help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0951
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burt, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, K. K. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burt, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, K. K. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Metabolism
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 10 3923-3929
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Impact of Acute and Chronic Low-Dose Glucocorticoids on Protein Metabolism

Morton G. Burt, Gudmundur Johannsson, A. Margot Umpleby, Donald J. Chisholm and Ken K. Y. Ho

Garvan Institute of Medical Research (M.G.B., G.J., D.J.C., K.K.Y.H.) and Department of Endocrinology, St. Vincent’s Hospital (M.G.B., D.J.C., K.K.Y.H.), Sydney, New South Wales, 2010 Australia; University of New South Wales (M.G.B., D.J.C., K.K.Y.H.), Sydney, 2052 Australia; and Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology (A.M.U.), GKT School of Medicine, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Ken K. Y. Ho, Pituitary Research Unit, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia. E-mail: k.ho{at}garvan.unsw.edu.au.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: High-dose glucocorticoids cause acute protein loss by increasing protein breakdown and oxidation. Whether lower glucocorticoid doses, typical of therapeutic use, induce sustained catabolism has not been studied.

Objective: Our objective was to assess the effect of acute and chronic therapeutic glucocorticoid doses on protein metabolism.

Design and Setting: We conducted an open longitudinal and a cross-sectional study at a clinical research facility.

Patients and Intervention: Ten healthy subjects were studied before and after a short course of prednisolone (5 and 10 mg/d sequentially for 7 d each). Twelve subjects with inactive polymyalgia rheumatica receiving chronic (>12 months) prednisone (mean = 5.0 ± 0.8 mg/d) were compared with 12 age- and gender-matched normal subjects.

Main Outcome Measure: Whole-body protein metabolism was assessed using a 3-h primed constant infusion of 1-[13C]leucine, from which rates of leucine appearance (leucine Ra, an index of protein breakdown), leucine oxidation (Lox, index of protein oxidation) and leucine incorporation into protein (LIP, index of protein synthesis) were estimated.

Results: Prednisolone induced an acute significant increase in Lox (P = 0.008) and a fall in LIP (P = 0.08) but did not affect leucine Ra. There was no significant difference between the effects of the 5- and 10-mg prednisolone doses on leucine metabolism. In subjects receiving chronic prednisone therapy, leucine Ra, Lox, and LIP were not significantly different from normal subjects.

Conclusion: Glucocorticoids stimulate protein oxidation after acute but not chronic administration. This time-related change suggests that glucocorticoid-induced stimulation of protein oxidation does not persist but that a metabolic adaptation occurs to limit protein loss.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MAINTENANCE OF OPTIMAL body protein status is an essential regulatory process for good health. Protein loss is a cause of substantial morbidity. Protein malnutrition increases mortality in chronic renal failure (1), AIDS (2), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3). Endogenous glucocorticoid overproduction in Cushing’s syndrome causes a marked reduction in lean body mass (LBM) (4, 5, 6) and leads to skin thinning and muscle wasting and weakness (7). Therapeutic use of glucocorticoids results in a similar but usually milder physical phenotype.

Insights into the regulation of whole-body protein metabolism have been made possible by the application of steady-state tracer methodology, such as the leucine turnover technique. This has allowed accurate and noninvasive estimation of whole-body rates of protein breakdown, oxidation, and synthesis, the key components of protein metabolism. High doses of glucocorticoids (e.g. prednisolone 40–60 mg/d) acutely induce protein catabolism by increasing protein breakdown and oxidation in healthy young adults (8, 9, 10). However, most patients receiving glucocorticoids for control of inflammatory or autoimmune disease are elderly and are treated with prednisolone doses of less than 10 mg/d (11, 12). Little is known about the effect of lower therapeutic doses of glucocorticoids on protein metabolism in the elderly.

The acute and chronic effects of a hormone on protein metabolism may differ. GH acutely reduces protein oxidation and increases protein mass in subjects with GH deficiency (13, 14, 15). However, during chronic GH treatment, protein oxidation returns toward baseline (16), a change that may reflect a metabolic adaptation that maintains protein mass at a new steady state (17). It is not known to what extent therapeutic doses of glucocorticoids perturb protein metabolism and whether this effect is sustained.

The aims were to assess whether 1) therapeutic glucocorticoid doses acutely induce protein catabolism and 2) acute changes in protein metabolism are maintained during chronic glucocorticoid use in elderly subjects. Two clinical studies were undertaken to address these aims. First, healthy elderly subjects were studied before and after a short course of glucocorticoids. Second, protein metabolism in subjects on long-term glucocorticoids was compared with healthy subjects matched for age and gender. The primary endpoint of both studies was whole-body protein oxidation, which reflects the balance between whole-body protein breakdown and synthesis.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects and study design

Acute effects of glucocorticoids (study 1). Ten healthy subjects (seven women), aged at least 55 yr (range 56–78 yr) were recruited from the general public. Subjects were excluded if they were receiving glucocorticoids and if they had diabetes mellitus, an active infection, congestive heart failure, hepatic or renal disease, or a malignancy. The study design consisted of an open-label two-dose sequential study of prednisolone 5 mg/d followed by 10 mg/d for 7 d each.

Chronic effects of glucocorticoids (study 2). This was a cross-sectional study comparing 12 subjects (11 women) with documented but inactive polymyalgia rheumatica treated with glucocorticoids for at least 12 months to 12 normal subjects (11 women) of similar age. Five normal subjects (four women) had also participated in study 1. Subjects with polymyalgia rheumatica had received a stable prednisone dose (2–10 mg/d) for at least 3 months and were in remission as defined by resolution of clinical symptoms and a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Subjects were excluded if they had congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hepatic or renal disease, or malignancy or if they were receiving immunosuppressive therapy other than prednisone. No subject was receiving medication known to influence 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ß-HSD) activity (18). The Research Ethics Committee of St. Vincent’s Hospital (Sydney, Australia) approved both studies, and all subjects provided written informed consent.

Clinical protocol

Subjects attended the Clinical Research Facility, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia, at 0830 h after an overnight fast.

Assessment of body composition. Fat mass (FM), LBM, and bone mineral content (BMC) were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry using a total body scanner (Lunar model DPX, software version 3.1; Lunar Corp., Madison, WI), which also quantified regional body composition of the upper and lower limb along with truncal and central abdominal fat. Truncal fat comprises fat in the chest, abdominal, and pelvic regions, whereas central abdominal fat is contained within a manually traced region bordered by the upper margin of the second and the lower margin of the fourth lumbar vertebral bodies and the outer margins of the ribs (19). At our institution, the coefficients of variation (CV) for FM and LBM are 2.9 and 1.4%, respectively (20).

Estimation of extracellular water (ECW). ECW was estimated using the bromide dilution technique. ECW was calculated from the change in serum bromide concentration 140 min after injection of a known amount of bromide using the formula of Miller et al. (21). The intraassay CV for measurement of serum bromide concentration at our institution is less than 4% (22). The mean day-to-day intrasubject CV for ECW, based on four subjects studied on two occasions, is 5.7% (22). ECW was subtracted from LBM to calculate body cell mass (BCM), the metabolically active component of LBM (20).

Assessment of whole-body protein turnover. Whole-body protein turnover was assessed using a primed constant infusion of 1-[13C]leucine as previously described (23, 24). NaH13CO3 and 99% 1-[13C]leucine were obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Woburn, MA). Solutions were prepared under sterile conditions using 0.9% saline. A 0.1 mg/kg priming dose of NaH13CO3 was immediately followed by a 3-h primed constant infusion of 1-[13C]leucine (prime, 0.5 mg/kg; infusion, 0.5 mg/kg·h), based on previous studies demonstrating that steady state was achieved during this time period (24). Blood and breath samples were collected before (–10 and 0 min) and at the end of the infusion (140, 160, and 180 min). Blood was placed on ice, and plasma was separated and stored at –80 C until analysis. CO2 production rates were measured with an open circuit ventilated hood system (Deltatrac metabolic monitor; Datex Instrumentation Corp., Helsinki, Finland), which was calibrated against standard gases before each study. Measurements of CO2 production were collected during two 20-min periods. After an equilibration period of 5 min, the final 15 min of recordings were averaged.

Calculation of whole-body protein turnover. Rates of whole-body protein turnover were estimated using the reciprocal pool method (25). Because leucine has two pathways of disposal, oxidation and reincorporation into protein, the principles of steady-state kinetics allow calculation of rates of leucine appearance (leucine Ra, an index of protein breakdown), leucine oxidation (Lox, an index of oxidative loss of protein), and leucine incorporation into protein (LIP, an index of protein synthesis). In the reciprocal pool method, {alpha}-ketoisocaproic acid (KIC), formed when leucine undergoes transamination, is used as a surrogate marker of leucine when calculating its rate of appearance, because plasma KIC more accurately reflects the intracellular environment (25, 26). Because the carboxyl group of leucine labeled with 13C is removed in the first irreversible step in its oxidative degradation, changes in the isotopic enrichment of CO2 with 13C are used to estimate Lox. Therefore, Lox is calculated by multiplying leucine Ra by the fraction of isotope oxidized and dividing by a correction factor to account for the proportion of CO2 that is excreted in breath and not fixed in other metabolic pathways, 71% in our laboratory (24). LIP is derived as the difference between leucine Ra and Lox. The CV for leucine Ra, Lox, and LIP at our institution, based on seven subjects studied on two occasions, are 3.5, 6.1, and 3.5%, respectively.

Indirect calorimetry. Resting energy expenditure (REE) and substrate oxidation rates were calculated using the equations of Ferrannini (27). The mean day-to-day intrasubject CV for REE at our Institute is about 4% (20, 28).

Estimation of insulin sensitivity. Homeostasis models of insulin resistance (HOMA-R) and secretion (HOMA-ß) were calculated from measures of fasting glucose and insulin as described by Matthews et al. (29).

Estimation of physical activity. Physical activity was assessed using a modified Baecke questionnaire. The questionnaire is designed specifically for mature subjects, assessing participation in household chores and leisure activities (30). A higher score denotes greater physical activity.

Analytical methods

KIC was extracted from plasma as described by Nissen et al. (31). KIC enrichment with 13C was measured as the butyldimethylsilyl derivative by gas chromatography (model 5890; Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA)-mass spectrometry (MSD 5971A; Hewlett-Packard), with selective monitoring of ions 301 and 302 (32). CO2 enrichment in breath was measured at St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK, on a SIRA series II isotope ratio mass spectrometer (VG Isotech, Cheshire, UK).

Glucose measurements were performed immediately after the samples were drawn and were analyzed by an immobilized glucose oxidase method on a glucose analyzer (model 23AM; Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, OH). Serum bromide concentration was measured by HPLC after removal of plasma proteins by centrifugal ultrafiltration (22). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) was measured using a commercial assay (Immulite 2000; Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). The limit of detection was 0.4 µmol/liter, and the CV was 7.3% at 2.1 µmol/liter and 7.6% at 4.4 µmol/liter. For the purpose of statistical analysis, samples with undetectable levels were assigned a value of 0.4 µmol/liter. IGF-I was measured using a two-site RIA after acid ethanol extraction, with a CV of 8.2% at 13.8 nmol/liter and 7.3% at 28.6 nmol/liter (33). Plasma insulin (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) (Bioclone Australia Pty. Ltd., Marrickville, New South Wales, Australia) concentrations were measured by RIA using commercial kits. The interassay CV for insulin was 4.2% at 42 µU/ml. The interassay CV for IGFBP-3 was 7.3% at 0.65 µg/ml and 10.6% at 4.2 µg/ml (34).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was undertaken using statistical software packages Statview 4.5 PPC (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) and SPSS 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results are expressed as mean ± SE unless otherwise stated. In study 1, ANOVA with repeated measures was used to assess changes in variables across the three time points to determine a glucocorticoid treatment effect. Post hoc paired t tests with a Bonferroni correction were then performed to determine whether there was a difference between the 5- and 10-mg/d prednisolone doses. In study 2, unpaired t tests were used to compare differences between glucocorticoid users and normal subjects. Data that were not normally distributed were log-transformed for analysis or analyzed nonparametrically. Simple and multiple regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between variables. Correction of whole-body leucine turnover for differences in body composition was made using analysis of covariance, which is the recommended technique for correction of a biological variable with a nonzero intercept (35, 36).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Acute effect of glucocorticoids (study 1)

Subjects. The 10 healthy subjects’ mean age was 68.2 ± 2.8 yr, mean weight was 64.9 ± 4.2 kg, and body mass index (BMI) was 24.2 ± 1.2 kg/m2. All subjects completed the study protocol and complied with prednisolone treatment (on the basis of returned pill bottles). No subject reported any adverse events related to prednisolone use.

Endocrine and metabolic parameters. Serum DHEAS fell (P < 0.0001) and IGF-I increased (P = 0.005) during prednisolone treatment (Table 1Go). Prednisolone treatment did not significantly change body weight, ECW, fasting glucose or insulin, HOMA estimates of insulin sensitivity and secretion, IGFBP-3, REE, or substrate oxidation (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Weight, ECW, glucose, serum hormone concentrations, and indirect calorimetry in 10 healthy elderly subjects at baseline, after prednisolone 5 mg/d for 7 d and 10 mg/d for an additional 7 d

 
Whole-body leucine turnover. Prednisolone induced a significant increase in Lox (P = 0.008) and a reduction in LIP that approached statistical significance (P = 0.08) but did not affect leucine Ra (Table 2Go). Lox increased after prednisolone 5 mg/d (P = 0.03) and 10 mg/d (P = 0.07), although the change with the latter dose did not quite reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference between the changes in Lox induced by the two prednisolone doses. LIP fell slightly, but not significantly, with both doses (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Rates of leucine Ra, Lox, and LIP in 10 subjects at baseline and then after prednisolone 5 mg/d for 7 d and 10 mg/d for an additional 7 d

 
The data were also analyzed with Lox expressed as a percentage of leucine Ra (Lox/leucine Ra, percent Lox), reflecting the percentage of amino acids generated from protein breakdown undergoing oxidation. As shown in Fig. 1Go, percent Lox rose significantly with both the 5- and 10-mg/d prednisolone doses (P < 0.005). No difference between the effect of the 5- and 10-mg/d prednisolone doses on percent Lox was observed (Fig. 1Go). Because the effects of prednisolone on body fat and lean mass over the short duration of treatment are minimal, it is unlikely that the leucine metabolic changes were influenced secondarily by a change in body composition.


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Lox (white bars) and LIP (gray bars) expressed as a percentage of leucine Ra in 10 subjects at baseline and after prednisolone (Pred) 5 mg/d for 7 d and 10 mg/d for an additional 7 d. Bars represent mean ± SE. *, P < 0.005 vs. baseline.

 
Chronic effects of glucocorticoids (study 2)

Subjects. There were no significant differences in age, weight, and BMI between subjects receiving long-term glucocorticoids and normal subjects (Table 3Go). Glucocorticoid users had a significantly lower physical activity score than normal subjects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Subject characteristics, hormone levels, and insulin sensitivity of 12 normal subjects and 12 subjects receiving long-term glucocorticoids for polymyalgia rheumatica (glucocorticoid users)

 
Endocrine and metabolic parameters (Table 3Go). DHEAS concentration was significantly lower in glucocorticoid users than in normal subjects. DHEAS was below the limit of detection (<0.4 µmol/liter) in nine of 12 glucocorticoid users compared with one of 12 normal subjects (P = 0.0009; {chi}2 = 11.0). There were no significant differences in IGF-I, IGFBP-3, fasting glucose, or glycosylated hemoglobin between the two groups. Fasting insulin tended to be higher in glucocorticoid users, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.08). HOMA-R was significantly greater in glucocorticoid users than in normal subjects (P = 0.04). REE and substrate oxidation were not significantly different between glucocorticoid users and normal subjects.

Body composition (Table 4Go). In glucocorticoid users, percent FM was greater by 12%, LBM was lower by 8%, and BMC was lower by 11% than in normal subjects; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The mean ECW was not significantly different in the two groups, nor was there a difference in the derived BCM between the two groups. Percent truncal (P = 0.009) and central abdominal (P = 0.018) fat was about 25% greater in glucocorticoid users than in normal subjects, whereas limb fat was not significantly different (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Whole- and regional-body composition in 12 normal subjects and 12 subjects receiving long-term glucocorticoids for polymyalgia rheumatica (glucocorticoid users)

 
Whole-body leucine turnover. Because LBM (23, 24, 37) and FM (23, 38) both influence rates of whole-body protein metabolism, their relationship with leucine turnover was first assessed in simple regression analyses. Whole-body leucine turnover was subsequently adjusted for significant covariates to ensure differences in body composition between the groups did not influence results. In an analysis of the two groups combined, LBM was significantly and positively correlated with leucine Ra (r2 = 0.25; P = 0.014), Lox (r2 = 0.33; P = 0.004), and LIP (r2 = 0.17; P = 0.047). The correlations between leucine turnover and BCM were similar to LBM (data not shown). FM was positively correlated with leucine Ra (r2 = 0.17; P = 0.04) and LIP (r2 = 0.23; P = 0.02) but not Lox (r2 = 0.001; P = 0.90). Physical activity score was not significantly correlated with indices of leucine turnover (data not shown); therefore, data were not corrected for its influence.

A multiple regression analysis was performed to ascertain the independent effects of LBM, FM, and glucocorticoid use (defined as present or absent) on whole-body leucine turnover (Table 5Go). LBM was an independent determinant of all three indices of leucine turnover. FM was an independent determinant of leucine Ra and LIP but not Lox. Glucocorticoid use was not an independent determinant of any index of whole-body leucine turnover. Rates of whole-body leucine turnover in glucocorticoid users and normal subjects were then calculated unadjusted and after correction for LBM alone and LBM and FM (Table 6Go). In all analyses, there were no significant differences in leucine Ra, Lox, or LIP between glucocorticoid users and normal subjects, supporting the findings from multiple regression analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5. Multiple regression analysis assessing the independent effects of LBM, FM, and glucocorticoid use on rates of leucine Ra, Lox, and LIP in 12 normal subjects and 12 subjects on long-term glucocorticoids

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 6. Rates of leucine Ra, Lox, and LIP in 12 normal subjects and 12 subjects on long-term glucocorticoids unadjusted and corrected for LBM alone and LBM and FM by analysis of covariance

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
These longitudinal and cross-sectional studies provide strong evidence that the acute and chronic effects of similar doses of glucocorticoids on protein metabolism differ. In therapeutic doses, acute glucocorticoids significantly increased Lox and reduced LIP to a level that approached statistical significance. After chronic administration of similar doses, none of the indices of leucine metabolism were significantly different from age- and gender-matched controls in a careful analysis that accounted for the confounding effects of body composition differences. Therefore, the data suggest that protein oxidation is acutely increased but returns to normal during long-term treatment.

The findings of study 1 suggest that glucocorticoids in therapeutic doses acutely induce protein catabolism by increasing whole-body protein oxidation. Protein oxidation represents the difference between protein breakdown and synthesis that is irreversibly lost from the body. A prednisolone dose of 5 mg/d, about 1.5 times physiological glucocorticoid production, significantly increased protein oxidation by 20%. The failure to find a greater change in protein oxidation with the prednisolone 10-mg/d dose could reflect the sequential study design, with an acute increase in protein oxidation attenuated during the second week of treatment. Previous studies using prednisolone doses of about 40–60 mg/d have reported glucocorticoids acutely increase protein oxidation by 55–110% (8, 9, 10, 39), suggesting there is a dose response to glucocorticoid. One recent study reported that a prednisone dose of 0.5 mg/kg/d (35 mg/d for a 70-kg man) for 6 d did not significantly alter whole-body protein turnover or skeletal muscle fractional synthetic rate and amino acid kinetics in the lower limb (40). The authors concluded that moderate glucocorticoid doses were not catabolic (40). These differing findings may reflect the different investigative techniques used, because Short et al. (40) did not quantify whole-body protein oxidation, which was increased in our study. The contrasting interpretations of the two studies may reflect that protein oxidation is a more sensitive measure of a small imbalance between protein breakdown and synthesis or that glucocorticoids exert a greater effect on nonskeletal muscle sources of protein (e.g. skin or the splanchnic bed).

A major finding of this study is that the acute and chronic effects of similar doses of glucocorticoids are different. Although the paired longitudinal data have greater statistical power than the unpaired cross-sectional data, the finding that Lox is not significantly increased in chronic glucocorticoid users is unlikely to represent a type II error, because the rate of Lox was, if anything, lower than in normal subjects (Table 6Go). Furthermore, the groups were well matched for age and gender distribution, and differences in conversion of prednisone to prednisolone by 11ß-HSD are unlikely to be responsible for this finding, because subjects were not receiving medication known to influence 11ß-HSD activity. Based on the observations in study 1, a sample size of 12 subjects per group in study 2 would have a power of 90% to detect a 20% greater Lox in glucocorticoid users at the 0.05 significance level. Therefore, the findings suggest that stimulation of protein oxidation by therapeutic glucocorticoids wanes over time, so that the rate of protein oxidation returns to baseline. Normalization of protein oxidation may represent an adaptive or corrective metabolic mechanism to limit protein loss and achieve a new steady state of protein mass. A similar phenomenon has been observed for GH treatment, in that the acute change in protein oxidation is no longer present after chronic treatment (16).

The finding of a normal rate of protein oxidation in chronic glucocorticoid users stands in contrast to our report in Cushing’s syndrome, a pathological state of chronic glucocorticoid excess where protein oxidation was persistently increased (23). The likely explanation for this difference is the degree of glucocorticoid excess. In subjects with Cushing’s syndrome, the mean 24-h urinary free cortisol excretion was about 10 times physiological glucocorticoid production (23), whereas a prednisone dose of 5 mg/d is about 1.5 times physiological levels. The magnitude of increase in Lox of 55–110% induced acutely by high-dose glucocorticoids (8, 9, 10, 39) is greater than in Cushing’s syndrome where mean Lox was increased by only 20% (18). Some adaptation probably occurs during chronic high-dose glucocorticoid excess in Cushing’s syndrome but is not sufficient to return Lox to normal. Therefore, the difference in the rates of Lox between Cushing’s syndrome and therapeutic glucocorticoid use is likely to reflect incomplete metabolic compensation to the greater glucocorticoid effect in the former.

Cushing’s syndrome results in unequivocal changes in body composition with greater total and truncal adiposity and reduced LBM (5, 6, 41). In glucocorticoid users, a similar pattern of body composition change was found; however, only truncal and central abdominal fat were significantly different from normal subjects (Table 4Go). Measurement of visceral fat was not undertaken in this study but would provide further insight into the effect of low-dose glucocorticoids on regional fat accumulation. Changes in abdominal adiposity may have contributed to increased insulin resistance as measured by HOMA in subjects on chronic glucocorticoid therapy. Previous studies reported subjects receiving long-term therapeutic doses of glucocorticoids for giant cell arteritis (42) and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (43, 44) had greater truncal and total adiposity but no significant difference in LBM. Body composition was not the primary endpoint in the present study and was quantified to ensure that differences did not confound estimates of leucine turnover. Because the sample size of the two groups was relatively small, the negative results could represent a type II error. However, the finding of a normal rate of protein oxidation in chronic glucocorticoid users provides a metabolic mechanism that may explain the lack of significant reduction in LBM.

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. Because subjects were studied only during the fasting state, the effect of glucocorticoids in the nonfasted state has not been assessed. However, previous studies have reported that glucocorticoids exert a qualitatively and quantitatively similar acute effect on fasting and postprandial protein oxidation (8, 9). Another area unexplored by this study is the effect of glucocorticoids on protein metabolism in skeletal muscle. Rates of whole-body protein turnover represent the net effect of protein turnover in all tissues and may not be representative of skeletal muscle. The acute (40, 45, 46) and chronic (47) effects of glucocorticoids in skeletal muscle have been reported to differ from those found at the whole-body level. Another issue that is not clear is whether changes in protein metabolism are, in part, influenced by changes in other hormones, such as DHEAS and IGF-I. A recent study reported that DHEA replacement in hypoadrenal women did not alter whole-body or skeletal muscle protein metabolism (48). It is uncertain whether a reduction in DHEAS of 30–40% or increase in IGF-I of less than 20% would have a significant effect on protein metabolism. Finally, for clinical reasons, we were unable to withdraw prednisone in chronic glucocorticoid users to ascertain whether this would alter protein metabolism.

In summary, therapeutic glucocorticoids acutely induce protein catabolism by increasing irreversible oxidative loss of amino acids. However, during chronic glucocorticoid use, the rate of protein oxidation is not significantly different from normal. Normalization of the rate of oxidative loss of protein may represent a metabolic adaptation that protects against ongoing loss of body protein and provides an explanation for the lack of a significant reduction in LBM in glucocorticoid users. A proposed model demonstrating time-dependent changes in protein metabolism during glucocorticoid therapy is depicted in Fig. 2Go. Glucocorticoids acutely increase protein oxidation, leading to a reduction in protein mass. However, during chronic glucocorticoid use, the rate of protein oxidation returns to baseline; therefore, protein loss is not ongoing, and a new steady state of protein mass is achieved. Finally, the time-dependent changes in the dynamics of protein metabolism indicate that the timing of study after intervention is critical to the interpretation of results.


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Proposed model demonstrating the effect of therapeutic glucocorticoids (GCs) on protein metabolism.

 


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the research nurses Amanda Idan, Olivia Wong, Angela Peris, and Margot Hewett for clinical assistance; Dr. James Gibney for assistance with the study design; Dr. Tuan Nguyen for statistical advice; Dr. Kin Leung for assistance with measurement of serum bromide by HPLC; and Ann Poljak from the Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of New South Wales, and Nicola Jackson from Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, GKT School of Medicine, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, for assistance with mass spectrometry. Professor Ric Day and the Department of Rheumatology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, and the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Support Group, Arthritis Foundation of New South Wales, helped greatly with subject recruitment.


    Footnotes
 
M.G.B. was supported by scholarships from the St. Vincent’s Clinic Foundation, Sydney, Australia, and the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

Disclosure Statement: M.G.B., A.M.U., and D.J.C. have nothing to declare. G.J. has received consulting and lecture fees from Pfizer and Novo-Nordisk. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Pharmacia Endocrine Care International Fund for Research and Education (to K.K.Y.H.).

First Published Online July 24, 2007

Abbreviations: BCM, Body cell mass; BMC, bone mineral content; BMI, body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; ECW, extracellular water; FM, fat mass; HOMA-ß, homeostasis model of insulin secretion; HOMA-R, homeostasis model of insulin resistance; 11ß-HSD, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; IGFBP-3, IGF-binding protein-3; KIC, {alpha}-ketoisocaproic acid; LBM, lean body mass; leucine Ra, leucine appearance; LIP, leucine incorporation into protein; Lox, leucine oxidation; REE, resting energy expenditure.

Received April 27, 2007.

Accepted July 18, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Owen Jr WF, Lew NL, Liu Y, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM 1993 The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 329:1001–1006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kotler DP, Tierney AR, Wang J, Pierson Jr RN 1989 Magnitude of body-cell-mass depletion and the timing of death from wasting in AIDS. Am J Clin Nutr 50:444–447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Marquis K, Debigare R, Lacasse Y, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Carrier G, Maltais F 2002 Midthigh muscle cross-sectional area is a better predictor of mortality than body mass index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:809–813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wajchenberg BL, Bosco A, Marone MM, Levin S, Rocha M, Lerario AC, Nery M, Goldman J, Liberman B 1995 Estimation of body fat and lean tissue distribution by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and abdominal body fat evaluation by computed tomography in Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2791–2794[Abstract]
  5. Garrapa GG, Pantanetti P, Arnaldi G, Mantero F, Faloia E 2001 Body composition and metabolic features in women with adrenal incidentaloma or Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5301–5306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Burt MG, Gibney J, Ho KK 2006 Characterization of the metabolic phenotypes of Cushing’s syndrome and growth hormone deficiency: a study of body composition and energy metabolism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 64:436–443[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ross EJ, Linch DC 1982 Cushing’s syndrome–killing disease: discriminatory value of signs and symptoms aiding early diagnosis. Lancet 2:646–649[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Beaufrere B, Horber FF, Schwenk WF, Marsh HM, Matthews D, Gerich JE, Haymond MW 1989 Glucocorticosteroids increase leucine oxidation and impair leucine balance in humans. Am J Physiol 257:E712–E721
  9. Horber FF, Haymond MW 1990 Human growth hormone prevents the protein catabolic side effects of prednisone in humans. J Clin Invest 86:265–272[Medline]
  10. Garrel DR, Moussali R, De Oliveira A, Lesiege D, Lariviere F 1995 RU 486 prevents the acute effects of cortisol on glucose and leucine metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:379–385[Abstract]
  11. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Begaud B, Zhang B, Cooper C 2000 Use of oral corticosteroids in the United Kingdom. QJM 93:105–111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Walsh LJ, Wong CA, Pringle M, Tattersfield AE 1996 Use of oral corticosteroids in the community and the prevention of secondary osteoporosis: a cross sectional study. BMJ 313:344–346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mauras N, O’Brien KO, Welch S, Rini A, Helgeson K, Vieira NE, Yergey AL 2000 Insulin-like growth factor I and growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH-deficient humans: differential effects on protein, glucose, lipid, and calcium metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1686–1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Russell-Jones DL, Bowes SB, Rees SE, Jackson NC, Weissberger AJ, Hovorka R, Sonksen PH, Umpleby AM 1998 Effect of growth hormone treatment on postprandial protein metabolism in growth hormone-deficient adults. Am J Physiol 274:E1050–E1056
  15. Russell-Jones DL, Weissberger AJ, Bowes SB, Kelly JM, Thomason M, Umpleby AM, Jones RH, Sonksen PH 1993 The effects of growth hormone on protein metabolism in adult growth hormone deficient patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 38:427–431[Medline]
  16. Shi J, Sekhar RV, Balasubramanyam A, Ellis K, Reeds PJ, Jahoor F, Sharma MD 2003 Short- and long-term effects of growth hormone (GH) replacement on protein metabolism in GH-deficient adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:5827–5833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gotherstrom G, Svensson J, Koranyi J, Alpsten M, Bosaeus I, Bengtsson B, Johannsson G 2001 A prospective study of 5 years of GH replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults: sustained effects on body composition, bone mass, and metabolic indices. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4657–4665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Tomlinson JW, Walker EA, Bujalska IJ, Draper N, Lavery GG, Cooper MS, Hewison M, Stewart PM 2004 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific regulator of glucocorticoid response. Endocr Rev 25:831–866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Carey DG, Jenkins AB, Campbell LV, Freund J, Chisholm DJ 1996 Abdominal fat and insulin resistance in normal and overweight women: direct measurements reveal a strong relationship in subjects at both low and high risk of NIDDM. Diabetes 45:633–638[Abstract]
  20. O’Sullivan AJ, Kelly JJ, Hoffman DM, Freund J, Ho KK 1994 Body composition and energy expenditure in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:381–386[Abstract]
  21. Miller ME, Cosgriff JM, Forbes GB 1989 Bromide space determination using anion-exchange chromatography for measurement of bromide. Am J Clin Nutr 50:168–171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Johannsson G, Gibney J, Wolthers T, Leung KC, Ho KK 2005 Independent and combined effects of testosterone and growth hormone on extracellular water in hypopituitary men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3989–3994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Burt MG, Gibney J, Ho KK 2007 Protein metabolism in glucocorticoid excess: study in Cushing’s syndrome and the effect of treatment. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 292:E1426–E1432
  24. Hoffman DM, Pallasser R, Duncan M, Nguyen TV, Ho KK 1998 How is whole body protein turnover perturbed in growth hormone-deficient adults? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:4344–4349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Schwenk WF, Beaufrere B, Haymond MW 1985 Use of reciprocal pool specific activities to model leucine metabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 249:E646–E650
  26. Horber FF, Horber-Feyder CM, Krayer S, Schwenk WF, Haymond MW 1989 Plasma reciprocal pool specific activity predicts that of intracellular free leucine for protein synthesis. Am J Physiol 257:E385–E399
  27. Ferrannini E 1988 The theoretical bases of indirect calorimetry: a review. Metabolism 37:287–301[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Greenfield JR, Samaras K, Hayward CS, Chisholm DJ, Campbell LV 2005 Beneficial postprandial effect of a small amount of alcohol on diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: modification by insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:661–672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC 1985 Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and ß-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Voorrips LE, Ravelli AC, Dongelmans PC, Deurenberg P, Van Staveren WA 1991 A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:974–979
  31. Nissen SL, Van Huysen C, Haymond MW 1982 Measurement of branched chain amino acids and branched chain {alpha}-ketoacids in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 232:170–175[Medline]
  32. Schwenk WF, Berg PJ, Beaufrere B, Miles JM, Haymond MW 1984 Use of t-butyldimethylsilylation in the gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis of physiologic compounds found in plasma using electron-impact ionization. Anal Biochem 141:101–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Hoffman DM, O’Sullivan AJ, Baxter RC, Ho KK 1994 Diagnosis of growth-hormone deficiency in adults. Lancet 343:1064–1068[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Kam GY, Leung KC, Baxter RC, Ho KK 2000 Estrogens exert route- and dose-dependent effects on insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 and the acid-labile subunit of the IGF ternary complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1918–1922[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tanner JM 1949 Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlations. J Appl Physiol 2:1–15[Medline]
  36. Short KR, Vittone JL, Bigelow ML, Proctor DN, Nair KS 2004 Age and aerobic exercise training effects on whole body and muscle protein metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286:E92–E101
  37. Welle S, Nair KS 1990 Relationship of resting metabolic rate to body composition and protein turnover. Am J Physiol 258:E990–E998
  38. Toth MJ, Tchernof A, Rosen CJ, Matthews DE, Poehlman ET 2000 Regulation of protein metabolism in middle-aged, premenopausal women: roles of adiposity and estradiol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1382–1387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Oehri M, Ninnis R, Girard J, Frey FJ, Keller U 1996 Effects of growth hormone and IGF-I on glucocorticoid-induced protein catabolism in humans. Am J Physiol 270:E552–E558
  40. Short KR, Nygren J, Bigelow ML, Nair KS 2004 Effect of short-term prednisone use on blood flow, muscle protein metabolism, and function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:6198–6207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Mayo-Smith W, Hayes CW, Biller BMK, Klibanski A, Rosenthal H, Rosenthal DI 1989 Body fat distribution measured with CT: correlations in healthy subjects, patients with anorexia, and patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Radiology 170:515–518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Nordborg E, Schaufelberger C, Bosaeus I 1998 The effect of glucocorticoids on fat and lean tissue masses in giant cell arteritis. Scand J Rheumatol 27:106–111[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Hagenfeldt K, Martin Ritzen E, Ringertz H, Helleday J, Carlstrom K 2000 Bone mass and body composition of adult women with congenital virilizing 21-hydroxylase deficiency after glucocorticoid treatment since infancy. Eur J Endocrinol 143:667–671[Abstract]
  44. Stikkelbroeck NM, Oyen WJ, van der Wilt GJ, Hermus AR, Otten BJ 2003 Normal bone mineral density and lean body mass, but increased fat mass, in young adult patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1036–1042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Louard RJ, Bhushan R, Gelfand RA, Barrett EJ, Sherwin RS 1994 Glucocorticoids antagonize insulin’s antiproteolytic action on skeletal muscle in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:278–284[Abstract]
  46. Liu Z, Jahn LA, Long W, Fryburg DA, Wei L, Barrett EJ 2001 Branched chain amino acids activate messenger ribonucleic acid translation regulatory proteins in human skeletal muscle, and glucocorticoids blunt this action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2136–2143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Gibson JN, Poyser NL, Morrison WL, Scrimgeour CM, Rennie MJ 1991 Muscle protein synthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: effect of chronic corticosteroid therapy on prostaglandin F2{alpha} availability. Eur J Clin Invest 21:406–412[Medline]
  48. Christiansen JJ, Gravholt CH, Fisker S, Moller N, Andersen M, Svenstrup B, Bennett P, Ivarsen P, Christiansen JS, Jorgensen JO 2005 Very short term dehydroepiandrosterone treatment in female adrenal failure: impact on carbohydrate, lipid and protein metabolism. Eur J Endocrinol 152:77–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. G. Burt, G. Johannsson, A. M. Umpleby, D. J. Chisholm, and K. K. Y. Ho
Impact of Growth Hormone and Dehydroepiandrosterone on Protein Metabolism in Glucocorticoid-Treated Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 688 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burt, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, K. K. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burt, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, K. K. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals