help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1131
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/2/698    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pilla, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pilla, R. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*HYDROCORTISONE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Schizophrenia
*Steroids
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 2 698-704
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Diminished Glucocorticoid Negative Feedback in Polydipsic Hyponatremic Schizophrenic Patients

Morris B. Goldman, Gordon Wood, Megan B. Goldman, Michelle Gavin, Stacey Paul, Suhaila Zaheer, Ghazala Fayyaz and Ramani S. Pilla

Department of Psychiatry (Mo.B.G., Me.B.G., S.P., S.Z., G.F.), University of Chicago, and Psychiatric Institute (Mo.B.G., G.W., M.G.), University of Illinois at Chicago in affiliation with University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; and Departments of Statistics and Biology (R.S.P.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Morris B. Goldman, Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago Hospitals, 5841 South Maryland, MC 3077, Chicago, Illinois 60637. E-mail: m-goldman{at}uchicago.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: The mechanism and significance of diminished glucocorticoid negative feedback in schizophrenia is unknown but is more commonly observed in schizophrenic patients with primary polydipsia. Polydipsic patients, especially those who are also hyponatremic, exhibit other neuroendocrine abnormalities that have been linked to hippocampal pathology.

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the effect of cortisol on plasma ACTH under conditions thought to be most sensitive to hippocampal influences.

Design: The design was repeated measures.

Setting: The study was conducted at an inpatient clinical research center.

Participants: Participants included eight polydipsic hyponatremic and eight polydipsic normonatremic as well as six schizophrenic patients without water imbalance. Eight healthy community volunteers matched for age and gender were also studied.

Intervention: Metyrapone (750 mg) was administered orally at 1430 and 1900 h. Beginning at 1930 h, hydrocortisone was infused over 150 min at 0.03 mg/kg·h. Blood samples and other measures were obtained at 20-min intervals from 1850 to 2320 h.

Main Outcome Measures: Plasma ACTH and cortisol were measured.

Results: ACTH levels did not decline significantly during the cortisol infusion in the polydipsic hyponatremic group. For any given level of cortisol, ACTH levels were higher in the hyponatremic group. Although levels declined after cortisol in the other three groups, the decline was greatest in patients without water imbalance.

Conclusions: The marked impairment in glucocorticoid negative feedback in polydipsic hyponatremic schizophrenic patients is consistent with hippocampal mineralocorticoid dysfunction.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ALTERED CORTISOL REGULATION has been demonstrated in many psychiatric illnesses and thought to contribute to the underlying psychopathology (1). Whereas less commonly reported in schizophrenia than affective disorders, about 20% of schizophrenic patients demonstrate a diminished cortisol response to dexamethasone (2). The mechanism and significance of this finding are unknown. Dexamethasone resistance is particularly common in the 20% (3) of schizophrenic patients who exhibit primary polydipsia (4). These patients exhibit other abnormalities in neuroendocrine regulation. For instance, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) as well as plasma arginine vasopressin responses to psychological, but not systemic, mediated stressors are enhanced in polydipsic patients, particularly those with hyponatremia (5). In contrast, response to psychological (but not systemic) stress is blunted in patients with normal water balance. Polydipsic hyponatremic patients, but neither polydipsic normonatremic patients (6) nor patients with normal water balance, (7) also exhibit a downward resetting of the set point for vasopressin secretion. This abnormality is increased by acute psychosis and predisposes the already hyponatremic patients to life-threatening water intoxication (8).

These neuroendocrine findings in polydipsic patients could reflect hippocampal dysfunction. The hippocampus is the brain region most frequently implicated in schizophrenia (9). This structure modulates vasopressin and HPAA responses to both psychological stress (10, 11) and glucocorticoid feedback (12, 13). The anterior hippocampus, which is selectively smaller in patients with polydipsia and hyponatremia, compared with matched schizophrenic patients (Ref. 14 and manuscript submitted for publication), is the primate analog of the segment that restrains neuroendocrine responses to psychological stress in rodents (10, 11). An animal model of schizophrenia, which disrupts neurodevelopment of this segment (15), impairs glucocorticoid feedback (16) as well as the restraint of vasopressin and HPAA responses to psychological stress (17). Based on these observations, and other data suggesting a heightening of putative hippocampal influences on neuroendocrine secretion in patients with normal water balance (18), we made the following predictions: HPAA feedback will be blunted in 1) polydipsic patients with hyponatremia, compared with those with normonatremia; 2) these two groups, compared with healthy controls; and 3) these three groups, compared with patients with normal water balance (i.e. a representative sample of the majority of schizophrenic patients).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Psychiatric subjects were grouped by a two-step procedure (6) before and after transfer to the Psychiatric Clinical Research Center at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Depending on the group to which they were initially assigned, subjects had prior, or no prior, evidence of polydipsia (unexplained urine specific gravities < 1.008 on multiple occasions) or hyponatremia (unexplained serum sodium levels < 125 mEq/liter on at least two occasions) (6, 19). Grouping was subsequently confirmed by obtaining spot urine and plasma samples three times weekly during the first 3 wk of admission. Confirmed polydipsic hyponatremic subjects had two or more morning plasma osmolalities that were less than 275 mosmol/kg and mean afternoon urine osmolality less than 300 mosmol/kg (n = 8), whereas polydipsic normonatremics had mean plasma osmolality greater than 285 mosmol/kg (none lower than 280 mosmol/kg) and mean afternoon urine osmolality less than 300 mosmol/kg (n = 8). Nonpolydipsic normonatremic subjects (i.e. normal water balance) had mean plasma osmolality greater than 285 mosmol/kg and mean afternoon urine osmolality greater than 500 mosmol/kg (n = 6; Table 1Go). All had primary diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and were otherwise without major medical or neurological disorders (6). None was taking corticosteroids, lithium, thiazide diuretics, carbamazepine, or chlorpropamide. Informed witnessed written consent was obtained after the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Chicago, and the University of Illinois at Chicago approved the studies. We matched groups based on age, gender, and diagnosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Mean (SD) demographic and clinical characteristics of three schizophrenic groups1

 
During the first 3 wk of admission, patients were acclimated to the research setting and psychotropic medications were optimized. Haloperidol was the preferred antipsychotic, although subjects could receive olanzapine or risperidone if they had had adverse reactions to haloperidol. Mood instability as well as severe anxiety was treated with valproic acid and clonazepam (see legend to Table 1Go). During the fifth week of admission, trained technicians administered the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) (20), Hamilton Depression Scale (21), and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (22). Psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed at discharge in a multidisciplinary conference and relied largely on results from the Structured Clinical Interview Diagnosis for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (23). Healthy controls were recruited by advertisements placed around the University community, screened as previously described (6), and studied as outpatients. Each was administered the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual–nonpatient version (version 2.0) (24) by a trained technician to rule out a current or past Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, Axis I disorder.

Procedures

Hippocampal involvement in glucocorticoid-negative feedback can be inferred in vivo by assessing feedback during the diurnal nadir (25, 26). At this time of the day, intrinsic HPAA stimulatory activity is minimal, and mineralocorticoid receptors (which have much greater affinity for cortisol than glucocorticoid receptors and are concentrated in the hippocampus) have a greater impact on ACTH levels (27, 28). To enhance our ability to detect differences in feedback sensitivity and better assure infused cortisol was acting at mineralocorticoid receptors, we first lowered endogenous cortisol levels with metyrapone, which blocks the conversion of 11-deoxycortisol to cortisol (29).

Figure 1Go outlines our approach, which was adapted from the literature (29). Psychiatric subjects were studied during the sixth week of their admission after completing related studies [magnetic resonance imaging scan, cold pressor/postural stimuli (5)] on wk 4 and 5, respectively. Upon admission to the Clinical Research Center, subjects were prohibited from smoking and fluid intake was limited. Two 750-mg doses of metyrapone (Metopirone; Novartis, East Hanover, NJ) were administered orally with milk at 1630 and 1900 h. Two iv lines were placed at 1800 h after a light meal. Ten milligrams of Solu-cortef (Pfizer, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada) were dissolved in 500 mg of 5% dextrose and infused at the rate of 0.03 mg cortisol per kilogram body weight per hour beginning at 1930 h and ending at 2200 h. Blood samples were obtained at 20-min intervals from 1850 to 2320 h. At each sampling interval, blood was drawn, and vital signs (Dinamap XL vital signs monitor; Critikon, Tampa, FL) along with presence of nausea or lightheadness were recorded. Subjects were supine throughout the study and not allowed to fall asleep. Healthy controls were studied as outpatients under two conditions, 1–2 wk apart. In a randomly assigned order they received an infusion of cortisol on one occasion and diluent on the other.


Figure 1
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Outline of procedure.

 
Because feedback sensitivity and hippocampal involvement vary across the diurnal cycle (30), we also characterized diurnal cortisol activity on a separate occasion. Salivary cortisol was measured at 30-min intervals from when patients woke up until lights out (31). These measurements were taken during the fourth week of hospitalization in the patients and 1 wk after the first metyrapone study in the healthy controls.

Laboratory

Collected blood samples were processed as previously described (7). Plasma cortisol and ACTH were measured by chemiluminescent automated immunoassays [cortisol, Immulite 1000; Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA; lower limit of detection of 0.2 µg/dl, intraassay coefficient of variation of 3.0–5.1%, interassay coefficient of variation of 4–6.4%; ACTH: Nichols Advantage, San Clemente, CA; limit of detection 1 pg; interassay coefficient of variation at 14 pg, 7.0%]. 11-Deoxycortisol was assayed using a double-antibody RIA kit (ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Costa Mesa, CA), and salivary cortisol was measured by ELISA (Salimeterics kit; State College, PA; limit of detection 0.05 pg/ml, intraassay coefficient of variation of 4.4%, interassay coefficient of variation of 7.6%.).

Data analysis

The data from the repeated measures design were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects regression model with normal error terms (32, 33). Unlike a standard ANOVA, this method accurately models the intersubject differences in initial ACTH levels and the intrasubject correlation of the repeated measures (33). ACTH was transformed by taking its square root to normalize the distribution of the residuals at each of the 15 time points (–40 min to 240 min at 20 min intervals). Time was centered at the midpoint of the study (+100 min). The shape of the response was decomposed into linear, quadratic, and cubic time trends to isolate differences in the rate of decline (i.e. linear trend = slope) of ACTH as well as differences in the rise and decline of the measures (i.e. quadratic trend).

The three time trends were treated as fixed effects, whereas the subject effect was treated as a random effect. To test our three hypotheses (see introductory text), we formulated the analysis of the group effects as three contrasts: 1) the polydipsic hyponatremic group, compared with the polydipsic normonatremic group; 2) these two polydipsic groups, compared with the healthy controls; and 3) these three groups, compared with the nonpolydipsic normonatremic patients. The three group contrasts and their nine interactions with the time trends were entered into the model as fixed effects. The two conditions in the healthy controls were analyzed in an analogous manner. Type I error level was set at 0.05. All effects are reported as Z scores. The relationship between ACTH and cortisol was assessed using a linear mixed-effects regression model as previously described (6).

Significant main effects are reported only when interaction terms were insignificant. Cross-sectional data were analyzed using an ANOVA with the group contrasts defined above. For exposition of the Results section, significant group contrasts are defined in a narrative form (e.g. nonpolydipsic normonatremic subjects levels declined faster than the other three groups) and the associated test statistic for the relevant time trend (e.g. linear) by group contrast interaction is listed in parentheses.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cortisol and diluent infusion in healthy controls

To characterize the normal ACTH response to cortisol better, healthy controls were studied twice: once receiving an infusion of cortisol and once receiving an infusion of saline. As expected, recognized neuroendocrine modulators (i.e. plasma osmolality, plasma glucose, plasma sodium, blood urea, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, expired air carbon monoxide, hemoglobin) before the infusion were similar in the two conditions (data not shown). Cortisol and ACTH levels at this juncture (i.e. 30 min after the second dose of metyrapone) were about half and double normal evening levels, respectively (Fig. 2Go, A and B). One subject noted mild transient nausea during the diluent infusion; however, there were no reports of lightheadness or nausea reported during the cortisol infusion.


Figure 2
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Effects of cortisol and diluent infusion on neuroendocrine measures in healthy controls. Each symbol shows the mean (±SEM) for each variable at a different time interval before and after a 150-min infusion of cortisol ({odot}) or diluent (•) as illustrated in Fig. 1Go. Arrow denotes second dose of metyrapone.

 
Throughout the 150-min cortisol infusion, plasma cortisol increased steadily and after the infusion declined back toward baseline (Fig. 2AGo). In contrast, levels did not change after diluent (condition by time interactions: quadratic trend Z = 10.1, P < 0.001). Eighty minutes into the cortisol infusion, ACTH levels began a linear decline (Fig. 2BGo), whereas they were rising in the diluent condition consistent with the peak effects of the second dose of metyrapone (condition by time interaction: linear trend Z = 5.87, P < 0.001). As expected, 11-deoxycortisol levels mirrored ACTH levels. Thus 11-deoxycortisol levels began a linear decline well into the cortisol infusion, whereas levels were rising in the diluent condition (Fig. 2CGo, condition by time interactions: linear trend Z = 3.62, P < 0.001). Plasma glucose declined slightly in both conditions (linear trend Z = 2.13, P = 0.032). Levels of other recognized modulators did not change.

Demographic and baseline measures: all groups

The three patient groups resembled each other on demographic, behavioral, and clinical variables except for expected differences in indices of water balance (Table 1Go). The number of patients receiving atypical antipsychotic medication did not differ across groups. Demographic as well as baseline laboratory measures were also similar in all four groups, except for the baseline sodium measurement (which was lower in the hyponatremic subjects) and the nonfasting glucose measurement (which was lower in the healthy controls) (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Indices of water balance and other potential modulators prior to the study and the cortisol infusion

 
Cortisol infusion in healthy controls and patient groups

ANOVA under the specified group contrasts revealed that preinfusion cortisol levels (i.e. 0 min) did not differ. ACTH levels, in contrast, were lower in healthy controls than the two polydipsic patient groups, who resembled nonpolydipsic patients in this respect (Table 2Go). Consistent with the prestudy fluid restriction, plasma sodium did not differ across groups. Other basal measures were also similar. Plasma cortisol rose steadily during the infusion and afterward returned toward baseline (Fig. 3AGo). The fitted mixed-effects linear regression model revealed a slightly, but significantly, slower rise in the polydipsic hyponatremic, relative to the normonatremic, group (quadratic trend Z = 2.83, P = 0.004).


Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Effects of cortisol infusion on neuroendocrine measures in three patient groups and healthy controls. Each symbol shows the mean (±SEM) for subjects in matched groups at a different time interval before and after an infusion of cortisol as illustrated in Fig. 1Go. Groups consisted of schizophrenic patients who were polydipsic and hyponatremic (PHS, {blacksquare}), polydipsic and normonatremic (PNS, {square}), or nonpolydipsic and normonatremic (NNS, •), and healthy controls ({odot}). Arrow denotes second dose of netyrapone. Significant group by time trend contrasts are indicated in the graphs.

 
Throughout the study period ACTH levels in the polydipsic hyponatremic group fluctuated without ever exhibiting a clear decline. In the polydipsic normonatremic group, levels declined steadily toward the end of the infusion, and, as predicted, their decline exceeded that of the hyponatremic group (Fig. 3BGo, linear trend Z = 5.04, P < 0.001). Also as predicted, the rate of decline in the healthy controls was greater, albeit marginally, than in the two polydipsic groups (linear trend: Z = 1.92, P = 0.054); and the rate in nonpolydipsic patients exceeded that of the other three groups (Fig. 3BGo, linear Z = 7.07, P < 0.001). ACTH levels declined significantly from their baseline levels at 80 min into the infusion in the nonpolydipsic patients, 100 min in healthy controls, 160 min in the polydipsic normonatremic patients and at no time point in the polydipsic hyponatremic patients. To exclude the possibility that changes in the rate of cortisol increase could account for the group differences, we calculated the change in ACTH from baseline as a function of change in lagged (–40 min) cortisol from baseline at subsequent time point as previously described (29). This analysis also demonstrated a steeper decline in ACTH in the polydipsic normonatremic than the hyponatremic group (Z= 3.97, P < 0.001) and in the nonpolydipsic patients, compared with the other three groups (Z = 4.11, P < 0.001). The response in the two polydipsic groups did not differ significantly from the healthy controls.

To examine further the relationship between the two hormones, we considered ACTH as a function of lagged cortisol levels over the time period of +40 to +180 min (Fig. 4Go). The graph suggests that polydipsic hyponatremics were not only relatively insensitive to cortisol but also shifted relative to the other three groups. Thus, at any given level of cortisol, ACTH levels were higher in polydipsic hyponatremics, although they seemed to decline at least at the highest levels of cortisol. Fitting a mixed-effects linear regression model again demonstrated that the slope of the relationship was not as steep in the hyponatremic polydipsics (Z = 2.28, P = 0.03) and was steeper in the nonpolydipsic patients, compared with the other three groups (Z = 2.37, P = 0.02).


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Mean ACTH as a function of lagged mean cortisol (–40 min) for each time point when ACTH was showing the greatest change (+40 to +180 min). See Fig. 3Go legend for definitions of symbols.

 
Plasma glucose declined to a similar extent in all groups throughout the study (data not shown; linear effect Z = 4.99, P < 0.001). Other measures did not change significantly and remained similar across groups (data not shown). Exclusion of patients who received atypical antipsychotic medication from the analysis did not appreciably influence the findings. Two nonpolydipsic normonatremics and one polydipsic normonatremic reported transient nausea during the study, whereas another nonpolydipsic normonatremic and one polydipsic hyponatremic subject reported transient lightheadness. The neuroendocrine responses of these five patients resembled those of other group members (data not shown).

Salivary cortisol

Salivary cortisol was measured from when subjects awoke to lights out on a separate occasion. All groups showed a similar steep drop in morning levels followed by slower declines in the afternoon and evening (Fig. 5Go, linear trend Z = 12.27, P < 0.001; quadratic trend Z = 5.36, P < 0.001).


Figure 5
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Characterization of diurnal circadian rhythm. Salivary cortisol samples were obtained at 30-min intervals from the time the subject woke up to lights out. Each symbol shows the mean (±SEM) for all subjects in each group over a 2-h time period. The time shown is the midpoint of each sampling period; however, statistical analysis was performed on raw data. See Fig. 3Go for definitions of symbols.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Glucocorticoid-negative feedback is markedly diminished in polydipsic hyponatremic patients, whereas it is enhanced in patients with normal water imbalance. Thus, plasma ACTH never declined significantly during or after a 2.5-h cortisol infusion in polydipsic hyponatremic patients, whereas it declined earlier and at a greater rate in patients with normal water balance, compared with the other three subject groups (Fig. 3BGo). Furthermore, the relationship of ACTH to cortisol was shifted and blunted in the hyponatremic patients, whereas it was enhanced in the nonpolydipsic patient group (Fig. 4Go). The data did not support our second hypothesis (i.e. that the rate of ACTH decline in polydipsic groups will be blunted relative to healthy controls). This data analysis was complicated by the lower basal ACTH levels in the latter group. Together these findings support the previous observation that impaired glucocorticoid-negative feedback is found more commonly in polydipsic than nonpolydipsic schizophrenic patients, (4) but also support previous data that glucocorticoid regulation under physiologic conditions is not fundamentally altered (Fig. 5Go) (34).

The blunted response in the hyponatremic subjects cannot be attributed to recognized factors. Thus, preinfusion cortisol levels were similar across groups, and basal ACTH levels were similar in the three patient groups (Fig. 3Go, A and B, and Table 2Go). Whereas cortisol levels increased more slowly in the hyponatremic subjects, peak cortisol levels did not appear to differ, controlling for the rate of cortisol rise did not alter the findings, and the relationship between ACTH and cortisol was also blunted. A diurnal shift in HPAA axis sensitivity can be discounted because patients were on the same routine for 6 wk before the study and diurnal salivary cortisol levels did not differ (Fig. 5Go). Recent data suggest atypical antipsychotic agents blunt cortisol activity (35), but the number of subjects taking these drugs did not differ across patient groups nor did excluding those subjects appreciably alter the findings. Other possible factors such as age (29), obesity (26), acute psychiatric symptoms or levels of stress, nausea, or lightheadedness can be discounted because groups resembled each other on these measures (Tables 1Go and 2Go). Whereas we did not include a group of nonpsychiatric subjects with hyponatremia or polydipsia, water imbalance per se seems an unlikely explanation because chronically hyponatremic animals have normal glucocorticoid feedback (36). The blunted ACTH sensitivity to cortisol in the hyponatremics and the enhanced sensitivity in nonpolydipsic patients are presumably offset by comparable differences in cortisol sensitivity to ACTH, because otherwise diurnal cortisol levels should have differed (12). Our unpublished data support this line of reasoning.

Our findings provide additional support for the view that neuroendocrine defects in hyponatremic schizophrenic patients (4, 7, 8) are a product of hippocampal-mediated mineralocorticoid dysfunction. Hence, this study was conducted during the diurnal nadir when stimulatory drive is minimal and hippocampal mineralocorticoid receptors modulate the HPAA axis (12, 25, 26, 27, 28). Indeed, the apparent shift in the relationship of ACTH and cortisol in the hyponatremics is consistent with mineralocorticoid dysfunction (12, 13) and is reminiscent of the unexplained shift in the relationship between vasopressin and plasma osmolality seen in these patients (7). The hippocampus (10, 11), in part via mineralocorticoid receptors (37), also normally constrains HPAA and vasopressin responses to psychological stimuli. Previous studies also demonstrate that hyponatremic patients exhibit both smaller anterior hippocampal formations (14) and greater HPAA and arginine vasopressin responses to psychological (but not systemic) stress than matched patients or healthy controls (5). Indeed, disruption of the development of this hippocampal segment produces an animal model of schizophrenia (15) characterized by enhanced HPAA and vasopressin responses to psychological stress (17) as well as impaired glucocorticoid-negative feedback (16). Finally, the hippocampus and mineralocorticoid receptors contribute to basic cognitive functions, (12) including the ability to behaviorally adapt to psychological stress (15, 38), which is also impaired in many schizophrenic patients (39). Thus, although speculative at this juncture, this subset of schizophrenic patients may provide unique opportunities to clarify the role of the hippocampus and mineralocorticoid receptors in both neuroendocrine regulation and severe mental illness.

There are several strengths of this study. Inclusion of matched psychiatric patient control groups diminishes the likelihood that findings in hyponatremics could be a consequence of nonspecific factors associated with schizophrenia, psychotropic medications, or polydipsia. Furthermore, psychiatric subjects were well characterized, habituated to the research setting, and maintained on a common diurnal cycle. The clinical research center setting provided for accurate sampling and measuring of potential confounding factors. Conducting the study in the evening after metyrapone treatment helped assure that changes in ACTH were a consequence of cortisol actions on mineralocorticoid receptors (25, 26, 29). Studying healthy controls twice enabled us to precisely characterize the normal ACTH response under these conditions, and measurement of diurnal cortisol activity enabled us to eliminate the possibility that changes in diurnal sensitivity were responsible for the findings.

Several limitations, however, also require emphasis. As in our previous studies (6, 7, 8), sample size was small, raising the issue of the robustness of the findings and whether undetected differences could have accounted for the results. Furthermore, by restricting ourselves to three a priori contrasts, we could not explore all group differences. Subjects with water imbalance were neither as polydipsic nor as hyponatremic as in previous studies (7, 8). Whereas this should have reduced differences between groups, it might also increase the possibility that undetected differences account for the findings. By not including a diluent infusion in the psychiatric patients, we cannot be absolutely certain that differences in ACTH responses are a consequence of differences in the effects of cortisol. Most of the data cited above regarding the functional role of hippocampus come from studies of rodents, not humans or other primates. Finally, whereas the enhanced feedback in the nonpolydipsic patients essentially eliminates the possibility that findings in hyponatremics are a nonspecific result of schizophrenia or its treatment, its etiology and significance remain to be determined.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are indebted to the patients and staff at the Psychiatric Clinical Research Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; the nursing, laboratory, and support staffs of the Clinical Research Centers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Chicago; Sheila Dowd, Ph.D., Jane Strong, R.N., and Beth Winans, Ph.D., for completing ratings and working closely with staff and patients; Barbara Brown, M.S.; Mary Beth Gaskill, B.A.; Colin Mitchell, Ph.D., and Neil Scherberg, Ph.D., for assisting with the neuroendocrine assays; and Eve Van Cauter, Ph.D., and Phil Janicak, M.D., for assistance with design of the studies or reviewing the manuscript. Dr. Morris B. Goldman had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Brain Research Foundation, an affiliate of the University of Chicago; State of Illinois funding of the Psychiatric Institute and the Psychiatric Clinical Research Center; National Institutes of Health Grants RO1-MH-56525 (to Mo.B.G.), M01-RR-00055 (to University of Chicago), M01-RR-13987 (to University of Illinois at Chicago); National Science Foundation (to R.S.P.); and Office of Naval Research (to R.S.P.).

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online November 21, 2006

Abbreviations: HPAA, Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; PANSS, Positive and Negative Symptom Scale.

Received May 25, 2006.

Accepted November 9, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gallagher P, Watson S, Smith MS, Ferrier IN, Young AH 2005 Effects of adjunctive mifepristone (RU-486) administration on neurocognitive function and symptoms in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 57:155–161[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Sharma RP, Pandey GN, Janicak PG, Peterson J, Comaty JE, Davis JM 1988 The effect of diagnosis and age on the DST: a metaanalytic approach. Biol Psychiatry 24:555–568[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. de Leon J, Verghese C, Tracy JI, Josiassen RC, Simpson GM 1994 Polydipsia and water intoxication in psychiatric patients: a review of the epidemiological literature. Biol Psychiatry 35:519–530
  4. Goldman MB, Blake L, Marks RC, Hedeker D, Luchins DJ 1993 Association of nonsuppression of cortisol on the DST with primary polydipsia in chronic schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 150:653–655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Goldman MB, Gnerlich J, Hussain NN, Neuroendocrine responses to a cold pressor stimulus in polydipsic hyponatremic and in matched schizophrenic patients. Neuropsychopharmacology, in press
  6. Goldman MB, Robertson GL, Luchins DJ, Hedeker D 1996 The influence of polydipsia on water excretion in hyponatremic, polydipsic schizophrenic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1465–1470[Abstract]
  7. Goldman MB, Luchins DJ, Robertson GL 1988 Mechanisms of altered water metabolism in psychotic patients with polydipsia and hyponatremia. N Engl J Med 318:397–403[Abstract]
  8. Goldman MB, Robertson GL, Luchins DJ, Hedeker D, Pandey GN 1997 Psychotic exacerbations and enhanced vasopressin secretion in schizophrenics with hyponatremia and polydipsia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:443–449[Abstract]
  9. Harrison PJ 2004 The hippocampus in schizophrenia: a review of the neuropathological evidence and its pathophysiological implications. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 174:151–162[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Nettles KW, Pesold C, Goldman MB 2000 Influence of the ventral hippocampal formation on plasma vasopressin, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and behavioral responses to novel acoustic stress. Brain Res 858:181–190[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Herman JP, Ostrander MM, Mueller NK, Figueiredo H 2005 Limbic system mechanisms of stress regulation: hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 29:1201–1213[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Wellhoener P, Born J, Fehm HL, Dodt C 2004 Elevated resting and exercise-induced cortisol levels after mineralocorticoid receptor blockade with canrenoate in healthy humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5048–5052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Seckl JR, Meaney MJ 2004 Glucocorticoid programming. Ann NY Acad Sci 1032:63–84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Luchins DJ, Nettles KW, Goldman MB 1997 Anterior medial temporal lobe volumes in polydipsic schizophrenic patients with and without hypo-osmolemia: a pilot study. Biol Psychiatry 42:767–770[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Trivedi MA, Coover GD 2004 Lesions of the ventral hippocampus, but not the dorsal hippocampus, impair conditioned fear expression and inhibitory avoidance on the elevated T-maze. Neurobiol Learn Mem 81:172–184[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Goursaud AP, Mendoza SP, Capitanio JP 2006 Do neonatal bilateral ibotenic acid lesions of the hippocampal formation or of the amygdala impair HPA axis responsiveness and regulation in infant rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)? Brain Res 1071:97–104[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Mitchell CP, Goldman MB 2004 Neonatal lesions of the ventral hippocampal formation disrupt neuroendocrine responses to auditory stress in the adult rat. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29:1317–1325[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Jansen LM, Gispen-de Wied CC, Kahn RS 2000 Selective impairments in the stress response in schizophrenic patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 149:319–325[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Goldman MB, Marks RC, Blake L, Petkovic M, Hedeker D, Luchins DJ 1992 Estimating daily urine volume in psychiatric patients: empiric confirmation. Biol Psychiatry 31:1228–1231[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kay SR, Fiszbein S, Opler LA 1987 The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 13:261–276[Medline]
  21. Bech P, Kastrup M, Rafaelsen OJ 1986 Mini-compendium of rating scales for states of anxiety, depression, mania, and schizophrenia with corresponding DSM-III syndromes. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 326;1–37
  22. Endicott J, Spitzer R, Fleiss J, Cohen J 1976 The Global Assessment Scale: a procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33:767–771
  23. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB 1992 The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R: history, rationale and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49:624–629[Abstract]
  24. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW 1996 Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders-non patient edition. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department
  25. Spencer RL, Kim PJ, Kalman BA, Cole MA 1998 Evidence for mineralocorticoid receptor facilitation of glucocorticoid receptor-dependent regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. Endocrinology 139:2718–2726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Jessop DS, Dallman MF, Fleming D, Lightman SL 2001 Resistance to glucocorticoid feedback in obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4109–4114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Deuschle M, Weber B, Colla M, Muller M, Kniest A, Heuser I 1998 Mineralocorticoid receptor also modulates basal activity of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical system in humans. Neuroendocrinology 68:355–360[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Otte C, Yassouridis A, Jahn H, Maass P, Stober N, Wiedemann K, Kellner M 2003 Mineralocorticoid receptor-mediated inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in aged humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:B900–B905
  29. Wilkinson CW, Petrie EC, Murray SR, Colasurdo EA, Raskind MA, Peskind ER 2001 Human glucocorticoid feedback inhibition is reduced in older individuals: evening study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:545–550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Bradbury MJ, Cascio CS, Scribner KA, Dallman MF 1991 Stress-induced adrenocorticotropin secretion: diurnal responses and decreases during stress in the evening are not dependent on corticosterone. Endocrinology 128:680–688[Abstract]
  31. Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DK 1994 Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19:313–333[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G 2000 Linear mixed models for longitudinal data, Springer series in statistics, New York: Springer
  33. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD 2006 Longitudinal data analysis, New York: Wiley
  34. Van Cauter E, Linkowski P, Kerkhofs M, Hubain P, L’Hermite-Baleriaux M, Leclercq R, Brasseur M, Copinschi G, Mendlewicz J 1991 Circadian and sleep-related endocrine rhythms in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 48:348–356[Abstract]
  35. Mann K, Rossbach W, Muller MJ, Muller-Siecheneder F, Pott T, Linde I 2006 Nocturnal hormone profiles in patients with schizophrenia treated with olanzapine. Psychoneuroendocrinology 31:256–264[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Dohanics J, Hoffman GE, Verbalis JG 1991 Hyponatremia-induced inhibition of magnocellular neurons causes stressor-selective impairment of stimulated adrenocorticotropin secretion in rats. Endocrinology 128:331–340[Abstract]
  37. Cole MA, Kalman BA, Pace TW, Topczewski F, Lowrey MJ, Spencer RL 2000 Selective blockade of the mineralocorticoid receptor impairs hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis expression of habituation. J Neuroendocrinol 12:1034–1042[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Berger S, Wolfer DP, Selbach O, Alter H, Erdmann G, Reichardt HM, Chepkova AN, Welzl H, Haas HL, Lipp HP, Schutz G 2006 Loss of the limbic mineralocorticoid receptor impairs behavioral plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:195–200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Myin-Germeys I, Delespaul P, van Os J 2005 Behavioral sensitization to daily life stress in psychosis. Psychol Med 35:733–741[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/2/698    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pilla, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pilla, R. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*HYDROCORTISONE
Medline Plus Health Information
*Schizophrenia
*Steroids
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals