glycoprotein hormone receptors: determinants in leucine-rich repeats responsible for ligand specificity. EMBO J 22:2692–2703[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Fan QR, Hendrickson WA 2005 Structure of human follicle-stimulating hormone in complex with its receptor. Nature 433:269–277[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Latrofa F, Chazenbalk GD, Pichurin P, Chen CR, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B 2004 Affinity-enrichment of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies from Graves’ patients and normal individuals provides insight into their properties and possible origin from natural antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:4734–4745[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 FASEB J.Home page
G. Kleinau, H. Jaeschke, S. Mueller, B. M. Raaka, S. Neumann, R. Paschke, and G. Krause
Evidence for cooperative signal triggering at the extracellular loops of the TSH receptor
FASEB J, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 2798 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1058    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgenthaler, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Minich, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgenthaler, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Minich, W. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Autoimmunity
Right arrow Thyroid

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals