help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0685
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/9/3281    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrascosa, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrascosa, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 9 3281-3286
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society


RAPID COMUNICATION

The d3/fl-Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Polymorphism Does Not Influence the Effect of GH Treatment (66 µg/kg per Day) or the Spontaneous Growth in Short Non-GH-Deficient Small-for-Gestational-Age Children: Results from a Two-Year Controlled Prospective Study in 170 Spanish Patients

A. Carrascosa, C. Esteban, R. Espadero, M. Fernández-Cancio, P. Andaluz, M. Clemente, L. Audí, H. Wollmann, L. Fryklund, L. Parodi and the Spanish SGA Study Group1

Department of Pediatrics (A.C., C.E., M.F.-C., P.A., M.C., L.A.), Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Autonomous University, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; Medical Unit (R.E.), Pfizer Spain, 28108 Madrid, Spain; WW Medical Endocrine Care (H.W.), Pfizer GmbH, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany; WW Endocrine Care Team (L.F.), Pfizer Health AB, 191 90 Sollentuna, Sweden; and Clinical Polyomics (L.P.), Pfizer Inc., New York, New York 10017

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Antonio Carrascosa, Servicio de Pediatría, Unidad de Endocrinología, Hospital Maternoinfantil Vall d’Hebron, Paseo Vall d’Hebron 119, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: ancarrascosa{at}vhebron.net.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Context: The d3/fl-GH receptor (d3/fl-GHR, exon 3-deleted/full-length GHR) has recently been associated with responsiveness to GH therapy.

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate whether the d3/fl-GHR genotypes influence the intensity of spontaneous and/or GH therapy-stimulated growth in small-for-gestational-age (SGA) patients.

Design: This was a 2-yr prospective, controlled, randomized trial.

Setting: Thirty Spanish hospitals participated. Auxologic and GH secretion evaluation was hospital based, whereas molecular analyses and auxologic data computation were centralized.

Patients: Patients included 170 short SGA children: 140 remained prepubertal and 30 entered puberty during the second follow-up year.

Intervention: Eighty-six were treated with GH (66 µg/kg·d) for 2 yr and 84 were not treated.

Main Outcome Measures: Previous and 2-yr follow-up auxologic data were recorded at each hospital, d3/fl-GHR genotypes determined, and data analyzed for patients who remained prepubertal (group 1, 68 GH treated and 72 non-GH treated) and for all the patients (group 2).

Results: In group 1 GH-treated patients, growth velocity, and height-SD score during the first and second years, total 2-yr height gain (18.5 ± 2.4 cm in d3/d3; 18.4 ± 2.6 in d3/fl; 19.5 ± 2.3 in fl/fl), {Delta} 2-yr height increase (9.1 ± 2.4 cm in d3/d3; 9.4 ± 3.0 in d3/fl; 10.4 ± 2.1 in fl/fl), first-year growth prediction and studentized residual values (0.08 ± 1.26 in d3/d3; 0.28 ± 1.21 in d3/fl; 0.67 ± 0.95 in fl/fl) did not differ among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes. In group 1 non-GH-treated patients, neither growth velocity nor height-SD score changed significantly, and values were similar in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. Results in all patients (group 2) were similar to those in group 1.

Conclusions: In short non-GH-deficient SGA children, both spontaneous growth rate and responsiveness to 66 µg/k·d GH therapy were similar for each d3/fl-GHR genotype carried.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
APPROXIMATELY 10% of children born small for gestational age (SGA) do not achieve postnatal catch-up height and are short at adulthood (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Although in the great majority GH response to acute stimuli is more than 10 ng/ml, GH therapy has proved to be effective in promoting growth (6, 7, 8, 9), and a certain degree of peripheral GH-IGF-I-axis resistance has been proposed, although this resistance has been demonstrated in only a few cases (10, 11, 12, 13, 14).

Recently the d3/fl-GH receptor polymorphism (d3/fl-GHR) has been associated with responsiveness to GH therapy in short SGA and idiopathic short stature (ISS) French children (15), German patients with Turner syndrome (16), and GH-deficient Brazilian children (17). However, other studies failed to find similar results in SGA German children (16) and GH-deficient Italian patients (18).

We report the results of a Spanish 2-yr controlled, prospective trial in 170 (86 GH treated and 84 non-GH treated) short SGA children analyzed according to their d3/fl-GHR genotypes.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

One hundred seventy Spanish prepubertal short SGA Caucasian patients (84 boys aged 8.0 ± 2.7 yr and 86 girls aged 7.4 ± 2.5 yr) were included in a 2-yr prospective and controlled trial. Thirty hospitals participated and patients were recruited from September 2001 to December 2002. Patients were assigned to treatment or not in a randomized and double-blind form at each hospital. Inclusion criteria were: gestational age greater than 35 wk; birth weight and/or birth length less than –2 SD (19); age over 3 yr; prepubertal stage; height less than – 2 SD (20); never having been treated with GH or other anabolic agents; normal thyroid, kidney, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and liver functions; GH response peak more than 10 ng/ml; and normal karyotype in girls. Exclusion criteria were neonatal brain injury, chromosomopathies, malformation syndromes, chronic diseases, and steroid therapy.

Height and weight were measured 6–12 months before study inclusion, at inclusion, and every 4 months thereafter. Growth velocities before inclusion (PGV) and for the two consecutive 1-yr periods were calculated. Parental heights were measured in 166 patients (81 boys and 85 girls). Height and weight were transformed into SD scores (SDS) according to age-, sex-, and pubertal stage-matched control values recently reported in Spanish cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (19, 20, 21). Total height gain (first year height gain + second year height gain), {Delta} increment in SDS (second year height-SDS minus inclusion height-SDS) and in centimeters (first year height gain minus PGV + second year height gain minus PGV), body mass index (BMI), BMI-SDS, and target height-SDS were calculated. Serum IGF-I and IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 were measured and expressed as SDS according to age- and sex-matched control values, and the IGF-I to IGFBP-3 (nanograms per milligram) ratio was calculated.

Of the 170 patients, 86 (48 boys aged 8.5 ± 2.6 yr, 38 girls aged 7.4 ± 2.9 yr) were treated with GH (66 µg/kg body weight per day) for 2 yr, and the other 84 (36 boys aged 7.5 ± 2.8 yr, 48 girls aged 7.4 ± 2.1 yr) were not treated. Eighteen GH-treated and 12 non-GH-treated patients entered puberty during the second follow-up year (testicular volume > 4 ml in boys and appearance of breast buds in girls); thus, only 68 GH-treated (39 boys aged 7.8 ± 2.3 yr, 29 girls aged 6.2 ± 2.3 yr) and 72 non-GH-treated (32 boys aged 7.0 ± 2.6 yr, 40 girls aged 6.8 ± 1.7 yr) patients remained strictly prepubertal during the 2 follow-up years. For this reason the results were evaluated in two different arms: for patients who patients remained prepubertal during the 2 follow-up years (group 1) and for all the patients (group 2).

Growth prediction

Growth prediction for the first year of therapy was calculated according to Ranke et al. (22) for the 166 patients with target height data. Residual growth and studentized residuals were calculated in only 85 GH-treated patients.

Genotyping

The d3/fl-GHR genotypes were evaluated according to Pantel et al. (23) with modifications. When a homozygous d3/d3 genotype was detected (a single band corresponding to 532 bp) and/or when a band potentially corresponding to the 935-bp product was mildly amplified, a second PCR using only G1 and G3 primers was carried out, followed by electrophoresis.

Hormone measurements

Serum GH was measured in each hospital laboratory by commercial assays. Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured in a central laboratory by commercial RIA assays (Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA). Reference values for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 SDS calculations were generated in the central laboratory (24).

Ethics

This work was approved by the ethics committee of each participating hospital. Written informed consent was obtained for each subject over 12 yr of age, and informed parental consent was also obtained for all patients regardless of age.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as percentages and mean ± SD. Differences for the variables evaluated between GH-treated and non-GH-treated groups and among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes were calculated using nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U tests and Kruskal-Wallis test) with the Statview 4.5 program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Group 1: patients who remained prepubertal during the 2-yr study

Similar d3/fl-GHR genotype frequencies were found in GH-treated (n = 68) and non-GH-treated (n = 72) patients. At study inclusion, chronological age, birth length, birth weight, parental heights, target height, height-SDS, PGV (centimeters per year, SDS) were not statistically different between GH-treated and non-GH-treated patients or among d3/fl-GHR genotypes (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Clinical and anthropometric parameters in short SGA children who remained prepubertal (group 1) during the 2-yr follow-up (mean ± SD)

 
In GH-treated patients, PGV significantly (P < 0.0001) increased during the first and second years of therapy, as did height-SDS, and these increases were similar in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. Total 2-yr height gain and {Delta} 2-yr height increase values did not differ statistically among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes. In non-GH-treated patients, PGV did not change significantly during the first and second years of follow-up nor did height-SDS, and these values were similar in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. Total 2-yr height gain and {Delta} 2-yr height increase values did not differ statistically among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes (Table 1Go and Fig. 1Go). BMI-SDS values at inclusion and during the 2 yr of follow-up were similar and not statistically different among d3/fl-GHR genotypes (GH treated and non-GH treated) (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. PGV (centimeters per year) and height gain (centimeters) during the 2 yr of follow-up according to d3/fl-GHR genotypes. A, Group 1, prepubertal GH-treated patients. B, Group 2, all GH-treated patients. C, Group 1, prepubertal non-GH-treated patients. D, Group 2, all non-GH-treated patients. No statistically significant differences were observed among d3/fl-GHR genotypes or between groups 1 and 2 for GH-treated and non-GH-treated patients.

 
In GH-treated patients, first-year growth prediction was similar and did not differ statistically in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. The same occurred in non-GH-treated patients when the prediction was calculated as if they were treated with the same GH dose (66 µg/kg·d). Studentized residuals in GH-treated patients showed no statistically significant differences among d3/fl-GHR genotypes (Table 1Go).

IGF-I-SDS, IGFBP-3-SDS, and IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio did not differ statistically between GH-treated and non-GH-treated patients at inclusion. In the GH-treated, a significant increase (P < 0.0001) in IGF-I-SDS was observed at the first and second years (–0.68 ± 1.45, +1.16 ± 0.91, and +0.93 ± 1.12, respectively, n = 27). The same occurred for IGFBP-3-SDS (0.57 ± 1.14, 1.77 ± 0.86, and 1.71 ± 0.85, respectively, n = 27) and IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio (48.3 ± 24.6, 77.5 ± 22.0, and 88.3 ± 30.6, respectively). In the non-GH-treated, IGF-I-SDS, IGFBP-3-SDS, and IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio values at inclusion (–0.93 ± 1.21, 0.61 ± 1.03, and 45.5 ± 18.6, respectively) remained similar and did not differ statistically at the first and second follow-up years (data not shown).

Group 2: all patients

At study inclusion, no significant differences were found between GH-treated (n = 86) and non-GH-treated (n = 84) patients for chronological age (see Patients and Methods), d3/fl-GHR genotype frequencies (d3/d3: 8.9 and 10.7%; d3/fl: 43.8 and 46.4%; fl/fl: 47.2 and 42.8%, respectively) for height-SDS, PGV, birth length, birth weight, parental heights, target height, IGF-I-SDS, IGFBP-3-SDS, and IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio, as also occurred when data were analyzed according to d3/fl-GHR genotypes. When these data were compared with the corresponding data of group 1 patients (68 GH treated and 72 non-GH treated), no statistically significant differences were observed (Figs. 1Go and 2Go and data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Height-SDS (H-SDS) and growth velocity-SDS (GV-SDS) at inclusion (B) and during the first (1 ) and second (2 ) years of follow-up, according to d3/fl-GHR genotypes. A, Group 1, prepubertal GH-treated patients. B, Group 2, all GH-treated patients. C, Group 1, prepubertal non-GH-treated patients. D, Group 2, all non-GH-treated patients. No statistically significant differences were observed among d3/fl-GHR genotypes or between groups 1 and 2 for GH-treated and non-GH-treated patients.

 
In GH-treated patients, PGV (4.4 ± 1.1 cm/yr, –1.70 ± 1.20 SDS) significantly (P < 0.0001) increased during the first (10.6 ± 1.7 cm/yr, 6.0 ± 1.9 SDS) and second (8.8 ± 1.1 cm/yr, 2.87 ± 1.55 SDS) years of therapy, as did height-SDS (from –3.30 ± 0.70 at inclusion to –2.20 ± 0.80 at 1 and –1.66 ± 0.98 at 2 yr), and these increases were similar in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. Total 2-yr height gain was 18.8 ± 2.5 cm and {Delta} 2-yr height increase was 9.9 ± 2.8 cm and 1.61 ± 0.84 SDS. These values did not differ among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes. The same occurred when these data were compared with the corresponding data of the 68 GH-treated patients of group 1 (Figs. 1Go and 2Go and data not shown).

In non-GH-treated patients, PGV (4.7 ± 0.9 cm/yr, –1.47 ± 0.94 SDS) did not change significantly during the first (5.2 ± 1.3 cm/yr, –0.59 ± 1.21 SDS) and second (5.2 ± 1.4 cm/yr, –0.64 ± 1.27 SDS) years of follow-up nor did height-SDS (–3.16 ± 0.81 at inclusion, –3.06 ± 0.75 at 1 yr and –3.11 ± 0.87 at 2 yr), and these values were similar in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. Total 2-yr height gain was 10.5 ± 2.1 cm, and {Delta} 2-yr height increases were 0.9 ± 2.6 cm and 0.06 ± 0.76 SDS. These values did not differ among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes. The same occurred when these data were compared with the corresponding data of the 72 non-GH-treated patients of group 1 (Figs. 1Go and 2Go and data not shown).

In GH-treated patients, first-year growth prediction was similar and did not differ statistically in each d3/fl-GHR genotype. The same occurred in the non-GH-treated group when the prediction was calculated as if they were treated with the same GH dose (66 µg/kg·d). When these data were compared with the corresponding data of the 68 GH-treated and 72 non-GH-treated patients of group 1, no statistically significant differences were found (data not shown). In GH-treated patients, studentized residuals showed no statistically significant differences among the d3/fl-GHR genotypes (0.4 ± 1.2 in d3/d3, 0.2 ± 1.2 in d3/fl, and 0.6 ± 0.9 in fl/fl), and these values were similar and did not differ from those found in the 68 GH-treated patients of group 1.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This Spanish prospective, 2-yr, controlled trial in short SGA prepubertal children was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GH therapy (66 µg/k·d) and study some molecular aspects related to GH-IGF-I and vitamin D axes. The anthropometric data were compared with those of age-, sex-, and pubertal stage-matched Spanish controls obtained in recent cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (19, 20, 21). Of the 170 patients included, approximately half, 86, were treated with GH and the other 84 remained as controls. Because 30 patients (18 GH treated and 12 non-GH treated) entered puberty during the second year of the study, results were analyzed in two different ways: for those who remained prepubertal during the 2 yr of follow-up and the whole group. Regardless of the number of patients in each analysis, d3/fl-GHR genotype frequencies and anthropometric and hormonal data at inclusion and during follow-up were similar within GH-treated (68 and 86, respectively), within non-GH-treated (72 and 84, respectively), and between GH-treated and non-GH-treated patients. In GH-treated patients, growth velocity and height-SDS rose, whereas this did not occur in non-GH-treated patients, and these results concur with those previously reported (6, 7, 8, 9, 24). Although patients in group 1 with the d3/d3 genotype were 1.3 yr older at inclusion, all remained prepubertal at the end of the study, which suggests that this age difference may not have influenced the response to GH therapy.

Responsiveness to GH therapy varies from patient to patient, and genetic differences in the GH-IGF-I axis cascade, which leads to biological effects, have been suggested (6, 7, 8, 9, 22, 25). Recently in two cohorts of prepubertal short children, Dos Santos et al. (15) reported significant differences in 2-yr GH therapy responsiveness according to the d3/fl-GHR genotype borne. The first cohort (25 SGA and 51 ISS children) was treated with 44–48 µg/kg·d and the second (35 SGA and 61 ISS children) with 30 µg/kg·d. Children bearing d3/d3 and d3/fl genotypes grew more than those bearing the fl/fl genotype. In addition, those authors (15) showed in vitro that HEK293 cells transfected with the d3-GHR isoform had an increased response to GH therapy, compared with those with the full-length isoform.

Our study in 84 short SGA patients treated for 2 yr with GH at 66 µg/k·d and a previous German study in 60 short SGA treated for 1 yr with GH at 52–57 µg/k·d (16) did not confirm the results obtained by Dos Santos et al. (15), who did not evaluate the short SGA patients as a group but mixed with ISS children, with SGA children representing 32.8 and 36.4% in the cohorts treated with 45–48 and 30 µg/k·d, respectively. Whether this could explain the different clinical results obtained should be considered, and further studies on GH therapy effects in SGA and ISS children studied separately are required.

A further interesting difference between the study by Dos Santos et al. (15) and ours is the GH dose used. Whereas they used doses of 44–48 and 30 µg/kg·d, we used a higher dose (66 µg/kg·d) as did Binder et al. (16) in the German study (56 µg/kg·d). In addition to the study by Dos Santos et al., two other publications showed that after 1 yr of GH therapy at 38 µg/kg·d in 53 German Turner syndrome patients (16) and 33 µg/kg·d in 58 Brazilian GH-deficient patients (17), the increase in height velocity was significantly higher in patients bearing the d3/d3-GHR genotype than in those bearing the fl/fl-GHR genotype. By contrast, a recent Italian study failed to find similar results in 54 GH-deficient children treated with 28 µg/kg·d for 1 yr, although in that study d3/fl-GHR genotypes were not described in detail (18).

Results among d3/fl-GHR genotypes differed only in the SGA patients studied by Binder et al. (16) for the studentized residuals after combining the homozygous d3/d3 with the heterozygous d3/fl to be compared with the homozygous fl/fl. In our study, the application of a similar mathematic strategy would have yielded the opposite result, with the fl/fl patients showing a tendency toward an increased response to GH therapy, compared with the combined d3/d3 and d3/fl patients, although no statistically significant differences were found (data not shown). The possibility of the high GH doses used by Binder et al. and us in short SGA children masking the d3/fl-GHR genotype differences observed when lower GH doses are used in short SGA, ISS, Turner, and GH-deficient patients should be considered.

The increment in growth rate associated with GH administration during the 2 yr of GH therapy was 9.1 ± 2.4, 9.4 ± 3.0, and 10.4 ± 2.1 cm in d3/d3, d3/fl, and fl/fl, respectively, in our work; in the study by Dos Santos et al. (15), increases were 9.4, 9.9, and 5.2 cm in cohort 1 and 8.57, 7.58, and 4.13 in cohort 2 for the d3/d3, d3/fl, and fl/fl genotypes, respectively. It seems clear that the maximum height increase during the 2 yr of GH therapy reached by the d3/d3 genotype in the study by Dos Santos et al. (15) cohort 1 was similar to the one reached by our patients, independently of genotypes. This suggests that the maximum 2-yr height increase under GH therapy was reached by all genotypes in our work, whereas it was reached only by the best responder genotypes in the work by Dos Santos et al. (15) (the d3/d3 and/or d3/fl), and this could be related to the GH doses. Further studies in short SGA children treated with these low GH doses are required to confirm or rule out this hypothesis. Additional studies evaluating the effect on adult height of long-term GH therapy, according to the d3/fl-GHR genotype carried and the GH dose used, are also required.

In the short SGA children studied by us, PGV and height-SDS at inclusion values were similar for each d3/fl-GHR genotype in GH-treated and non-GH-treated patients. In addition, in the latter, growth velocity and total height-SDS gain during the 2 yr of follow-up were also similar for each d3/fl-GH genotype. These results show that spontaneous skeletal growth in our short SGA patients did not differ among d3/fl-GH genotypes and concur with those published previously (15, 16).

In summary, the results of our 2-yr controlled clinical trial show that in prepubertal short, non-GH-deficient, SGA children, both the spontaneous growth rate and responsiveness to 66 µg/kg·d GH therapy were similar for each d3/fl-GHR genotype carried. However, due to the low d3/d3 GHR genotype frequency, a bias in our results cannot be completely excluded.


    Acknowledgments
 
The Spanish SGA Study Group included: J. Ajram; A. Aragones; A. Arroyos; A. Balaguer; M. J. Ballester; J. Bel; M.V. Borrás; J. Bosch; N. Cabrinety; M. Caimarí; M. Camprubí; P. Cantero; R. Cañete; G. Cao; G. Carreras; R. Corripio; A. De Ureta; C. J. Del Valle; R. Espigares; A. Feliu; C. Fernández; J. Ferragut; A. Ferrández; A. Ferrer; M. E. Gallego; A. Gómez; J. P. González; R. Gracia; G. Grau; M. Gussinyé; P. Gutierrez; M. T. Herráez; L. Ibáñez; J. I. Labarta; J. L. Lechuga; G. Lledó; A. Llusà; R. López; J. P. López-Siguero; L. Lorenzo; C. Luzuriaga; A. Mainou; M. V. Marcos; M. J. Martínez-Aedo; P. Martul; E. Mayayo; A. Montesdeoca; R. Nosas; A. Oliver; M. J. Pisonero; N. Pons; J. M. Rial; I. Rica; S. Rite; J. Rodrigo; F. Rodríguez Hierro; A. Rodríguez; I. Rodríguez; A. Romo; J. Sánchez del Pozo; E. Sastre; B. Sinués; B. Sobradillo; J. Tacons; A. Vela; and E. Vicens-Calvet.

Christine O’Hara is acknowledged for useful help with the English version of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from Institute of Health Carlos III, RCMN (C03/08), and Grant FIS PI-020803 from Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain, and Pfizer Spain. C.E. was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from Departament Universitats, Recerca i Serveis per a la Informació. M.F.-C. is the recipient of a fellowship (Beca de Formación en Investigación) from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid, Spain.

First Published Online June 27, 2006

1 See Acknowledgments for members of the Spanish SGA Study Group. Back

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; d3/fl-GHR, exon 3-deleted full-length GH receptor; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; ISS, idiopathic short stature; PGV, previous growth velocity; SDS, SD score(s); SGA, small for gestational age.

Received March 29, 2006.

Accepted June 20, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Karlberg J, Albertsson-Wikland K 1995 Growth in full-term small-for-gestational-age infants: from birth to final height. Pediatr Res 38:733–739[Medline]
  2. Hokken-Kolega AC, de Rider MA, Lemmen RJ, den Hartog H, de Muinck SM, Drop SL 1995 Children born small for gestational age; do they catch up? Pediatr Res 38:267–271[Medline]
  3. Coutant R, Carel JC, Letrait M, Chatelain P, Coste J, Chaussain JL 1998 Short stature associated with intrauterine growth retardation: final height of untreated and growth hormone-treated children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1070–1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Vicens-Calvet E, Espadero RM, Carrascosa A 2002 Longitudinal study of pubertal growth spurt in children born small for gestational age without postnatal catch-up growth. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 15:381–383[Medline]
  5. Lee PA, Chernausek SD, Hokken-Koelega AC, Czernichow P; International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board International 2003 International Small for Gestational Age Advisory Board Consensus Development Conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001. Pediatrics 111:1253–1261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Carel JC, Chatelain P, Rochiccioli P, Chaussain JL 2003 Improvement in adult height after growth hormone treatment in adolescents with short stature born small for gestational age: results of a randomized controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1587–1593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. van Pareren Y, Mulder P, Houdijk M, Jansen M, Reeser M, Hokken-Koelega A 2003 Adult height after long-term continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3584–3590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dahlgren J, Wikland KA, Swedish Study Group for Growth Hormone Treatment 2005 Final height in short children born small for gestational age treated with growth hormone. Pediatr Res 57:216–222[Medline]
  9. Jaquet D, Collin D, Levy-Marchal C, Czernichow P 2004 Adult height distribution in subjects born small for gestational age. Horm Res 62:92–96[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Goddard AD, Covello R, Luoh SM, Clackson T, Attie KM, Gesundheit N, Rundle AC, Wells JA, Carlsson LM 1995 Mutations of the growth hormone receptor in children with idiopathic short stature. N Engl J Med 333:1093–1098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sanchez J, Perera E, Baumbach L, Cleveland W 1998 Growth hormone receptor gene mutations in children with idiopathic short stature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:4079–4083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sjoberg M, Salazar T, Espinosa C, Dagnino A, Avila A, Eggers M, Cassorla F, Carvallo P, Mericq MV 2001 Study of GH sensitivity in Chilean patients with idiopathic short stature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4375–4381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Abuzzahab MJ, Schneider A, Goddard A, Grigorescu F, Lautier C, Keller E, Kiess W, Klammt J, Kratzsch J, Osgood D, Pfaffle R, Raile K, Seidel B, Smith RJ, Chernausek SD; Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR) Study Group 2003 IGF-I receptor mutations resulting in intrauterine and postnatal growth retardation. N Engl J Med 349:2211–2222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rosenfeld RG, Hwa V 2004 New molecular mechanism of GH resistance. Eur J Endocirnol 151(Suppl 1):S11–S15
  15. Dos Santos C, Essioux L, Teinturier C, Tauber M, Goffin V, Bougneres P 2004 A common polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor is associated with increased responsiveness to growth hormone. Nat Genet 36:720–724[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Binder G, Baur F, Schweizer R, Ranke MB 2006 The d3-growth hormone receptor polymorphism is associated with increased responsiveness to GH in Turner syndrome and in short small-for-gestational-age children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:659–664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jorge AAL, Marchisotti FG, Montenegro LR, Carvalho LR, Mendonca BB, Arnhold IJP 2006 Growth hormone (GH) pharmacogenetics: influence of GH receptor exon 3 retention or deletion on first-year growth hormone response and final height in patients with severe GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1076–1080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pilotta A, Mella P, Filisetti M, Felappi B, Prandi E, Parrinello G, Notarangelo LD, Buzi F 2006 Common polymorphisms of the growth hormone (GH) receptor do not correlate with the growth response to exogenous recombinant human GH in GH deficient children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:1178–1180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Carrascosa A, Yeste D, Copil A, Gussinye M 2004 Secular growth changes. Weight, height and body mass index values in infant, children adolescents and young adults from Barcelona population. Med Clin (Barc) 123:445–451[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Carrascosa A, Yeste D, Copil A, Almar J, Salcedo S, Gussinyé M 2004 Anthropometric growth patterns of preterm and full-term newborns (24–42 week’s gestational age) at the Hospital Materno-Infantil Vall d’Hebron (Barcelona) (1997–2002). An Pediatr (Barc) 60:406–415
  21. Ferrández-Longas A, Baguer L, Labarta JI, Labena C, Mayayo E, Puga B, Rueda C, Ruiz-Echarri M 2005 Longitudinal study of normal Spanish children from birth to adulthood (anthropometric, pubertal, radiological and intellectual data). Pediatr Endocr Rev 2(Suppl 4):423–559
  22. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Cowell CT, Wikland KA, Reiter EO, Wilton P, Preace DA; KIGS International Board 2003 Prediction of response to growth hormone treatment in short children born small for gestational age: analysis of data from KIGS (Pharmacia International Growth Database). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:125–131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Pantel J, Machinis K, Sobrier ML, Duquesnoy P, Goossens M, Amselem S 2000 Species-specific alternative splice mimicry at the growth hormone receptor locus revealed by the lineage of retroelements during primate evolution. J Biol Chem 275:18664–18669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Audí L, Llopis MA, Granada ML, Hermoso F, del Valle J, Rodríguez-Arnao MD, Bel J, Luzuriaga C, Gallego E, Marín F; Grupo Español de Estudio de la Talla Baja 2001 Low sensitivity of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and urinary GH in the diagnosis of growth hormone insufficiency in slowly growing short-statured boys. Med Clin (Barc) 116:6–11[Medline]
  25. de Zegher F, Hokken-Koelega A 2005 Growth hormone therapy for children born small for gestational age: height gain is less dose dependent over the long term than over the short term. Pediatrics 115:458–462



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
G. Kenth, J. A M. Mergelas, and C. G. Goodyer
Developmental changes in the human GH receptor and its signal transduction pathways
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 71 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Raz, M. Janner, V. Petkovic, D. Lochmatter, A. Eble, M. T. Dattani, P. C. Hindmarsh, C. E. Fluck, and P. E. Mullis
Influence of Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Deletion of Exon 3 and Full-Length Isoforms on GH Response and Final Height in Patients with Severe GH Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 974 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Carrascosa, L. Audi, M. Fernandez-Cancio, C. Esteban, P. Andaluz, E. Vilaro, M. Clemente, D. Yeste, M. A. Albisu, and M. Gussinye
The Exon 3-Deleted/Full-Length Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Did Not Influence Growth Response to Growth Hormone Therapy over Two Years in Prepubertal Short Children Born at Term with Adequate Weight and Length for Gestational Age
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 764 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Carrascosa, L. Audi, C. Esteban, M. Fernandez-Cancio, P. Andaluz, M. Gussinye, M. Clemente, D. Yeste, and M. A. Albisu
Growth Hormone (GH) Dose, But Not Exon 3-Deleted/Full-Length GH Receptor Polymorphism Genotypes, Influences Growth Response to Two-Year GH Therapy in Short Small-for-Gestational-Age Children
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 147 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Schreiner, S. Stutte, P. Bartmann, B. Gohlke, and J. Woelfle
Association of the Growth Hormone Receptor d3-Variant and Catch-up Growth of Preterm Infants with Birth Weight of Less Than 1500 Grams
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4489 - 4493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. G Rosenfeld
Pharmacogenomics and pharmacoproteomics in the evaluation and management of short stature
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 157(suppl_1): S27 - S31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Schmid, P.-A. Krayenbuehl, R.-L. Bernays, C. Zwimpfer, F. E. Maly, and P. Wiesli
Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Isoform in Acromegaly: Lower Concentrations of GH but Not Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Patients with a Genomic Deletion of Exon 3 in the GH Receptor Gene
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2007; 53(8): 1484 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. B. Jensen, S. Vielwerth, T. Larsen, G. Greisen, H. Leffers, and A. Juul
The Presence of the d3-Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Is Negatively Associated with Fetal Growth but Positively Associated with Postnatal Growth in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2758 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
P. Saenger, P. Czernichow, I. Hughes, and E. O. Reiter
Small for Gestational Age: Short Stature and Beyond
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 219 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Kenth, Z. Shao, D. E. C. Cole, and C. G. Goodyer
Relationship of the Human Growth Hormone Receptor Exon 3 Genotype with Final Adult Height and Bone Mineral Density
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 725 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Audi, C. Esteban, A. Carrascosa, R. Espadero, A. Perez-Arroyo, R. Arjona, M. Clemente, H. Wollmann, L. Fryklund, L. A. Parodi, et al.
Exon 3-Deleted/Full-Length Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Genotype Frequencies in Spanish Short Small-for-Gestational-Age (SGA) Children and Adolescents (n = 247) and in an Adult Control Population (n = 289) Show Increased fl/fl in Short SGA
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2006; 91(12): 5038 - 5043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/9/3281    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrascosa, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrascosa, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals