help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0620
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zitzmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nieschlag, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zitzmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nieschlag, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Male Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 10 3844-3853
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Androgen Receptor Gene CAG Repeat Length and Body Mass Index Modulate the Safety of Long-Term Intramuscular Testosterone Undecanoate Therapy in Hypogonadal Men

Michael Zitzmann and Eberhard Nieschlag

Institute of Reproductive Medicine, University Clinics, Muenster D-48149, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Eberhard Nieschlag, Institute of Reproductive Medicine of the University, Muenster D-48149, Germany. E-mail: eberhard.nieschlag{at}ukmuenster.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: A reliable form of androgen substitution therapy regarding kinetics, tolerance, and restoration of androgenicity is paramount in hypogonadal men. Intramuscular injection of the long-acting ester testosterone undecanoate (TU) offers a new modality.

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the safety of TU regarding metabolic and pharmacogenetic confounders.

Design: This was a longitudinal one-arm open observation trial. A minimum of five individual assessments was a prerequisite. Putative modulators of safety parameters entering regression models were nadir and/or delta total testosterone concentrations, body mass index, androgen receptor (AR) gene CAG repeat length, and age.

Setting: The study was conducted at an andrological outpatient clinic.

Patients: Patients included 66 hypogonadal men (mean age 38 ± 9.9 yr).

Main Outcome Measures: A total of 515 data time points each related to prostate, erythropoiesis, lipoproteins, and circulation during 118 treatment-years with 1000 mg TU at 10- to 14-wk intervals.

Results: Testosterone substitution resulted in significant decrements of serum levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, resting diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and heart rate. Erythropoiesis was stimulated and concentrations of high-density lipoproteincholesterol increased. Parameters remained stable after four injections. No adverse effects regarding the prostate were observed. Significantly increased hematocrit greater than 50% was predicted by enhanced androgen action (shorter AR CAG repeats per higher testosterone levels). However, insufficient androgen action (longer AR CAG repeats per lower testosterone levels) caused pathological safety parameters (high blood pressure, adverse lipid profiles). In addition, a body mass index 30 kg/m2 or greater represents a clinically relevant factor for the occurrence of all pathological safety parameters. Risk calculations for obese patients and nonlinear pharmacogenetic models to tailor androgen substitution are presented.

Conclusions: Testosterone substitution with im TU is generally well tolerated. Modifications of androgen action are due to both AR CAG repeats and testosterone levels. Adverse observations are mostly seen in obese patients.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE CLINICAL PICTURE of male hypogonadism manifests itself with a diversity of symptoms that are due to a deficiency of testosterone (T) or its action; replacement is the treatment of choice (1). Today the clinician is able to choose from a broad spectrum of preparations that exhibit distinct pharmacokinetic properties and offer different routes of application. In addition to short-acting transdermal or buccal modalities, a long-acting intramuscular preparation of testosterone undecanoate (TU) has recently become available (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3).

These preparations effectively establish, restore, and maintain T-dependent functions in men. Diagnostic procedures identifying the underlying cause of hypogonadism are a prerequisite for the start of therapy. T substitution therapy has to be accompanied by standardized procedures of surveillance to avoid adverse effects (1, 4).

Recently metaanalyses revealed that erythropoiesis, lipid constellations, and the prostate may be especially susceptible to undesired changes during T substitution (5, 6). However, these studies comprise data involving older injectable T preparations, producing unfavorable supraphysiologic serum levels. These are no longer seen with the new injectable TU, which may result in fewer or different side effects. We have long-term experience with this preparation in nonhuman primates as well as substitution therapy of hypogonadal men (7, 8, 9, 10, 11), which has also been evaluated by other groups (12, 13).

In addition, it has been previously shown that metabolic aspects such as body mass index (BMI) or age in general may influence the effect of T on safety parameters (14). The pharmacogenetic influence of the CAG repeat polymorphism of the androgen receptor (AR) gene on these parameters might also play a long-term role concerning safety aspects. It has been previously demonstrated that the effects of other T preparations, such as short-acting im injected esters, transdermal and oral preparations are modulated by this polymorphism (15, 16, 17, 18). These pharmacogenetic reports did not specifically evaluate the effects of BMI on the outcome of T substitution.

Therefore, we investigated the side effects of T substitution by im applied TU in 66 hypogonadal men during 118 treatment-years, and it is the first time that long-term aspects of safety in combination with both metabolic features and pharmacogenetics are considered.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Figure 1Go illustrates the process of patient selection: all patients currently receiving im TU were identified from our patient database. These men presented for examination and possible treatment of hypogonadism-related symptoms. Such symptoms were fatigue, loss of libido, depressiveness, change in body composition/weight, decreased physical performance, decrease in aggressive behavior, disability to cope, decreased work performance, and lack of androgenization. For inclusion, at least one of these symptoms had to be accompanied by low total T levels (<12 nmol/liter).


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Illustration of patient selection: all patients currently receiving im TU were identified from our patients’ database. Further screening procedures excluded those men receiving less than four injections (screening I), those with injections given intermediately at other centers (screening II), and those with missing data (screening III). Finally, 66 men were eligible for evaluation. Also see Patients and Methods concerning inclusion and exclusion criteria for T treatment and other details.

 
Exclusion criterion for T therapy were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels above 4 ng/ml. All patients gave written informed consent for the use of their data for scientific evaluation as approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany, and the state medical board. By its design, this study cannot be considered a safety study in its own right, and there has been no systematic recording of all adverse events in its broadest interpretation, without preconceived opinion as to their possible relevance, as is done in clinical trials with systematic assessment of safety. Rather, we have monitored a predefined set of safety parameters for treatment with TU: hemoglobin content, hematocrit, weight, prostate parameters, lipid metabolism, and circulation parameters (blood pressure and pulse) and linked them analytically to baseline and undertreatment hormone concentrations, age, BMI, and the AR polymorphism.

No patient discontinued the treatment before receiving four injections. Further screening procedures excluded those men having yet received less than four injections, those with injections given intermediately at other centers, and those with missing data. Finally, 66 men were eligible for evaluation (Fig. 1Go). These 66 hypogonadal men received a total of 383 injections of 1000 mg TU in 10- to 14-wk intervals. Eligibility for evaluation was given after assessment of baseline values, a minimum of four injections, and presentation to assess data before a putative further (minimum fifth) injection, accumulating to 515 data time points spanning 118 treatment-years. Thirty-five men had primary, 27 secondary, and four late-onset hypogonadism as previously defined (4, 19). None of these patients has been reported in manuscripts concerning T substitution and the modulation of androgen effects by the CAG repeat polymorphism (citations 16 and 17 refer to patients who received other preparations). Data of three of the 66 patients who are mentioned in this report have been referred to in an interim report about the efficacy of im TU in general, dating back to 2002 (9). Data of all other 63 patients have not been evaluated in previous publications.

Biochemical analyses

All venous blood samples were obtained between 0800 and 1200 h after a 30-min rest before the first or next injection of TU. Serum or plasma were separated at 800 g. Samples were immediately stored at –20 C. Serum T levels were measured by a commercial ELISA kit (DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany), and mean interassay coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 5%. Concentrations of SHBG were determined by highly specific time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays (Autodelfia, Freiburg, Germany). Mean intraassay CVs were less than 5% and mean interassay CVs less than 10%. Levels of free T were calculated from levels of SHBG and total serum T according to previously published calculations (20). PSA was determined with highly specific time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (Autodelfia), with a normal upper limit of reference range of less than 4 ng/ml. Mean intra- and interassay CVs were less than 2 and 5%, respectively. Sampling was performed before prostate palpation and transrectal ultrasonography. Red blood count was performed on a SE 9500 system (Sysmex Europe, Hamburg, Germany). A Hitachi 917 autoanalyzer (Hitachi/ Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was used for the quantification of serum concentrations of lipoproteins with enzymatic tests. Interassay CV was less than 5%.

Determination of AR CAG repeats

DNA was isolated from EDTA blood samples using the Nucleon kit (Amersham Life Science, Freiburg, Germany) and analysis of the AR gene microsatellite residues was performed as previously published (16).

Measurement of prostate size

Transrectal ultrasonography was performed as previously described using a high-resolution transrectal ultrasonography probe (7.5 MHz for sagittal and transversal scans with an ultrasound scanner type 2002 ADI; B-K Medical, Gentofte, Denmark) (16, 21).

Resting blood pressure and heart rate

Blood pressure and resting pulse were measured by trained physicians using a standardized oscillometric device (M5 Professional; Omron Medical Technics, Mannheim, Germany) with a cuff size appropriate to individual body habitus. Measurements were taken after the subject had rested in sitting position for at least 5 min in a quiet room.

Medication

In its injectable form, TU is a new preparation and has recently been made available (2004 in Germany). The medication used before market introduction was identical in preparation and content of TU and was provided by Bayer Schering Pharma, (Berlin, Germany; former Schering AG, Berlin, Germany): 1000 mg of TU (since 2004: Nebido) are dissolved in castor oil.

To achieve a fast steady-state after initiation of therapy, the second injection has to be given after 6–10 wk. Thereafter the dosing interval can be prolonged, reaching 10–14 wk. In general, patients were injected according to the following regimen: wk 0->wk 6->wk 18->wk 30->further injections, starting wk 40–44 on an individual basis titrated according to nadir T levels at wk 30.

Statistics

All variables were checked for normal distribution by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov one-sample test for goodness of fit and log transformed if necessary. All data are presented as mean ± SD. In case of percent values (hematocrit), arcsin transformation was performed. Because most relevant changes of T treatment are likely to occur within the first year of treatment (6, 22), we compared baseline and T steady-state conditions before the fifth injection of TU (wk 40–44) by t tests for matched pairs. In case of significant differences, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models for repeated measurements including covariates of interest were assessed (BMI, age, {delta}-serum T concentrations, AR CAG repeats). Baseline correlations were calculated as Spearman rank correlations using nontransformed variables.

To assess long-term effects of safety, all data points except baseline values (n = 449) were analyzed in terms of passing respective thresholds into the pathological range. Such a condition was defined as yes or no and entered in binomial regression models involving the above-named covariates. Instead of {delta}-T levels, nadir T concentrations were chosen because this analysis applied to single time points. Because time under treatment was variable and a pathological condition could occur more than once in a single patient, duration of substitution was introduced as inverse weight to stratify for possible confounding effects.

Because BMI turned out to be a major confounder of treatment and safety, the relative risk was calculated for obese vs. nonobese men in {chi}2 tests.

The association between T levels in combination with AR CAG repeats and safety parameters may not be linear, as previous publications suggest (16). To this end, a nonlinear model to describe pharmacogenetic effects on hematocrit was created, involving data points of persons with a BMI less than 30 kg/m2 (n = 316) only because BMI is an additional factor of influence (see Fig. 3Go and Table 3Go). A three-dimensional model to these data points was calculated, assuming a log-linear association of T concentrations with androgen effects (19, 23), a quasilog-linear binding of T to its receptor within the concentration range observed in humans (reviewed in Ref. 24) and a linear effect of the AR polymorphism on the transcription of androgen target genes (25). Thus, the underlying formula is based on these principles: Androgen effect = Log (T) x [m – (n x log (T) x CAGn)] + k.


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Crude relative risk (RR) for hypogonadal men with a BMI 30 kg/m2 or greater (n = 16) involving 133 data time points in comparison with nonobese men (n = 50) involving 316 data time points to be observed with pathological safety parameters during androgen substitution with TU 1000 mg im (data obtained during 118 treatment-years, involved are all data time points except baseline examinations: n = 449). Results according to {chi}2 tests, logarithmic scale.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Predictors of safety parameters that were assessed within the pathological range during 118 patient-years of treatment with TU im in 66 hypogonadal men (maximum individual duration: 494 wk)

 
Constant m describes the general association of T with the androgen effect, which is tissue specific and is mitigated by the length of the AR CAGn polymorphism. Constant n relates to the AR CAGn polymorphism and is higher in target tissues with higher concentrations of AR coactivators (26, 27) because these determine the effect of the polymorphism. The effect of the CAGn polymorphism depends on the amount of T binding to the AR, which is, under physiological conditions, log linear. Constant k describes the value of the androgen-dependent target parameter, which is measurable at absolute T deficiency.

Computations were performed using the statistical software package SPSS (Chicago, IL; release 14.0) and GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA; release 3.2).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Overall, substitution treatment with TU was well tolerated. Patient characteristics and hormone levels at baseline as well as under treatment are demonstrated in Table 1Go. Table 2Go displays major changes of safety parameters and the significant effectors of these changes after four injections of TU 1000 mg im at the time point before the fifth injection, i.e. after 40–44 wk of T substitution. Table 3Go exhibits the frequency of pathological observations during the whole treatment period of 118 patient-years as well as predisposing factors. Figure 2Go displays total serum T concentrations before and during therapy (also see Table 1Go). Figure 3Go displays the crude relative risk of obese men vs. nonobese men to be diagnosed with safety parameters within the pathological range during T substitution. Figure 4Go represents a nonlinear model of pharmacogenetics of T treatment in regard to hematocrit as a safety parameter and allows individual application of threshold levels for nadir T levels under substitution therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. General characteristics of 66 hypogonadal men treated by the long-acting, im formulation of TU 1000 mg (total of 383 injections)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Changes of safety parameters during treatment with 1000 mg TU (im) in 66 hypogonadal men (assessments prior to putative fifth injection: 40–44 wk after initiation of treatment)

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Total serum T concentrations displaying 515 data points of 66 hypogonadal men before (circles) and during substitution therapy with TU im (diamonds: nadir levels). The smoothing curve for mean nadir T concentrations during therapy was created from sliding average data (lag time 40 d). Note that the scale of the x-axis was broken for better display.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Nonlinear pharmacogenetic model to describe the effects of T levels and the AR polymorphism on hematocrit based on the 316 intratreatment observations in nonobese men. The best-fitting model to predict hematocrit as androgen target parameter under substitution therapy with TU 1000 mg im was found for constants m =20, n = 0.2, k = 31 (for the formula outlined in Statistics; R2 = 0.75 for the nonlinear model and R2 = 0.40 for linear associations; superiority of the nonlinear model by f test: P < 0.001); x-axis: length of the AR CAG repeat polymorphism; y-axis: nadir of total T concentration before the next injection of TU 1000 mg im; z-axis: hematocrit. Light gray plane is the safety limit of hematocrit (50%). Note that this applies to nonobese persons only. Obese men will require lower nadir T levels (Fig. 3Go and Table 3Go). The table inset outlines the combination of nadir total testosterone (TT) levels achieved under substitution therapy with TU and AR CAG repeat length at which a hematocrit of 50% is reached (these data represent results of the nonlinear formula outlined in Statistics). AR CAG repeat lengths above 25 require supraphysiological T levels to reach this safety threshold. Because this model is based on data obtained during the observation period, it would be hypothetical to extend the table to present such high T levels: there are no real data present to support such assumptions. The same applies to AR CAG repeat lengths less than 15 in terms of very low nadir levels. Note that obese men with an AR CAG repeat length 26 or greater might reach hematocrit levels greater than 50% at physiological T levels (see above). Also note that the TT levels displayed represent nadir T levels under substitution therapy by TU 1000 mg im and should not be mistaken for physiological T concentrations in eugonadal men.

 
Correlations of BMI with nadir levels of sex hormones and SHBG under treatment (at the time point after four injections of TU 1000 mg im before the fifth injection, i.e. after 40–44 wk of T substitution) exhibited the following picture: T concentrations were not related to BMI (rs = 0.03, P = 0.62). Serum SHBG levels were lower (rs = –0.26, P = 0.001) in men with higher BMI. Correspondingly, serum concentrations of free T under treatment exhibited a positive association with BMI, albeit as nonsignificant trend (rs = 0.16, P = 0.06). Concentrations of free T under treatment closely reflected total T levels (rs = 0.96, P < 0.001) and did not exhibit different results in statistical evaluations. Serum concentrations of estradiol under treatment were strongly related to BMI (rs = 0.44, P < 0.001). Estradiol levels were used as additional independent variables for analyses in second-step approaches (Tables 2Go and 3Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This open one-arm study presents novel data on safety issues related to T substitution therapy in hypogonadal men. Besides the direct relevance of elevation of T levels by substitution therapy, we demonstrate the influence of BMI and age as well as pharmacogenetics exerted by the AR CAG repeat polymorphism. The nonexistence of longer placebo-controlled trials of T substitution is quite understandable because ethics in general and the physicians’ responsibility for his hypogonadal male patients in particular do not allow long-term placebo-controlled trials: the adverse effects of hypogonadism on well-being, health, and life expectancy are known (1, 4, 19, 28, 29, 30). Nevertheless, this study provides an advantage over metaanalyses by involving a single T preparation being used over a considerable period of time in a single center applying standardized and well comparable procedures. Notwithstanding, comparisons between subgroups according to BMI or other confounders are feasible.

In agreement with other long-term surveillance approaches that involve transdermal T preparations (22, 31), we observed major changes within the first year of treatment (Table 2Go). After reaching a plateau of androgenization, hypogonadal men seem to maintain a stable level of androgen-related effects; correspondingly, nadir total T levels are perpetuated within the normal range when hypogonadal men are regularly treated with injectable TU (Table 1Go).

Prostate safety is an issue of major concern among physicians treating hypogonadal men with T substitution. This study demonstrates that PSA levels are not necessarily affected to a clinically relevant degree, if at all, by external application of T. Nevertheless, to find a significant treatment effect on prostate volume without effect on serum PSA may seem rather unexpected. However, prostate volumes did not change to a major degree (Table 2Go). In addition, T treatment may not necessarily significantly alter PSA levels, as has been demonstrated by the largest metaanalysis of placebo-controlled trials regarding T substitution (6). Another large study involving transdermal application of T gel reported a significant increase in PSA levels. Nevertheless, these changes were subtle (baseline: 0.85 ± 0.06 ng/ml, 1.11 ± 0.08 ng/ml at month 6) and remained well within the normal range (22).

Such findings may be explained by low intraprostatic changes of hormone concentrations during T substitution (32).

Prostate size of hypogonadal men being substituted with TU im increases to values within the normal range, corroborating earlier findings with other T preparations (33). This effect is most visible within the first year of treatment and is more pronounced in older men and those with short AR CAG repeats and/or larger changes of T levels (Table 2Go). We have previously demonstrated such effects in a cohort of 131 men being treated with various androgen preparations (16).

Erythropoiesis is stimulated by T supplementation (reviewed in Ref. 34). This effect is generally considered beneficial because anemia is frequently encountered in male hypogonadism and contributes to overall complaints of weakness and fatigue (22). However, overstimulation of erythropoiesis may cause an elevated hematocrit. Hematocrit values over 50–52% are related to increased blood viscosity, and there is evidence from larger neurological studies unrelated to T that elevated hematocrit can result in cerebral ischemia: erythrocyte aggregation may facilitate platelet activation and aggregation (35, 36, 37). Identifiable risk factors in a prospective study involving 1000 stroke patients were arterial hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and high hematocrit (≥50%) (38). However, it remains unclear whether high hematocrit caused by T treatment has the same relevance as described in the stroke studies because T exerts direct counterregulatory effects on hemostasis (39). Although hematocrit was observed to be higher in a recent metaanalysis of T substitution, the incidence of cardiovascular events was not increased in comparison with placebo-treated men (6). It is also known that the T effect on hematocrit is dose as well as age related (40, 41). In agreement, we demonstrate that effects of injectable TU on hematocrit and erythropoiesis are augmented by high nadir T concentrations as well as advanced age (Tables 2Go and 3Go). In addition, we are able to report that short AR CAG repeats and high BMI contributed to the elevation of hematocrit during T substitution. Table 2Go displays general, significant changes in hemoglobin content and hematocrit after initiation of therapy, and Table 3Go exhibits risk markers for elevation of these parameters above safety thresholds. Remarkably, men with a BMI 30 kg/m2 or greater and/or CAG repeats less than 20 seem to have a markedly increased risk of developing blood hyperviscosity (Table 2Go and Fig. 3Go). We present a nonlinear pharmacogenetic model to estimate androgen effects on hematocrit (Fig. 4Go).

We also considered estradiol concentrations as pivotal in regard to obesity. Aromatase activity may be increased due to augmented fat tissue in obese men and may thus cause higher estradiol concentrations on T substitution therapy. Indeed, serum concentrations of estradiol under treatment were strongly related to BMI (see Results). Estradiol levels were used as additional independent variables for analyses in second-step approaches and replaced BMI as confounder of hemoglobin levels and hematocrit (Tables 2Go and 3Go), suggesting an independent effect of this sex steroid. This finding supports a previous, similar observation (41). Preexisting lung disease may present an additional factor in regard to the increase of hematocrit but was not diagnosed in our patients. Cigarette smoking did not exhibit a significant effect on the red blood picture under T substitution.

In regard to lipid metabolism, the general effect induced by androgen substitution within our study is a shift toward favorable profiles with lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, which seems to be especially the case in younger, slimmer men receiving higher doses of T (Table 2Go). These changes in LDL-cholesterol concentrations are in agreement with a recent metaanalysis (5). Alterations in HDL-cholesterol under T therapy are usually described as a slight decline. For example, a study conducted in younger hypogonadal men showed a decrease of HDL levels with T treatment (im and transdermal) relative to the untreated state (e.g. Refs. 5 , 42), whereas we report a significant increase, especially in younger, slimmer men. Such findings are in agreement with cross-sectional, noninterventional observations (reviewed in Ref. 43). It can be speculated that our findings are due to the longer observation period of therapy, which may induce favorable alterations in body composition. This aspect was not measured here but is known from previous observations in T-treated hypogonadal men (44, 45). In opposition to this general treatment effect within the total cohort (Table 2Go), we also observed some hypogonadal men with elevated LDL-cholesterol and decreased HDL-cholesterol during androgen substitution: their specific characteristics are detailed in Table 3Go and are due to a higher BMI (also see Fig. 3Go). Thus, a higher body mass in hypogonadal men may attenuate or even reverse general effects of T treatment in regard to lipid metabolism.

An association between hypogonadism and arterial blood pressure in men has been suggested by a cross-sectional approach: inverse correlations between endogenous T levels and systolic as well as diastolic blood pressure were described in 356 healthy elderly men (46). Here we report a systematic approach to treatment effects of T substitution in men and demonstrate favorable effects because diastolic and systolic blood pressure as well as resting heart rate decreased significantly during treatment with TU. This new and important observation is especially notable in the case of younger, slimmer men with higher androgen activity due to the CAG repeat AR polymorphism and/or higher {delta}-T concentration under treatment (Table 2Go). However, and similar to the effects described in lipid metabolism, some patients exhibited safety parameters regarding blood pressure and heart rate above the normal range and thus of inverse nature to the general treatment effect (Table 3Go). Blood pressure values (systolic and/or diastolic) or resting heart rates were elevated in men with higher BMI, lower nadir T concentrations, and attenuated androgen action due to the AR polymorphism (Table 3Go).

In summary, a marked tendency to augment the effects of T substitution (in case of hematocrit) or inverse to the favorable androgenic response (in case of lipid metabolism and circulation) can be observed in obese hypogonadal men. The crude relative risk for hypogonadal men with a BMI 30 kg/m2 or greater to be diagnosed with adverse safety parameters during treatment with TU is quite relevant (Fig. 3Go). In principle, this finding reflects the generally increased cardiovascular risk of obese men and may not be directly related to T substitution (47).

Because the effect of BMI on cardiovascular risk might not be related to serum concentrations of total T, this might still be the case for free T because BMI reduces SHBG. However, overall levels of free T rather followed concentrations of total T and results of analyses did not change (see Results and Tables 2Go and 3Go). Thus, observation of factors that can be considered adverse in regard to cardiovascular risk (high LDL-cholesterol, low HDL-cholesterol) were not related to total or free T but high BMI as such (Table 3Go). Rather, the general treatment trend was reduction of these parameters (Table 2Go) and related to higher T concentrations and lower BMI. In addition, insufficient T concentrations seemed to contribute to the observation of high blood pressure (Table 3Go). Free T levels tended to be higher in obese men (see Results). Thus, it is, from a clinically intuitive point, unlikely that free T itself contributed to the generation of unfavorable observations (Table 3Go). These observations are most likely due to other factors inherent to obesity (47). However, a statistical dissociation of obesity from levels of free T is not possible within this setting. Hence, we cannot exclude that in some obese men free T levels might have contributed to adverse effects, which may have been facilitated via lower SHBG and hence high levels of free T.

In addition, the relevance of the AR CAG repeat polymorphism in pharmacogenetics of T treatment seems to be of clinical significance, as previously indicated (16, 17). The length of the repeat tract (normal range 9–37) is inversely associated with the transcriptional and physiological activity induced by T in vitro (25), in mouse models (48), and in humans (15, 16, 17, 49 , metaanalysis in Ref. 50). The modulatory effect on androgen-dependent gene transcription is linear, given a fixed concentration of T over a range from 0 to 200 repeats as seen in in vitro studies (51), and is probably mediated by a differential affinity of coactivator proteins to the encoded polyglutamine stretch of the actual AR protein, such as ARA24 and p160 (26, 27). Because these proteins are ubiquitously but nevertheless nonuniformly expressed, the modulatory effect of the CAG repeat chain on AR target genes is most likely not only dependent on androgenic saturation and AR expression but also varies from tissue to tissue.

However, androgen effects seem to follow a nonlinear pattern, when nadir total T levels under substitution therapy with TU and AR CAG repeat length are simultaneously taken into consideration: we present a nonlinear model derived from general hormone kinetics to describe the effects of T treatment on hematocrit (see Statistics and Fig. 4Go; also see review in Ref. 52). Quite in agreement with previous clinical findings (50), an AR CAG repeat length greater than 25 seems to require T levels quite above the normal range and may cause a picture of hypogonadism in the presence of normal T levels.

According to the number of AR CAG repeats, the nadir T level (respectively dosing interval of TU im) may be individually modulated to achieve beneficial effects (Table 2Go) yet simultaneously avoid an elevated hematocrit. According to our data and a recent metaanalysis (6), this safety parameter may deserve even greater recognition in comparison with prostate issues when treating hypogonadal men.

In conclusion, this long-term observation demonstrates that the use of the novel modality of T substitution by injectable, long-acting TU is generally well tolerated. Special attendance during T treatment in general is required in obese men because adverse effects are more prevalent in this subgroup. Pharmacogenetics exerted by the AR will be a future option to tailor individual T dosage.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Susan Nieschlag, M.A., for language editing and Farid Saad (Bayer-Schering Health Care, Berlin, Germany) for providing the medication.


    Footnotes
 
The trial has been retroactively entered into the www.clinicaltrials.gov online database. Study ID nos.: IRM 96/17, EK 78a/97Nie1; last updated: March 26, 2007; record first received, March 26, 2007; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00452322; Health Authority: Germany, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices.

Disclosures: Both authors received lecture fees of less than $10,000 in regard to this topic. Both authors received consulting fees of less than $10,000 in regard to this topic.

First Published Online July 17, 2007

Abbreviations: ANCOVA, Analysis of covariance; AR, androgen receptor; BMI, body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; T, testosterone; TU, T undecanoate.

Received March 20, 2007.

Accepted July 9, 2007.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, Swerdloff RS, Montori VM 2006 Testosterone therapy in adult men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1995–2010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Nieschlag E, Behre HM, Bouchard P, Corrales JJ, Jones TH, Stalla GK, Webb SM, Wu FC 2004 Testosterone replacement therapy: current trends and future directions. Hum Reprod Update 10:409–419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nieschlag E 2006 Testosterone treatment comes of age: new options for hypogonadal men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 65:275–281[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Nieschlag E, Swerdloff R, Behre HM, Gooren LJ, Kaufman JM, Legros JJ, Lunenfeld B, Morley JE, Schulman C, Wang C, Weidner W, Wu FC 2005 Investigation, treatment and monitoring of late-onset hypogonadism in males: ISA, ISSAM, and EAU recommendations. Int J Androl 28:125–127[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Isidori AM, Giannetta E, Greco EA, Gianfrilli D, Bonifacio V, Isidori A, Lenzi A, Fabbri A 2005 Effects of testosterone on body composition, bone metabolism and serum lipid profile in middle-aged men: a meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 63:280–293[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Calof OM, Singh AB, Lee ML, Kenny AM, Urban RJ, Tenover JL, Bhasin S 2005 Adverse events associated with testosterone replacement in middle-aged and older men: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:1451–1457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Behre HM, Abshagen K, Oettel M, Hübler D, Nieschlag E 1999 Intramuscular injection of testosterone undecanoate for the treatment of male hypogonadism: phase I studies. Eur J Endocrinol 140:414–419[Abstract]
  8. Nieschlag E, Büchter D, von Eckardstein S, Abshagen K, Simoni M, Behre HM 1999 Repeated intramuscular injections of testosterone undecanoate for substitution therapy in hypogonadal men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51:757–763[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. von Eckardstein S, Nieschlag E 2002 Treatment of male hypogonadism with testosterone undecanoate injected at extended intervals of 12 weeks: a phase II study. J Androl 23:419–425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Weinbauer GF, Partsch CJ, Zitzmann M, Schlatt S, Nieschlag E 2003 Pharmacokinetics and degree of aromatization rather than total dose of different preparations determine the effects of testosterone: a nonhuman primate study in Macaca fascicularis. J Androl 24:765–774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wistuba J, Marc Luetjens C, Kamischke A, Gu YQ, Schlatt S, Simoni M, Nieschlag E 2005 Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of injectable testosterone undecanoate in castrated cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) are independent of different oil vehicles. J Med Primatol 34:178–187[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Schubert M, Minnemann T, Hübler D, Rouskova D, Christoph A, Oettel M, Ernst M, Mellinger U, Krone W, Jockenhövel F 2004 Intramuscular testosterone undecanoate: pharmacokinetic aspects of a novel testosterone formulation during long-term treatment of men with hypogonadism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5429–5434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Harle L, Basaria S, Dobs AS 2005 Nebido: a long-acting injectable testosterone for the treatment of male hypogonadism. Expert Opin Pharmacother 6:1751–1759[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Coviello AD, Lakshman K, Mazer NA, Bhasin S 2006 Differences in the apparent metabolic clearance rate of testosterone in young and older men with gonadotropin suppression receiving graded doses of testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4669–4675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E 2003 The CAG repeat polymorphism within the androgen receptor gene and maleness. Int J Androl 26:76–83[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Zitzmann M, Depenbusch M, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E 2003 Prostate volume and growth in testosterone-substituted hypogonadal men are dependent on the CAG repeat polymorphism of the androgen receptor gene: a longitudinal pharmacogenetic study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2049–2054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zitzmann M, Depenbusch M, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E 2004 X-chromosome inactivation patterns and androgen receptor functionality influence phenotype and social characteristics as well as pharmacogenetics of testosterone therapy in Klinefelter patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:6208–6217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wakisaka N, Taira Y, Ishikawa M, Nakamizo Y, Kobayashi K, Uwabu M, Fukuda Y, Taguchi Y, Hama T, Kawakami M 2005 Effectiveness of finasteride on patients with male pattern baldness who have different androgen receptor gene polymorphism. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 10:293–294[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zitzmann M, Faber S, Nieschlag E 2006 Association of specific symptoms and metabolic risks with serum testosterone in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4335–4343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM 1999 A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3666–3672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Behre HM, Yeung CH, Holstein AF, Weinbauer GF, Gassner P, Nieschlag E 2000 Diagnosis of male infertility and hypogonadism: transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate gland and the seminal vesicles. In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, eds. Andrology: male reproductive health and dysfunction. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 98
  22. Wang C, Cunningham G, Dobs A, Iranmanesh A, Matsumoto AM, Snyder PJ, Weber T, Berman N, Hull L, Swerdloff RS 2004 Long-term testosterone gel (AndroGel) treatment maintains beneficial effects on sexual function and mood, lean and fat mass, and bone mineral density in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2085–2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Bhasin S, Woodhouse L, Casaburi R, Singh AB, Bhasin D, Berman N, Chen X, Yarasheski KE, Magliano L, Dzekov C, Dzekov J, Bross R, Phillips J, Sinha-Hikim I, Shen R, Storer TW 2001 Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E1172–E1181
  24. Klocker H, Gromoll J, Cato ACB 2004 The androgen receptor: molecular biology. In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, eds. Testosterone: action, deficiency, substitution. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 39–92
  25. Mhatre AN, Trifiro MA, Kaufman M, Kazemi-Esfarjani P, Figlewicz D, Rouleau G, Pinsky L 1993 Reduced transcriptional regulatory competence of the androgen receptor in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nat Genet 5:184–188[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hsiao PW, Lin DL, Nakao R, Chang C 1999 The linkage of Kennedy’s neuron disease to ARA24, the first identified androgen receptor polyglutamine region-associated coactivator. J Biol Chem 274:20229–20234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Irvine RA, Ma H, Yu MC, Ross RK, Stallcup MR, Coetzee GA 2000 Inhibition of p160-mediated coactivation with increasing androgen receptor polyglutamine length. Hum Mol Gen 9:267–274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Shores MM, Matsumoto AM, Sloan KL, Kivlahan DR 2006 Low serum testosterone and mortality in male veterans. Arch Intern Med 166:1660–1665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR 2006 Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4448–4456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Amin S, Zhang Y, Felson DT, Sawin CT, Hannan MT, Wilson PW, Kiel DP 2006 Estradiol, testosterone, and the risk for hip fractures in elderly men from the Framingham Study. Am J Med 119:426–433[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Behre HM, von Eckardstein S, Kliesch S, Nieschlag E 1999 Long-term substitution therapy of hypogonadal men with transscrotal testosterone over 7–10 years. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 50:629–635[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Marks LS, Mazer NA, Mostaghel E, Hess DL, Dorey FJ, Epstein JI, Veltri RW, Makarov DV, Partin AW, Bostwick DG, Macairan ML, Nelson PS 2006 Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on prostate tissue in men with late-onset hypogonadism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 296:2351–2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Behre HM, Bohmeyer J, Nieschlag E 1994 Prostate volume in testosterone-treated and untreated hypogonadal men in comparison to age-matched normal controls. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 40:341–349[Medline]
  34. Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E 2004. Androgens and erythropoiesis. In: Nieschlag E, Behre HM, eds. Testosterone: action, deficiency, substitution. 3rd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 283–296
  35. Lowe GD 1999 Rheological influences on thrombosis. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 12:435–449[Medline]
  36. Lowe GD, Forbes CD 1985 Platelet aggregation, haematocrit, and fibrinogen. Lancet 16:395–396[CrossRef]
  37. Wannamethee G, Perry IJ, Shaper AG 1994 Haematocrit, hypertension and risk of stroke. J Intern Med 235:163–168[Medline]
  38. Lee BI, Nam HS, Heo JH, Kim DI; Yonsei Stroke Team 2001 Yonsei Stroke Registry. Analysis of 1,000 patients with acute cerebral infarctions. Cerebrovasc Dis 12:145–151[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Zitzmann M, Junker R, Kamischke A, Nieschlag E 2002 Contraceptive steroids influence the hemostatic activation state in healthy men. J Androl 23:503–511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bhasin S, Woodhouse L, Casaburi R, Singh AB, Mac RP, Lee M, Yarasheski KE, Sinha-Hikim I, Dzekov C, Dzekov J, Magliano L, Storer TW 2005 Older men are as responsive as young men to the anabolic effects of graded doses of testosterone on the skeletal muscle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:678–688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Dobs AS, Meikle AW, Arver S, Sanders SW, Caramelli KE, Mazer NA 1999 Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a permeation-enhanced testosterone transdermal system in comparison with bi-weekly injections of testosterone enanthate for the treatment of hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3469–3478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Dobs AS, Bachorik PS, Arver S, Meikle AW, Sanders SW, Caramelli KE, Mazer NA 2001 Interrelationships among lipoprotein levels, sex hormones, anthropometric parameters, and age in hypogonadal men treated for 1 year with a permeation-enhanced testosterone transdermal system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1026–1033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Barrett-Connor EL 1995 Testosterone and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in men. Diabetes Metab 21:156–161
  44. Snyder PJ, Peachey H, Hannoush P, Berlin JA, Loh L, Lenrow DA, Holmes JH, Dlewati A, Santanna J, Rosen CJ, Strom BL 1999 Effect of testosterone treatment on body composition and muscle strength in men over 65 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2647–2653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Woodhouse LJ, Gupta N, Bhasin M, Singh AB, Ross R, Phillips J, Bhasin S 2004 Dose-dependent effects of testosterone on regional adipose tissue distribution in healthy young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:718–726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Fogari R, Preti P, Zoppi A, Fogari E, Rinaldi A, Corradi L, Mugellini A 2005 Serum testosterone levels and arterial blood pressure in the elderly. Hypertens Res 28:625–630[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Schulte H, Cullen P, Assmann G 1999 Obesity, mortality and cardiovascular disease in the Munster Heart Study (PROCAM). Atherosclerosis 144:199–209[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Albertelli MA, Scheller A, Brogley M, Robins DM 2006 Replacing the mouse androgen receptor with human alleles demonstrates glutamine tract length-dependent effects on physiology and tumorigenesis in mice. Mol Endocrinol 20:1248–1260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Canale D, Caglieresi C, Moschini C, Liberati CD, Macchia E, Pinchera A, Martino E 2005 Androgen receptor polymorphism (CAG repeats) and androgenicity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 63:356–361[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Zeegers MP, Kiemeney LA, Nieder AM, Ostrer H 2004 How strong is the association between CAG and GGN repeat length polymorphisms in the androgen receptor gene and prostate cancer risk? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:1765–1771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Nakajima H, Kimura F, Nakagawa T, Furutama D, Shinoda K, Shimizu A, Ohsawa N 1996 Transcriptional activation by the androgen receptor in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. J Neurol Sci 142:12–16[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Zitzmann M 2007 Mechanisms of disease: pharmacogenetics of testosterone therapy in hypogonadal men. Nat Clin Pract Urol 4:161–166[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
J. R. Roney, Z. L. Simmons, and A. W. Lukaszewski
Androgen receptor gene sequence and basal cortisol concentrations predict men's hormonal responses to potential mates
Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2010; 277(1678): 57 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
B. Kornmann, E. Nieschlag, M. Zitzmann, J. Gromoll, M. Simoni, and S. Von Eckardstein
Body Fat Content and Testosterone Pharmacokinetics Determine Gonadotropin Suppression After Intramuscular Injections of Testosterone Preparations in Normal Men
J Androl, September 1, 2009; 30(5): 602 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. M. Traish, F. Saad, R. J. Feeley, and A. Guay
The Dark Side of Testosterone Deficiency: III. Cardiovascular Disease
J Androl, September 1, 2009; 30(5): 477 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Nieschlag
Male Hormonal Contraception: Love's Labour's Lost?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1890 - 1892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. R. Sattler, C. Castaneda-Sceppa, E. F. Binder, E. T. Schroeder, Y. Wang, S. Bhasin, M. Kawakubo, Y. Stewart, K. E. Yarasheski, J. Ulloor, et al.
Testosterone and Growth Hormone Improve Body Composition and Muscle Performance in Older Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1991 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
C. Wang, E. Nieschlag, R. Swerdloff, H. M. Behre, W. J. Hellstrom, L. J. Gooren, J. M. Kaufman, J.-J. Legros, B. Lunenfeld, A. Morales, et al.
Investigation, Treatment, and Monitoring of Late-Onset Hypogonadism in Males: ISA, ISSAM, EAU, EAA, and ASA Recommendations
J Androl, January 1, 2009; 30(1): 1 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C Wang, E Nieschlag, R Swerdloff, H M Behre, W J Hellstrom, L J Gooren, J M Kaufman, J-J Legros, B Lunenfeld, A Morales, et al.
Investigation, treatment and monitoring of late-onset hypogonadism in males: ISA, ISSAM, EAU, EAA and ASA recommendations
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 159(5): 507 - 514.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. A. Yassin and F. Saad
Testosterone and Erectile Dysfunction
J Androl, November 1, 2008; 29(6): 593 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zitzmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nieschlag, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zitzmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nieschlag, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Male Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals