| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REVIEW |
and Adipose TissueUnderstanding Obesity-Related Changes in Regulation of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism
Canada Research Chair for Cardiovascular Obesity Research and Management (A.M.S.), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8L 2X2; Institut Pasteur de Lille (B.S.), Département dAthérosclérose, F-59019 Lille, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U545 (B.S.), F-509019 Lille, France; and Université de Lille 2 (B.S.), F-59006 Lille, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Arya M. Sharma, M.D., FRCPC, Professor of Medicine, Canada Research Chair for Cardiovascular Obesity Research and Management, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8L 2X2. E-mail: sharma{at}cardio.on.ca.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evidence Acquisition: Articles on the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) in adipose tissue of healthy individuals and those with obesity, metabolic syndrome, or type 2 diabetes were sourced using MEDLINE (19902006).
Evidence Synthesis: Articles were assessed to provide a comprehensive overview of how PPAR
-activating ligands improve adipose tissue function, and how this links to improvements in insulin resistance and the progression to type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis.
Conclusions: PPAR
is highly expressed in adipose tissue, where its activation with thiazolidinediones alters fat topography and adipocyte phenotype and up-regulates genes involved in fatty acid metabolism and triglyceride storage. Furthermore, PPAR
activation is associated with potentially beneficial effects on the expression and secretion of a range of factors, including adiponectin, resistin, IL-6, TNF
, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and angiotensinogen, as well as a reduction in plasma nonesterified fatty acid supply. The effects of PPAR
also extend to macrophages, where they suppress production of inflammatory mediators. As such, PPAR
activation appears to have a beneficial effect on the relationship between the macrophage and adipocyte that is distorted in obesity. Thus, PPAR
-activating ligands improve adipose tissue function and may have a role in preventing progression of insulin resistance to diabetes and endothelial dysfunction to atherosclerosis.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The adipocyte has been described as presiding at the "crossroads" of energy homoeostasis, inflammation, and atherosclerosis, and a growing body of research into obesity and insulin-resistant states identifies visceral white adipose tissue as a key endocrine organ in this respect (5, 6, 7).
Adipose tissue is a heterogeneous organ that includes multiple distinct sc, intra-abdominal, and intrathoracic depots (8). The endocrine function and lipid storage/buffering capacity of adipose tissue depends upon both fat depot location and adipocyte cell morphology. In particular, omental and mesenteric adipocytes, which are the main components of visceral abdominal fat, are more endocrinologically active than sc adipocytes (2, 9, 10, 11). As a person becomes overweight because of an inappropriate lifestyle, adipose tissue becomes dysfunctional, including alterations in adipocyte morphology and metabolic activity, with visceral adipocytes particularly affected (2, 12, 13). Under these conditions, obesity is associated with marked infiltration of adipose tissue by macrophages (Refs. 14, 15). These changes impair the ability of adipose tissue to control plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) and contribute to aberrant endocrine function, with multiple potential consequences in terms of metabolic dysfunction, insulin resistance, and cardiovascular disease risk (10).
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) is highly expressed in adipose tissue, where it plays a central role in adipose tissue function. Because of their insulin-sensitizing properties, activators of PPAR
(i.e. thiazolidinediones) are widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, contributing to a wealth of information regarding PPAR
function in adipose tissue and elsewhere. This review discusses the emerging role of PPAR
in the regulation and control of adipose tissue function, and considers the impact of interventions that target PPAR
. Although genetic defects (e.g. in PPAR
or its cofactors) undoubtedly contribute to an individuals susceptibility for diabetes, we will focus exclusively on the modulation of adipose function resulting from lifestyle-induced acquired obesity by PPAR
activation. Moreover, the consequences and direct actions of PPAR
activators on vascular function and atherosclerosis (reviewed extensively in Ref. 16) will not be discussed.
