help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1695
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/2/725    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenth, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goodyer, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenth, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goodyer, C. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium and Bone Metabolism
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 2 725-728
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society


BRIEF REPORT

Relationship of the Human Growth Hormone Receptor Exon 3 Genotype with Final Adult Height and Bone Mineral Density

Gurvinder Kenth, Zhuo Shao, David E. C. Cole and Cynthia Gates Goodyer

Endocrine Research Laboratory (G.K., Z.S., C.G.G.), McGill University Health Centre-Montreal Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3Z 2Z3; Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology and Pediatrics (D.E.C.C.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L5; and Division of Experimental Medicine (G.K., C.G.G.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.G.G.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3Z 2Z3

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Cynthia Gates Goodyer, Endocrine Research Laboratory, Room 415/1, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 4060 Ste Catherine Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3Z 2Z3. E-mail: cindy.goodyer{at}muhc.mcgill.ca.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Three recent clinical studies have reported that two of the most common isoforms of the human GH (hGH) receptor (hGHR), exon 3 full-length (3+) and exon 3 deleted (3–), may have differential effects on the growth response of children receiving hGH therapy, whereas others refute this. However, none of the investigations has explored the relationship between these hGHR isoforms and final adult height (FAH) or measures of bone mineral density (BMD) within a healthy adult population.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible influences of hGHR exon 3 isoforms on FAH and BMD measures of a normal population.

Design: The study was designed to correlate the hGHR exon 3 genotype of a cohort of healthy adults with FAH, BMDs [spine (L2–L4) and hip (femoral neck)], and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel.

Patients: Participants were 368 unrelated healthy adult white women, aged 18–35 yr.

Main Outcome Measures: We analyzed association of hGHR exon 3 genotypes with FAH, BMD, and QUS. Heights were measured using a stadiometer, BMDs using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and QUS by standard technique. Detailed medical histories, including lifestyle factors, were obtained using a standardized interview.

Results: The distribution of hGHR genotypes in the 368 samples was 53.3% for 3+/3+, 35.6% for 3+/3–, and 11.1% for 3–/3–. There was no correlation between the hGHR exon 3 genotypes and FAH, BMD, or QUS in this cohort.

Conclusion: The hGHR 3+ and 3– isoforms appear not to have differential effects on two major growth outcomes of hGH action, FAH, and BMD in a population of healthy adult women.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HUMAN GH PLAYS a major role in regulating growth and metabolic activity during childhood and adolescence (1). The biological effects of this hormone are initiated after binding to a dimer of its cell surface receptor [human GH (hGH) receptor (hGHR)], a 620-amino-acid single-transmembrane protein (2, 3).

Pantel et al. (4) have shown that, because of a retroviral-mediated mechanism at the genomic level, both exon 3+ and exon 3– hGHR isoforms exist in the normal population. The lack of exon 3 results in a 22-amino-acid truncation of the extracellular domain, N terminal to the hGH binding domain, and loss of one glycosylation site (4). There is a continuing controversy as to whether the exon 3– isoform modifies hGH effects on human growth or metabolism. It appears not to alter binding of hGH (5, 6), but the crystal structure of this region has not been modeled to date.

Recent clinical studies characterizing the relationship between the hGHR exon 3 genotype and the growth response in patients with short stature undergoing hGH therapy are summarized in Table 1Go. Three groups have reported significant differences in height velocity between those with the 3+/3+ genotype vs. those with at least one 3– allele, including patients who have been diagnosed as small for gestational age (SGA), hGH-deficient, idiopathic short stature (ISS), or Turner syndrome (7, 8, 9). Dos Santos et al. (7) also reported a small significant increase in the ability of HEK293 cells expressing 3+/3– or 3–/3– hGHR to respond to hGH with stimulation of a signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) reporter vector compared with 3+/3+-expressing cells. In contrast, other groups report no significant association between the genotypes and response to hGH therapy in their SGA and hGH-deficient cohorts (9, 10, 11, 12).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Summary of clinical pediatric studies investigating the possible association of hGH responsiveness and the hGHR 3– allele

 
However, none of these studies investigated the relationship between hGHR genotype and final adult height (FAH) in a normal population. In addition, although SGA and hGH-deficient pediatric cohorts have lower bone mineral density (BMD) as well as height, and respond to hGH treatment with increased BMD (13), the relationship between hGHR and measures of BMD has not been reported. The purpose of this investigation, therefore, was to determine whether there is a correlation between hGHR exon 3 genotype and either FAH or BMD measures in a large cohort of healthy adult women.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Experimental subjects

This study analyzed 368 individuals from a cohort of 678 unrelated healthy white young women, aged 18–35 yr, and recruited in the City of Toronto (Ontario, Canada) for large-scale investigations of peak BMD determinants (14). Subjects recruited by newspaper advertisements and posted flyers were screened by a telephone interview and excluded if they: 1) were not 18–35 yr old; 2) had a history of a comorbid condition; or 3) were taking medications known to affect bone. Approval was obtained from the local Research Ethics Board and written informed consent from each subject. Height was measured using a stadiometer, BMD of the lumbar spine ([L2–L4 (LS)] and hip [femoral neck (FN)] using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and bone volume quality by a stiffness index (SI) by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneus (14, 15). A standardized interview was conducted to evaluate medical history and lifestyle factors. The database of physical, medical and lifestyle information was coded to preserve anonymity.

hGHR genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes by standard procedures. A 38-cycle amplification of the region around exon 3 of the hGHR gene was performed on 100-ng samples using specific primers (GenBank accession no. AF155912) (4) that amplify a fragment of 935 bp for the 3+ allele and 532 bp for the 3– allele. For each set of unknown samples, 3+/3+ and 3+/3– controls were amplified and run on the same gel.

Statistical methods

Genotypic and relevant phenotypic information was coded and analyzed for association with FAH, BMD, and QUS-SI. The significance of associations among the three hGHR genotypes and outcome variables was determined using SPSS (version 12.0.1). Spearman rho coefficients were tested for significance and ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc testing was used to complete the assessment of univariate associations with genotype. For FAH, a multiple regression analysis included age at menses and calcium intake as covariates, with and without the PTH receptor 1 (PTHR1) genotype, a known genetic determinant in this cohort (16). For QUS-SI, general linear modeling was used to incorporate the hGHR genotype information into a univariate model, with original significant covariates, including the estrogen receptor 1 (ER1) XbaI and PvuII single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and the amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) genotype and their interaction, as described before (15). For BMD at FN and LS, the same approach was used but only the TaqI genotype for vitamin D receptor (VDR) was included, because the linkage disequilibrium with the other significant VDR genotype covariate, the BsmI SNP, is virtually complete in this cohort (14). P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Genotyping and distribution of hGHR exon 3

Amplified fragments of the hGHR exon 3 locus were as expected: 935 bp for the full-length (3+) allele and 532 bp for the exon 3– allele. The distribution of hGHR genotypes in the 368 samples was 53.3% (3+/3+), 35.6% (3+/3– and 11.1% for 3–/3– and did not deviate significantly from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The allele frequencies for 3+ and 3– alleles were 71.4% and 28.6%, respectively, similar to what has been reported by Pantel et al. (4), as well as all six of the clinical studies in Table 1Go: approximately half of Europeans and North and South Americans are 3+/3+ and the other half have at least one 3– allele.

Physical characteristics of the cohort and genetic associations

No significant differences in age, FAH, weight, BMI, age at menses, or BMD (LS, FN) were noted among the three subgroups (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Physical data for the cohort of 368 young adult women by hGHR genotype

 
The QUS-SI reached marginal significance in a nonparametric ANOVA (F2,360 = 3.5, P = 0.030), largely because of a significantly lower mean SI (94.7 ± 1.2) in the 3+/3– heterozygotes, compared with the 3+/3+ homozygotes (98.4 ± 1.0). However, the 3+/3– group was also lower than the 3–/3– group (98.9 ± 1.8), so that any genetic model with dominance or gene dosage effect is unlikely. The 3+/3– group was also marginally, but not significantly, older, and the BMD data at L2–L4 suggest a slight random stratification effect; in addition, the significance disappears if multiple testing is taken into account.

Because complete data were available on only a subset of the original cohort (14), previously reported associations were reexamined to rule out bias of attrition. Overall, means and SD values for the variables of interest (FAH, LS-BMD, FN-BMD, QUS-SI) in the subset (see Table 2Go) were essentially the same as those published for the larger cohort (14, 15). The Spearman rank coefficient between hGHR genotype and FAH was not significant, nor was ANOVA with genotype as factor (data not shown). Multivariate regression modeling of FAH, based on 358 cases with no missing values, showed that age at menarche, calcium intake, and PTHR1-(AAAG)6 genotype remained significant independent predictors (P < 0.05, P < 0.02, and P < 0.01, respectively), as reported before for a larger cohort (n = 569) (16). In contrast, hGHR genotype was not significant (P > 0.65) as a predictor, whether or not the PTHR1 genotype was included in the model.

In a reexamination of QUS-SI, the original model (model 2 for a cohort of n = 663) (15) was readily validated by general linear modeling. In the smaller cohort, the following dependent variables were still significant predictors of QUS-SI: BMI (P = 0.006), cups of coffee per day (P = 0.034), and current exercise (P = 0.010). Addition of hGHR genotype to the model suggested a marginally significant (P = 0.046) predictive effect, although it did not persist when ER1 and AIB1 genotypes were also inserted.

Similar reexamination of BMD at LS and FN by general linear modeling confirmed that the TaqI VDR SNP is a significant predictor for FN but not LS in the original cohort (P = 0.031 and P = 0.217, respectively) (14), as well as the present subset (P = 0.021 and P = 0.217). Whether the hGHR genotype was used to replace the VDR SNP predictor or both were coinserted, hGHR was not a significant predictor for BMD at either FN (P = 0.852 and P = 0.936, respectively) or LS (P = 0.640 and P = 0.212).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although nutritional, steroidal, growth factor, and environmental factors are also important (1), it is well known that hGH plays a major role in regulating postnatal growth and BMD in both children and adults, and that its specific receptor, hGHR, is essential for these effects (1, 2, 13, 17, 18). What is not clear is whether the exon 3– deleted form of the receptor has a special physiological role in regulating responsiveness to hGH, as suggested by three recently published clinical studies but refuted by others (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) (see details in Table 1Go). The loss of 22 amino acids at the N terminus of the extracellular domain, external to the ligand binding domain, has not been shown to alter hGH binding (5, 6). Dos Santos et al. (7) showed a small positive effect of the 3– allele on the responsiveness of transiently transfected cells to hGH in terms of STAT5 signaling, but otherwise no investigations of intracellular signaling differences have been reported.

Although it was initially thought that the 3– hGHR isoform was caused by individual-specific alternative splicing mechanisms (19, 20), Pantel et al. (4) showed that it is more likely caused by a homologous recombination event occurring between retroviral elements that surround exon 3 in the hGHR gene. The production of both full-length and 3– isoforms is a species-specific event: other mammalian species (e.g. rabbits, rodents) express only the full-length GHR, whereas birds, bony fish, marsupials, and amphibians express only an exon 3– GHR (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI). Interestingly, the hPRLR, closely related to the hGHR, always lacks an exon 3 equivalent (NCBI).

Our study demonstrates a lack of association of FAH and BMD with hGHR exon 3 genotypes in a healthy adult cohort. It is possible that there is a weak association between genotype and bone quality measured by ultrasound, but a more likely explanation of our marginal results is chance stratification, particularly because it is the heterozygous group that differs from both homozygous ones. Overall, our results support the findings of Pilotta et al. (10), Carrascosa et al. (11), and Blum et al. (12) that suggest no effect of the 3– allele on hGH responsiveness in children with short stature, although our biological endpoints and the hGH "physiologies" are different. Although it is impossible to compare our genotyping study directly with therapeutic trials of supraphysiological levels of hGH (7, 9, 11), three of the investigations used "replacement doses" of hGH to treat hGH-deficient children (8, 10, 12). Yet even among these studies, there is no consensus: Jorge et al. (8) found a significant effect of at least one 3– allele on growth velocity, whereas Pilotta et al. (10) and Blum et al. (12) found no association. In addition, hGH dose does not appear to be a predisposing factor: higher dose treatments in SGA cohorts have had both positive (7) and not significant (9, 11) results.

Thus, although we cannot clarify the present controversy, we have shown that the hGHR 3+ and 3– isoforms do not differentially affect two major outcomes of hGH action, FAH and BMD, within a cohort of healthy adult Caucasian females.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Laurent Legault for his helpful review of the manuscript and Dr. Geoffrey N. Hendy for facilitating this study.


    Footnotes
 
Funding for this study came from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (to C.G.G.) and an Industrially Oriented Research (IOR) grant from NSERC-Dairy Farmers of Canada (to D.E.C.C.). G.K. was supported by a studentship from the McGill University Health Centre-Montreal Children’s Hospital Research Institute, and Z.S. by a bursary from the CIHR Training Program in Skeletal Health Research.

First Published Online November 7, 2006

G.K. and Z.S. contributed equally to this work.

D.E.C.C. and C.G.G. contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations: AIB1, Amplified in breast cancer 1; BMD, bone mineral density; ER1, estrogen receptor 1; FAH, final adult height; FN, femoral neck; hGH, human GH; hGHR, hGH receptor; ISS, idiopathic short stature; LS, lumbar spine; PTHR1, PTH receptor 1; QUS, quantitative ultrasound; SGA, small for gestational age; SI, stiffness index; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; STAT5, signal transducer and activator of transcription 5.

Received August 8, 2006.

Accepted October 30, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Veldhuis JD, Roemmich JN, Richmond EJ, Rogol AD, Lovejoy JC, Sheffield-Moore M, Mauras N, Bowers CY 2005 Endocrine control of body composition in infancy, childhood, and puberty. Endocr Rev 26:114–146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Waters MJ, Hoang HN, Fairlie DP, Pelekanos RA, Brown RJ 2006 New insights into growth hormone action. J Mol Endocrinol 36:1–7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Leung DW, Spencer SA, Cachianes G, Hammonds RG, Collins C, Henzel WJ, Barnard R, Waters MJ, Wood WI 1987 Growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, cloning and expression. Nature 330:537–543[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Pantel J, Machinis K, Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Goossens M, Amselem S 2000 Species-specific alternative splice mimicry at the growth hormone receptor locus revealed by the lineage of retroelements during primate evolution. J Biol Chem 275:18664–18669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Duriez B, Amselem S, Goossens M 1993 Expression and binding properties of two isoforms of the human growth hormone receptor. FEBS Lett 319:16–20[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Urbanek M, Russell JE, Cooke NE, Liebhaber SA 1993 Functional characterization of the alternatively spliced, placental human growth hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 268:19025–19032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Dos Santos C, Essioux L, Teinturier C, Tauber M, Goffin V, Bougneres P 2004 A common polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor is associated with increased responsiveness to growth hormone. Nat Genet 36:720–724[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Jorge AA, Marchisotti FG, Montenegro LR, Carvalho LR, Mendonca BB, Arnhold IJ 2006 Growth hormone (GH) pharmacogenetics: influence of GH receptor exon 3 retention or deletion on first-year growth response and final height in patients with severe GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1076–1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Binder G, Baur F, Schweizer R, Ranke MB 2006 The d3– growth hormone (GH) receptor polymorphism is associated with increased responsiveness to GH in Turner syndrome and short small-for-gestational-age children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:659–664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pilotta A, Mella P, Filisetti M, Felappi B, Prandi E, Parrinello G, Notarangelo LD, Buzi F 2006 Common polymorphisms of the growth hormone (GH) receptor do not correlate with the growth response to exogenous recombinant human GH in GH-deficient children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1178–1180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Carrascosa A, Esteban C, Espadero R, Fernandez-Cancio M, Andaluz P, Clemente M, Audi L, Wollman H, Fryklund L, Parodi L, and the Spanish Study Group 2006 The d3– growth hormone receptor polymorphism does not influence the effect of GH treatment (66 µg/k/day) or the spontaneous growth in short non-GH-deficient small-for-gestational-age children: results from a two-year controlled prospective study in 170 Spanish patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3281–3286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Blum W, Machinis K, Shavrikova E, Keller A, Stobbe H, Pfaeffle R, Amselem S 2006 The growth response to growth hormone (GH) treatment in children with isolated GH deficiency is independent of the presence of the exon 3-minus isoform of the GH receptor. J Clin Endocrinal Metab 91:4171–4174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Arends NJ, Boonstra VH, Mulder PG, Odink RJ, Stokvis-Brantsma WH, Rongen-Westerlaken C, Mulder JC, Delemarre-Van de Waal H, Reeser HM, Jansen M, Waelkens JJ, Hokken-Koelega AC 2003 GH treatment and its effect on bone mineral density, bone maturation and growth in short children born small for gestational age: 3-year results of a randomized, controlled GH trial. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 59:779–787[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Rubin L, Hawker G, Peltekova V, Fielding L, Ridout R, Cole D 1999 Determinants of peak bone mass: clinical and genetic analyses in a young female Canadian cohort. J Bone Mineral Res 14:633–643[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Patel MS, Cole DE, Smith JD, Hawker GA, Wong B, Trang H, Vieth R, Meltzer P, Rubin LA 2000 Alleles of the estrogen receptor alpha-gene and an estrogen receptor cotranscriptional activator gene, amplified in breast cancer-1 (AIB1), are associated with quantitative calcaneal ultrasound. J Bone Miner Res 15:2231–2239[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Scillitani A, Jang C, Wong BY, Hendy GN, Cole DE 2006 A functional polymorphism in the PTHR1 promoter region is associated with adult height and BMD measured at the femoral neck in a large cohort of young caucasian women. Hum Genet 119:416–421[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Rosenfeld RG, Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J 1994 Growth hormone (GH) insensitivity due to primary GH receptor deficiency. Endocr Rev 15:369–390[Abstract]
  18. Robson H, Siebler T, Shalet SM, Williams GR 2002 Interactions between GH, IGF-I, glucocorticoids, and thyroid hormones during skeletal growth. Pediatr Res 52:137–147[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zogopoulos G, Figueiredo R, Jenab A, Ali Z, Lefebvre Y, Goodyer CG 1996 Expression of exon 3-retaining and -deleted human growth hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid isoforms during development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:775–782[Abstract]
  20. Wickelgren RB, Landin KL, Ohlsson C, Carlsson LM 1995 Expression of exon 3–retaining and exon 3– excluding isoforms of the human growth hormone-receptor is regulated in an interindividual, rather than a tissue-specific, manner. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2154–2157[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
G. Kenth, J. A M. Mergelas, and C. G. Goodyer
Developmental changes in the human GH receptor and its signal transduction pathways
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 71 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Schreiner, S. Stutte, P. Bartmann, B. Gohlke, and J. Woelfle
Association of the Growth Hormone Receptor d3-Variant and Catch-up Growth of Preterm Infants with Birth Weight of Less Than 1500 Grams
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4489 - 4493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. G Rosenfeld
Pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics in the evaluation and management of short stature
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 157(suppl_1): S27 - S31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. B. Jensen, S. Vielwerth, T. Larsen, G. Greisen, H. Leffers, and A. Juul
The Presence of the d3-Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Is Negatively Associated with Fetal Growth but Positively Associated with Postnatal Growth in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2758 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/2/725    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kenth, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goodyer, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kenth, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goodyer, C. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium and Bone Metabolism
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals