| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Sleep Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry (A.N.V., S.P., E.O.B., A.S., M.B.), and Health Evaluation Sciences (H.-M.L., C.M.B.), Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033; and First Department of Pediatrics and Unit on Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes (E.Z., G.P.C.), University of Athens, GR-157-84 Athens, Greece
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Alexandros N. Vgontzas, M.D., Department of Psychiatry, H073, Penn State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033. E-mail: avgontzas{at}psu.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: In this study, we evaluated the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in nonpsychologically distressed obese subjects with and without SA and examined the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in SA patients.
Design and Participants: In study I, four-night sleep laboratory recordings and serial 24-h plasma measures of cortisol were obtained in 45 obese men with and without apnea and nonobese controls. Sleep apneic patients were reassessed after 3 months of CPAP use. In study II, 38 obese men with and without sleep apnea and nonobese controls were challenged with ovine CRH administration after four nights in the sleep laboratory.
Results: The sleep patterns were similar between obese and nonobese controls. Twenty-four-hour plasma cortisol levels were highest in nonobese controls, intermediate in obese apneic patients, and lowest in obese controls (8.8 ± 0.4 vs. 8.1 ± 0.3 vs. 7.5 ± 0.3 µg/dl, P < 0.05). CPAP tended to reduce cortisol levels in the apneic patients (difference –0.7 ± .4 µg/dl, P = 0.1). CRH administration resulted in a higher ACTH response in both obese groups, compared with nonobese controls; the three groups were not different in cortisol response.
Conclusions: Nonpsychologically distressed, normally sleeping, obese men had low cortisol secretion. The cortisol secretion was slightly activated by SA and returned to low by CPAP use. The low cortisol secretion in obesity through its inferred hyposecretion of hypothalamic CRH might predispose the obese to sleep apnea.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Obstructive sleep apnea in obese patients is associated with abdominal (visceral) obesity and insulin resistance and may itself be a manifestation of the metabolic syndrome (9, 10). Chronic stress-related activation of the HPA axis has been proposed as a risk factor in the development of visceral obesity and metabolic syndrome (11). Indeed, it is plausible that sleep apnea, through nocturnal hypoxia and repetitive electroencephalographic arousals, may lead to increased secretion of cortisol, which in turn may contribute to and accelerate the worsening of visceral obesity and the metabolic syndrome (2).
The goal of this study was to evaluate HPA axis function at the basal state by 24-h serial plasma sampling of cortisol and after a challenge test, i.e. ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH administration, in well-characterized, psychologically healthy obese men with sleep apnea, obese controls, and nonobese controls. We hypothesized that obese patients with sleep apnea would show HPA axis hyperactivity, compared with their controls, and that CPAP would have a beneficial effect on cortisol hypersecretion. Furthermore, we expected no differences in terms of plasma cortisol levels and response to CRH test between nondistressed obese and nonobese individuals studied under the strictly controlled conditions of the sleep laboratory.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
The subjects were recruited from the Sleep Disorders Clinic and through advertisement from the community. The participants in the two studies were similar in terms of age and BMI (see Tables 1
and 3
).
|
|
Procedures
Sleep laboratory. A thorough medical assessment, including physical examination, routine laboratory tests (including complete blood cell count, urinalysis, thyroid function tests, electrocardiography, and urine drug screen), and sleep history, was completed for each patient and control subject. Those who were positive for abnormal findings in the battery of clinical tests were excluded from the study. Blood pressure was measured in the evening during the physical examination using a pneumoelectric microprocessor-controlled instrument. The recorded blood pressure was the average of three consecutive readings during a 5-min period after 10 min of rest in the supine position. All potential participants in the study were screened in the sleep laboratory for 1 night for 8 h (2300–0700 h) using standard polysomnographic procedures (12). Throughout the night, respiration was monitored by thermocouples and/or pressure transducers at the nose and mouth (model TCT1R; Grass Instrument Co., Quincy, MA) and thoracic strain gauges. All-night recordings of hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SaO2) were obtained using a cardiorespiratory oximeter (model 8800; Nonin Medical, Inc., Plymouth, MN) attached to the finger. The subjects who met the inclusion criteria were monitored in the sleep laboratory for 4 consecutive nights (1 adaptation and 3 baseline nights). The patients with sleep apnea were reassessed with the same protocol after at least 3 months of closely monitored nightly use of CPAP. The sleep records were scored independently of any knowledge of the experimental conditions according to standardized criteria (12). Also, the respiratory data were quantified as previously described (13).