| Adipose TissueIntegral in Metabolic Regulation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is good evidence to suggest that adipose tissue may serve as a dynamic buffer to control fatty acid flux by maintaining the balance between suppression of NEFA release and clearance of circulating triglycerides; this process is analogous to the roles of the liver and skeletal muscle in the tight control of glucose levels (18). Thus, in the fasting state, adipose tissue releases fatty acids (to be used as a substrate by other oxidative tissues), whereas, in the fed state, the adipocyte changes to "absorb" fatty acids from the circulation (mainly from circulating triglycerides). This capacity to absorb fatty acids from the circulation gives adipose tissue a special role in protecting other tissues from excessive fatty acid flux ("fat overflow"). There are marked regional differences in this process [i.e. hormone-induced release of NEFA is more pronounced in visceral adipose tissue (where the lipolytic effect of catecholamines is greater and the antilipolytic effect of insulin is less), whereas spontaneous (basal) release is more pronounced in the sc area] (19). This may be relevant to the hepatic delivery of NEFA and other adipose tissue-derived factors because only the visceral adipose tissue has direct access to the portal system.
In addition to a role as a lipid buffer, adipose tissue appears to have a major endocrine function by expressing and secreting a range of metabolically active hormones, such as adiponectin, resistin, and leptin; along with a diverse range of other secreted factors, these are collectively termed "adipocytokines" or, more accurately, "adipokines" (4, 5, 20, 21). To date, more than 100 such secreted factors have been identified (21) (selected examples are summarized in Fig. 1
), with recent additions, such as the proatherogenic cytokine IL-18 and novel adipokine omentin (22, 23). Visceral white adipose tissue, in general, appears to be more involved in endocrine actions than sc white or brown fat tissue (24). Many adipokines, including IL-6, IL-8, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1), and angiotensinogen, are found at higher levels in visceral adipose tissue (9, 25, 26, 27, 28). However, adiponectin expression and leptin expression/release are generally higher in sc adipose tissue compared with visceral tissue (29, 30, 31). It is also worth noting that, with some exceptions, such as adiponectin and leptin, a large proportion of the release of many of these factors may be derived from cells other than adipocytes within the adipose tissue (32). Furthermore, with the exception of adiponectin (the major adipokine secreted by fat cells), all adipokines may, to varying degrees, also have nonadipose tissue sources.
|
, IL-6), endocrine function (leptin, sex hormones, growth factors), metabolic function (NEFA, adiponectin, resistin), and cardiovascular function (NEFA, angiotensinogen, PAI-1, etc.) (3, 4, 11, 33) (Fig. 1
One key adipokine, adiponectin, appears to be important in glucose and lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle and the liver, and acts as an insulin sensitizer (35, 36). Recent evidence also suggests that adiponectin operates as a key autocrine regulator of adipocyte secretory function, reducing the release of IL-6 and IL-8, growth-regulated oncogene-
, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1
and -1ß, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 and TIMP-2 (37). TIMPs play an important role in extracellular matrix remodeling and, hence, may be essential for adipogenesis. Therefore, it has been suggested that, by decreasing the secretion of TIMPs, adiponectin may decrease adipocyte hypertrophy and fat accumulation, and, thus, directly contribute to adipose tissue remodeling by increasing the number of smaller adipocytes (37). How variations in this and other adipokines might be involved in the pathophysiological processes associated with obesity is highlighted below.
| The Sick Fat Cell Syndrome |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Altered adipokine activity in insulin-resistant obesity
The release of adipokines is another aspect of adipose function that is altered in obesity and the abnormalities are more marked in those with abdominal visceral obesity compared with other obesity phenotypes (2). For instance, in obese states, there is a decrease in adipocyte-derived plasma adiponectin and an increase in leptin (albeit alongside leptin resistance); thus, increases in visceral adiposity alter two "insulin-sensitizing" mechanisms (7, 40). Adiponectin is the only adipokine known to be down-regulated in obesity, although hypoadiponectinemia has been more closely related to the degree of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia than the degree of adiposity (40). Thus, factors other than obesity per se (e.g. hyperinsulinemia and/or insulin resistance) might be major determinants of adiponectin levels. It has been suggested that the adipokine resistin, which is increased in obesity, could provide a crucial link between obesity and type 2 diabetes, with a role in the molecular mechanisms by which increased adiposity causes insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Treatment of normal mice with recombinant resistin impairs glucose tolerance and insulin action, while insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by adipocytes is enhanced by neutralization of resistin and is reduced by resistin treatment (41). Furthermore, resistin appears to influence adipocyte differentiation, although there are conflicting reports as to whether it inhibits or promotes this process (42, 43). Although the physiological role of resistin in humans remains unclear, a recent study shows that macrophages are the major source of this adipokine in human adipose tissue (44).
An increase in visceral adipose tissue-derived proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF
and IL-6, in obesity is also implicated in insulin resistance, although their functions are poorly defined (7, 9, 20, 45). IL-6 appears to be released principally from visceral adipose tissue rather than sc fat (9). TNF
appears to act locally in adipose tissue, influencing the levels of other adipokines, such as PAI-1 and adiponectin (7). In addition, production of several adipocyte-derived acute phase reactants, with causal links to insulin resistance (e.g. serum amyloid proteins), increases in viscerally obese subjects, and, thus, they serve as indicators of systemic inflammation (5, 6, 46). Alterations in adipocyte production of factors, such as angiotensinogen, have implications for control of coagulation and normal regulation of blood pressure. Such factors, along with many of the other molecules secreted by adipose tissue (e.g. NEFA), may underlie the increased cardiovascular disease risk associated with increased adiposity (1, 3, 33).
This altered adipose endocrine function can also influence the circulating lipid profile. Adiponectin decreases the plasma concentration of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) apolipoprotein (Apo)-B in middle-aged men by increasing its rate of catabolism (47). This association is independent of the effect of insulin resistance on hepatic VLDL ApoB secretion and may result principally from the effect of adiponectin on lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle (47). This may explain why low plasma adiponectin levels are associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia [i.e. elevated triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and a preponderance of small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles] (47, 48).
Inflammation in obesity
The relationship between visceral adipocytes and the chronic inflammatory process of a corona of macrophages around the adipocytes may be linked to the alteration in cytokine production highlighted previously. It has become increasingly evident that there is an interrelationship between metabolic and inflammatory processes, and that obesity is linked to a state of chronic low-grade inflammation (48, 49). In particular, obesity is associated with significant infiltration of adipose tissue by macrophages (Refs. 14 and 15 ; for review, see Ref. 50). Many inflammation and macrophage-specific genes are dramatically and progressively up-regulated in white adipose in mouse models of obesity (15). The macrophage levels differ between fat depots, with the more metabolically active omental visceral adipose tissue containing a significantly greater number than sc adipose tissue in obese humans (51).
The precise mechanisms underlying increased macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue in obesity remain to be elucidated. Monocyte chemoattractant proteins such as MCP-1 (also known as C-C motif chemokine ligand-2) and their receptors may play a role. This protein, which is necessary for macrophage recruitment, is elevated in obesity, and mice deficient in this protein have decreases in food intake and obesity, and reduced macrophage content and inflammatory profile in adipose tissue (52). Furthermore, they exhibit increased adiponectin levels, decreased steatosis, and improved glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, MCP-1 levels are higher in visceral adipose tissue compared with sc adipose tissue (53), and transgenic overexpression of MCP-1 in adipose tissue results in increased macrophage infiltration (54).
Adipose tissue macrophages constitute the major source of TNF
and MCP-1 in adipose tissue and express high levels of IL-6, as well as receptors for both leptin and adiponectin (50, 53). Macrophages and adipocytes share many characteristics. Both TNF
and IL-6 can induce an inflammatory phenotype in adipocytes (55), whereas adiponectin released by adipocytes may have antiinflammatory effects, such as inhibiting leptin-induced TNF
production (56). Some data also suggest that adiponectin may, in fact, have pro-inflammatory properties under some conditions, although prolonged exposure to adiponectin appears to render macrophages tolerant (57). As such, it has been predicted that cross talk is likely between macrophages and adipocytes, particularly in the more metabolically active visceral depots (58, 59). Thus, the colocalization of metabolically active adipocytes and other cell types in adipose tissue with macrophages provides an amplified paracrine environment, setting up a potential vicious cycle of inflammatory cell infiltration, cytokine production, and adipocyte dysfunction (48). One component of cross talk may involve a paracrine loop between NEFA and TNF
(60). A recent study using cocultures of adipocyte and macrophage cell lines showed that macrophage-derived TNF
increases the release of free fatty acids from adipocytes. This effect in turn induces inflammatory changes (i.e. an up-regulation of MCP-1, IL-6, and TNF
expression, and a down-regulation of adiponectin), at least partly through activation of MAPK (60).
Thus, macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue is observed in obesity, and many of the factors secreted by macrophages can induce inflammation in adipose tissue. Although direct evidence linking macrophages with inflammation and insulin insensitivity per se has been lacking, recently it has been shown directly that macrophage-secreted factors can induce inflammatory responses in adipocytes and also induce insulin insensitivity in adipocytes (i.e. increased lipolysis and reduced suppression of lipolysis by insulin) (61). Although the mechanisms by which inflammatory cytokines reduce insulin responsiveness are unclear, this effect is associated with increased nuclear factor
B activity (61), induction of suppressor of cytokine signaling expression (62), and stimulation of inactivating IRS-1 phosphorylation (63).
PPAR ReceptorsA Pivotal Role in Adipose Tissue Function
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
is found in a wide variety of human tissues, it is most highly expressed in adipose tissue (64). More specifically, both the PPAR
1 and
2 isoforms, which are derived from the same gene by alternative promoter usage and splicing, are expressed at high levels in adipocytes and macrophages (64, 65, 66). Although several lipid metabolites have been shown to activate PPAR
, their role as endogenous ligands remains unclear (67). However, the use of PPAR
agonists (thiazolidinediones) for the treatment of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes has provided the tools and stimulus for further investigation of PPAR
function. Clinical studies involving thiazolidinediones suggest that the direct effects of these glucose-lowering agents on adipose tissue can contribute to improvements in hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, and hepatic steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes (68, 69, 70, 71, 72).
PPAR
, adipocyte morphology, and fat distribution
Based on data from ex vivo studies, activation of PPAR
in adipose tissue may cause apoptosis of large fat cells in visceral and/or sc fat depots from rodents and induce the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature fat cells in sc (but not visceral) fat depots from humans (73, 74), along with the up-regulation of key genes involved in lipogenesis and triglyceride storage (75, 76). Ex vivo studies in rats also show that thiazolidinediones induce a phenotypic change, remodeling visceral adipocytes to a smaller size with higher lipid storage potential (77) (Fig. 3
). A further effect of PPAR
activation, shown in vitro, may also be to promote a shift to the brown vs. white adipose tissue phenotype (24).
|
activation appears to promote a shift toward more, but "better quality," fat tissue, such that, despite weight gain, there are improvements in insulin sensitivity and glycemic control, and, in the case of pioglitazone, in triglyceride levels (80). However, differential effects among different thiazolidinediones on triglyceride levels (see below) suggest that factors other than PPAR
activation may be involved.
PPAR
and adipose-derived factors
The impact of PPAR
in adipose tissue also extends to another main area of dysfunction associated with obesity and insulin resistance, that of altered adipokine release. PPAR
activation is associated with potentially beneficial effects on the expression and secretion of a whole range of adipokines, including adiponectin, resistin, leptin, IL-6, TNF
, PAI-1, MCP-1, and angiotensinogen (84, 85, 86, 87).
The up-regulation of adiponectin in response to PPAR
activation exposure may be a key factor. Adiponectin appears to be an important mediator of PPAR
agonist-mediated improvements in insulin sensitivity, particularly with respect to improving hepatic insulin sensitivity (88). The increase in plasma adiponectin concentration observed after thiazolidinedione therapy is strongly associated with a decrease in hepatic fat content, and improvements in both hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity (82) (Fig. 4
). In particular, an increase in the ratio of high molecular weight to low molecular weight adiponectin strongly correlates with improvements in hepatic insulin sensitivity in response to thiazolidinedione treatment (89). Recent studies in obese adiponectin-deficient knockout mice suggest that thiazolidinedione-induced amelioration of hepatic insulin resistance is mediated via an adiponectin-dependent mechanism that involves activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (90, 91). Therefore, increases in adiponectin caused by PPAR
activation may play an important role in reversing the abnormality in hepatic fat mobilization and hepatic/muscle insulin insensitivity in people with type 2 diabetes (68, 82). Although thiazolidinediones appear to have differential effects on lipid profiles (e.g. pioglitazone is associated with significant improvements in triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL particle concentration, and LDL particle size compared with rosiglitazone) (92), their impact on adiponectin levels may contribute to improvements in atherogenic lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes.
|
As expected with PPAR
activation, a reduction in plasma NEFA is a consistent observation across many large-scale thiazolidinedione clinical trials (93). This reduction in plasma NEFA also provides a potential mechanism to improve insulin sensitivity in the liver and periphery, as well as reducing lipotoxicity in the pancreatic ß-cell and improving insulin secretory function (12). Accordingly, thiazolidinedione-induced decreases in NEFA correlate with improvements in both muscle and hepatic insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes (71). A study in PPAR
± mice showed that PPAR
indirectly protects pancreatic islets from lipotoxicity by regulating triglyceride partitioning among tissues (reducing net influx of NEFA into the islets) and that thiazolidinediones can restore insulin secretion impaired by lipotoxicity (94). It is possible that ß-cell protective effects of thiazolidinediones may also be mediated indirectly through reduced ß-cell stress resulting from the amelioration of insulin resistance. However, based on studies in isolated human islets, there is also evidence that PPAR
activation can have direct effects on ß-cell function (95, 96, 97).
The adipose tissue-related improvements seen in circulating levels of inflammatory factors, such as IL-6, TNF
, and PAI-1, with PPAR
activation may also have indirect antiinflammatory and anticoagulant effects on the liver and vasculature, in addition to the direct effects of thiazolidinediones in those tissues (98, 99) (Fig. 5
). Furthermore, the effects of thiazolidinediones on the RAS may contribute to their long-term antihypertensive effects (87), but could also have implications for vascular leakage and edema.
|
, macrophages, and inflammation
PPAR
activation in macrophages inhibits the expression of a number of proinflammatory genes (14, 15, 100). These findings suggest that PPAR
functions as a negative regulator of macrophage activation (100). Thus, PPAR
activation may have beneficial effects on the relationship between the stromal macrophage and visceral adipocyte that is distorted in obesity (Fig. 6
). Furthermore, as well as increasing adiponectin release from adipocytes and the ratio of high molecular weight to total adiponectin, PPAR
activation also induces the expression of the AdipoR2 adiponectin receptor in both adipocytes and macrophages (101, 102).
|
agonists suppress macrophage production of TNF
, IL-6, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and IL-1ß induced by lipopolysaccharide and interferon
via down-regulation of their respective genes (14, 15). Although thiazolidinediones have been shown to reduce plasma TNF
levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, the exact source of this factor is unclear, and the changes do not correlate with improvements in hepatic or peripheral insulin sensitivity (71), although this does not exclude the possibility of local effects within the adipose tissue. In adipose tissue cultures, MCP-1 is correlated with specific macrophage markers, adiposity, and adipose tissue localization (with higher levels in visceral adipose tissue relative to sc tissue), and the relationship seems to be related to the number of adipose-resident macrophages (53). Thiazolidinediones decrease MCP-1 levels in these cultures, and similar effects are observed in clinical studies. Indeed, pioglitazone has been shown to reduce MCP-1 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (103). Moreover, in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, pioglitazone treatment, but not metformin, reduces expression of CD68 (a macrophage marker) and MCP-1 in adipose tissue, apparently by reducing macrophage numbers, resulting in reduced inflammatory cytokine production and improvement in insulin sensitivity (85).
Insights from animals lacking adipose PPAR
Several innovative studies involving targeted deletion ("knockout") of these receptors in experimental animal models have assisted in understanding the function of PPAR
specifically in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, and the secondary effects in other organs, including the liver and pancreas (both of which express low levels of PPAR
) (39, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108).
Targeted deletion of PPAR
in fat tissue resulted in marked reduction in the number of adipocytes, alongside a compensatory hypertrophy of the remaining cells and the appearance of a population of small adipocyte-like cells (105). In addition, it resulted in elevated levels of plasma NEFA and triglycerides, and decreased levels of plasma leptin and adiponectin. These mice were also significantly more susceptible to high-fat diet-induced steatosis (fatty liver), hyperinsulinemia, and insulin insensitivity (in fat and liver, but not muscle). Thiazolidinediones failed to reduce plasma NEFA in these animals, unlike their effect in mice with intact fat PPAR
. Similar effects on adipocyte-derived factors and steatosis were also observed in a different adipose PPAR
- deficient model (109), albeit with some differences in the effects on overall insulin sensitivity.
On the other hand, targeted deletion of muscle PPAR
suggests that muscle PPAR
is not required for the glucose-lowering effects of thiazolidinediones but, nevertheless, may play a role in the maintenance of normal adiposity, whole-body insulin sensitivity, and hepatic insulin action, a process that may involve altered lipid metabolism in muscle (106). Similarly, thiazolidinediones remained effective in nonlipoatrophic mice lacking liver PPAR
, suggesting that adipose tissue is the major site of thiazolidinedione action in typical mice with adipose tissue (104), although in the absence of adipose tissue, the liver may become a primary site of thiazolidinedione action because of the induction of PPAR
expression in this organ.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PPAR
has emerged as a key regulator of adipocyte and macrophage function in adipose tissue. Direct effects of PPAR
activation on adipose tissue lipid metabolism and endocrine function may be linked with secondary benefits in liver and muscle lipid metabolism and insulin signaling, and suggest that PPAR
is an important target for pharmacotherapy to tackle the metabolic syndrome and obesity related insulin resistance (110, 111). Furthermore, activation of PPAR
in adipose tissue may also have positive effects on pancreatic ß-cell function and vascular inflammation, and help to minimize the aggravated paracrine relationship between adipocytes and macrophages seen in obesity.
Thus, adipose PPAR
appears to be an essential mediator for the maintenance of whole body insulin sensitivity; adipose PPAR
protects nonadipose tissue against lipid overload and guarantees appropriate production of adipokines, such as adiponectin and leptin from adipocytes (108, 110). PPAR
ligands promote the restoration of normal levels of adipose-derived substances, including NEFA, TNF
, leptin, adiponectin, and PAI-1. Thus, PPAR
ligands reverse major defects of the insulin resistance syndrome and have important effects that inhibit atherosclerosis, improve endothelial cell function, and attenuate inflammation.
An excess of visceral adipose tissue increases the risk for a number of conditions, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes. Although more research is needed, current data suggest that PPAR
activating ligands improve adipose tissue function, and may prevent the progression of both insulin resistance to diabetes and endothelial dysfunction to atherosclerosis.
| Footnotes |
|---|
First Published Online December 5, 2006
Abbreviations: Apo, Apolipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acids; PAI, plasminogen activator inhibitor; PPAR
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
; RAS, renin-angiotensin system; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein.
Received June 14, 2006.
Accepted November 29, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in the control of brown adipocyte differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1740:293304[Medline]
expression by murine macrophages: involvement of cAMP-PKA and MAPK pathways. Cell Immunol 238:1930[CrossRef]
and IL-6 in macrophages and promotes tolerance to itself and other pro-inflammatory stimuli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 335:12541263[Medline]
. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 25:20622068
stimulate phosphorylation of IRS-1 at inhibitory Ser307 via distinct pathways. J Clin Invest 107:181189[CrossRef][Medline]
(PPAR
) in human atherosclerosis and regulation in macrophages by colony stimulating factors and oxidized low density lipoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:76147619
2 protects against atherosclerosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:42384242
,ß-unsaturated ketone is a core moiety of natural ligands for covalent binding to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
. J Biol Chem 280:1414514153
ligands increase expression and plasma concentrations of adiponectin, an adipose-derived protein. Diabetes 50:20942099
(PPAR
) deficiency and PPAR
agonist improve insulin resistance. J Biol Chem 276:4124541254
have depot-specific effects on human preadipocyte differentiation. J Clin Invest 100:31493153[Medline]
target genes related to lipid storage in vivo. Diabetes Care 27:16601667
ligands on the adipose tissue in insulin resistance. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 73:6575[CrossRef][Medline]
-agonist-mediated improvements in hepatic insulin sensitivity? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 29(Suppl 1):S17S23
agonists. J Biol Chem 281:26542660
-deficient mice on a high-fat diet. Diabetes 53:28442854
2 in the modulation of insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286:E560E567
by rosiglitazone protects human islet cells against human islet amyloid polypeptide toxicity by a phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase-dependent pathway. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:66786686
improves pancreatic adaptation to insulin resistance in obese mice and reduces lipotoxicity in human islets. Diabetes 55:16051613
and atherosclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 21(Suppl 1):S13S20
, PPAR
, and LXR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 314:151158[CrossRef][Medline]
activation increases adiponectin receptors and reduces obesity-related Inflammation in adipose tissue: comparison of activation of PPAR
, PPAR
and their combination. Diabetes 54:33583370
contributes to hepatic steatosis, triglyceride clearance, and regulation of body fat mass. J Biol Chem 278:3426834276
knockout causes insulin resistance in fat and liver but not in muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:1571215717
-deficient mice develop increased adiposity and insulin resistance but respond to thiazolidinediones. J Clin Invest 112:608618[CrossRef][Medline]
, CREB-binding protein, and adiponectin. J Pharmacol Sci 97:164170[CrossRef][Medline]
-mediated insulin sensitization: the importance of fat versus muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 288:E287E291
in adipose tissues of mice protects against high fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:62076212This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J van Dijk, E. J. Feskens, M. B Bos, D. W. Hoelen, R. Heijligenberg, M. G. Bromhaar, L. C. de Groot, J. H. de Vries, M. Muller, and L. A Afman A saturated fatty acid-rich diet induces an obesity-linked proinflammatory gene expression profile in adipose tissue of subjects at risk of metabolic syndrome Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2009; 90(6): 1656 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Smith, W. R. Butler, and T. R. Overton Effects of prepartum 2,4-thiazolidinedione on metabolism and performance in transition dairy cows J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3623 - 3633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tang, S. Zheng, and A. Chen Curcumin Eliminates Leptin's Effects on Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation via Interrupting Leptin Signaling Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3011 - 3020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Bonsignore and J. Eckel Metabolic aspects of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome Eur. Respir. Rev., June 1, 2009; 18(112): 113 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, E. Hummler, T. Rieg, O. Pochynyuk, V. Bugaj, J. Schroth, G. Dechenes, B. Rossier, R. Cunard, and J. Stockand Thiazolidinedione-Induced Fluid Retention Is Independent of Collecting Duct {alpha}ENaC Activity J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 721 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Banga, R. Unal, P. Tripathi, I. Pokrovskaya, R. J. Owens, P. A. Kern, and G. Ranganathan Adiponectin translation is increased by the PPAR{gamma} agonists pioglitazone and {omega}-3 fatty acids Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2009; 296(3): E480 - E489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Prentki and S. R. M. Madiraju Glycerolipid Metabolism and Signaling in Health and Disease Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2008; 29(6): 647 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Takada, M. H. Fonseca-Alaniz, T. B. F. de Campos, S. Andreotti, A. B. Campana, M. Okamoto, C. d. N. Borges-Silva, U. F. Machado, and F. B. Lima Metabolic recovery of adipose tissue is associated with improvement in insulin resistance in a model of experimental diabetes J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 51 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macias-Gonzalez, F. Cardona, M. Queipo-Ortuno, R. Bernal, M. Martin, and F. J. Tinahones PPAR{gamma} mRNA Expression Is Reduced in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells after Fat Overload in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome J. Nutr., May 1, 2008; 138(5): 903 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Hausman, S. P. Poulos, T. D. Pringle, and M. J. Azain The influence of thiazolidinediones on adipogenesis in vitro and in vivo: Potential modifiers of intramuscular adipose tissue deposition in meat animals J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E236 - E243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Aravindakshan, and M. R. Sairam Changes in Adiponectin and Inflammatory Genes in Response to Hormonal Imbalances in Female Mice and Exacerbation of Depot Selective Visceral Adiposity by High-Fat Diet: Implications for Insulin Resistance Endocrinology, December 1, 2007; 148(12): 5667 - 5679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Qatanani and M. A. Lazar Mechanisms of obesity-associated insulin resistance: many choices on the menu Genes & Dev., June 15, 2007; 21(12): 1443 - 1455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |