This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by De Galan, B. E. Articles by Smits, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by De Galan, B. E. Articles by Smits, P. Related Collections Diabetes and Insulin Metabolism

Preserved Sensitivity to ß₂-Adrenergic Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypoglycemia Unawareness

Departments of General Internal Medicine (B.E.D.G., B.J.J.S., P.S.) and Pharmacology-Toxicology (P.D.M., L.W., P.S.), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Bastiaan E. De Galan, M.D., Ph.D., Department of General Internal Medicine 463, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail: b.degalan{at}aig.umcn.nl.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Background and Objective: Use of ß₂-adrenergic receptor agonists has been advocated for the treatment of hypoglycemia unawareness in type 1 diabetes. In vitro, however, hypoglycemia unawareness has been associated with reduced ß₂-adrenergic sensitivity. Therefore, in vivo sensitivity to ß₂-adrenergic receptor agonist stimulation was compared between type 1 diabetic patients with and without hypoglycemia unawareness and nondiabetic controls.

Methods: Ten type 1 diabetic patients with hypoglycemia unawareness, 12 type 1 diabetic patients with intact hypoglycemic awareness, and 11 healthy controls were enrolled. ß₂-Adrenergic sensitivity was determined by measuring the forearm vasodilator response to intraarterial infusion of salbutamol. Salbutamol was infused in six increasing doses ranging from 0.003 to 1.0 µg¹·min^–1·dl^–1. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was bilaterally measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. Diabetic patients received low-dose insulin before FBF measurements to ensure that experiments were carried out under normoglycemic conditions.

Results: At baseline, FBF was 1.9 ± 0.3 ml¹·min^–1·dl^–1 in controls, 2.3 ± 0.4 ml¹·min^–1·dl^–1 in patients with intact awareness, and 1.4 ± 0.1 ml¹·min^–1·dl^–1 in patients with hypoglycemia unawareness (P = 0.048 vs. aware patients). In response to salbutamol, FBF increased 9.1-fold in controls, 8.0-fold in patients with intact awareness, and 10.7-fold in patients with hypoglycemia unawareness (P = NS). Heart rate increased in all groups due to systemic spillover of salbutamol but appeared blunted, considering a greater fall in mean arterial pressure in patients with hypoglycemia unawareness.

Conclusions: Sensitivity to ß₂-adrenergic receptor agonist stimulation is preserved in type 1 diabetic patients with hypoglycemia unawareness.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
PATIENTS WITH TYPE 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are at a continuous risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia as a result of insulin treatment, especially in a setting of blunted glucose counterregulatory defenses and hypoglycemia unawareness. In turn, hypoglycemia unawareness occurs as a consequence of repeated iatrogenic hypoglycemic events and is closely linked to defects in hormonal counterregulation, in particular to the blunted adrenaline response (1). To stimulate adrenergic action, treatment with ß₂-adrenergic agonists has been advocated to prevent nocturnal hypoglycemia clinically (2) and support swift recovery from hypoglycemia (3). However, the applicability of such treatment for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness might be offset when sensitivity to adrenergic stimulation is reduced. Various groups have reported reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity in hypoglycemia-unaware T1DM patients when compared with control and hypoglycemia-aware diabetic subjects, based on reduced cardiac chronotropic responses to isoproterenol (4, 5, 6, 7). Although reversal of reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity could be achieved when hypoglycemias were meticulously avoided (7), a single nocturnal hypoglycemic event was sufficient to decrease ß-adrenergic sensitivity in T1DM patients with intact hypoglycemic awareness, whereas it increased in nondiabetic controls (8).

There is evidence from in vitro studies that the reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity associated with hypoglycemia unawareness is mediated through the ß₂-adrenergic receptor. In hypoglycemia-unaware T1DM patients with a reduced chronotropic response to iv isoproterenol, ß₂-adrenergic receptors on mononuclear leukocytes were found to express reduced affinity for isoproterenol (9). In another study, 1 wk of intensive insulin treatment reduced ß₂-adrenoceptor density on lymphocytes in T1DM, the magnitude of which correlated highly with the number of hypoglycemic events and with loss of hypoglycemic awareness (10). These data contrast with an in vivo study investigating the effect of local perfusion with terbutaline, a ß₂-adrenergic agonist, through a microdialysis catheter (11). In that study, terbutaline-induced lipolysis and stimulation of adipose and skeletal muscle tissue blood flow were not found to differ between intensively treated (presumably hypoglycemia unaware) T1DM patients and control subjects. However, blood flow was assessed indirectly, using a model that can be applied only under the assumption of steady-state conditions (12).

Other than by in vitro (9, 10) or indirect (11) assessment, the sensitivity of the ß₂-adrenergic receptor has not been tested quantitatively in T1DM with hypoglycemia unawareness by a validated in vivo technique. The purpose of the present study was to compare ß₂-adrenergic sensitivity in vivo in T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness to that in T1DM patients with normal hypoglycemic awareness and nondiabetic controls. To quantify ß₂-adrenergic sensitivity, we measured the vasodilator action of salbutamol, a selective ß₂-adrenergic receptor agonist, using the perfused forearm technique (13).

	Subjects and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Subjects

Written informed consent was obtained from 22 T1DM patients recruited from the outpatient clinic of our hospital and 11 healthy controls recruited by advertisement. All diabetic subjects were free of classical long-term diabetic complications, except background retinopathy. Autonomic neuropathy was excluded by normal responses to cardiovascular reflex tests (i.e. heart rate response to Valsalva maneuver, heart rate variability to deep breathing, and blood pressure responses to standing up and sustained handgrip) (14). The magnitude of hypoglycemic awareness was assessed on the basis of the score on a Dutch modification of a standardized hypoglycemia questionnaire (15). Patients with a score less than 3 (of maximal 10) were classified as being hypoglycemia aware (n = 12), and patients with higher scores were classified as hypoglycemia unaware (n = 10). Three of the latter had previously participated in a trial in which their inability to detect hypoglycemia was objectified by a hypoglycemic clamp test (16). All participants had a normal blood pressure and used no medication other than insulin or oral contraceptives, except for one nondiabetic and one diabetic subject who were on stable T₄ supplementation therapy for longer than 1 yr. Seven subjects were current smokers, one in the control group and three in each of the diabetic groups. All participants were requested to abstain from caffeine-containing substances and smoking for at least 48 h, from alcohol for at least 24 h, and from food intake at least 10 h before experiments took place. Diabetic subjects were asked to perform blood glucose self-measurements at least four times per day for at least 5 d preceding the experiment and to reduce the bedtime insulin dose by 20% on the preceding day to avoid nocturnal hypoglycemia. All patients checked capillary glucose at approximately 0200 h, and in case of nocturnal hypoglycemia, the test was canceled or postponed. The Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Medical Ethics Committee approved the study.

Procedure

All experiments took place in the morning in a quiet, temperature-controlled room (23–24 C), with the subjects supine. The brachial artery of the nondominant arm was cannulated (Angiocath 20-gauge; Beckton Dickinson, Sandy, UT) under local anesthesia (Xylocaine 2%) for infusion of salbutamol (Ventolin; GlaxoSmithKline, Zeist, The Netherlands) and blood pressure monitoring (monitor 378341A; Hewlett Packard GmbH, Böblingen, Germany). Intraarterial infusion rates were calculated per deciliter forearm volume, measured by water displacement. In the diabetic subjects, an antecubital vein of the contralateral arm was cannulated for administration of insulin (Actrapid; Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) and glucose 20% (if necessary). After cannulation(s), a 30-min equilibration period was allowed to pass before baseline variables were obtained. A low-dose iv insulin infusion of 7–10 mU/min·m^–2 body surface area was initiated to obtain normoglycemia in the diabetic subjects. Because of insulin’s (modest) vasodilator effect (17), the insulin infusion was terminated as soon as plasma glucose levels fell to less than 7.0 mmol/liter; glucose 20% was given as necessary to prevent hypoglycemia.

The ensuing experimental procedure was similar for all participants. At constant flow rates, 5-min infusions of saline and incremental doses of salbutamol diluted in saline vehicle (0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 µg·min^–1·dl^–1) were subsequently administered intraarterially. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured during the final 2 min of each dosing step in both arms, using electrocardiogram-triggered mercury-in-silastic (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) strain gauge venous occlusion plethysmography, as described previously (13). The mean of six to eight FBF measurements was used for data analysis. Hand circulation was eliminated during FBF measurements by wrist cuffs inflated 100 mm Hg above systolic blood pressure. The succeeding salbutamol doses were interrupted once by a 15-min drug-free interval for deflation of the wrist cuffs to allow recovery of hand circulation.

Analytical methods

Arterial plasma glucose levels were determined in duplicate by the glucose oxidation method (Beckman Glucose Analyzer II; Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Plasma insulin levels were determined by RIA (16). Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) was measured using HPLC (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Veenendaal, The Netherlands) with reference values of 4.8–6.2%.

Calculations and statistical analyses

Vasodilator responses to salbutamol were expressed as absolute FBF and as increase in FBF above baseline values (FBF). The effects of salbutamol on FBF and hemodynamic variables were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA. Differences in means were tested by Student’s t test. For data that had no normal distribution, the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare paired and unpaired data, respectively. The ² test was used to compare the male-female distribution of the study population. The SPSS personal computer software package (version 12.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are presented as means ± SEM unless otherwise specified.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. As a group, the diabetic patients were slightly older and had higher heart rate and blood pressure at baseline than the control subjects. There was a preponderance of males among the unaware diabetic patients and a preponderance of females among the aware diabetic patients, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. HbA_1c and fasting plasma glucose values were lower and disease duration was longer in T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness, compared with patients with intact awareness. Insulin levels were significantly higher in diabetic patients than controls at all time points (Table 2) but despite intermittent insulin infusion remained relatively stable for the duration of the experiment. Plasma glucose levels, albeit significantly higher than in controls, remained around the upper value for the normoglycemic range in the diabetic patients during FBF measurements.

Baseline values for FBF in the infusion arm were 1.9 ± 0.3 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in control subjects, 2.3 ± 0.4 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in hypoglycemia-aware T1DM patients (P = NS), and 1.4 ± 0.1 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in hypoglycemia-unaware patients (P = 0.048 vs. aware patients). Corresponding values in the noninfused arm were 1.9 ± 0.2, 2.0 ± 0.2, and 1.6 ± 0.2 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 (P = NS). The lowering of plasma glucose levels in the diabetic patients did not affect FBF in either arm (data not shown). Maximal FBF responses to salbutamol in the infused arm were 14.9 ± 1.3 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in controls, 14.6 ± 1.3 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in hypoglycemia-aware diabetic patients, and 13.8 ± 1.5 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in hypoglycemia-unaware diabetic patients (Fig. 1), corresponding to 9.1-, 8.0-, and 10.7-fold increases, respectively (P < 0.001 for all groups). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for either the maximal FBF response or the course of FBF (P = 0.7 by ANOVA). Comparable results were obtained when the data were expressed as absolute or relative changes in FBF from baseline (FBF).

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1. Local FBF in the experimental arm during intraarterial infusion of salbutamol. FBF increased in the experimental arms in all groups (P < 0.001) but to similar extent (P = NS between groups).

Stratification according to glycemic control and duration of disease

Stratification of the diabetic patients (n = 22) according to HbA_1c value yielded a low-HbA_1c group [mean HbA_1c 7.1% (range 6.0–7.9), n = 8], a middle-HbA_1c group [8.1% (8.0–8.3%), n = 7], and a high-HbA_1c group [9.5% (8.7–11.4%), n = 7]. In response to salbutamol, FBF increased from 1.7 ± 0.5 to 13.5 ± 1.4 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in the low-HbA_1c group, from 1.6 ± 0.3 to 14.0 ± 2.0 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in the middle-HbA_1c group, and from 2.4 ± 0.5 to 15.3 ± 1.7 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in the high-HbA_1c group (P = NS by ANOVA). When recalculating FBF responses according to disease duration, FBF increased from 1.9 ± 0.3 to 15.4 ± 1.3 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in patients with a mean disease duration of 9.9 (range 3–15) yr and from 1.9 ± 0.4 to 13.1 ± 1.4 ml·min^–1·dl^–1 in patients with a mean disease duration of 20.6 (17–33) yr (P = NS by ANOVA).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity has been reported in T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness (9, 10). The present study was conducted to test the involvement of the ß₂-adrenergic receptor in vivo. Therefore, the vasodilator response to local administration of salbutamol was compared among T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness, T1DM patients with intact hypoglycemic awareness, and nondiabetic controls. Our finding of similar vasodilator responses does not support a role for the ß₂-adrenergic receptor in reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity. When the data were expressed as fold increase from baseline, salbutamol elicited even higher responses in unaware diabetic patients than the other two groups, although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Our data extend those obtained previously with microdialysis (11) but are at variance with in vitro studies reporting reduced ß₂-adrenoceptor-mediated action in hypoglycemia-unaware T1DM patients on basis of reduced ß₂-adrenergic receptor density or affinity for isoproterenol on white blood cells (9, 10). However, alterations in ß₂-adrenoceptor density or binding affinity on white blood cells do not necessarily reflect those on other tissues, such as the vascular wall. In addition, white blood cells may not be a stable population, especially after stress hormone release. Lymphocytes, granulocytes, and monocytes of various subsets that differ according to receptor density and binding affinity from cells already in the circulation can be mobilized by catecholamines and cortisol (18). In contrast, the perfused forearm technique is a validated in vivo method to quantify tissue sensitivity to vasoactive substances (10). Moreover, our findings remained unaltered when the diabetic patients were stratified according to tightness of glycemic control as crude marker of (the risk for) hypoglycemia unawareness.

It is unlikely that the higher insulin levels in the two diabetic groups affected our data. First, a significant vasodilator effect of insulin requires 4-fold higher plasma concentrations than those achieved here (17); second, insulin does not exert its vasodilator effects by modulation of ß-adrenergic receptors (19). Moreover, insulin levels were identical in the two diabetic groups throughout the experiments, and baseline FBF, although mutually different, was not dissimilar from that in controls.

Our study had some limitations. First of all, the groups were incompletely matched for sex, age, and disease duration. The effect of the latter two parameters on ß₂-adrenergic sensitivity is probably negligible: vasodilator responses to ß-adrenergic stimulation are age independent (20), and stratification of our data according to disease duration did not reveal an effect of diabetes per se. However, ß₂-adrenergic sensitivity may differ by sex, with women probably having a more profound responsiveness to ß₂-adrenergic stimulation than men (21). In the present study, women were overrepresented in the hypoglycemia-aware diabetic group and underrepresented in the unaware diabetic group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. A post hoc analysis of our data by gender did not reveal differences in ß₂-adrenergic sensitivity between men and women in either the control or diabetic group or when all subjects were pooled (data not shown), although it should be acknowledged that our study was not designed for that purpose. Yet even when gender would have had an effect, a more balanced matching according to gender would have resulted in greater, not smaller, salbutamol responsiveness in the T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness.

Previous in vivo studies on ß-adrenergic sensitivity in diabetes used the isoproterenol sensitivity test (4, 5, 6, 7, 8), in which ß-adrenergic sensitivity is expressed as the dose of iv isoproterenol that produces an increment in heart rate of 25 bpm over baseline values. This heart rate increment is the consequence of direct stimulation of cardiac ß₁- (and ß₂-) adrenoceptors and an indirect baroreflex response to ß₂-adrenoceptor-mediated peripheral vasodilatation (22). When reconciling data from studies using the isoproterenol test with that of the current study, it seems plausible that hypoglycemia-associated reduction in ß-adrenergic sensitivity is mediated by the ß₁-adrenergic receptor. In our study, the heart rate response to systemic spillover of salbutamol in T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness appeared blunted in view of the greater fall in blood pressure, which lends support to this suggestion. However, subtle impairments in baroreflex sensitivity, only to be detected by spectral analysis (23, 24) but not by conventional tests, have been found to correlate with diabetes duration. Because disease duration was longer in patients with hypoglycemia unawareness, compared with patients with intact awareness in both the current study and studies using the isoproterenol test (4, 5, 6), a contribution of reduced baroreflex sensitivity to the lower heart rate response cannot be excluded.

In conclusion, sensitivity to ß₂-adrenergic agonist stimulation is not reduced in T1DM patients with hypoglycemia unawareness. This observation may be of potential value when treatment with ß₂-adrenergic agonists is considered to support glucose counterregulation. Whether reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity in hypoglycemia unawareness is mediated through the ß₁-adrenergic receptor or impairments in the baroreflex response pathway requires further study.

	Acknowledgments

 
We are indebted to all participants for their cooperation in the study.

	Footnotes

 
The authors have nothing to disclose and no conflicts of interest.

First Published Online May 16, 2006

Abbreviations: FBF, Forearm blood flow; HbA_1c, hemoglobin A_1c; MAP, mean arterial pressure; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Received March 8, 2006.

Accepted May 8, 2006.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Subjects and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Cryer PE 2002 Hypoglycaemia: the limiting factor in the glycaemic management of type I and type II diabetes. Diabetologia 45:937–948[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Saleh TY, Cryer PE 1997 Alanine and terbutaline in the prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia in IDDM. Diabetes Care 20:1231–1236[Abstract]
3. Wiethop BV, Cryer PE 1993 Alanine and terbutaline in treatment of hypoglycemia in IDDM. Diabetes Care 16:1131–1136[Abstract]
4. Berlin I, Grimaldi A, Landault C, Zoghbi F, Thervet F, Puech AJ, Legrand JC 1988 Lack of hypoglycemic symptoms and decreased ß-adrenergic sensitivity in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:273–278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Trovik TS, Jaeger R, Jorde R, Sager G 1994 Reduced sensitivity to ß-adrenoceptor stimulation and blockade in insulin dependent diabetic patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness. Br J Clin Pharmacol 38:427–432[Medline]
6. Korytkowski MT, Mokan M, Veneman TF, Mitrakou A, Cryer PE, Gerich JE 1998 Reduced ß-adrenergic sensitivity in patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness. Diabetes Care 21:1939–1943[Abstract]
7. Fritsche A, Stefan N, Haring H, Gerich J, Stumvoll M 2001 Avoidance of hypoglycemia restores hypoglycemia awareness by increasing ß-adrenergic sensitivity in type 1 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 134:729–736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Fritsche A, Stumvoll M, Grub M, Sieslack S, Renn W, Schmulling RM, Haring HU, Gerich JE 1998 Effect of hypoglycemia on ß-adrenergic sensitivity in normal and type 1 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 21:1505–1510[Abstract]
9. Trovik TS, Vaartun A, Jorde R, Sager G 1995 Dysfunction in the ß2-adrenergic signal pathway in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and unawareness of hypoglycaemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 48:327–332[Medline]
10. Schwab KO, Menche U, Schmeisl G, Lohse MJ 2004 Hypoglycemia-dependent ß2-adrenoceptor downregulation: a contributing factor to hypoglycemia unawareness in patients with type 1 diabetes? Horm Res 62:137–141[Medline]
11. Enoksson S, Caprio SK, Rife F, Shulman GI, Tamborlane WV, Sherwin RS 2003 Defective activation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue lipolysis in type 1 diabetes mellitus during hypoglycemia. J Clin Endocrinal Metab 88:1503–1511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Wallgren F, Amberg G, Hickner RC, Ekelund U, Jorfeldt L, Henriksson J 1995 A mathematical model for measuring blood flow in skeletal muscle with the microdialysis ethanol technique. J Appl Physiol 79:648–659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Brakkee AJ, Vendrik AJ 1966 Strain-gauge plethysmography; theoretical and practical notes on a new design. J Appl Physiol 21:701–704[Free Full Text]
14. Ewing DJ, Clarke BF 1982 Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Br Med J 285:916–918[Free Full Text]
15. Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder Frederick LA, Julian D, Schlundt D, Polonsky W 1995 Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM. A prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care 18:517–522[Abstract]
16. de Galan BE, Tack CJ, Lenders JW, Pasman JW, Elving LD, Russel FG, Lutterman JA, Smits P 2002 Theophylline improves hypoglycemia unawareness in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 51:790–796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Anderson EA, Hoffman RP, Balon TW, Sinkey CA, Mark AL 1991 Hyperinsulinemia produces both sympathetic neural activation and vasodilation in normal humans. J Clin Invest 87:2246–2252[Medline]
18. van Tits LJ, Michel MC, Grosse-Wilde H, Happel M, Eigler FW, Soliman A, Brodde OE 1990 Catecholamines increase lymphocyte ß2-adrenergic receptors via a ß2-adrenergic, spleen-dependent process. Am J Physiol 258:E191–E202
19. Tack CJ, Heeremans M, Thien T, Lutterman JA, Smits P 1996 Regional hyperinsulinemia induces vasodilation but does not modulate adrenergic responsiveness in humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 28:245–251[CrossRef][Medline]
20. DeSouza CA, Clevenger CM, Greiner JJ, Smith DT, Hoetzer GL, Shapiro LF, Stauffer BL 2002 Evidence for agonist-specific endothelial vasodilator dysfunction with ageing in healthy humans. J Physiol 542:255–262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Kneale BJ, Chowienczyk PJ, Brett SE, Coltart DJ, Ritter JM 2000 Gender differences in sensitivity to adrenergic agonists of forearm resistance vasculature. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1233–1238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Brodde OE 1990 Physiology and pharmacology of cardiovascular catecholamine receptors: implications for treatment of chronic heart failure. Am Heart J 120:1565–1572[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Weston PJ, James MA, Panerai R, McNally PG, Potter JF, Thurston H, Swales JD 1996 Abnormal baroreceptor-cardiac reflex sensitivity is not detected by conventional tests of autonomic function in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clin Sci (Lond) 91:59–64[Medline]
24. Ferrer MT, Kennedy WR, Sahinen F 1991 Baroreflexes in patients with diabetes mellitus. Neurology 41:1462–1466[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R. White Jr. The Contribution of Medications to Hypoglycemia Unawareness Diabetes Spectr, April 1, 2007; 20(2): 77 - 80. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by De Galan, B. E. Articles by Smits, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by De Galan, B. E. Articles by Smits, P. Related Collections Diabetes and Insulin Metabolism