CPAP use. All 16 patients with sleep apnea used CPAP for 3 months. The optimal nasal CPAP pressure was determined during a full night polysomnographic study as the pressure necessary to abolish all respiratory events and snoring, secondary arousals, and episodes of SaO2 desaturation during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and in the supine position. To assure adherence, we monitored closely the CPAP use on a daily basis by calculating the time that the patient is breathing through the machine and not just the time the machine is on (AutoSet T, SmartStart; ResMed, Poway, CA). Furthermore, a respiratory therapist visited the home of each patient weekly for the first 4 wk and monthly thereafter to provide us with information regarding CPAP usage (number of hours used each day), pressure setting, and mask leakage. The average nightly use of CPAP was 4.6 ± 1.7 h, whereas 15 of the 16 met the criteria of regular users (14).
Twenty-four-hour blood sampling (study I)
Twenty-four-hour blood sampling was performed serially, every 30 min, on the fourth day and night in the sleep laboratory in the participants of study I and repeated in the patients with sleep apnea after 3 months of regular nightly use of CPAP as previously described (15). During the sleep periods, blood samples were obtained from an adjacent room by connecting external tubing to the indwelling catheter through a perforation in the wall.
Ovine CRH stimulation test (study II)
The participants of study II were given oCRH as an iv bolus injection at 2000 h, when the HPA axis is normally quiescent in the evening (16), on d 5 after the fourth night in the sleep laboratory. An indwelling catheter was inserted in the antecubital vein about 30 min before the first blood draw. Blood was drawn 30 and 15 min before the administration of CRH; at the time of the injection; and 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min afterward for measurement of ACTH and cortisol.
Hormone assays
Blood collected from the indwelling catheter was transferred to an ethylenediamine tetraacetate-containing tube and refrigerated until centrifugation (within 3 h). The supernatant was frozen at –20 C until hormone assay. ACTH and cortisol levels were measured by specific immunoassay techniques as previously described (17). The lower limit of detection was 5 pg/ml for ACTH and 0.7 µg/dl for cortisol. The intra- and interassay coefficients were, respectively, 4.6 and 6.0% for cortisol and 10.0 and 12.0% for ACTH. Also, single measures of cortisol binding globulin (CBG) were obtained with a double antibody/immunoabsorbent RIA (Labor Diagnostika Nord, Nordhorn, Germany). The lower detection limit was 11.5 µg/ml, and the intra- and interassay coefficients ranged from 2.9 to 3.9% and 2.4 to 5.5%, respectively.
Statistical analyses
The sleep variables were calculated based on the mean values from nights 2 and 3 for the 24-h blood draw study (night 4 was not included due to potential blood draw-induced sleep disturbance) and from nights 2 to 4 in the CRH study. For comparisons of age, BMI, and sleep variables among the three groups, the ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, when the variable displayed high level of skewness, was used. If the overall test was significant, pairwise comparisons among the three groups were further conducted using the Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For comparisons before and after the CPAP treatment for the apnea group, the paired t test was used. We note that the conclusions for the tests were essentially the same, regardless of whether parametric or nonparametric tests were used.
For study I the cortisol values among the three groups (see Table 4
), and before and after CPAP treatment for the apnea group, were compared using the repeated measurements analysis assuming the within-subject observations followed a group-specific autoregressive variance-covariance structure. The results were analyzed for the entire 24 h, daytime (0800–2200 h), and nighttime (2300–0700 h), respectively, and adjusted for age and race for the three-group comparisons but not for the before and after CPAP treatment comparison.
|
Alternatively, the repeated-measurement analyses were also performed for the post-oCRH administration cortisol and log-transformed ACTH data, in which the models adjusted for age and the mean of the baseline values and assumed group-specific autoregressive variance-covariance structure. The overall and time-specific differences among the three groups were contrasted.
The data are expressed as the mean ± SE, except for age and BMI, which are expressed as the mean ± SD. The statistical significance level selected for all analyses was set to be 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study I.
The group of sleep apneic patients, compared with both nonapneic obese and nonobese controls, demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of stage 1 sleep and significantly lower percentages of stage 2 and REM sleep (Table 1
). There were no significant differences between nonapneic obese and nonobese controls in any of the sleep variables. After the use of CPAP for 3 months, there was a significant improvement of wake time after sleep onset, percent stage 1 sleep, percent stage 2 sleep, percent REM sleep and a significant shortening of REM latency (Table 2
). Also, the apnea/hypopnea index and minimum SaO2 were significantly and markedly improved while on CPAP (53.3 ± 7.0 vs. 4.5 ± 1.9 and 72.4 ± 2.1 vs. 85.9 ± 1.6, both P < 0.001).
|
Study II.
The group of sleep apneic patients, compared with both nonapneic obese and nonobese controls, demonstrated a significantly higher wake time after sleep onset, total wake time, and percentage stage 1 sleep (P < 0.01) (Table 3
). The same patients demonstrated a significantly lower percentage of sleep time and stage 2 sleep (P < 0.05) than either control groups. There were no differences between obese and nonobese controls in any of the sleep variables. Finally, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were significantly higher in the sleep apneic patients group (144.3 ± 7.0, 89.4 ± 3.6 and 107.7 ± 4.6, respectively), compared with the nonobese controls (123.0 ± 1.6, 76.3 ± 1.4, and 91.9 ± 1.0) (P < 0.01 for all three blood pressure variables).
HPA axis
Basal function of the HPA axis (study I).
The 24-h mean values of cortisol were highest in nonobese controls, intermediate in obese apneic patients, and lowest in nonapneic obese controls (8.8 ± 0.4 vs. 8.1 ± 0.3 vs. 7.5 ± 0.3 µg/dl, overall P < 0.05 and P = 0.013 between nonobese and obese controls) (Fig. 1
and Table 4
). Similar nonsignificant trends were observed for the daytime period (0800–2200 h). During the nighttime period (2300–0700 h), the difference between obese sleep apneic patients and obese controls became significant, whereas the cortisol levels of obese sleep apneic patients and nonobese controls were very similar (Table 4
). The association of BMI and mean 24-h cortisol levels in the groups of nonobese and obese controls was negative (r = –0.4, P = 0.03). Three months of CPAP use was associated with a trend to reduce plasma cortisol levels in the apneic group (difference: –0.7 ± 0.4 µg/dl, P = 0.1), bringing it closer to the levels of the nonapneic obese controls (Fig. 2
). This effect was uniformly present throughout the 24-h period. There was no correlation between average nightly use of CPAP and the reduction of cortisol levels after CPAP. There were no differences of CBG levels among the three groups studied (42.1 ± 1.7 µg/ml for sleep apneics, 42.2 ± 1.5 for obese controls, and 42.9 ± 2.0 for nonobese controls).
|
|
Responses to CRH (study II)
Basal plasma levels of ACTH and cortisol were not different among the three groups. However, both obese sleep apneic patients and nonapneic obese controls had enhanced ACTH responses to the administration of CRH (Fig. 3
). Specifically, net integrated ACTH was increased in the two obese groups, compared with the nonobese controls (log difference of means: 0.61 ± 0.24, P < 0.05 between apneic patients and nonobese controls and 0.41 ± 0.23, P = 0.09 between nonapneic obese and nonobese controls). Similar increases were observed in total integrated ACTH (log difference of means: 0.43 ± 0.22, P = 0.06 apneic patients vs. nonobese controls and 0.30 ± 0.19, P = 0.10 nonapneic obese controls vs. nonobese controls) and net peak ACTH secretion (log difference of means: 0.49 ± 0.26, P = 0.07 apneics vs. nonobese controls and 0.40 ± 0.23, P = 0.10 nonapneic obese vs. nonobese). There were no differences in any of the ACTH response variables (net integrated, total integrated, peak secretion) between obese patients with sleep apnea and obese controls. After collapsing the obese apneic patients and nonapneic obese controls, a comparison of the obese group (apneic patients and nonapneic controls) vs. nonobese controls showed a significant difference in all three variables of ACTH response. Specifically, net integrated ACTH (log difference of means: 0.56 ± 0.20 P < 0.01), total integrated ACTH (log difference of means: 0.39 ± 0.17 P < 0.05), and net peak ACTH secretion (log difference of means: 0.48 ± 0.20 P < 0.05) were all significantly increased in obese vs. nonobese controls.
|
Finally, there were no differences among the three groups in terms of cortisol responses to oCRH administration, including net integrated cortisol, total integrated cortisol, net peak cortisol, and results based on the repeated measurement analysis (Fig. 3
). The peak ACTH and cortisol values occurred, respectively, 30 and 60 min after CRH administration.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We were partially surprised by the results, which showed that obesity is associated with a decreased cortisol secretion and an exaggerated response of ACTH to CRH, suggesting a hyposecretion of hypothalamic CRH. These findings challenge the notion supported by studies that the HPA axis in obesity, particularly central obesity, is hyperactive or normal (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). In the majority of these studies, the psychological profile, including emotional distress, anxiety, and/or depression, of the subjects was not assessed formally, and/or the evaluation of the function of the HPA axis was not based on serial 24-h plasma sampling for cortisol in a strictly controlled environment. Our findings are consistent with reports of significantly lower levels of plasma cortisol in adults and children (24, 25) or 24-h urinary free cortisol in women with abdominal obesity that, similar to our study, were screened for depression (26). This lower HPA axis activity in obese subjects is consistent with the hypoalertness and daytime sleepiness and fatigue of obese individuals (27, 28).
In our study, obese individuals without sleep apnea slept at night as well as nonobese individuals. Previous studies by us and others reported that severely obese individuals, compared with normal-weight subjects, sleep poorly at night (13, 27, 29). However, in this study, obese subjects were carefully selected not to have poor sleep and especially insomnia, a condition that has been associated with an activated HPA axis (30). Our decision not to include emotionally distressed insomniac subjects is supported by an analysis of objective sleep measures of 73 obese individuals without sleep apnea that showed that less sleep was associated with psychological distress, whereas more sleep was associated with absence of distress (31).
Are the lower plasma cortisol values in obese subjects secondary to central or peripheral alterations of the HPA axis? Vicennati and Pasquali (26) suggested that the lower urinary free cortisol values they found in obese, nondepressed women were most likely secondary to subtle abnormalities of cortisol transport, metabolism, and/or target tissue activity. Admittedly, hypersensitivity of tissues to glucocorticoids could result in both low circulating cortisol, due to increased cortisol-negative feedback, and central obesity analogous to mild Cushing syndrome (11).
Reports of the ACTH and/or cortisol response to exogenous CRH in obese patients have been inconsistent, ranging from a blunt to an exaggerated response or no difference, compared with nonobese controls (23). Our oCRH study showed that obese subjects with and without sleep apnea had a higher response of ACTH but not cortisol, which is consistent with two previous reports (32, 33). These results suggest that in nondepressed, nonapneic obese men, the HPA axis is chronically slightly hypoactive, associated with hypotrophic adrenal cortices requiring compensatorily elevated amounts of ACTH to produce normal amounts of cortisol. These findings are reminiscent of data in patients with hypothalamic adrenal insufficiency and are against the glucocorticoid hypersensitivity hypothesis in obesity, in which we would have expected a lower rather than a higher ACTH response to oCRH.
Our CRH stimulation data are also compatible with an increased peripheral clearance of cortisol in obese subjects, which might have led to compensatory increases of CRH and ACTH secretion in an attempt to maintain free cortisol within a minimum normal range (34, 35). This type of ACTH and cortisol response to CRH was observed in AIDS patients with insulin resistance and lipodystrophy (36). In these patients, there was a mild early ACTH hypersecretion response and a normal cortisol response to CRH.
There are only a few studies on the effects of sleep apnea on the HPA axis, and most of these have primarily focused on the effects of CPAP on cortisol secretion (5, 6, 7, 8, 37). Several studies have reported that CPAP does not reduce cortisol levels or that acute withdrawal of CPAP therapy does not result in an increase in cortisol levels (5, 6, 8, 37). In contrast, another study reported that CPAP corrected preexisting hypercortisolemia, particularly after prolonged use (7). Several of these studies were limited in that cortisol was measured at a single time point, they did not use appropriate controls, and were not done under controlled conditions. Our study demonstrated that sleep apnea in obese men is associated with increased cortisol level during the night, compared with nonapneic obese controls, which is corrected after the use of CPAP for 3 months. The correction of the increased cortisol appears to be related to the elimination, through CPAP, respectively, of the stress of repetitive respiratory pausing (apnea) and sleep fragmentation and/or better oxygen saturation. The decrease of cortisol levels after CPAP use may also be related to the beneficial effect of CPAP on blood pressure, via a decrease in sympathetic activity, reported in these patients. Our findings on the effect of CPAP on blood pressure are consistent with randomized controlled trials that have shown that CPAP treatment of severe sleep apnea reduces blood pressure (38).
The pathogenesis of airway collapse during sleep in patients with sleep apnea is not well understood; however, there is evidence of decreased excitatory stimuli from neural systems to respiratory centers (39). CRH is a potent stimulus of respiration (40), and its inferred hyposecretion in obese patients may explain why such patients are at higher risk for sleep apnea. Furthermore, prolonged exercise is associated with increased CRH levels (41), which may explain the beneficial effect of exercise in sleep apneics (42). Fatigue and sleepiness are common complaints of obesity, and we and others have reported that obesity, even without sleep apnea, is associated with objective sleepiness and hypoalertness (19, 29). The inferred low levels of CRH secretion, the low levels of 24-h cortisol secretion, combined with high plasma levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF
are consistent with the hypoalertness and daytime sleepiness and fatigue of obese individuals (9, 10, 43).
Finally, our data, that obesity in nondepressed individuals is associated with lower cortisol secretion, whereas in psychologically stressed, obese individuals, there is HPA axis activation albeit from a lower baseline, may provide the basis for a meaningful phenotyping of obesity. One phenotypic subtype may be associated with depression/anxiety, HPA axis hyperactivity, and less sleep and the other with HPA axis normalcy or hypoactivity, normothymia, and more sleep; this subtyping is supported further by our recent study of the association between amount of sleep and psychological distress in the obese (31). This proposed subtyping may have important therapeutic implications and lead to the development of novel treatment approaches specific for each subtype.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
First Published Online September 4, 2007
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CBG, cortisol binding globulin; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; o, ovine; REM, rapid eye movement; SaO2, oxygen saturation.
Received April 4, 2007.
Accepted August 27, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Henley, G. M. Russell, J. A. Douthwaite, S. A. Wood, F. Buchanan, R. Gibson, W. W. Woltersdorf, J. R. Catterall, and S. L. Lightman Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Activation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4234 - 4242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Carneiro, S. M. Togeiro, L. F. Hayashi, F. F. Ribeiro-Filho, A. B. Ribeiro, S. Tufik, and M. T. Zanella Effect of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function and 24-h blood pressure profile in obese men with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2008; 295(2): E380 - E384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |