help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0640
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow High Resolution Figures
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lima, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Rostan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lima, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Rostan, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 12 4853-4864
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

High Frequency of Germline Succinate Dehydrogenase Mutations in Sporadic Cervical Paragangliomas in Northern Spain: Mitochondrial Succinate Dehydrogenase Structure-Function Relationships and Clinical-Pathological Correlations

Jorge Lima1, Tália Feijão1, André Ferreira da Silva, Isabel Pereira-Castro, Gregorio Fernandez-Ballester, Valdemar Máximo, Agustin Herrero, Luis Serrano, Manuel Sobrinho-Simões and Ginesa Garcia-Rostan

Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (J.L., T.F., A.F.d.S., I.P.-C., V.M., M.S.-S., G.G.-R.) and Medical Faculty (J.L., M.S.-S.), University of Porto, 4200–465 Porto, Portugal; Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology (IBMC) (G.F.-B.), Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, 03202 Alicante, Spain; Department of Pathology (A.H.), School of Medicine, Oviedo University, Oviedo, 33006 Asturias, Spain; Department Structural and Computational Biology (L.S.), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, 69117 Germany and Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; and Hospital S. João (M.S.-S.), 4202–451 Porto, Portugal

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ginesa Garcia-Rostan, M.D., Ph.D., Dr. Alfredo Martinez, No. 3, 3°B, 33005 Oviedo-Asturias, Spain. E-mail: ginesarostan{at}telefonica.net.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purpose: Germline SDHB, SDHC, and/or SDHD mutations have been reported in familial and apparently sporadic paragangliomas (PGLs). There is, however, some variation in the prevalence, penetrance, and phenotypic expression of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) mutated gene among different populations. We sought to determine whether germline mutations in SDHB, SDHC, and/or SDHD play a role in cervical PGLs from northern Spain, where this disorder is particularly frequent, and whether there is any difference with respect to the data published in other populations.

Design: Thirty-six sporadic cervical PGLs and four familial PGLs were investigated by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and sequencing. Computational biology was applied to address the structural-conformational changes behind missense mutations and, simultaneously, infer the possible consequences in protein function.

Results: Eight sporadic cases (22.2%) carried pathogenic germline mutations, six of which were in SDHB and two in SDHD. Three families had mutations in SDHD and one in SDHB. Seven of 11 different pathogenic mutations (64%) affected SDHB. Ten mutations were novel. Missense mutations were primarily found in SDHB and frameshift mutations in SDHD. Missense SDHB mutations seemed to alter the enzymatic activity by hampering the electron transfer. SDH-linked tumors occurred mainly in males (P = 0.0033), occurred at a younger age (P < 0.0001), were usually multifocal (P = 0.0011), and exhibited a larger size (P = 0.0341).

Conclusions: A significant proportion of sporadic cervical PGLs arise as a consequence of intrinsic genetic factors. At variance with previous reports, SDHB is frequently mutated in sporadic cervical PGLs and the mutations do not entail a deleterious behavior. Therefore, SDHB genetic testing may be considered in all subjects presenting with solitary cervical PGL and no family history.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CERVICAL PARAGANGLIOMAS (PGLS) represent 0.012% of all human tumors and 0.6% of all neoplasms in the head and neck. Those occurring in the carotid body account for 60–80% of all cervical PGLs. Other tumor locations include the jugulotympanic paraganglia at the skull base (18–36%) and the vagal body (3–4%) (1). It is estimated that up to 30% of the cervical PGLs are familial, which corresponds to one of the highest frequencies of inherited susceptibility among human tumors. Although most sporadic cervical PGLs present as a single highly vascularized mass, lacking endocrine activity, multicentric or bilateral tumors occur in 10% of the cases. In the familial setting, about 40% of the patients display bilateral carotid body tumors. Multicentric PGLs may develop at other head and neck paraganglia or the sympathoadrenal abdominal paraganglia. Patients with hereditary cervical PGLs may be diagnosed earlier than sporadic cases, with a trend for an earlier age of tumor onset in successive generations (2, 3). Cervical PGLs are mostly benign, slow-growing tumors. Only 2–5% of carotid body or jugulotympanic PGLs and 10–19% of vagal PGLs disclose uncertain malignant potential (4, 5, 6).

Familial PGL is a genetically heterogeneous disorder (OMIM 168000), which involves various chromosomal loci. In 1997, linkage analyses in several unrelated Dutch and North American PGL families revealed two loci, 11q23.1 and 11q13, that segregated with the disease (7). In 2000, Baysal et al. (8) showed that germline loss-of-function mutations in SDHD at 11q23.1 caused familial PGL. Shortly afterward, studies based on direct candidate gene analyses demonstrated that germline mutations in two other genes at chromosome 1, SDHB (1p36.13) and SDHC (1q23.3), were also involved in familial PGL (9, 10). The causative gene mapping at 11q13 still awaits identification.

SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD genes (SDH genes) are nuclear genes that code for the SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD subunits of the heterotetrameric mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase (SDH). The SDHB subunit, also known as iron-sulfur protein, is part of the hydrophilic catalytic domain and is highly conserved throughout species. SDHB is directly bound to SDHA, which contains the flavin-adenine dinucleotide (FAD) prosthetic group and the substrate binding site, and to SDHC and SDHD, which together anchor SDH to the mitochondrial inner membrane and provide the ubiquinone binding site. SDHC and SDHD harbor the heme group to which the electrons are transferred from the iron-sulfur clusters: FES (2Fe-2S), FS4 (4Fe-4S), and F3S (3Fe-4S). These iron-sulfur clusters are located within SDHB and act as redox centers, transporting the electrons derived from the FAD prosthetic group (reduced on oxidation of succinate) to the membrane soluble transporter ubiquinone, which will then enter the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system (11, 12).

So far, the majority of the studies dealing with germline SDH mutations in PGL patients have been carried out in North European and/or North American populations. These studies, besides revealing an evident familial clustering of the disease, with three founder mutations in The Netherlands, have also shown that a subset of apparently sporadic cervical PGLs harbor germline mutations in SDH genes. The latter individuals represent occult familial cases with incomplete/low penetrance of the mutated allele (13, 14).

Although germline mutations in SDHB and/or SDHD have been reported in apparently sporadic and familial cervical PGLs (70–90% of familial cervical PGLs and ~8% of sporadic cervical PGLs), the overall mutation frequency for each of these two genes is significantly different. Mutations in SDHD are considered the major cause of cervical PGLs. To date, 94 and 69 unique allelic variants have been described in SDHB and SDHD, respectively (http://chromium.liacs.nl/lovd_sdh) (15). The prevalence of SDHC mutation carriers among cervical PGL patients is much lower. Only nine different allelic variants, primarily associated with familial presentations, have been annotated in SDHC (16).

The accumulated data indicate that there is some variation in the prevalence, penetrance, and phenotypic expression of the SDH mutations among different populations. Understanding the cause/s of these variations is important for the genetic counseling and proper management of PGL patients. In this study, we sought to determine whether germline mutations in SDHB, SDHC, and/or SDHD play a role in the nosology of cervical PGLs from northern Spain, where this disorder is particularly frequent. We also assessed whether there is any difference with respect to the overall mutation prevalence, mutation pattern, and penetrance reported in other populations. Because some missense substitutions may result in partially functional mutant proteins that could account for the reduced/incomplete penetrance observed in some SDH mutation carriers, we also addressed the structural-functional consequences behind punctual, unreported SDHB mutations.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and control cases

Individuals diagnosed with cervical PGL at the Hospital Central de Asturias (Spain), between 1981 and 2005, were identified by retrospectively reviewing the clinicopathological records and direct patient/family interview. Forty unrelated cases (36 sporadic and four inherited) were enrolled in the study due to the availability of DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes, tumor tissue, and clinical data. All histological diagnoses were reviewed according to established morphological criteria (3, 4). Sporadic cases were defined as those having no familial history of PGLs in the parental and grandparental generations. Disease was considered to be inherited when at least two first-degree relatives, preferentially from different generations, or two second-degree relatives were affected by PGLs. Patients displaying syndromic features associated with von Hippel Lindau disease (VHL), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2), or neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) were excluded from the study population. Only the index patient of each family entered in the first screening of mutations. Missense mutations were regarded as pathogenetically relevant if not found among 203 anonymous healthy blood donors residing in the same geographic area of the patients. Identification of a putative disease-causing mutation was followed by genetic testing of all at risk living relatives of the mutation carriers.

Informed consent for genetic testing was obtained from all patients, relatives, and control cases. Processing of samples and of patient information was in agreement with protocols approved by the corresponding ethical committees.

Mutational analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using a standard salt-precipitation method (17). Matching tumoral DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens according to a previously described protocol (18). When necessary, tumors were microdissected to increase the proportion of neoplastic cells, which always represented at least 80% of the total.

The occurrence of SDHB, SDHC, and/or SDHD mutations was evaluated by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP). Primers and PCR/SSCP conditions are available on request. All mobility shifts observed in the SSCP analysis were ratified by repeating the PCR-SSCP assay.

Whenever a sample displayed recurrent aberrant SSCP conformers, the respective PCR product was purified using the GFX PCR DNA and gel band purification kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). The purified target DNA was subjected to automatic sequencing (ABI PRISM 3100 genetic analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), using the BigDye terminator version 3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). Sense and antisense sequencing was performed for confirmation. All mutations were further verified by PCR and direct sequencing from a new DNA template.

Structural analysis of SDHB mutations

The structure of the human mitochondrial enzyme SDH was modeled at 2.4A resolution (1ZOY.PDB) by means of homology with the recently solved crystal structure from porcine heart (19). The porcine structure sorts out the low sequence homology found in the integral membrane anchors of the prokaryotic counterpart (20) and overrides the absence of the ubiquinone binding sites, providing a reliable model to study the structural-conformational changes induced by human mutations as well as their relationship with human mitochondrial pathologies. Modeling was performed upon sequence alignment using the BuildModel function implemented in Fold-X (21, 22). During this procedure Fold-X performs the mutagenesis while testing different rotamers, allowing neighbor side chains to move. The emerging models undergo additional optimization by the Repair function of Fold-X, where those residues that have bad torsion angles or van der Waals clashes are identified and corrected.

The structure was edited with Swiss-PDB viewer 3.7 (23) and all the molecular graphics created with Pymol (24). The comparison between wild-type and mutated models gives the opportunity to understand the structural consequences behind punctual mutations.

Statistical analysis

The Fisher’s exact test, ANOVA test, and {chi}2 test with the Yates correction were applied in the statistical computing (Statview; SAS Inc., Cary, NC). P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient and tumor characteristics

Among the 48 patients diagnosed with PGL, 36 (75%) had no family history and 12 (25%) inherited the disease. The clinical and pathological features (Table 1Go) closely paralleled those described in most larger series (3, 4). Apparently sporadic carotid body tumors was the only group in which a higher prevalence of males (five of eight, 63%) was detected. In the familial group, nearly 38% of the patients with carotid body PGLs showed bilateral, synchronous, or metachronous tumors. Tympanic PGLs were detected only in sporadic presentations (P = 0.0213), displayed a smaller size (average 0.8 cm), and occurred preferentially in females (nine of 10).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Clinical features of 48 PGL patients analyzed for SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD germline mutations

 
In agreement with the reported nonfunctional status of most cervical PGLs, none of the patients involved in this study had increased levels of catecholamine secretion. Microscopically, consistent with the neuroendocrine nature of normal paraganglia, the neoplastic chief cells showed strong-moderate immunoreactivity for chromogranin-A, neuron-specific enolase, and/or synaptophysin, whereas the nonneoplastic sustentacular cells embracing the chief cells demonstrated weak positivity for S-100.

The mean follow-up time was similar in both groups (~7 yr). All the sporadic patients who developed a tumor recurrence had undergone resection of a single jugular (two of five) or jugulotympanic (three of five) PGL. Up to the last follow-up performed in this cohort, no patient had evidenced local and/or distant metastases. Only one familial patient bearing extra-adrenal PGLs died of the disease. It is noteworthy that 73% of the patients had lived near the sea level or at low altitudes.

Molecular genetics

Twenty-five of the 40 PGL patients (62.5%) initially enrolled in the germline mutational screening revealed aberrant SSCP conformers. The type of alteration, exonic/intronic location, altered nucleotide position, specific nucleotide change, and corresponding amino acid substitution are summarized in Table 2Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. SDHB, SDHC, and/or SDHD sequence variants in sporadic and familial cervical PGLs: distribution according to tumor origin

 
Half of the patients (20 of 40) carried germline coding sequence variants [13 in SDHB (65%), five in SDHD (25%), and two in both genes (10%)]. Noncoding sequence alterations were limited to SDHB (13 patients, 32.5%) and SDHC (two patients, 5%). Nine of the patients who displayed the intronic variant IVS2–36G>T at SDHB harbored a concomitant exonic variant (A6A) in SDHB.

Frameshift coding alterations were more likely to appear in SDHD (80%) and missense alterations in SDHB (62.5%). The ratio of different nonsynonymous to different synonymous sequence variants was 3:1 for SDHD and 5:3 for SDHB. Most of the missense sequence variants were transitions and involved residues highly conserved among species (87.5%, seven of eight). The only missense transversion (R17L in SDHD) observed in this cohort affected an amino acid conserved in mammals but not in bacteria. Six of nine SDHB (67%) (C93R, C186Y, P197S, P254L, L180L, and c.312InsCACTGCA), one SDHC (100%) (IVS1 + 13 InsTG), and three of seven SDHD (43%) (R17L, c.383–386InsT, and c.120–127DelCCCAGAAT) sequence alterations had not been previously reported (http://chromium.liacs.nl/lovd_sdh) (15). Sequence alterations in the SDHD gene were roughly equally distributed throughout all four exons, whereas those in the SDHB gene tended to cluster in exon 1 (50%) followed by exon 4 (19%) and were not seen in exons 2 and 8.

Four coding sequence variants were present in the chromosomes of healthy individuals: G12S (three of 186; 1.6%), H50R (three of 274; 1%), and S68S (9 of 252; 3.6%) for SDHD and A6A (two of 182; 1%) for SDHB. The two intronic sequence variants, IVS2–36G>T in SDHB and IVS1 + 13 InsTG in SDHC, detected in 15 PGL patients, were also found in 12.8% (52 of 406) and 6.3% (12 of 192) healthy control cases, respectively. All six alterations will be designated hereafter as polymorphisms.

After excluding the aforementioned polymorphisms, it emerged a trend for an association of pathogenic missense mutations with SDHB (five of six, 83%) and frameshift mutations with SDHD (four of five, 80%) (P = 0.0801).

Sporadic paragangliomas

Sixteen patients (44.4%) carried germline coding alterations [12 (75%) in SDHB, three (19%) in SDHD and one (6%) in both genes] (Table 2Go). The only germline alteration observed in SDHC was an intronic polymorphism (IVS1 + 13 InsTG).

A total of 13 different germline coding alterations were identified, including seven nonsynonymous/missense alterations (54%), four synonymous alterations (31%), and two frameshift alterations (15%). All these germline alterations were confirmed at the somatic level and no additional somatic changes were observed. Figure 1Go shows the SSCP patterns and sequencing chromatograms of representative SDHD and SDHB mutation carriers.


Figure 1
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Representative SSCP patterns of missense SDHB and SDHD mutations detected in apparently sporadic cervical PGLs. A, C, and D correspond with carotid body PGLs. B shows a jugulotympanic PGL. Next to each hematoxylin and eosin section are the sequence chromatograms that emerged from the shifted bands that showed up in the SSCP gel (arrow at index lane). The migration pattern of our target DNA was compared with the electrophoretic mobility of a known wild-type sequence (WT lane). The nucleotide change is indicated within each sequence trace (arrow). Phenotypically unaffected at risk relatives of mutation carriers were investigated for the mutation found in the index case. Pedigrees are shown on each panel.

 
Most of the coding alterations (89%) were point mutations. One of those point mutations (L180L), involving a G>A transition in the last nucleotide of SDHB exon 5, resulted in alternative splicing of the SDHB primary transcript. To demonstrate that L180L could be an unreported splice site mutation and thus a pathogenic mutation, we extracted RNA from peripheral blood leukocytes and synthesized cDNA. By combining the same forward primer with two reverse primers, one specific for the wild-type transcript and the other specific for the mutated, we observed PCR-amplification only with the wild-type reverse primer, suggesting an abnormal splicing of the mutated allele (Fig. 2AGo). To further verify the splicing, a fragment encompassing part of exon 5 up to exon 7 was amplified and sequenced. The chromatogram showed the peak corresponding only to the wild-type allele (G) and not two superimposed peaks (G and A) as it would be expected if both alleles were correctly transcribed and spliced (Fig. 2BGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Abnormal splicing of the mutated allele bearing the G>A transition at nucleotide 540 of SDHB. A, A PCR product of 246 bp was obtained using a reverse primer specific for the wild-type primary transcript (lane A). No amplification was observed with a reverse primer specifically devised for the mutant allele (lane B). Lane C represents an internal PCR control with primers annealing in exons 4 and 7 (455 bp). Right margin, 1 kb plus ladder (lane M). B, To further confirm the splicing depicted in 2A, a fragment encompassing part of exon 5 up to exon 7 was amplified and sequenced. The corresponding chromatogram shows only the wild-type peak (G), where two superimposed peaks (G and A) should be present if both alleles are correctly transcribed and spliced.

 
The intronic polymorphism IVS2–36G>T in SDHB was in linkage disequilibrium with a coding polymorphism (A6A) in exon 1 of SDHB in six patients and associated with a pathogenic mutation (P197S) in exon 6 of SDHB in one patient. In four additional patients, the IVS2–36G>T was the only change detected. Similarly, two polymorphisms at SDHD (G12S and S68S) arose associated in one patient.

Structural biology studies revealed that all the SDHB missense mutations are predicted to alter the enzymatic activity by disrupting the anchoring to the FES, FS4, and F3S clusters present within the catalytic core of SDH. Some also may affect the interaction with other subunits of mitochondrial SDH such as flavoprotein (SDHA). Of note, the P197S mutation could hamper the binding of the ubiquinone. The mutation is placed in a pocket surrounded by hydrophobic and aromatic residues. The polar group of serine could directly clash with the ubiquinone ring, could hydrogen bond to W201, or both, breaking the binding of the ubiquinone to chain B and thus avoiding electron transfer. In addition, the adoption of dihedrals slightly forced for serine could induce a small local conformational change that, in turn, could affect C196, one of the three cysteines that link 3Fe-4S, and then disrupt cluster binding. The C93R mutation breaks the ligation of the cluster 2Fe-2S because this cysteine participates in the binding to the prosthetic group. The mutation places a big and charged amino acid that is oriented to FAD-binding protein (chain A). The arginine side chain clashes with H99, A102 (both in chain A), and even the FAD group, thus hampering the chain A-chain B complex association. The C186Y mutation breaks the binding to the cofactor 4Fe-4S. The side chain of tyrosine also clashes with backbone and side chain of L188 and with A210. The P254L mutation must carry a conformational reorganization of the loop because dihedral angles adopted by proline are forbidden for leucine. This conformational change could affect the contiguous C253 and thus the binding of the cluster 4Fe-4S, in which is directly implicated the C253. The side chain of leucine also clashes with backbone and side chain of L111 and T110. Additionally, the P254L mutation could also clash with C191, which in turn affects the C192 and binding to the 4Fe-4S cluster. Figure 3Go illustrates the predicted structural-functional consequences behind the pathogenic missense SDHB mutations found in this study. Conformational changes induced by R17L mutation in SDHD structure could not be analyzed because it is located in the signal peptide region, and no structural information was available. The mutation may affect protein transport to the membrane and/or membrane insertion.


Figure 3
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Detailed illustration of the structural consequences of missense mutations in the iron-sulfur protein (SDHB). The wild-type (wt) conformation is shown on the left and the mutant conformation on the right. Chain B, green backbone in wt, cyan backbone in mutants. Chain A, light green backbone in wt and mutant conformation. The FAD-binding protein (chain A), when affected, was represented in light magenta for both wt and mutant. A through E show mutations C93R, C98Y, C186Y, P197S, and P254L, respectively (see text for details). The figure was made with Pymol (http://www.pymol.org).

 
Sporadic cases evidenced only two frameshift mutations, and both led to altered proteins with premature stop codons that removed, depending on the mutation, half of exon 4 from SDHD (c.337–340DelGACT)(p.Asp113MetfsX21) or more than half of the mature SDHB protein, including half of exon 4 and exons 5–8 (c.312InsCACTGCA)(p.Ile105HisfsX16).

In a second round of analysis, 19 relatives of sporadic patients were investigated for the putative disease-causing mutation found in the respective proband. Genetic screening identified five phenotypically unaffected SDHB mutation carriers and one double, SDHD and SDHB, mutation carrier (Table 2Go). By the time we closed the study, all six mutated relatives were free of disease.

Sporadic cases harboring germline mutations disclosed features significantly different from those observed in individuals without germline mutations (Table 3Go). Irrespective of the affected gene, the mutation carriers were mainly males (P = 0.040), with a lower mean age at diagnosis (P = 0.0012). Curiously, SDHB-mutation carriers were younger than SDHD-mutation carriers. The mutated tumors were larger and affected primarily the vagal body. Despite all the SDHD-linked and half of the SDHB-linked cervical PGL patients lived near the sea level or at low altitudes, the residential altitudes were not significantly different between patients with and without germline mutations (62.5 vs. 71%, respectively, lived near the sea level or at low altitudes).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Correlation between pathogenic SDHD and/or SDHB mutations and clinical features in 36 sporadic head and neck PGL patients1

 
Familial paragangliomas

All four families (F1-F4) carried germline mutations (Table 2Go). The genealogical trees are depicted in Fig. 4Go. All but one of the SDHD mutation carriers in whom we could trace the parental origin received the mutation from the father. In line with published data, the only individual who inherited the mutation from the mother remained tumor free by the age of 31 yr.


Figure 4
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. The four families analyzed for SDHB, SDHC and SDHD mutations are shown. Each panel includes the histological appearance of different types of PGLs removed on that family (see text for details), a SSCP gel with all the relatives tested for the mutation demonstrated in the index case, the genealogical trees, and the corresponding chromatograms. Aberrant mobility shifts resulting from single-nucleotide substitutions (F-4), small deletions (F-2 and F-3), or insertions (F-1) are indicated with arrows within each SSCP gel. Beneath each gel lane appears the case number assigned in the respective pedigree.

 
In F1, the index case underwent surgery at the age of 36 yr for a left vagal body PGL and 1 yr later for a right carotid body PGL. His uncle had been affected by multiple PGLs, being diagnosed at the age of 45 yr with bilateral carotid body PGL, left vagal PGL, and left jugulotympanic PGL. These two patients shared a novel frameshift mutation in SDHD (c.386–387InsT), which leads to a cDNA with a stop codon 90 bp downstream of the original one, resulting in a protein 30 amino acids larger (p.Leu129PhefsX62). Both patients also showed the aforementioned linkage between the IVS2–36G>T and A6A in SDHB. Before closing this study, two mutation carriers, brothers of the index case, a 27-yr-old female and a 46-yr-old male, underwent surgery for a carotid body PGL and a vagal PGL, respectively. Three phenotypically unaffected relatives also revealed the c.386–387InsT mutation.

In F2, the index case underwent surgery at the age of 42 yr for a right carotid body PGL and a right jugular PGL. Two years later, a left carotid body PGL was removed in the same patient. A brother was also diagnosed of bilateral carotid body PGLs at the age of 42 yr. Both presented a frameshift mutation in SDHD (c.337–340DelGACT), which results in a premature stop codon (p.Asp113MetfsX21) and thus in a truncated protein lacking the last 26 amino acids. This mutation was also detected in three other family members that, so far, have not developed the disease. In addition to the c.337–340DelGACT SDHD mutation, the index case also presented the SDHC IVS1 + 13 InsTG intronic variant.

In F3, the index case underwent surgery twice, at the age of 40 yr for a left carotid body PGL and 15 yr later for a right jugular PGL. A brother was diagnosed of carotid body PGL at the age of 60 yr. Both exhibited an unreported frameshift mutation in SDHD (c.120–127DelCCCAGAAT), which results in a premature stop codon (p.Ile40MetfsX25) that removes 92 amino acids. Three phenotypically unaffected relatives also carried the mutation.

In F4, the index case was diagnosed with a right jugular PGL at the age of 39 yr. His mother had developed a carotid body and a jugulotympanic PGL, being first treated at the age of 43 yr. The other two diseased members were a brother of the index case, deceased at the age of 33 yr, who presented with multiple extraadrenal PGLs 2 yr before and a cousin of the index case, who, at the age of 38 yr, underwent surgery for an extraadrenal PGL. These four patients harbored a missense mutation (C98Y) in a highly conserved residue of SDHB. They also showed the polymorphisms IVS2–36G>T and A6A in SDHB. Three disease-free relatives also disclosed the C98Y mutation. Structural modeling revealed that C98Y mutation may disrupt the enzymatic activity of SDHB because the C98 residue participates in the prosthetic group binding. The mutation hampers the interaction with SDHA and breaks the binding to cluster 2Fe-2S. The Y98 aromatic ring clashes with the 2Fe-2S cluster and also with the neighboring S100, C93 (side chain and backbone), and R94 backbone (Fig. 3BGo).

The germline mutations found in these four families were confirmed at the somatic level. No additional somatic mutations were detected in any of the affected family members.

Fifty-three percent of SDHD and 43% of SDHB mutation carriers were disease free at the last follow-up annotated in our familial registry. Despite some of the nonaffected at risk carriers might be too young to have clinical manifestations and may develop the disease in their lifetime, our findings suggest incomplete/reduced penetrance of the mutated alleles. Of note, three families had lived near sea level (SDHB-C98Y) or at low average altitudes (SDHD-c.386–387InsT and SDHD-c.337–340DelGACT).

Genotype-phenotype correlation

To evaluate the impact of our results on the routine clinical management of cervical PGL patients, the phenotype of patients with germline mutations was compared with that of patients without germline mutations (Table 4Go). SDH-mutated tumors occurred predominantly in males (P = 0.0033), occurred at a younger age (P < 0.0001), were usually multifocal (P = 0.0011), and exhibited a larger average size (P = 0.0341). When comparing familial PGLs with occult familial cases, we observed that the former group was significantly associated with tumor multiplicity (P = 0.014).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. SDH genotype-phenotype correlation in 48 patients with PGL: comparison between familial cases and occult familial conditions

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study reinforce the involvement of germline mitochondrial SDH mutations in the etiology of a significant number of apparently sporadic cervical PGLs. Taking into account only those alterations that were absent in healthy controls, we observed that 22.2% of the apparently sporadic cervical PGLs were most probably the consequence of pathogenic germline SDHB and/or SDHD mutations. In agreement with previous studies (see SDHB@chromium.liacs.nl/lovd_sdh/ and SDHD@chromium.liacs.nl/lovd_sdh/), the sequence variants A6A in SDHB and H50R, G12S, and S68S in SDHD were also found in healthy blood donors, supporting their categorization as nondeleterious polymorphisms. In contrast with previous reports, we did not detect the SDHB S100S alteration among our healthy control cases. Such discrepancy might be related with different allele frequencies in different populations. Because the S100S alteration has been shown in other healthy populations and does not result in amino acid change, we consider that it is probably nondeleterious.

In five sporadic SDH mutation carriers, at least one phenotypically unaffected relative harbored a mutation identical with that shown in the proband, excluding the possibility of considering those alterations as de novo germline mutations. This observation supports the term of occult familial condition given to those sporadic patients who carry pathogenic germline mutations. Of note, the proportion of occult familial cases in our series (22.2%) is higher than the heritability estimates recorded thus far for sporadic presentations in most European and North American series of head and neck PGLs without a founder effect (0–9%) (16, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). A study performed in 23 sporadic cervical PGLs from Australia revealed a similar percentage (17%) of occult familial conditions; however, half of the patients with germline mutations disclosed the SDHD P81L mutation, which has been associated with a founder effect (13, 30, 31). Single ancestral haplotypes are determinant in cervical PGLs occurring in The Netherlands, where about 36% of the sporadic cases seem to arise as a consequence of three founder/ancestral mutations in SDHD (D92Y, L95P, and L139P) (28, 32). According to the reported absence of a founder/ancestral effect in SDHB among low-altitude inhabitants, in our series we did not observe founder mutations in the SDHB gene.

Another surprising finding of our study was the difference in the mutation frequency of SDHB and SDHD genes, depending on the existence or not of familial disease history. Whereas occult familial cervical PGLs were mainly associated with SDHB mutations, familial cases with proven disease history were mostly associated with SDHD mutations. The causes for the different mutation pattern are unknown. Intrinsic and/or extrinsic modifiers might play a yet undetermined role in the sporadic population analyzed in this study. In addition, the low residential altitudes in 69% of the sporadic cases might have contributed to the high frequency of SDHB mutation carriers. It is believed that environmental oxygen, which is determined by geographical elevations, exerts a major modifier role on the prevalence, penetrance, and phenotypic expression of SDH mutations (14, 33). Low altitudes may reduce gene penetrance and consequently relax the natural selection against SDH mutations, which are therefore able to remain in the population gene pool. Different population-based studies in Dutch inhabitants living near the sea level have shown that, whereas the frequency of germline SDHD mutations increases with successive generations through genetic drift, the likelihood of developing cervical PGLs among at risk mutation carriers does not increase on the same proportion (28, 32).

Our results support the previous observations that germline SDHC mutations are rare among apparently sporadic cervical PGLs (see SDHC@chromium.liacs.nl/lovd_sdh/) (16, 25, 26, 34, 35). In this study, germline SDHB mutations emerged as the leading cause of cervical PGLs. Twelve of 40 sporadic and familial patients (30%) disclosed pathogenic mutations and 58% were in SDHB. Moreover, seven of the 11 different pathogenic mutations (64%) found in our study were located in SDHB. These findings appear to argue against putative anatomical preferences by different SDH subunits as has been formerly suggested (13, 14, 27, 29). Most of the annotated SDHD mutation carriers have been associated with cervical PGLs, contributing to the belief that SDHD dysfunction is the key event in PGLs developing in the head and neck region. Here we provide genetic evidence supporting the involvement of the SDHB subunit in a significant number of cervical PGLs. Whether differences, other than founder/ancestral haplotypes, inherent to the populations analyzed thus far may play a role in the preference of one gene over the other still awaits clarification.

We found no evidence for distant metastases and/or extraparaganglial malignancies in patients with germline SDHB mutations, who were free of disease after an average follow-up period of 7 yr. This observation is in contrast with previous data showing an increased likelihood for tumor recurrence, distant metastases, and/or early onset of renal cell carcinoma or papillary thyroid carcinoma among patients with germline SDHB mutations (29, 36, 37, 38, 39). However, most of these patients had developed intraabdominal extraadrenal PGLs, which tend to be the most aggressive type of PGL (3, 4). In our series, the only two patients who underwent surgery for an intraabdominal extraadrenal PGL belonged to the single family with a SDHB point mutation, and one of them developed multiple extraadrenal PGLs, dying shortly afterward of disease. Strikingly, most of the reported patients harboring malignant SDHB-mutated PGLs, with follow-up information available, had prolonged survival periods, apparently not significantly different from those observed in patients without germline mutations that had metastases at first intervention or during the follow-up (29, 36, 40). Taking all these findings together, it is likely that the hormonal and developmental milieu (head and neck vs. abdominal paraganglia) within which the tumor grows might exert a considerable influence over its molecular biology and natural history and thus be more important than the affected gene (SDHD vs. SDHB).

Our study adds a number of new SDHB and SDHD mutations to those already described (35). In contrast with previous reports, nonsense mutations were not detected among SDHD-linked cervical PGL patients who primarily carried frameshift mutations. In line with published data, missense substitutions were the most common type of mutation among SDHB-linked cervical PGLs. Both frameshift and missense mutations were predicted to result in profound conformational changes in mitochondrial SDH structure, which most likely result in severe SDH dysfunction. All the pathogenic missense SDHB mutations (C93R, C98Y, P197S, C186Y, and P254L), by breaking the binding to the iron-sulfur clusters, may interfere in the electron transfer through the FES, FS4, and F3S clusters present within the catalytic core of SDH. In addition, C93R and C98Y may inhibit the interaction with SDHA and P197L may affect ubiquinone binding, which would also hinder electron entry in the OXPHOS system. Several other lines of evidence provide additional indirect support to the functional relevance of the aforementioned missense SDHB mutations. First, the prevalence of missense mutations in this study was higher than the background mutation frequency of nonfunctional alterations observed in the genome of tumor cells. Second, the residues affected by those mutations are highly conserved during evolution. Third, C93R, C98Y, P197S, C186Y, and P254L were not found in healthy control individuals recruited from the general population. Fourth, the C98Y mutation cosegregated with disease phenotype.

In this study we also demonstrate that occult familial cases and familial cases with proven disease history have a common clinicopathological signature, which distinguishes them from truly sporadic cervical PGL patients without germline SDH mutations. The only feature that distinguished truly familial from occult familial cases was tumor multifocality, which occurred more often in familial cases with proven disease history. Indeed, it has been proposed to consider bilateral or multifocal PGLs as a phenotypical marker for inherited predisposition.

In conclusion, this study highlights the clinical usefulness of genetic testing in all subjects presenting with solitary cervical PGL and no family history. We provide genetic evidence that associates germline SDHB mutations with the pathobiology of a significant number of apparently sporadic cervical PGLs. Moreover, at variance with intraabdominal extraadrenal PGLs, SDHB dysfunction in PGLs of the head and neck region does not appear to entail a deleterious behavior. Our results support the option of offering genetic testing to all at-risk living relatives of sporadic and familial patients harboring a germline mutation. To enable an early detection of affected paraganglia and thus avoid the serious morbidity of surgery in advanced head and neck PGLs, the asymptomatic SDH-mutation carriers should probably be enrolled in a surveillance program.


    Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia for funding this project included in the thesis defended by Jorge Lima at the Medical Faculty of Porto University in December 2006. We thank the patients and their relatives for their stimulating cooperation with this project. We are also grateful for the outstanding contribution of the Blood and Tissue Bank of the Cruz Roja in Oviedo (Asturias), the Blood Bank at Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, and the following clinicians: Dr. Carlos Suarez, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias; Dr. Eulalia Porras, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar; Dr. Carlos Escobar, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer; Dr. Jose Maria Anda, Hospital Santiago Apostol; Dr. Albino Alonso, Hospital Santiago Apostol; Dr. Manel Maños, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge; Dr. Javier Yetano, Hospital Galdakao, Osakidetza; Dr. Ramon Malluguiza, Hospital General de Elda; Dr. Ignacio Alvarez, Hospital de Leon; Dr. Jose Ramon Garcia Villar, Hospital Pontevedra; Dr. Jaime Marco, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia; Dr. Manuel Claver Hospital General Yagüe; Dr. Manuel Atienza, Hospital General de Albacete; and Dr. Hugo Galera, Hospital Virgen del Rocio. We also thank the technician Maria del Mar Eiroa Teijero for dealing with blood samples shipment.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia of Portugal Grants POCTI/SAU-OBS/61945/2004 (to G.G.-R.) and POCTI/CBO/43944/2001 (to J.L.) and Editorial Planeta of Spain (to I.P.-C.).

Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.

First Published Online September 11, 2007

1 J.L. and T.F. contributed equally to this work. Back

Abbreviations: PGL, Paraganglioma; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis.

Received March 21, 2007.

Accepted September 4, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Batsakis JG 1979 Paragangliomas in the head and neck. In: Tumors of the head and neck: clinical and pathological considerations. Batsakis JG, ed. 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; pp 369–380
  2. Parry DM, Li FP, Strong LC, Carney JA, Schottenfeld D, Reimer RR, Grufferman S 1982 Carotid body tumors in humans: genetics and epidemiology. J Natl Cancer Inst 68:573–578[Medline]
  3. DeLellis RA, LLoyd RA, Heitz PU, Eng C 2004 Pathology and genetics of tumors of endocrine organs in WHO classification of tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press
  4. Lack EE 1992 Tumors of the adrenal gland and extra-adrenal paraganglia. In: Atlas of tumor pathology. Series 3, fascicle 19th. Rosai J and Sobin LH, eds. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
  5. Nora JD, Hallett Jr JW, O’Brien PC, Naessens JM, Cherry Jr KJ, Pairolero PC 1988 Surgical resection of carotid body tumors: long-term survival, recurrence, and metastasis. Mayo Clin Proc 63:348–352[Medline]
  6. Manolidis S, Shohet JA, Jackson CG, Glasscock III ME 1999 Malignant glomus tumors. Laryngoscope 109:30–34[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Baysal BE, Farr JE, Rubinstein WS, Galus RA, Johnson KA, Aston CE, Myers EN, Johson JT, Carrau R, Kirkpatrick SJ, Myssiorek D, Singh D, Saha S, Gollin SM, Evans GA, James MR, Richard CW 1997 Fine mapping of an imprinted gene for familial nonchromaffin paragangliomas, on chromosome 11q23. Am J Hum Genet 60:121–132[Medline]
  8. Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, Lawrence EC, Myssiorek D, Bosch A, van der May A, Taschner PE, Rubinstein WS, Myers EN, Richard III CW, Cornelisse CJ, Devilee P, Devlin B 2000 Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science 287:848–851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Niemann S, Muller U 2000 Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nat Genet 26:268–270[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, Dahia PL, Douglas F, George E, Skoldberg F, Husebye ES, Eng C, Maher ER 2001 Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet 69:49–54[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Cecchini G 2003 Function and structure of complex II of the respiratory chain. Annu Rev Biochem 72:77–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Gottlieb E, Tomlinson IP 2005 Mitochondrial tumour suppressors: a genetic and biochemical update. Nat Rev Cancer 5:857–866[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Baysal BE 2003 On the association of succinate dehydrogenase mutations with hereditary paraganglioma. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14:453–459[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Baysal BE 2004 Genomic imprinting and environment in hereditary paraganglioma. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 129:85–90[Medline]
  15. Fokkema IF, Den Dunnen JT, Taschner PE 2005 LOVD: easy creation of a locus-specific sequence variation database using an "LSDB-in-a-Box" approach. Hum Mutat 26:63–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Schiavi F, Boedeker CC, Bausch B, Peçzkowska M, Fuentes Gomez C, Strassburg T, Pawlu C, Buchta M, Salzmann M, Hoffmann MM, Berlis A, Brink I, Cybulla M, Muresan M, Walter MA, Forrer F, Välimäki M, Kawecki A, Szutkowski A, Schipper J, Walz MK, Pigny P, Bauters C, Willet-Brozick JE, Baysal BE, Januszewicz A, Eng C, Opocher G, Neumann HP 2005 Predictors and prevalence of paraganglioma syndrome associated with mutations of the SDHC gene. JAMA 294:2057–2063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Mullenbach R, Lagoda PJ, Welter C 1989 An efficient salt-chloroform extraction of DNA from blood and tissues. Trends Genet 5:391
  18. Garcia-Rostan G, Tallini G, Herrero A, D’Aquila TG, Carcangiu ML, Rimm DL 1999 Frequent mutation and nuclear localization of β-catenin in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 59:1811–1815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sun F, Huo X, Zhai Y, Wang A, Xu J, Su D, Bartlam M, Rao Z 2005 Crystal structure of mitochondrial respiratory membrane protein complex II. Cell 121:1043–1057[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Yankovskaya V, Horsefield R, Tornroth S, Luna-Chavez C, Miyoshi H, Leger C, Byrne B, Cecchini G, Iwata S 2003 Architecture of succinate dehydrogenase and reactive oxygen species generation. Science 299:700–704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L 2002 Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 320:369–387[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, Serrano L 2005 The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W382–W388
  23. Guex N, Peitsch MC 1997 SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18:2714–2723[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. DeLano WL 2006 The PyMOL molecular graphics system. San Carlos, CA: DeLano Scientific LLC
  25. Bayley JP, van Minderhout I, Weiss MM, Jansen JC, Oomen P, Menko FH, Pasini B, Ferrando B, Wong N, Alpert LC, Williams R, Blair E, Devilee P, Taschner PE 2006 Mutation analysis of SDHB and SDHC: novel germline mutations in sporadic head and neck paraganglioma and familial paraganglioma and/or pheochromocytoma. BMC Med Genet 7:1
  26. Baysal BE, Willett-Brozick JE, Lawrence EC, Drovdlic CM, Savul SA, McLeod DR, Yee HA, Brackmann DE, Slattery WH, III, Myers EN, Ferrell RE, Rubinstein WS 2002 Prevalence of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD germline mutations in clinic patients with head and neck paragangliomas. J Med Genet 39:178–183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Benn DE, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Reilly JR, Bertherat J, Burgess J, Byth K, Croxson M, Dahia PL, Elston M, Gimm O, Henley D, Herman P, Murday V, Niccoli-Sire P, Pasieka JL, Rohmer V, Tucker K, Jeunemaitre X, Marsh DJ, Plouin PF, Robinson BG 2006 Clinical presentation and penetrance of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:827–836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Dannenberg H, Dinjens WN, Abbou M, Van Urk H, Pauw BK, Mouwen D, Mooi WJ, de Krijger RR 2002 Frequent germ-line succinate dehydrogenase subunit D gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic parasympathetic paraganglioma. Clin Cancer Res 8:2061–2066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Neumann HP, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, Muresan M, Buchta M, Franke G, Klisch J, Bley TA, Hoegerle S, Boedeker CC, Opocher G, Schipper J, Januszewicz A, Eng C 2004 Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA 292:943–951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Badenhop RF, Jansen JC, Fagan PA, Lord RS, Wang ZG, Foster WJ, Schofield PR 2004 The prevalence of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD mutations in patients with head and neck paraganglioma and association of mutations with clinical features. J Med Genet 41:e99
  31. Baysal BE 2002 Hereditary paraganglioma targets diverse paraganglia. J Med Genet 39:617–622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Taschner PE, Jansen JC, Baysal BE, Bosch A, Rosenberg EH, Brocker-Vriends AH, Van der Mey AG, van Ommen GJ, Cornelisse CJ, Devilee P 2001 Nearly all hereditary paragangliomas in the Netherlands are caused by two founder mutations in the SDHD gene. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 31:274–281[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Astrom K, Cohen JE, Willett-Brozick JE, Aston CE, Baysal BE 2003 Altitude is a phenotypic modifier in hereditary paraganglioma type 1: evidence for an oxygen-sensing defect. Hum Genet 113:228–237[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Amar L, Bertherat J, Baudin E, Ajzenberg C, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Chabre O, Chamontin B, Delemer B, Giraud S, Murat A, Niccoli-Sire P, Richard S, Rohmer V, Sadoul JL, Strompf L, Schlumberger M, Bertagna X, Plouin PF, Jeunemaitre X, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP 2005 Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma or functional paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol 23:8812–8818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Bayley JP, Devilee P, Taschner PE 2005 The SDH mutation database: an online resource for succinate dehydrogenase sequence variants involved in pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma and mitochondrial complex II deficiency. BMC Med Genet 6:39
  36. Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Favier J, Rustin P, Rieubland C, Crespin M, Nau V, Khau VK, Corvol P, Plouin PF, Jeunemaitre X 2003 Mutations in the SDHB gene are associated with extra-adrenal and/or malignant phaeochromocytomas. Cancer Res 63:5615–5621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Vanharanta S, Buchta M, McWhinney SR, Virta SK, Peczkowska M, Morrison CD, Lehtonen R, Januszewicz A, Jarvinen H, Juhola M, Mecklin JP, Pukkala E, Herva R, Kiuru M, Nupponen NN, Aaltonen LA, Neumann HP, Eng C 2004 Early-onset renal cell carcinoma as a novel extraparaganglial component of SDHB-associated heritable paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet 74:153–159[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Amar L, Baudin E, Burnichon N, Peyrard S, Silvera S, Bertherat J, Bertagna X, Schlumberger M, Jeunemaitre X, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Plouin PF 2007 Succinate dehydrogenase B gene mutations predict survival in patients with malignant pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:3822–3828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Eisenhofer G, Raygada M, Adams KT, Solis D, Lenders JW, Pacak K 2007 Clinical presentations, biochemical phenotypes, and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit B-associated pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:779–786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Young AL, Baysal BE, Deb A, Young WF 2002 Familial malignant catecholanine-secreting paraganglioma with prolonged survival associated with mutation in the succinate dehydrogenase B gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4102–4105



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
B E Baysal
Clinical and molecular progress in hereditary paraganglioma
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2008; 45(11): 689 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow High Resolution Figures
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lima, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Rostan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lima, J.
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Rostan, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals