help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1616
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riancho, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zarrabeitia, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riancho, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zarrabeitia, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium and Bone Metabolism
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 2 660-665
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Identification of an Aromatase Haplotype That Is Associated with Gene Expression and Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

José A. Riancho, Carmen Valero, Angel Naranjo, Dieter J. Morales, Carolina Sañudo and María T. Zarrabeitia

Departments of Internal Medicine (J.A.R., C.V., C.S.) and Surgery (A.N., D.J.M.), Hospital U. M. Valdecilla, and Unit of Legal Medicine (M.T.Z.), University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: José A. Riancho, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital U. M. Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, 39008 Santander, Spain. E-mail: rianchoj{at}unican.es.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: Osteoporosis has a significant genetic component. The aromatase-dependent conversion of androgenic precursors is the main source of estrogens in postmenopausal women.

Objective: The objective of the investigation was to study the relationship of a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the aromatase gene with osteoporosis and determine their functional influence on gene transcription.

Design, Participants, and Methods: This was a case-control study including 135 women with vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis and 312 controls. Alleles at four SNPs situated between exons I.2 and 3 were determined by Taqman assays. Total aromatase RNA and differential allelic-specific expression were studied by RT-real time PCR in adipose tissue samples taken from 50 individuals.

Results: The SNPs studied were in strong linkage disequilibrium. A common haplotype, present in about half of the population, was identified as being associated with an increased risk of fractures (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2–2.8, P = 0.006). There was evidence of differential allelic expression. In heterozygous individuals, transcripts bearing T alleles at rs700518 SNP (which were included in the risk haplotype) were less abundant than those with the alternative C alleles (P < 0.001). Total aromatase expression was four times lower in fat samples from individuals who were homozygotes for the unfavorable alleles than in the opposite homozygotes (P = 0.007).

Conclusions: A common haplotype of aromatase associated with gene expression is also associated with the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. These data are in line with the hypothesis that the aromatase-dependent synthesis of estrogens plays an important role in bone homeostasis in postmenopausal women.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ESTROGENS PLAY A CRITICAL role in bone homeostasis, and the decline in estrogen availability after the menopause is a central factor in the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis (1). However, genetic factors are known to have an important influence on bone mass and osteoporosis risk (2, 3, 4). Given the role of estrogens in bone homeostasis, genes related to estrogen metabolism are likely candidates to contribute to such hereditary influence.

The main source of estrogens in postmenopausal women is the aromatization of androgenic precursors, a reaction catalyzed by aromatase, the product of the CYP19A1 gene (5). In humans the gene is expressed in not only the gonads but also other tissues, including the adipose tissue and bone. The influence of aromatase-derived estrogens on the skeleton is revealed by the reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors (6).

The CYP19A1 gene is located on chromosome 15q21 and spans about 120 kb. It has a complex structure, with a 30-kb coding region and a long 5' region, spanning about 90 kb. This 5' region contains regulatory sequences and several variants of the first exon, whose transcription is driven by different tissue-specific promoters. These alternative forms of the first exon are transcribed and, after RNA splicing, joined onto a common splice acceptor site in exon 2, immediately upstream of the coding region (7). Thus, the mature mRNA contains a variable nontranslated first exon and a common set of exons 2–10 coding for the amino acid sequence of aromatase. Several investigators have reported an association between some common polymorphisms of the aromatase gene and BMD (8, 9). In a previous study, we reported that polymorphisms situated between exon I.2 and the coding region showed a closer association to BMD than those situated in regions further 5' upstream (10). Therefore, in this study we genotyped other polymorphisms in that region to identify combination haplotypes associated with osteoporotic fractures and explored their functional relevance by determining their influence on gene transcription.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study subjects

We studied two groups of postmenopausal women aged over 50 yr. The fracture group included 135 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and nontraumatic vertebral fractures confirmed by lateral x-rays of the spine showing a decrease in vertebral height of at least 20%. The control group included 312 control women recruited by voice and written announcements from various sources to prevent a preferential selection bias (hospital workers, civic associations, religious groups, and geriatric residences). All were living in Cantabria, a region in Northern Spain with a population of 530,000. All subjects were interviewed by one of the investigators to check the absence of exclusion criteria. Subjects taking bisphosphonates, corticosteroids, antiepileptics, thiazides, estrogens, or other drugs known to modify bone mass as well as those with past or present diseases known to affect bone metabolism, poor mental or physical performance status, or non-Spanish ancestry were excluded. Causes of secondary osteoporosis were excluded by clinical examination and laboratory tests (including complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum biochemical profile, protein electrophoresis, thyroid hormones, and PTH). Calcium intake from dairy products was estimated by a questionnaire (10). Present physical activity was graded semiquantitatively by the number of weekly sessions of weight-bearing exercise. Alcohol intake was defined as a daily intake of more than 10 g. Women were regarded as smokers if they had a present or past history of smoking at least five cigarettes per day for a minimum of 5 yr. Age at menarche and menopause was established by recalling the first and last menstruation, respectively. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Committee of Ethics in Clinical Research, and informed consent was obtained from study subjects.

Genotyping

Previous work suggested an association of some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) situated around the translation start site of CYP19A1 with bone mass (10). Therefore, we decided to study other SNPs in that region. These included: 1) rs1062033, a C/G polymorphism situated in exon I.2 (at position 49,335,230; human genome map build 36.1); 2) rs767199, an A/G polymorphism located between alternative exons I.2 and I.6 (at position 49,327,679); 3) rs4775936, a C/T SNP located in the vicinity of exon I.6 (at position 49,323,314); and 4) rs700518, a synonymous C/T SNP in exon 3 (at position 49,316,404). They were selected after exploring public databases (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Hapmap, Celera) because they could be analyzed by readily available Taqman assays, had balanced allelic frequencies, and some other interesting characteristics: previously published association with bone mass [rs1062033 and rs4775936 (11, 12)]; exonic location that allowed it to be used as an allele expression marker (rs700518); or an intermediate location between other distant markers (rs767199). Linkage disequilibrium was not considered a priori. The two flanking SNPs were used in gene expression studies.

Genomic DNA was obtained from the peripheral blood using a commercial kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Genotyping was performed using allele-specific Taqman probes labeled with VIC and FAM. Primers and probes were designed by the manufacturer with Primer Express software (Taqman Assays-on-Demand, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Amplification reactions were performed in a 5-µl volume in optical 96-well plates, with 1 µl DNA (10–20 ng), 2.5 µl universal PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), and 0.25 µl assay mix with the specific primers and probes. After amplification, the fluorescence was read in an ABI7300 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). About 5% of the results were ambiguous and samples had to be retyped. Random samples were analyzed twice to check for consistency of results. DNA analysis was performed blindly from other results. The existence of potential binding sites within the regions studied was explored by searching the TRANSFAC database with P-Match software (www.gene-regulation.com).

Aromatase gene expression in adipose tissue

Gene expression was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Subcutaneous fat samples were obtained during abdominal surgical procedures, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –70 C. Total RNA was isolated by using a commercial kit (lipid minikit, QIAGEN), following the manufacturer’s instructions, after homogenizing samples (~100 mg) with a ball mill (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany). Aliquots of RNA (1–4 µg) were reverse transcribed with the Superscript III kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), using random hexamers as primers. In negative control reactions, reverse transcriptase was omitted. After RT-PCR, aromatase gene expression was determined by real-time PCR in an ABI7300 apparatus (Applied Biosystems). The reactions were performed in triplicate in 96-well plates containing aliquots of the cDNA obtained by reverse transcription (RT), 5 µl of universal PCR master mix, and primers and probe complementary to an exonic boundary in the aromatase common transcript region (Taqman gene expression assays, Applied Biosystems).

The cycle threshold (Ct) was determined. This represents the cycle at which a significant increase in fluorescence is first detected and is inversely related to the amount of target cDNA in the starting material. The results were normalized to TATA box binding protein (TBP) expression analyzed in the same reaction plate to take into account possible between-sample differences in RNA amount and quality as well as variability in the efficiency of RT. Control samples of reverse-transcribed reference human RNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were also included. The relative RNA levels were calculated using the formula 2{Delta}Ct1 – {Delta}Ct2, where {Delta}Ct1 is the difference between the control cDNA Ct and the sample cDNA Ct when the target gene (aromatase) is amplified, and {Delta}Ct2 is the difference between control cDNA Ct and the sample cDNA Ct when the control gene (TBP) is amplified.

Differential allelic expression

Differential allelic expression was studied in a series of fat samples from individuals who were heterozygous for the rs700518 polymorphism (situated in the coding region of the gene) by a modification of the RT-coupled 5' nuclease assay-based procedure (13, 14). RNA was extracted from fat samples as described above and residual DNA was removed by treating samples with DNase. After RT as described, the expression level of each allele was studied by real-time PCR with universal PCR master mix and the primers and allele-specific probes used for genotyping. Amplification of each allele was determined by monitoring the fluorescence of FAM and VIC-labeled probes. The Ct of each allele was determined. When the expression from one allele is dominant, amplification of the transcript from that allele will reach the threshold at an earlier cycle, thus having a smaller Ct. The difference in Ct ({Delta}Ct) is a measure of differential expression between the alleles. In general, the expression of one allele to the other is in a ratio 1:2 {Delta}Ct. Although cycle thresholds are directly related to the amount of specific cDNA present in the sample, the allele-specific Ct may also be influenced by other factors, such as the different fluorescence signal efficiency of FAM and VIC labels. Therefore, a standard curve was constructed with serial dilutions of two homozygous genomic DNA mixed in different proportions. The regression curve fitted an exponential function (r2 = 0.98) that was used to calculate the expression ratio from each allele from the observed {Delta}Ct with the formula: allele ratio = 3.592 x e–0.237 {Delta}Ct.

The ratio of allele-specific cDNA from reverse-transcribed RNA isolated from adipose tissue samples was compared with the ratio of allele-specific genomic DNA isolated from the blood cells of heterozygous individuals (which is expected to equal 1).

Statistical analyses

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested with HWSIM software (http://krunch.med.yale.edu/hwsim/hwsim.doc). Linkage disequilibrium between different loci was estimated by the normalized distances and correlation coefficients, estimated with Haploview (www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview). Haplotype reconstruction was performed with two different software packages, Phase v2 (15) (http://www.stat.washington.edu/stephens/software.html) and Chaplin (16) (http://www.genetics.emory.edu/labs/epstein/software/), and haplotype frequencies were computed. Very similar results were obtained with both programs. Differences in the global distribution of haplotypes between patients and controls were first assessed with a PAC-likelihood permutation test implemented in Phase. Then the association of frequent (>5%) individual haplotypes with vertebral fractures was estimated with the Wald test, and different models were compared with the Akaike information criterion (AIC), a combined index of model prediction ability and simplicity, by using Chaplin software. Finally, haplotype-associated risk of fracture was estimated by the odds ratio derived from logistic regression analysis with SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test for ordered categories was used to analyze the differences in aromatase gene expression between subjects with different genotypes.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Haplotypes and fractures

The characteristics of the groups are shown in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of control and fracture women

 
Control women were slightly younger, taller, and more likely to exercise than women with fractures. Allele frequencies are shown in Table 2Go. There was no evidence for departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium proportions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Allele frequencies in fracture patients and controls

 
The four SNPs studied were in strong linkage disequilibrium, with normalized distance values between 0.89 (rs700518-rs1062033 pair) and 0.97 (rs4775936-rs1062033 pair) (all P < 0.001). The corresponding correlation coefficient varied between 0.66 and 0.87. Thus, only 15 of the 81 possible haplotypes were observed, and the majority of subjects had one of two discordant haplotypes that together comprised 89% of the population. The haplotype distribution in the fracture and control groups is shown in Fig. 1Go. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall haplotype frequency distribution in both groups (P = 0.01). Regarding the two most common haplotypes, which had opposite sequences, haplotype 1 (TCGC) was overrepresented in fracture patients: 55.5 vs. 47.2% in controls. On the contrary, haplotype 2 (CTAG) was less frequent in fracture patients than controls: 34.5 vs. 39.2%. Screening of the association of individual haplotypes with fracture status using different genetic models revealed that only haplotype 1 was significantly associated with fractures, best fitting a recessive model (beta = 1,65, AIC = 1638, P = 0.016 in a recessive model; beta = 1.34, AIC = 1639, P = 0.041 in a multiplicative model). According to their AIC, joint models including several haplotypes did not show a better performance than single haplotype models. The presence of two copies of haplotype 1 was significantly associated with osteoporotic fractures, with an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.2–2.8; P = 0.006; Table 3Go), in comparison with women with one or no copies of the haplotype. Similar results were found in multiple logistic regression models including possible confounding factors such as age and weight (odds ratio 1.8; confidence interval 1.2–2.9; P = 0.010).


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Haplotype distribution in fracture patients and controls (only haplotypes with a frequency above 1% are shown).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Distribution of haplotype 1 in fracture patients and controls

 
Polymorphisms and aromatase gene expression

Expression of the aromatase gene was studied in 50 individuals who were taken to surgery due to abdominal problems (usually gastrointestinal cancer, cholelithiasis, or hernia). RNA levels were similar in both sexes (P = 0.60) and were not related to the neoplastic or benign nature of the underlying disease (P = 0.89). Haplotype 1, which was shown to be associated with osteoporotic fractures, included a C allele at the rs1062033 locus. Individuals bearing such C alleles showed lower levels of aromatase gene expression than those with the alternative G allele, as revealed by the smaller levels of RNA shown in Fig. 2Go (P = 0.007). Aromatase RNA levels were about four times higher in samples from individuals who were homozygotes for the G allele than in homozygotes for the C allele. Similar differences were observed when subjects were classified according to rs700518 alleles (P = 0.012).


Figure 2
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Aromatase gene expression in adipose tissue samples, according to genotype (alleles at the rs1062033 locus). Results represent the amount of aromatase RNA, corrected for the amount of TBP RNA, in arbitrary units (mean and SE).

 
Haplotype 1 included a T allele at rs700518 locus, which is located in the common coding region of the aromatase gene. The analysis of the allele-specific expression in a group of unselected heterozygous individuals (n = 10) for this locus revealed that T alleles were underexpressed in comparison with C alleles. Thus, the average ratio of C-containing transcripts to T-containing transcripts was 1.97 ± 0.47 (ranging from 1.39 to 2.67; Fig. 3Go), which was significantly different from 1 and from the value of 1.01 ± 0.16 found in samples of genomic DNA (P < 0.001).


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Allele-specific expression. Aromatase gene transcripts bearing a C allele or T allele at locus rs700518 were measured by real-time RT-PCR with allele-specific probes. The ratio of C to T alleles is shown. The results obtained when the same PCR procedure was applied to CT heterozygous genomic DNA samples are also shown for comparison purposes.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study shows that a common haplotype of the aromatase gene, present in about half of the population, is associated with osteoporosis. The haplotype appears to behave as recessive; thus, the group of postmenopausal women bearing two copies of the haplotype, roughly one fourth of the population, appeared to have an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures (odds ratio slightly less than 2). These results are in line with previous data in a partially overlapping population, showing an association between common variants of the aromatase gene (as the C alleles at rs1062033) and osteoporosis (10). Other investigators have also reported an association between aromatase polymorphisms and BMD (8, 9, 12, 17).

The critical role of estrogens in bone homeostasis is widely recognized (1), and one of its consequences is the loss of bone occurring after the menopause, when the gonadal function ceases. However, despite the negative results of some studies (18), most investigators have found a positive relationship between free estradiol and BMD in postmenopausal women as well as an increased fracture risk in women with the lowest serum levels of estradiol (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Therefore, available evidence indicates that residual estrogen activity continues to play a role in bone metabolism after the menopause.

The aromatization of androgenic precursors is the main source of estrogens in men and in women after the menopause. A variety of human tissues have been shown to express the aromatase gene. Apart from the gonads, aromatase activity and/or RNA transcripts have been detected in muscle, fat, bone, nervous tissue, and several tumors (24). The adipose tissue is usually regarded as a major source of estrogens after the menopause. In fact, serum estradiol levels correlate with fat mass in postmenopausal women, and there is an inverse relationship between body weight and osteoporosis risk (25, 26). Therefore, although multiple humoral and physical mechanisms may be involved in the association between body mass and bone mass, it seems likely that the aromatase-derived production of estradiol in the adipose tissue helps to ameliorate the tendency to lose bone after the menopause. This does not exclude a role of locally produced estradiol at the bone level. Bone cells express a number of enzymes involved in steroid metabolism, including aromatase (27, 28, 29). Therefore, estradiol may also have a local effect in the bone tissue, paracrine or even autocrine, as shown in other tissues (5, 30).

There is wide evidence that aromatase activity influences bone homeostasis. Mice not expressing aromatase have a decreased bone mass (31, 32). In humans, a few patients with loss-of-function mutations of the aromatase gene resulting in profound skeletal abnormalities have been described (33). The pharmacological inhibition of aromatase is also associated with a decrease in BMD and an increased risk of fractures (6, 34).

Given the complex nature of osteoporosis, apart from cases of rare mutations, it seems unlikely for a single gene to play a quantitatively large role in determining bone mass. Indeed, in most association studies candidate genes only explain a small fraction of the total BMD variance, usually about 1–3%. However, the overall importance of genetic factors is beyond doubt. It has been suggested that heredity may explain between 40 and 80% of BMD variance and about 30% of fracture risk (2, 3, 35). Our data and those of the previously published studies mentioned above point toward aromatase as a likely candidate gene contributing to determine, in part, osteoporosis risk.

Genetic association studies may be biased by a number of factors, including population stratification. Although difficult to exclude completely, we tried to limit this potential bias by studying cases and controls from a limited geographical area. More importantly, we showed that the polymorphisms defining the osteoporosis-associated haplotype are associated with differences in aromatase gene expression. Thus, although the SNPs we studied do not induce changes in the amino acid sequence of aromatase, they are associated with functional differences at the genomic level.

Allele-specific expression differences can be identified by comparing the relative levels of exonic SNP alleles in RNA samples from heterozygous subjects. Within an individual RNA sample, alleles are exposed to the same cellular environment, and their differential expression must be due to regulatory polymorphisms situated within the same chromosomal region. When allelic expression differences are strongly influenced by transregulatory sequences, one exonic SNP allele will be expressed at a higher level in some heterozygous individuals, whereas the other allele will be preferentially expressed in different individuals. However, when allelic expression differences arise from a cis-regulatory polymorphism in strong linkage disequilibrium with a coding SNP, the same exonic SNP will tend to be expressed at a higher level in all heterozygous individuals (36). This phenomenon has been reported to occur in about one fifth to one third of human genes (37, 38). In the present study, we found that T alleles at the exonic locus rs700518, present in the osteoporosis-associated haplotype, are underexpressed in comparison with C alleles. This was a consistent finding, and the average allele C to allele T ratio was about 2, similar to the ratio found in studies of other genes showing differential allelic expression (13, 14, 38).

The identification of functional variations is central to the elucidation of the genetic component of complex diseases. Most functional studies of potential regulatory SNPs are based on in vitro techniques such as transient transfection experiments with allele-specific constructs. Although informative, the results of those experiments may sometimes be difficult to interpret, especially in large genes with a complex structure, due to the limited size of the cloned regions and the fact that they are studied outside their normal chromosomal environment. In this context, direct assessment of the relative abundance of allelic transcripts may be preferable to investigating allele-specific expression differences in the normal chromosomal context (38). This methodology allowed us to identify some allelic variants of the aromatase gene with functional consequences. The polymorphisms were associated with differences in gene expression, as demonstrated by the marked differences in the levels of SNP-specific alleles in samples from heterozygous individuals and the differences in the amount of total aromatase RNA between individuals with different genotypes. Interestingly enough, those polymorphisms associated with a lower level of gene expression were also associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures.

However, despite this association we cannot establish which SNP is actually responsible for the differences in gene transcription. Searching the TRANSFAC database of transcription factor binding sites by using an adipocyte-specific profile revealed potential binding sites for transcription factors such as specificity protein-1 (Sp1) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) in the vicinity of the loci rs1062033 and rs767199. Those factors have been shown to modulate aromatase gene expression in some tissues (39, 40). However, it is unclear to us whether those potential binding sites are actually functional.

In fact, the active polymorphism could be one of those studied here or another unidentified polymorphism in linkage disequilibrium with them. We did not use a map-based or tagging approach but a sequence-based approach to select the SNPs to study. An a posteriori search of the HapMap database suggests that CYP19A1 gene may have seven haplotype blocks, with rs1062033 sitting in block 3 and the three other SNPs in block 2. Further studies analyzing a larger number of SNPs distributed throughout the gene are needed to clearly identify which one of those polymorphisms, or others in linkage disequilibrium with them, is actually responsible for the differences in aromatase gene expression.

In conclusion, we have identified a set of SNPs in the aromatase gene that are associated with differences in gene expression and are in strong linkage disequilibrium, resulting in a common haplotype that is associated with the risk of osteoporotic fractures. These data give further support to the hypothesis that aromatase-derived estrogens play a role in bone homeostasis in postmenopausal women. Pending confirmation in other population groups, they also raise the possibility of using these gene variants as potential tools to identify women at higher risk of osteoporosis who could become a special target population for preventive strategies.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS 04/28).

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest.

First Published Online November 21, 2006

Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike information criterion; BMD, bone mineral density; Ct, cycle threshold; {Delta}Ct, difference in Ct; RT, reverse transcription; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; TBP, TATA box binding protein.

Received July 26, 2006.

Accepted November 10, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton III LJ 2002 Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of adult skeleton. Endocr Rev 23:279–302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ralston SH 2002 Genetic control of susceptibility to osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2460–2466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Peacock M, Turner CH, Econs MJ, Foroud T 2002 Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23:303–326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Baldock PA, Eisman JA 2004 Genetic determinants of bone mass. Curr Opin Rheumatol 16:450–456[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Simpson ER 2000 Role of aromatase in sex steroid action. J Mol Endocrinol 25:1549–1556
  6. McCloskey E 2006 Effects of third-generation aromatase inhibitors on bone. Eur J Cancer 42:1044–1051[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Sebastian S, Bulun SE 2001 A highly complex organization of the regulatory region of the human CYP19 (aromatase) gene revealed by the human genome project. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4600–4602[Free Full Text]
  8. Masi L, Becherini L, Gennari L, Amedei A, Colli E, Falchetti A, Farci M, Silvestri S, Gonnelli S, Brandi ML 2001 Polymorphism of the aromatase gene in postmenopausal Italian women: distribution and correlation with bone mass and fracture risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2263–2269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Somner J, McLellan S, Cheung J, Mak YT, Frost ML, Knapp KM, Wierzbicki M, Fogelman I, Ralston SH, Hampson GN 2004 Polymorphisms in the P450 c17(17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase) and P450 c19 (aromatase) genes: association with serum sex steroid concentrations and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:344–351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Riancho JA, Zarrabeitia MT, Valero C, Sañudo C, Hernandez JL, Amado JA, Zarrabeitia A, Gonzalez-Macias J 2005 Aromatase gene and osteoporosis: relationship of ten polymorphic loci with bone mineral density. Bone 36:917–925[Medline]
  11. Zarrabeitia MT, Hernandez JL, Valero C, Zarrabeitia AL, Garcia-Unzueta MT, Amado JA, Gonzalez-Macias J, Riancho JA 2004 A common polymorphism in the 5'-untranslated region of the aromatase gene influences bone mass and fracture risk. Eur J Endocrinol 150:699–704[Abstract]
  12. Enjuanes A, Garcia-Giralt N, Supervia A, Nogues X, Ruiz-Gaspa S, Bustamante M, Mellibovsky L, Grinberg D, Balcells S, Diez-Perez A 2006 A new SNP in a negative regulatory region of the CYP19A1 gene is associated with lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women. Bone 38:738–743[Medline]
  13. Zhu G, Lipsky RH, Xu K, Ali S, Hyde T, Kleinman J, Akhtar LA, Mash DC, Goldman D 2004 Differential expression of human COMT alleles in brain and lymphoblasts detected by RT-coupled 5' nuclease assay. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177:178–184[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Suda T, Katoh M, Hiratsuka M, Fujiwara M, Irizawa Y, Oshimura M 2003 Use of real-time RT-PCR for the detection of allelic expression of an imprinted gene. Int J Mol Med 12:243–246[Medline]
  15. Stephens M, Donnelly P 2003 A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction. Am J Hum Genet 73:1162–1169[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Epstein MP, Satten GA 2003 Inference on haplotype effects in case-control studies using unphased genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1316–1329[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Dick IM, Devine A, Prince RL 2005 Association of an aromatase TTTA repeat polymorphism with circulating estrogen, bone structure, and biochemistry in older women. Am J Pysiol Endocrinol Metab 288:E989–E995
  18. Barrett-Connor E, Mueller JE, von Muhlen DG, Laughlin GA, Schneider DL, Sartoris DJ 2000 Low levels of estradiol are associated with vertebral fractures in older men, but not women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:219–223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ettinger B, Pressman A, Sklarin P, Bauer DC, Cauley JA, Cummings SR 1998 Associations between low levels of serum estradiol, bone density, and fractures among elderly women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2239–2243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rogers A, Saleh G, Hannon RA, Greenfield D, Eastell R 2002 Circulating estradiol and osteoprotegerin as determinants of bone turnover and bone density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4470–4475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Khosla S, Melton III LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Klee GG, Riggs BL 1998 Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: a key role for bioavailable estrogen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2266–2274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rapuri PB, Gallagher JC, Haynatzki G 2004 Endogenous levels of serum estradiol and sex hormone binding globulin determine bone mineral density, bone remodeling, the rate of bone loss, and response to treatment with estrogen in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:4954–4962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Goderie-Plomp HW, van der KM, de Ronde W, Hofman A, de Jong FH, Pols HA 2004 Endogenous sex hormones, sex hormone-binding globulin, and the risk of incident vertebral fractures in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3261–3269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gruber CJ, Tschugguel W, Schneeberger C, Huber JC 2002 Mechanisms of disease: production and actions of estrogens. N Engl J Med 346:340–352[Free Full Text]
  25. Reid IR 2002 Relationships among body mass, its components, and bone. Bone 31:547–555[Medline]
  26. Lukanova A, Lundin E, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Muti P, Mure A, Rinaldi S, Dossus L, Micheli A, Arslan A, Lenner P, Shore RE, Krogh V, Koenig KL, Riboli E, Berrino F, Hallmans G, Stattin P, Toniolo P, Kaaks R 2004 Body mass index, circulating levels of sex-steroid hormones, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3: a cross-sectional study in healthy women. Eur J Endocrinol 150:161–171[Abstract]
  27. Enjuanes A, Garcia-Giralt N, Surks MI, Nogues X, Mellibovsky L, Carbonell J, Grinberg D, Balcells S, Diez-Perez A 2003 Regulation of CYP19 gene expression in primary human osteoblasts: effects of vitamin D and other treatments. Eur J Endocrinol 148:519–526[Abstract]
  28. Tanaka S, Haji M, Takayanagi R, Tanaka S, Sugioka Y, Nawata H 1996 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 enhances the enzymatic activity and expression of the messenger ribonucleic acid for aromatase cytochrome P450 synergistically with dexamethasone depending on the vitamin D receptor level in cultured human osteoblasts. Endocrinology 137:1860–1869[Abstract]
  29. Shozu M, Simpson ER 1998 Aromatase expression of human osteoblast-like cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 139:117–129[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Simpson ER, Davis SR 2001 Aromatase and the regulation of estrogen biosynthesis-some new perspectives. Endocrinology 142:4589–4594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Miyaura C, Toda K, Inada M, Ohshiba T, Matsumoto C, Okada T, Ito M, Shizuta Y, Ito A 2001 Sex and age-related response to aromatase deficiency in bone. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 280:1062–1068[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Oz OK, Zerwekh JE, Graves K, Nanu L, Millsaps R, Simpson ER 2000 Bone has a sexually dimorphic response to aromatase deficiency. J Bone Miner Res 15:507–514[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Herrmann BL, Saller B, Janssen OE, Gocke P, Bockisch A, Sperling H, Mann K, Broecker M 2002 Impact of estrogen replacement therapy in a male with congenital aromatase deficiency caused by a novel mutation in the CYP19 gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5476–5484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Eastell R, Hannon R 2005 Long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors on bone. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 95:151–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Michaelsson K, Melhus H, Ferm H, Ahlbom A, Pedersen NL 2005 Genetic liability to fractures in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 165:1825–1830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Tao H, Cox DR, Frazer KA 2006 Allele-specific KRT1 expression is a complex trait. PLoS Genet 2:e93
  37. Pant PV, Tao H, Beilharz EJ, Ballinger DG, Cox DR, Frazer KA 2006 Analysis of allelic differential expression in human white blood cells. Genome Res 16:331–339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Pastinen T, Sladek R, Gurd S, Sammak A, Ge B, Lepage P, Lavergne K, Villeneuve A, Gaudin T, Brandstrom H, Beck A, Verner A, Kingsley J, Harmsen E, Labuda D, Morgan K, Vohl MC, Naumova AK, Sinnett D, Hudson TJ 2004 A survey of genetic and epigenetic variation affecting human gene expression. Physiol Genomics 16:184–193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Yang S, Fang Z, Suzuki T, Sasano H, Zhou J, Gurates B, Tamura M, Ferrer K, Bulun S 2002 Regulation of aromatase P450 expression in endometriotic and endometrial stromal cells by CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (C/EBPs): decreased C/EBPß in endometriosis is associated with overexpression of aromatase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2336–2345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Watanabe M, Simpson ER, Pathirage N, Nakajin S, Clyne CD 2004 Aromatase expression in the human fetal osteoblastic cell line SV-HFO. J Mol Endocrinol 32:533–545[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Raskin, F. Lejbkowicz, O. Barnett-Griness, S. Dishon, R. Almog, and G. Rennert
BRCA1 Breast Cancer Risk Is Modified by CYP19 Polymorphisms in Ashkenazi Jews
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1617 - 1623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Lazary, J. P Kosa, B. Tobias, J. Lazary, B. Balla, K. Bacsi, I. Takacs, Z. Nagy, T. Mezo, G. Speer, et al.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms in new candidate genes are associated with bone mineral density and fracture risk
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 159(2): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riancho, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zarrabeitia, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riancho, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zarrabeitia, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Calcium and Bone Metabolism
Right arrow Female Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals